Overcoming Obstacles to Sustainable Development Discussed by US Groups
30 October 2001The obstacles are formidable but the hopes are high that
next year's World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South
Africa will lead to very practical results, according to a group of American
NGOs, business representatives and UN officials engaged in a
"conversation" on sustainable development.
In the first of a series of events sponsored by the Carriage House Foundation
for Globalization and Sustainability in New York, Gabe Pressman of NBC
moderated the discussion, which focused on the need for promoting sustainable
development and the obstacles that must be overcome.
In a country where the words 'sustainable development' have never been widely
used, from any quarter in public discourse, there was general agreement that
the Summit would help further the aims of sustainable development, although the
term itself was not easily expected to catch the public imagination.
Larry Papay, a Vice-President of the San Diego-based technology concern Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC), said "The global economy
demands sustainable development." The present model for business, which
never paid much attention to where natural or human inputs come from, is
outdated according to Papay. He explained that in the past, "resource were
used because they were there-now people have come to realize that there are
People have often said that industry was part of the problem, Papay said, but
"it should be seen as part of the solution." According to Papay, the
world needs a new economic model where companies must consider the
international market-where the real payoff can occur-and to do that, they must
consider human and environmental circumstances and considerations.
Globalization, however, is shutting out many people from the process, according
to Elena Petkova, Senior Associate of the World Resources Institute. Economic
globalization decreases the number of decision makers, she said, and leaves the
ones remaining further away from the people they impact. "People are going
to be more resentful if they can't influence decisions," she said.
Consequently, she argued that more public participation was necessary to make
sustainable development work.
But getting public attention to sustainable development is difficult, according
to Jeffrey Barber, Executive Director of the Washington-based Integrative
Strategies Forum, sustainable development is often ignored because it is not a
news story. "Because it is about preventing catastrophes, it defies sound
bites. It is seen as boring." Barber said that too many NGOs thought the
Summit was just an environmental conference, unaware that the three legs of
sustainable development consisted of economic growth, social development, and
The concept of "sustainable development" also seemed forbidding to
Pressman, who, as a journalist, said "the term made me wince." He
added, "One of the major problems of concept is that the term sustainable
development is not very sustainable. It is not what the public wants to
But Nitin Desai, Secretary-General for the Summit, told the NGOs that the
process of promoting sustainable development was very much like the fight for
civil rights in the United States. "Civil rights was once a very vague
term. In the 30's and 40's, many people didn't understand what it was. That was
part of the fight for civil rights and that is the way it will be for
Many of the NGOs attending the meeting were still unsure about what the Summit
could accomplish. Addressing these concerns, Desai said that Rio was an attempt
to link development and the environment. Under that approach, he said,
"there is a limit to what you can do. You can do so much to scrub sulfur
from a smokestack but you can't do that for carbon. You have to do something
What is needed, according to Desai, are specific programmes that integrate-not
coordinate-all of the sustainable development concerns. Other things must
change as well.
"We have been persistent in looking for solutions that are governmental in
nature," he said. "What really matters depends on what the other
stakeholders do. Johannesburg will not just be about governments, but it will
be about which stakeholders do what, and it will be about affecting the agendas
of these groups."
In summing up what he felt the Summit could accomplish, Barber imaged looking
back from the vantage point of 2012 and said, "People realized that they
had a different choice, and that it was better."
Copyright © United
Department of Economic and
Comments and suggestions
24 August 2006