|
Press Release
. Communiqué de presse
(Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document)
CC/PIO/246-E
The Hague, 6 October 1997
DARIO
KORDIC AND NINE OTHER INDICTEES WHO HAVE SURRENDERED VOLUNTARILY WILL ENTER
A PLEA ON WEDNESDAY 8 OCTOBER 1997
Prosecutor
not involved in negotiations on surrender and trial proceedings
Prosecutor to seek joint trials
Prosecutor to call upon FRY and Republika Srpska to secure more surrenders
On
Monday 6 October 1997, ten former members of the political and military bodies
of the then Croatian community of Herceg-Bosna surrendered themselves into custody
of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
They
were indicted on 10 November 1995, arising out of an investigation by the Office
of the Prosecutor of the ICTY into the "persecution on political, racial
and religious grounds of the Bosnian Muslim population" of the Lasva
Valley Region (Central Bosnia) in 1993.
The
next legal step will be the initial appearance of each accused before a Trial
Chamber during which each of the accused will be asked to enter a plea of guilty
or not guilty on each of the counts of the indictment in which he is named.
The
ten accused, charged in two separate indictments ("Kordic and others"
and "Kupreskic and others") will appear in two groups: further details
will be communicated in due time.
Meanwhile
the Office of the Prosecutor wishes to emphasize the following:
"The
Prosecutor is delighted at the news that ten indicted accused have surrendered
themselves voluntarily to the jurisdiction of this Tribunal.
Whilst
the Prosecutors Office has not been involved in any negotiations or discussions
which led to the surrender today, we are nevertheless grateful to all those
who have been involved in the events which have resulted in this significant
development.
The
Prosecutor has noted various comments and statements in the media over recent
days which may suggest that the Prosecutors Office would be in a position
to proceed to trial in respect of all of the accused within a period of three
to five months.
It
is necessary to make the Prosecutors position very clear on this point.
The Prosecutor has indeed indicated to the lawyers for the six accused who are
included in what has been described the Kupreskic indictment, that the Prosecutor
would be in a position to proceed to trial within three to five months. In making
this statement the Prosecutor has emphasised that it is a matter for the Judges
of this Tribunal to set the dates for trial and that the Courts calendar
of other matters awaiting trial must be taken into account.
The
Prosecutor has also explained this position to the lawyers for each of the other
accused who have surrendered today, that is Dario Kordic, Mario Serkez, Ivan
Santic and Pero Skopljak, and no indications have been given by the Prosecutor
as to whether the Prosecutors Office will be ready to proceed to trial
within the same period of time.
The
Prosecutor would like to point out that although ten accused have surrendered
themselves to the Tribunal, this does not mean that there will be ten trials.
These accused are jointly charged in two indictments. Clearly, it is the Prosecutors
intention to seek where possible to have joint trials and in this regard it
will be noted that six of these accused have been included in one indictment
and the other four in one other indictment. These four accused are also co-accused
in the indictment of Zlatko Aleksovski, who is presently in custody and is awaiting
trial.
In
light of the developments with the voluntary surrenders, the Prosecutor is considering
all matters and all possibilities in bringing these matters to trial at the
earliest possible opportunity.
In
this regard the Prosecutor also notes the assurances given by the Government
of the United States of America that it has guaranteed its full support and
has pledged to make every effort to strengthen the Tribunals resources
to facilitate speedy trials. It is obvious that many additional resources will
be required by the whole of the Tribunal if it is to be in a position to bring
these cases to trial at the earliest opportunity.
To
the extent that the Croatian authorities have played a role in securing the
voluntary surrender of these ten accused, the Prosecutor calls upon the Bosnian
Serb and FRY authorities to play a similar role in assuring the surrender to
the Tribunal, of indicted accused on their territory. In particular the Prosecutor
calls upon the FRY authorities to surrender the three JNA officers who are currently
residing on FRY territory and who stand jointly charged with Dokmanovic, who
is currently in custody in The Hague. Similarly the Prosecutor calls upon the
Bosnian Serb authorities to surrender indicted accused, including Radovan Karadzic
and Ratko Mladic".
Background
to the "Kordic and others" indictment
The
accused who have surrendered voluntarily are:
- Dario
KORDIC (born on 14 December 1960), the former Vice-President of the
Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna (HZ-HB) who as a such had the overall
leadership on the attacks on the Bosnian Muslim civilians in the Lasva River
area;
- Mario
SERKEZ(born on 27 March 1959), the former commander of the Vitez Brigade
of the Croatian Defence Council (HVO), the armed forces of the HZ-HB;
- Ivan SANTIC
(born in 1942), the mayor of Vitez at the time of the attacks;
- Pero SKOPLJAK
(born on 4 June 1943), was the Chief of Police of Vitez before becoming
an official in the Office of Dario Kordic.
According
to the indictment, the crimes the accused are charged with were carried out
on "such a large scale and widespread basis, and implemented in such
a systematic fashion" that they have "effectively destroyed
or removed almost the entire Muslim civilian population in the Lasva Valley".
The
crimes alleged in the indictment:
The
crimes referred to in the indictment include, but are not limited to:
- the bombardments and attacks of numerous undefended towns, villages and dwellings,
which caused the death of more than 100 Bosnian civilians in the Lasva Valley
area and in the city of Zenica, and which wounded many others,
- the internment of Bosnian Muslims who were subjected to cruel interrogations,
physical or psychological abuse, or used for forced labour (digging of trenches)
or as human shields,
- the attacks, bombardments and destruction of Bosnian Muslim businesses, buildings,
personal properties and livestock, in order to kill, terrorise or demoralise
the Bosnian Muslim population. Hundreds of civilians were killed or wounded
in numerous locations such as Ahmici and Vitez.
Each
of the accused is alleged to be individually responsible for the planning,
instigation, ordering or otherwise aiding and abetting in the planning, preparation
or execution of the crimes referred to in the indictment.
Each
of the accused is alleged to be also criminally responsible for the acts
of their subordinates: namely the accused knew, or had reason to know, that
subordinates to them were about to commit crimes, or had done so, and failed
to take the necessary measures to prevent such acts or to punish the perpetrators.
The
charges:
"By
their acts or omissions" the accused are charged with:
-
Dario KORDIC : crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva
Conventions of 1949, violations of the laws or customs of war.
-Mario CERKEZ : grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, violations
of the laws or customs of war.
- Ivan SANTIC and Pero SKOPLJAK : a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions
of 1949, a violation of the laws or customs of war.
Background
to the "Kupreskic and others" indictment:
The
accused who have turned themselves in are:
- Zoran
KUPRESKIC (born 23 September 1958) was a HVO soldier in Ahmici;
- Mirjan
KUPRESKIC (born 21 October 1963) was as a HVO soldier in Ahmici, brother
of Zoran;
- Vladimir
SANTIC (born 1 April 1958) was a HVO soldier in Vitez;
- Drago
JOSIPOVIC (born 14 February 1955) was a HVO soldier in Santici;
- Marinko
KATAVA (born 18 November 1952) was a HVO soldier in Vitez;
- Dragan
PAPIC (born 15 July 1967) was a HVO soldier in Ahmici.
The
crimes alleged in the indictment
The
Indictment charges the accused with their direct participation in the systematic
attacks in the spring of 1993 on Ahmici, Vitez and eight other mainly Muslim
villages in the Lasva Valley and the murder of civilians.
According
to the indictment, early that morning, HVO forces including the accused launched
a series of attacks on towns and villages throughout the Lasva River Valley.
HVO
forces first shelled these villages with heavy weapons, including mortars, rockets
and anti-aircraft guns. Groups of HVO soldiers then went from house to house
killing and wounding Muslim civilians, burning down their homes and barns, and
destroying their livestock. After the attacks, the HVO detained many civilians,
whom they later forced to dig trenches on the front lines.
The
most ferocious attacks were directed against the Muslim-dominated village of
Ahmici.
"The
HVO first shelled Ahmici from a distance, then groups of soldiers went from
house to house, attacking civilians and their property using tracer rounds and
explosives. Every Muslim house in the village was burned, and many unarmed Muslim
civilians were deliberately and systematically shot."
"A
minimum of 103 Muslim civilians were killed in and around Ahmici. Of [these]
(...) 33 were women and children. All 176 Muslim houses in Ahmici along with
[two] mosque[s] were destroyed.
"Before
the attack on 16 April, Muslims were 356 out of a total population of 466. After
the attack, no Muslims were left in the village."
The
charges
The
indictment charges the accused with a total of 18 counts of grave breaches of
the Geneva Convention and violations of the laws and customs of war, relating
to willful killing, contrary to Article 2(a) of the Statute; murder, contrary
to Article 3; the unlawful and wanton destruction of property, contrary to Article
2 (d); causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, contrary
to Article 2 (c); a deliberate attack on the civilian population and wanton
destruction of a village, contrary to Article 3; cruel treatment, contrary to
Article 3; participating in the unlawful confinement of civilians, contrary
to Article 2 (g); and outrages upon the personal dignity of another, contrary
to Article 3.
|