Press Release
. Communiqué de presse
(Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document)
|
APPEALS CHAMBER |
| CHAMBRE
D'APPEL |
The Hague, 2 December 2004
CT/P.I.S./921e
IVAN CERMAK AND MLADEN MARKAC GRANTED PROVISIONAL
RELEASE BY THE APPEALS CHAMBER
Today, 2 December 2004, the Appeals Chamber
consisting of Judge Mumba (Presiding), Judge Pocar, Judge Shahabuddeen,
Judge Güney and Judge Schomburg granted the provisional release
of Ivan Cermak and Mladen Markac.
Background
On 12 March 2004, Mr. Cermak and Mr. Markac
filed separate Motions for provisional release which were followed
by the Prosecutor’s Responses to the Motions on 25 March 2004 requesting
for each "that the Defence Motion be dismissed and that
the relief requested be denied." The Trial Chamber denied
the Accused’s Motions on 29 April 2004.
Mr. Cermak and Mr. Markac then filed separately
their second Motions for provisional release on 23 July 2004, and
on 28 July 2004 the Prosecutor filed a Response to the Motions stating
that "she does not oppose the provisional release for
Ivan Cermak and Mladen Markac with the conditions proposed by them
in their Motions." The Trial Chamber denied the accused’s
Motions on 14 September 2004.
Following the Trial Chamber’s Decision, the
Accused filed a joint Motion for leave to appeal the Trial Chamber’s
Decision on the second Motions for provisional release on 20 September
2004. On 29 September 2004, the Prosecutor filed a response in which
"the Prosecutor joins in the Accused’s Motion for leave
to appeal the Trial Chamber’s decision denying their second motions
for provisional release."
After the Bench of the Appeals Chamber granted
the Motion for leave to appeal the Impugned Decision on 13 October
2004, the Accused each filed an Interlocutory Appeal against the
Trial Chamber’s Decision on the second motion for provisional release
on 22 and 26 October 2004, respectively.
Pursuant to Rule 65(B) of the Rules of Procedure
and Evidence, the Appeals Chamber ordered that Ivan Cermak and Mladen
Markac be provisionally released under certain specific terms and
conditions outlined in its Decision.
***
The full
text of the Appeals Chamber’s Decision is available on the Tribunal’s
website www.un.org/icty.
Hard copies can also be obtained from the Press Office.
|