CONTENTS
A. Overview of the Proceedings
B. Plea Agreement
C. Testimony of the Accused
D. Sentencing Hearing
E. Continued Sentencing Hearing
IV. GUILTY PLEA AND PLEA AGREEMENT
A. The Political Career of the
Accused
B. Political Background
C. Preparations for Persecutions in Glogova
D. Acts of Persecutions
1. Attack on the Village of Glogova
2. Killing of Bosnian Muslim Civilians in Glogova
(a) Killing of Medo Delic, Seco
Ibisevic, Zlatija Ibisevic and Adem Junuzovic
(b) First Mass Killing
(c) Second Mass Killing
(d) Third Mass Killing
3. Forcible Displacement of Civilians
from Glogova
4. Destruction of an Institution Dedicated to Religion
(the Mosque) and Other Muslim Property
E. Events Following the Attack
on Glogova
F. Meeting in Pale
A. Legal Basis
B. Trial Chamber’s Findings
VII. INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ACCUSED
A. The Individual Guilt of an Accused
and the Principle of Proportionality
B. Principles and Purposes
1. Submissions of the Parties
2. Discussion
(a) Deterrence
(b) Retribution
C. Article 24 of the Statute
and Rule 101 of the Rules
D. Gravity of the Crime, Aggravating and Mitigating
Factors
E. Sentencing Ranges
1. Former Yugoslavia
2. The Applicability of the Principle of lex
mitior
3. Other Countries
IX. FACTS RELATED TO THE INDIVIDUAL CONDUCT OF THE ACCUSED
A. Gravity of the Offence and Aggravating Circumstances
1. Submissions of the Parties
2. Discussion
(a) Large Number of Victims
(b) Deronjic’s Superior Position as a Political
Leader in the Municipality of Bratunac
(c) Miroslav Deronjic’s Role in the Disarmament
of the Citizens of Glogova
(d) Deronjic’s Role in Ordering the Attack on
Glogova
(e) Deronjic’s Role during the Attack on Glogova
(f) Vulnerability and Helplessness of the Victims
of the 9 May 1992 Attack on Glogova
(g) Long-term Effects of the 9 May 1992 Attack
on Glogova on the Victims
(a) Submissions of the Parties
(b) Discussion
(i) Analysis of the country
reports submitted by the Max Planck Institute
(ii) Jurisprudence of the International Tribunals
2. Substantial Co-operation by the Accused
(a) Submissions of the Parties
(b) Discussion
(i) Provision of unique and
corroborative information to the Prosecution
(ii) Testimony of Miroslav Deronjic in other
proceedings before the Tribunal
(iii) Provision of original documentation
to the Prosecution
(iv) Identification of new crimes and perpetrators
unknown to the Prosecution
3. Contribution to Prevention of Revisionism of Crimes Committed in Srebrenica
(a) Submissions of the Parties
(b) Discussion
(a) Submissions of the Parties
(b) Discussion
5. No Opportunity for Voluntary Surrender
(a) Submissions of the Parties
(b) Discussion
6. The Accused’s Character, Behaviour and Possibility for Rehabilitation
(a) Submissions of the Parties
(b) Discussion
A. Submissions of the Parties
B. Discussion and Conclusion
C. Credit for Time Served Since Arrest
XII. LIST OF KNOWN MURDERED PERSONS
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHOMBURG
1. The Duty of the Prosecutor
2. The Appropriate Sentence for the Crimes
to which the Accused has Pleaded Guilty
(a) Guilty Plea
(b) Co-operation with the Tribunal
(c) Remorse
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MUMBA
A. List of Cited Court Decisions