Please note that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely a summary.

ICTY Weekly Press Briefing
Date: 5 July 2000
Time: 11:30 a.m.

REGISTRY AND CHAMBERS
Jim Landale, Spokesman for Registry and Chambers made the following statement:

First, there has been a slight change to Dusko Sikirica’s initial appearance. It was due to take place at 1430 this Friday, but has been moved back by half an hour to 1500 hours.

We also have copies of the Simic and Avramovic contempt of court judgement that was issued on 30 June.

In addition, we have copies of the Defence’s response to SFOR’s request for additional time to respond in the Todorovic case.

Also, the Appeals briefs in the Kupreskic case are being copied. We have not yet received one from Vlatko Kupreskic, who has been given an extension of time to file his brief due to a change in defence counsel. Copies will be available later.

In the Foca case: This morning we also received copies of an affadavit from of Kunarac’s wife, which could be of interest to you, and an affadavit from Professor Doctor Stanko Bejatovic, a legal expert for the defence who will give evidence on the crime of rape. We can provide copies to those who want them.

We also have copies of two press releases out today. The first concerns the Trial Chamber’s Judgement on the Motion for Judgement of Acquittal on certain counts in the Foca case. In addition, we have a press release from the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) on the exhumation programme in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Finally, there was another symposium coordinated by the Outreach Programme and hosted by the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in the Republika Srpska (RS) at the end of last week, this time in Banja Luka. This is the most significant public event staged in the RS by the Tribunal thus far. Representatives from the Chambers, Registry and OTP presented papers on their areas of expertise to a gathering from the judiciary, politics, law enforcement and the media in the RS. Just under 100 attended the event. It proved to be a welcome occasion for members of the tribunal to meet and discuss areas of mutual interest. The event was very successful with good audience participation and engagement from all.

There will be a similar event in Mostar in September.

In addition, I’m pleased to announce that the Public Information Services Internet Unit, in conjunction with the Outreach Programme, has launched a comprehensively revised and updated web page in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian as part of the Tribunal’s website.

PROSECUTION
Graham Blewitt, the Deputy Prosecutor, made the following statement:

The Prosecutor is issuing a press release today, detailing the preliminary reports of the exhumation work in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The press release basically says that work at two sites in the Prijedor region has been completed and as a consequence of these exhumations the bodies of 116 victims have been exhumed and examined. The OTP has also up until now been cooperating with the Bosnian State Commission for the Tracing of Missing Persons at another site at which another 50 victims were recovered. The OTP is assisting in the post mortem examinations of those victims. This basically completes the Prosecutor’s forensic work in the Prijedor region.

Next week on 13 July the OTP will be commencing the forensic activities in the Srebrenica exhumations sites. This will continue until the end of the year, which I anticipate, will be the end of October.

QUESTIONS:

• Asked for clarification of an alleged statement by Prime Minister Dodik that the Judges of the Tribunal would be visiting the RS in the near future, Landale replied that he was not aware of a planned visit by any of the Judges to the RS, however he would check.

• Asked what case the Prijedor exhumation site related to, Blewitt replied that the Prijedor exhumations related to detention camps. However, he added that, bearing in mind that there was a trial already taking place, in respect of the Omarska camp, with another trial pending on the Kereterm camp, it was necessary to be cautious in order not to inflict any prejudice on those cases. He concluded by saying that these exhumations did relate to detention camps in Prijedor and evidence would be called at the appropriate trials.

• Asked whether the other 50 bodies exhumed related to the same case, Blewitt replied that the site exhumed in connection with the Bosnian State Commission on the Tracing of Missing Persons was in an area named Donji Dubovik, which he believed was not associated with the detention camps. The OTP wished to acknowledge that they were working with this commission, he concluded.

• Asked what case the Srebrenica exhumations related to and how they would effect the Krstic case, Blewitt replied that the investigations into Srebrenica were not yet concluded. He added that there would be additional indictments coming out eventually. He said that he doubted that any additional evidence in the Krstic trial was needed as that part of the trial was now completed.

• Asked whether there would be further indictments in relation to Milosevic following exhumations in Kosovo, Blewitt replied that the impact of the OTP’s continued forensic work this year had meant that the OTP has had to deploy its own resources to numerous forensic teams working in Kosovo. The supporting network was not yet able to do the necessary work to pull the indictment together, so the forensic work was delaying the issuance of new indictments. Nothing would be seen before the end of this year in respect of that, but the OTP did anticipate an expansion of the existing indictment against President Milosevic and the four other accused by the inclusion of additional counts. There would be additional indictments against other people in respect of Kosovo, but he believed that until the results of the forensic work were assessed, these would not be forthcoming this year, but maybe early next year, he concluded.

• Asked whether he believed that there would be additional indictments on Srebrenica before the end of this year, Blewitt replied that he did.

• Asked for clarification of reports that defence lawyers had been giving part of their wages to suspects and what legal basis for sanctions the tribunal had to end this, Landale replied that these rumours were not new and that the Registrar had been aware of them for quite some time and had been looking into them. He added that the legal basis for taking action was a gray area as far as the Tribunal was concerned at that it was more a question of ethics. If solid proof were to be obtained by the Registrar that this practice was going on and she could identify individuals who were engaged in it, then it would possibly be a matter of contacting the bar associations of the people concerned, he said. Ordinarily in most countries it would be an issue for the bar associations to deal with any of their members engaged in this kind of practice.

At the moment the Tribunal was attempting to gather all the available information into this. Obviously no one could expect her to take any action or to make any pronouncements on it until she had solid proof. And given the nature of these types of allegations, proof could be quite difficult to come by, he concluded.

• Asked for clarification of the legal situation if the defence wished to call a possible future accused in the Krstic trial and what the outcome of this would be, Blewitt replied that this was an issue addressed in the very first trial, the Tadic trial, where the Chambers gave safe passage to defence witnesses namely that they would be free to travel here and give evidence without fear of being apprehended. The same would apply, he concluded.

*****