ICTY WEEKLY PRESS BRIEFING Latest Developments

Please note that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely a summary.

Date: 06.04.2006
Time: 12:00

Registry and Chambers:

Christian Chartier, Senior Information Officer, made the following statement:

Good Afternoon.

As you may know, I will be giving the weekly briefing until we secure a replacement for Jim Landale. Alexandra Milenov is now back doing her work as the Registry liaison officer in the Tribunal's Belgrade office.

During the extraordinary plenary session held on Wednesday, 29 March, the Judges amended Rule 15bis (Absence of a Judge) and adopted a new Rule 15ter (Reserve Judges). Entering into force today, the new rules reflect Security Council Resolution 1660 passed on 28 February 2006. As a reminder: Security Council resolution 1660 permits the Secretary-General to appoint, at the request of the Tribunal President, Reserve Judges from the Tribunal’s pool of Ad litem Judges to specific trials. Reserve Judges will be present at each stage of a trial and may replace a judge on a bench if he or she is unable to continue sitting. This measure assists the Tribunal in its efforts to complete its work by avoiding situations in which a specific trial would have to be restarted if one of the judges on the bench is unable to continue.

At the request of the Tribunal's President, the UN Secretary General has appointed two additional ad litem judges - Judge Stefan Trechsel from Switzerland and Judge Arpad Prandler from Hungary. Both Judges have been assigned to the Prlic et al. case, which will be presided over by Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti.

Judges Trechsel and Prandler will be sworn-in tomorrow in Courtroom I at 9 AM. To accommodate this, the trial against Milan Martic, a high-level political leader of the war-time Croatian Serb entity, will sit from 10:30 to 15:30. Next week this trial will continue in Courtroom II at 9:00.

In terms of the courtroom schedule for the days to come, the sentencing hearing against Ivica Rajic, former Commander in the Croatian Defence Council, will take place this Friday at 15:00 in Courtroom II.

The closing arguments against Bosnian Army officer Naser Oric will continue tomorrow at 14:15 in Courtroom III and, if necessary, will continue next week.

The trial against Yugoslav Army officers Mile Mrksic, Miroslav Radic and Veselin Slivancanin continues this Friday at 9:00 in courtroom III. Next week it will sit in Courtroom I at 14:15 on Monday and Tuesday and in courtroom III on Wednesday and Thursday at 9:00.

The trial against Momcilo Krajisnik, a former high-level leader of the Bosnian Serb political entity, will continue this week on Friday morning at 9:00 in courtroom II. The trial will sit next week Monday through Thursday at 9:00 in courtroom I.

A status conference against former high-level Commander of the Croatian Army, Ante Gotovina, will be held this Friday at 8:00 in Courtroom II.

There will be a status conference next Tuesday in the case against former Minister of Interior of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Ljube Boskoski and former ministry of Interior bodyguard, Johan Tarculovski in Courtroom II at 14:15.

There will also be a status conference in the case against a number of the highest-level leaders of the Bosnian Croat wartime entity, and one of the Republic of Croatia, the Prlic et al. case, next Wednesday at 9:00 in Courtroom III.

As a reminder, the Tribunal will be closed next Friday, 14 April and the following Monday, 17 April for Easter.

Office of the Prosecutor:

Anton Nikiforov, Advisor to the Prosecutor and acting Spokesperson of the Office of the Prosecutor, made the following statement:

I would just like to make a couple of comments on the meetings the Prosecutor had last week. As you all know she met European Union Commissioner for Enlargement Olli Rehn and we just wanted to reiterate our gratitude to all support we were provided from the European Union in terms of conditionality of the states of the former Yugoslavia for cooperation with the Office of the Prosecutor. This meeting provided us with strong and clear support in terms of cooperation provided by Belgrade authorities and as a result of that we also received clear assurances from Prime Minister Kostunica in Belgrade for the delivery of Ratko Mladic by the end of April which is obviously very important not only for the Office of the Prosecutor but for the Tribunal in general.

Prosecutor also met with the French Justice Minister Pascal Clément who visited the Tribunal and had a very useful discussion with the Prosecutor in regard to the law of the Tribunal, legal proceedings in the ICTY and the future of the ICTY. France provided full support to the Tribunal through the visit of Minister Clément and through recent discussions in the United Nations Security Council.

Finally in regard to the change of the Office of the Prosecutor Spokesperson I would like to say the following: The Prosecutor has decided to reassign Florence Hartmann to other special project within the Office of the Prosecutor. We will not go into further details regarding this decision. The Prosecutor is grateful to Florence for all her past valuable and very special contribution to the activities and efforts of the Office of the Prosecutor.

Questions:

Asked to comment on a statement made by Michael Johnson, former Registrar of the BiH State Court, in which he stated that both Mladic and Karadzic could be tried in by the BiH Court, Chartier replied with the following:

  • The suggestion that high level alleged perpetrators Mladic and Karadzic could be tried in BiH Courts is highly improbable.

  • The Statute of the Tribunal explicitly provides that it has primacy over domestic courts in cases of concurrent jurisdiction. Moreover, in Resolution 1503 (2003) the Security Council specifically mandated the Tribunal concentrate on the prosecution and trial of the most senior leaders suspected of being most responsible for crimes within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction and, pursuant to Rule 11bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, only cases of low level or intermediate responsibility may be transferred to competent national jurisdictions. The Tribunal has begun to transfer lower level and intermediate accused to the Special War Crimes Chamber ("WCC") of the BiH court.

  • Apart form these legal considerations, it is also unlikely that the WCC of the BiH court would have the capacity to hold the trials of these high level individuals due to security concerns in the region. The trial of such high accused in the region could have a destabilizing effect on a still fragile security situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

  • Another noteworthy aspect is that several member states to, such as the United Kingdom, France and the USA to name a few, have made various statements in which they very clearly stated that the Tribunal could and should not close its doors without the arrest and the transfer to Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic to the Hague in order to be tried. The European Union also made an announcement to the same effect, in December 2005.

Asked to elaborate on the clear assurance that Kostunica had given to the Tribunal, Nikiforov replied that the Tribunal could not give any further information on this issue, except for the fact that same assurances were given not only to the Prosecutor but also to Commissioner Olli Rehn. He added that Belgrade had requested to work in quiet in order to achieve results without any media pressure.

Asked about the status of evidence handed over to the Defence in the Milosevic case,

Chartier replied that great caution should be exercised by the holders of the documents disclosed by the Office of the Prosecutor to the Defence. He stated that the mandate of the legal advisers to the accused had been terminated with the termination of the case but that that did not mean that the documents had become private documents. Some documents have a public character and are publicly accessible; but some others have been filed confidentially, are confidential and must remain so until a Trial Chamber orders otherwise, if ever.

Finally a journalist asked to comment on rumors that Dragomir Andan (director of the RS police) was removed from his position at the request of Carla Del Ponte, Nikiforov answered that he could not comment on this.

Documents:

Date

Case Description

DocumentTitle

05-Apr-06

Blaskic (Contempt)

MOTION OF THE ACCUSED MARKICA REBIC FOR SUSPENSION OF THE ORDER ON PAYMENT OF FINES

31-Mar-06

Blaskic (Review)

DECISION BY THE REGISTRAR ACCEPTING MR SZE

05-Apr-06

Blaskic ,Kordic and Cerkez (Contempt)

RESPONSE OF THE ACCUSED JOSIP JOVIC TO THE PROSECUTOR'S JOINT PRE-TRIAL BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER(E)

31-Mar-06

Boskoski et al

CORRESPONDENCE FROM SLO TC II RE. RULE 65TER MEETING

03-Apr-06

Boskoski et al

DECISION ON DEFENCE MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

31-Mar-06

Boskoski et al

PROSECUTION'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH PRE-TRIAL JUDGE'S THIRD SCHEDULIGN ORDER SETTING TIME FOR SUBMISSIONS DATED 15 DECEMBER 2005 AND SUBMISSION OF FIRST AMENDED WITNESS LIST, FIRST AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST AND EXPERT REPORTS WITH ANNEXES A TO G

03-Apr-06

Boskoski et al

SCHEDULING ORDER

31-Mar-06

Bralo (Appeal)

MIROSLAV BRALO REPLY TO THE PROSECUTION'S RESPONSE TO HIS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO CERTIFIED TRIAL RECORD

04-Apr-06

Cermak & Markac

DEFENDANT ANTE GOTOVINA'S MOTION TO EXCEED THE WORD LIMITATION IN HIS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT AND FOR JOINDER

04-Apr-06

Cermak & Markac

DEFENDANT ANTE GOTOVINA'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT AND FOR JOINDER

04-Apr-06

Gotovina

DEFENDANT ANTE GOTOVINA'S MOTION TO EXCEED THE WORD LIMITATION IN HIS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT AND FOR JOINDER

04-Apr-06

Gotovina

DEFENDANT ANTE GOTOVINA'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PROSECUTION'S MOTION FOR NON-DISCLOSURE TO PUBLIC OF MATERIALS DISCLOSED PURSUANT TO RULES 66 AND 68

31-Mar-06

Gotovina

SCHEDULING ORDER FOR STATUS CONFERENCE

04-Apr-06

Gotovina

DEFENDANT ANTE GOTOVINA'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT AND FOR JOINDER

04-Apr-06

Haradinaj et al

DÉCISION RELATIVE A LA DEMANDE DE LA DEFENSE TENDANT AU REEXAMEN DES CONDITIONS DE LA MISE EN LIBERTE PROVISOIRE ACCORDEE A RAMUSH HARADINAJ LE 6 JUIN 2005

04-Apr-06

Haradinaj et al

DÉCISION RELATIVE À LA DEMANDE DE MISE EN LIBERTÉ PROVISOIRE DE RAMUSH HARADINAJ

04-Apr-06

Haradinaj et al

CORRIGENDUM À LA DÉCISION RELATIVE À LA DEMANDE DE MISE EN LIBERTÉ PROVISOIRE DE RAMUSH HARADINAJ

05-Apr-06

Kovacevic

NOTIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL MEDICAL REPORT REQUIRING URGENT ACTION BY THE TRIAL CHAMBER

05-Apr-06

Limaj et al (Appeal)

DECISION ON EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE

04-Apr-06

Limaj et al (Appeal)

ORDONNANCE PORTANT DESIGNATION DE JUGES DANS UNE AFFAIRE DONT EST SAISIE LA CHAMBRE D'APPEL ET NOMINATION D'UN JUGE DE LA MISE EN ETAT EN APPEL

04-Apr-06

Lukic et al

PROSECUTOR'S NOTIFICATION TO THE REFERRAL NECH AS TO REALIZATION OF CONDITIONS FOR RESUMPTION OF RULE 11BIS PROCEEDINGS

03-Apr-06

Lukic et al

SREDOJE LUKIC'S DEFENCE MOTION FOR ACCESS TO ALL CONFIDENTIAL & UNDER SEAL MATERIAL IN THE MILOŠEVIC CASE RELATING TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF VIŠEGRAD

31-Mar-06

Milosevic

MOTION OF GENERAL GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE

03-Apr-06

Milosevic

VINKO PANDUREVIC'S DEFENCE NOTIFICATION ON JOINING THE "MOTION OF GENERAL GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE"

03-Apr-06

Milosevic

SREDOJE LUKIC'S DEFENCE MOTION FOR ACCESS TO ALL CONFIDENTIAL & UNDER SEAL MATERIAL IN THE MILOŠEVIC CASE RELATING TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF VIŠEGRAD

06-Apr-06

Milosevic

ORDER ASSIGNING A TRIAL CHAMBER TO CONSIDER GRANTING ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL IN A CASE

31-Mar-06

Milutinovic et al.

PROSECUTION QUARTERLY REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF WITNESS WITH CONFIDENTIAL AND EXPARTE ANNEX A

05-Apr-06

Milutinovic et al.

SECOND AMENDED INDICTMENT

05-Apr-06

Milutinovic et al.

PRETRIAL ORDER AND APPENDED WORKPLAN

04-Apr-06

Mrksic

DECISION ON PROSECUTION'S ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR VARIATION OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES

04-Apr-06

Mrksic

PROSECUTION MOTION TO AMEND ITS RULE 65 TER WITNESS LIST

31-Mar-06

Oric

PROSECUTION'S SUBMISSION OF PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF 'THE PROSECUTION'S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENCE CLOSING BRIEF'

31-Mar-06

Oric

PROSECUTION'S SUBMISSION OF PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF 'PROSECUTION'S FINAL TRIAL BRIEF'

03-Apr-06

Perisic

PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO "GENERAL MILETIC'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS IN THE PERISIC CASE" AND TO THE "JOINDER MOTIONS" OF MILAN GVERO, LJUBOMIR BOROVCANIN, DRAGO NIKOLIC AND VINKO PANDUREVIC

03-Apr-06

Popovic et al

DECISION (BY THE REGISTRAR ASSIGNING MR. C. MEEK AS CO-COUNSEL FOR MR. BEARA

31-Mar-06

Popovic et al

GVERO DEFENCE NOTIFICATION ON JOINING THE " REQUÊTE DU GENERAL MILETIC AUX FINS DE TRADUCTION DE CERTAINES REQUÊTES DU PROCUREUR DANS LA LANGUE DE L'ACCUSE "

03-Apr-06

Popovic et al

PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO "GENERAL MILETIC'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS IN THE PERISIC CASE" AND TO THE "JOINDER MOTIONS" OF MILAN GVERO, LJUBOMIR BOROVCANIN, DRAGO NIKOLIC AND VINKO PANDUREVIC

31-Mar-06

Popovic et al

(STANISIC) DEFENCE RESPONSE TO REQUESTS BY GENERAL MILETIC AND OTHERS REGARDING ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL

04-Apr-06

Popovic et al

GENERAL MILETIC'S MOTION FOR TRANSLATION OF THE PRE-TRIAL BRIEF IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE ACCUSED

03-Apr-06

Popovic et al

VINKO PANDUREVIC'S DEFENCE NOTIFICATION ON JOINING THE "MOTION OF GENERAL GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE"

31-Mar-06

Popovic et al

MOTION OF GENERAL GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE

31-Mar-06

Popovic et al

BOROVCANIN DEFENCE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND FOR A LEAVE TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO PROSECUTION'S MOTIONS TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT

03-Apr-06

Prlic and Others

ORDER ASSIGNING JUDGES TO A CASE BEFORE A TRIAL CHAMBER

05-Apr-06

Prlic and Others

ORDONNANCE PORTANT MODIFICATION DU CALENDRIER D'UNE CONFERENCE DE MISE EN ÉTAT

05-Apr-06

Prlic and Others

DECISION

04-Apr-06

Prlic and Others

DECISION ON THE ADMISSION OF RULE 92 BIS WRITTEN STATEMENTS

31-Mar-06

Prlic and Others

OBSERVATIONS RELATIVES AU PROJET DE LIGNES DIRECTRICES DESTINÉES À RÉGIR L'ADMISSIBILITÉDES ÉLÉMENTS DE PREUVE ET GARANTIR UN FONCTIONNEMENT EFFICACE DE LA CONDUITE DU PROCÉS, PRÉSENTÉES PAR SLOBODAN PRALJAK

05-Apr-06

Prlic and Others

MÉMOIRE DE MILIVOJ PETKOVIC PRÉALABLE AU PROCÈS EN APPLICATION DE L'ARTICLE 65 TER F) DU RÈGLEMENT

31-Mar-06

Rasevic & Todovic

SAVO TODOVIC'S DEFENCE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE AND THE DEFENCE RESPONSE TO "PROSECUTION'S SUBMISSION OF SECOND JOINT AMENDED INDICTMENT WITH ANNEX A AND CONFIDENTIAL ANNEX B"

03-Apr-06

Stanisic

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS PRO BONO COUNSEL

31-Mar-06

Stanisic & Simatovic

DEFENCE RESPONSE TO REQUESTS BY GENERAL MILETIC AND OTHERS REGARDING ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL