Crimes within the Court's Jurisdiction

The crime of genocide Crimes against humanity
The crime of aggression Crimes against United Nations and
associated personnel
War crimes Other categories of crimes

At the heart of the effort to establish the first permanent international criminal court in history is the question of the scope of the Court's jurisdiction. What crimes will be covered? And how will they be defined?

The draft statute contains two provisions concerning the Court's jurisdiction upon which there is broad agreement. One emphasizes that the Court is intended to have jurisdiction over only "the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole". The second emphasizes that the Court is intended to be complementary to national criminal justice systems, i.e., the Court would exercise its jurisdiction only in cases where States do not exercise their national jurisdiction, because they are unable or unwilling to do so. This is referred to as the principle of complementarity. The principle is of great importance, because most countries would like to ensure that their own jurisdiction will not be superceded unnecessarily.

Many reasons have been put forward for restricting the Court's jurisdiction to only "the most serious crimes" of concern to the international community. Such reasons include the need to strengthen universal acceptance of the Court, which would pave the way for early ratification of the statute and establishment of the Court, and to avoid overburdening the Court and trivializing its role and function.

The crime of genocide
Support for the inclusion of the crime of genocide is virtually universal. Establishing an international criminal court where such crimes could be tried is felt by many to be an important reason for establishing the Court. Punishing the crime of genocide has been on the agenda of the United Nations since its formation.

Although crimes qualifying as genocide have been perpetrated since the earliest history of humankind, the term "genocide" is relatively new. It is said to combine the Greek genos, which means race or tribe, and the Latin cide, which means killing, and was coined to describe the Nazi activity in occupied Europe. Following the extermination of many Jews and members of other groups deemed undesirable by the Nazis in the Second World War, the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal recognized "persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds" as one of two categories of crimes against humanity, and established the principle of individual criminal responsibility for such crimes. As early as 1946, the United Nations General Assembly unanimously affirmed the principles of international law recognized by the Charter and Judgment of the Nürnberg Tribunal (the Nürnberg principles). In 1948, it adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which defined genocide and proclaimed it a crime against international law, "whether committed in time of peace or in time of war". It was in the resolution adopting that Convention that the United Nations General Assembly first considered the establishment of an international criminal court. The General Assembly recognized that there would be an increasing need for an international judicial organ to try "certain crimes" under international law.

There is broad agreement to use the wording of the Genocide Convention in the draft statute for the Court. Article 5 of the draft statute has been taken directly from the Convention:

". . . Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:


The following acts shall be punishable: