UGANDA
55th REGULAR SESSION OF THE UNITED
NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY
STATEMENT
BY
HON.
ERIKA KATEGAYA
FIRST
DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER / MINISTER
OF
FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF
Mr. President,
I bring to you and all member states of the United
Nations fraternal greetings and best wishes for the new Millennium from the
Government and People of Uganda. I also bring to you Mr. President, and through
you to the 55th Session, the personal best wishes of the President
of the Republic of Uganda, His Excellency Mr. Yoweri Kaguta Museveni.
I should like, at the outset, to congratulate you on
your well‑deserved and unanimous election to preside over this session of
the General Assembly which follows the footsteps of the historic and highly
successful Millennium Summit. Your predecessor, the distinguished Minister of
Foreign Affairs of Namibia, deserves our heartfelt thanks for presiding over so
many special and regular sessions during this tenure as President of the
General Assembly.
May I also avail myself of this opportunity to pay a
very special tribute to our illustrious Secretary‑General, His Excellency
Mr Kofi Annan, for the exemplary work he has continued to perform on behalf of
the Organization and the peoples of the world. The Secretary‑General
deserves special recognition by the United Nations family for his tireless
efforts geared to address the numerous challenges which face the United Nations
at the dawn of the new era.
Uganda warmly welcomes the admission of Tuvalu as
the 189th member state of
the United Nations.
Mr President,
For Uganda events in Africa
and, in particular, instability in the Great Lakes region continue to be of the
utmost concern and it is for this reason that I crave your indulgence if I
devote a substantial portion of my statement to those problems and challenges
which confront us in the Great Lakes Region.
Mr President,
As the international community is fully aware, the conflict
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo poses a major threat to the stability
of the Great Lakes Region and, therefore, to the entire African continent. That
conflict has its origins in the massive violation of the human and democratic .
rights of the peoples of the region during the long reign of dictators in a
number of countries in the region. Historical evidence suggests that when
people are oppressed, sooner or later they will rise and take up arms against
their oppressors. This is precisely what we are witnessing in the Great Lakes
region.
During the 1980s and 1990s, a number of
dictatorships were overthrown in spite of their determined attempts to save
their regimes by resorting to the most ruthless methods of survival, namely
genocide. This despicable weapon was not only used in Rwanda in 1994, but has
also been used to a lesser extent in Uganda, Burundi, former Zaire and the
Sudan. The instability which we are witnessing today is thus caused by the
continuing struggle
of the peoples of the region to reclaim their democratic and human rights.
In Uganda, the people's struggle brought about a
fundamental change in 1986 and this resulted in the establishment of democracy,
stability, and economic progress which the people of Uganda have enjoyed over
the past fourteen years. Unfortunately, the instability and civil wars taking
place in neighbouring countries have continued to impact negatively on our
attempt to consolidate the results of our victory. This has been the case,
especially when the remnants of our former oppressors have attempted to form
alliances with dictatorial regimes in some neighbouring countries or take
advantage of the power vacuum existing in such countries to establish bases
from which to launch desperate attacks on Uganda.
As the Government of Uganda has stated before, at
various times it cooperated with a number of progressive forces in the region
to help the people of Congo to free themselves from one of the longest and most
oppressive dictatorships the African continent has ever seen ‑ I am
referring to the dictatorship of the late Mobutu Sese Seko. In helping the
people of Congo, we were also hoping to free ourselves from the menace of
destabilization which had become the official policy of the late Mobutu. That
is why Ugandan troops found themselves in the Democratic Republic of Congo in
1997.
When a new regime came to power in the DRC, we
signed a protocol of cooperation under which Ugandan and Congolese security
forces would cooperate to contain the menace caused by armed groups organised
by the
remnants of Uganda's former dictators who were
operating from Congolese territory. Unfortunately, within a very short period,
the new regime in the DRC chose to turn its back on its former allies and form
an alliance with the very people who posed a threat to our security. Not only
did the regime turn its back against its external allies, it also turned its
back on its internal allies, thus provoking a fresh civil war in the country
within a year. The result was that a number of African countries which had been
allies in the struggle against the Mobutu dictatorship now found themselves
sucked into the conflict.
Fortunately, these countries soon saw the folly of
armed confrontation and chose to end the conflict through negotiations. The
result was the Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement. This agreement was a major
breakthrough in the attempt to establish genuine peace to the region because it
addressed the problems of establishing a democratic and accountable government
in the Congo and of catering for the legitimate security concerns of
neighbouring countries. The agreement still offers the best hope of
establishing and maintaining peace in the region. For this reason Uganda has
worked hard to have this agreement implemented. On 8th April this year, Uganda hosted an important meeting
of the Political Committee which was established under this agreement. At this
meeting, a disengagement plan was adopted under which all the fighting forces
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo would disengage under the supervision
of the United Nations Observer Mission (MONUC).
Unfortunately, it has not been possible to effect
the disengagement of forces in accordance with the stipulated calendar because
one of the signatories namely, the government of the Democratic Republic of
Congo, has done everything possible to block the implementation of this
disengagement plan as well as several aspects of the Lusaka Agreement. On 14th August this year an important summit of nine
countries in the region plus leaders of all rebel groups fighting against the
government of the DRC took place in Lusaka to identify the obstacles to the
implementation of the Ceasefire Agreement. Their conclusion was that the
government of the DRC was largely to blame for the current impasse. The
principal ways in which the Congolese government has prevented the
implementation of the ceasefire
are:
‑ Refusal to participate in the National
Dialogue
‑ Rejection of a distinguished and
eminent facilitator who was agreed
upon as a result of consultations and by consensus.
‑ Restriction to the freedom of movement
of MONUC peace observers
‑ Refusal to cooperate with the Joint
Military Commission
‑ Continued violations of the Ceasefire
The leaders of the region have expressed their
strong concern at the obstructions created by the DRC to the implementation of
the Ceasefire Agreement. If the DRC does not heed the calls of the regional
leaders, there is a serious risk that the region could once again be embroiled
in another large scale war. We, therefore, appeal to the DRC government to
reconsider its position and choose the path of dialogue both with its internal
and external opponents and abandon the path of military confrontation.
Uganda wishes to re‑affirm its full commitment
to the Lusaka Ceasfire Agreement which offers the best opportunity to bring
this conflict to an end so that the region can embark on the rehabilitation and reconstruction
phase. Uganda pledges its full support for all efforts aimed at ending the
conflict and appeals to the international community to give moral and material
backing to the Lusaka peace process.
Mr President,
Uganda believes that the problems of Burundi are
essentially political and internal. As the Chairman of the regional peace
initiative on Burundi, President Museveni of Uganda has worked tirelessly in
resolving the problems of Burundi. In this capacity he has convened and chaired
many regional summits on Burundi. We believe that a formula that creates
democracy with security for all the people of Burundi is possible.
We wish to place on record our appreciation to the
facilitator of the Burundi peace process, former President Nelson Mandela and his
predecessor the late Mwalimu Julius Nyerere for their untiring efforts in
working towards a peaceful solution to the Burundi problem.
Uganda welcomes the agreement reached on 28th August, 2000 in Arusha by the parties to the
Burundi peace process. We, however, regret that a few of the parties did not
sign the Agreement. Uganda would
like to appeal to them to sign the Agreement as soon as possible for the sake
of the future of the people of Burundi and the Great Lakes region. We call upon
the United Nations and the international community to provide the necessary
support and resources so that the Agreement can be successfully implemented.
Mr President,
Uganda is committed to the goal of general and
complete disarmament endorsed by the United Nations at the first Special
Session on Disarmament in 1978. It is against this background that we note,
with concern, the failure of the Disarmament Commission to reach an agreement
on the convening of the fourth Special Session devoted to Disarmament. The
holding of this Conference is critical for addressing important issues related
to disarmament, considering the fact that the Conference on Disarmament has
failed to agree on an agenda for two years in a row and the indefinite
extension of the nuclear Non‑proliferation Treaty. Uganda also attaches
great importance to the Ottawa Treaty on anti‑personnel land mines. We
supported last year the resolution on illicit trafficking in small arms because
the proliferation and use of small arms and light weapons remains a major
problem in our region. Uganda participated actively in regional initiatives on
this matter which resulted in the adoption of the Nairobi Declaration. We look
forward to the international conference on the problem of small arms in all its
aspects scheduled to take place in July 2001.
Mr President,
The world has entered the 21st Century
with globalisation as the most pervasive economic force to reckon with.
However, the expected benefits accruing from the process are not guaranteed for
all countries. For some, it has opened opportunities for rapid growth and
development through increased trade liberalisation and advancement in
technology. While for others, the process has led to increasing income
disparity and marginilisation in the global economy. The biggest challenge facing us at the dawn of
this century is, therefore, to muster the necessary political will to act
together and create an enabling environment for the successful integration of
the poorer countries into the global economy. Uganda is of the view that the
issue of globalisation can and should be seriously addressed multilaterally by
the United Nations and by other international organisations. We are confident
that the establishment of a rule‑based multilateral trading system,
institutionalized in the WTO, will facilitate the integration of developing
countries into the global trading system.
The challenge of ridding the world of the scourge of
abject poverty deserves more attention now than ever before because as more of
the world's population is now enjoying better living standards, the situation
of many others in the developing countries, especially the least developed, is
deteriorating rapidly. A larger percentage of the world's population lives on
less than a dollar a day today than a decade ago. The Secretary‑General's
report reveals that people living in sub‑saharan Africa are almost as
poor today as they were twenty years ago. This is an extremely sad commentary
on the state of past development cooperation. Urgent measures should be
undertaken to arrest this deterioration of the living conditions of people in
developing countries.
In Uganda, we believe that significant reduction in
poverty can be achieved through sustained and broad‑based income growth.
In most developing countries this can be effectively done through modernization
of the agricultural sector which dominates the economy and employs the majority
of the population. That is why in the last two years, we have been working to
develop a comprehensive set of policies for the modernization of agriculture as
part of the Government's broader strategy for poverty eradication. Uganda
welcomes and fully endorses the Secretary‑General's recommendations on
specific actions that need to be taken both nationally and at the international
level to reduce the number of people living in extreme poverty.
The last decade has witnessed unabated deterioration
in the socio‑economic conditions of the Least Developed Countries. A quick
review of progress in the implementation of the Programme of Action for the
LDCs for the 1990s will show that there have been more setbacks than progress.
While the LDCs have been undertaking far‑reaching and painful measures of
adjustment and reforms, the actions by the international community, on the
other hand, have fallen far short of the commitments to provide adequate
external support to complement the efforts of LDCs. As a result, the LDCs
continued to suffer from the lack of external resources for development due to
steady decline in the flow of Official Development Assistance to them. While it
is true that Foreign Direct Investment flows have increased significantly in
the last decade, the LDCs are not yet well equipped to attract such investments.
High levels of external debt have negatively affected the economies of the LDCs
and despite decades of liberalization most industrialized countries still
maintain protectionist measures in their markets especially for agricultural
products and textiles ‑ the two sectors in which developing countries
have a recognized comparative advantage. All these have had a combined effect
of stunting further the economic and social prospects of LDCs.
In this regard, Uganda strongly supports the Secretary‑General
in urging the industrialized countries to consider granting duty‑free and
quota‑free access for the exports of the LDCs as a demonstration of their
commitment which they should readily endorse at the third United Nations
Conference for Least Developed Countries in March 2001. My delegation also
urges the General Assembly to adopt the recommendations of the 10th Session of the United Nations Conference on
Trade and Development contained in the Bangkok Consensus and the Plan of Action
for the LDCs. While we call upon the industrialized countries to live up to
their promise in the context of the agreement reached in 1999 at the Cologne G8
Summit, we 'also call for stronger support to be given to the relevant UN
bodies like UNCTAD to enable implementation of their mandates to assist the
LDCs.
With specific reference to the African continent
where 33 of the 48 Least Developed Countries are found, the socio‑economic
situation is much more precarious despite many efforts made by African
countries individually and collectively to lay solid foundations for
development. The difficulty in achieving positive results in Africa's
development has been further complicated by the severity of Africa's AIDS
crisis. We call upon the international community to lend concrete support to
Africa's own efforts to realize the objective of the African Renaissance, which
aims to place the continent at the forefront of human development and progress.
The international community should support the efforts of African countries by
fulfilling commitments made in the context of the UN New Agenda for the
Development of Africa. These commitments include the reduction of African debt,
adequate resource flows, provision of greater market access and assistance in
diversification and capacity building. In this connection,
Uganda supports the proposals made by the Secretary‑General
in his report to this session of the General Assembly.
Mr President,
I would like to reiterate Uganda Government's
position to uphold the values and principles enshrined in the Universal
Declaration on Human Rights. I pledge Government's continued adherence to the
International Human Rights Conventions and norms.
In the pursuit of an international human rights
regime, it is imperative to establish institutions and mechanisms for this
purpose. Uganda will continue to support and work towards the establishment of
a strong International Criminal Court. Of particular concern to us is the
deterrence and punishment of the crime of genocide which has remained prevalent
in our region.
At the national level, in a bid to implement the
fundamental rights guaranteed by our Constitution, Ugandans voted on 29th June, 2000 in a referendum for a political
system of their choice. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the
international community for their support towards the success of the referendum
exercise. I am happy to report that the referendum was declared free and fair
by both local and international observers.
In our struggle to end internal conflict, Parliament
enacted the Amnesty Act 2000. In accordance with the Act, an Amnesty Commission
has now been established
and is operational. The mandate of the Commission is to monitor programmes of
demobilization, reintegration and resettlement of returnees, coordinate a
programme of sensitization of the general public on the Amnesty Law, consider
and promote appropriate reconciliation mechanisms in the affected areas and
promote dialogue and reconciliation in the spirit of the Amnesty Act. There is
a programme of reintegration into society which involves acquisition of skills
and a fund to promote self-employment. It is our hope that this process will
bring to an end internal conflict and all human rights violations associated
with conflict situations.
Mr President,
In closing, Uganda believes that as we enter the new
century the United Nations should be reformed, equipped and provided with the
necessary resources to implement fully, effectively and efficiently the mandates
the General Assembly and other principal organs of the Organization have
entrusted to it. In this connection, Uganda hopes that the long drawn‑out
negotiations on the reform of the Security Council will be finalized at the
current session of the Assembly.
I thank you Mr President.