PAKISTAN
H.E. MR.
ABDUL SATTAR
FOREIGN
MINISTER OF PAKISTAN
AT
THE UNITED
NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY
ON 18
SEPTEMBER, 2000.
Mr. President,
It gives me great pleasure to join
preceding speakers in offering you the Pakistan delegation's warm felicitations
on your election. We pledge to you our wholehearted cooperation in your efforts
dedicated to the success of this historic 55th session of the General Assembly.
I also take this opportunity to pay
tribute to the leadership of Secretary General Kofi Annan. His commitment and
dynamism have reinforced the rightful role of the United Nations in addressing
the challenges of our times.
The millennial transition is unique
in the lives of those fortunate to witness it. We are fortunate, too, that we
start this session in the glow of the Millennium Summit.
We shall be inspired in our work by
the ringing commitment of our leaders to values and principles fundamental to
maintenance of peace and security; by their resolve to free peoples from the
scourge of war, on one hand, and to free humanity from dehumanizing poverty.
Their determination to protect the environment, promote human rights, democracy
and good governance, and meet the special needs of Africa, will be our guide
and mandate in our deliberations.
It will be our duty, at this and
future sessions of the General Assembly, to translate the Declaration into
action. This is no doubt a difficult challenge. But it is a challenge we must
meet. Only thus can we contribute to the building of a future better than the
past.
To all these ends - at once
necessary as well as noble - our leaders pledged to spare no efforts to make
the United Nations a more effective instrument of international cooperation.
"What is needed" if I may
borrow an apt phrase from Secretary General's Report, "is a stronger
commitment to action." Action to achieve peace, and action to achieve
development.
Each one of our States can and must
take action on both fronts. But individual efforts cannot achieve optimum
results. All of us need to work, with dedication and a strong sense of
commitment, in a cooperative and harmonious environment to promote the twin
objectives for a better future.
The Millennium Declaration
emphasizes the determination of world leaders to save peoples from the scourge
of war. The Secretary General's Report highlights peace and security as "a
central objective of the United Nations at the dawn of the twenty-first
century, as it was when the Organization was founded over half a century
ago." The problem is how to prevent war and achieve peace. The solution is
not difficult to find. "What is needed is a
stronger commitment to action."
Given that commitment, crises and
conflicts can be prevented and peace can be achieved. Peace is not merely
possible. It is realizable through a civilized approach to conflict resolution.
Based on justice and international law, and the principles of its Charter, the
United Nations can ensure effective remedial action to maintain peace and
security.
People watched with relief as the
world community joined to prevent genocide in Bosnia and Kosovo. We similarly
greeted settlement of the East Timor issue, with the commendable cooperation of
the Government of Indonesia and the imaginative contribution of the Secretary
General. The imaginative and diligent efforts of his Representative, Ambassador
Jamsheed Marker, to promote the settlement are a mater of pride for the people
of Pakistan. These are examples of how the United Nations and the international
community can and should act to address conflicts by implementing its
principles and decisions.
In the Middle East, too, the peace
process has made steady if agonizingly slow progress. For the gains so far
made, tribute is due to the idealistic efforts of peacemakers and the realistic
approaches of the Palestinian and Israeli leaders. The residual issues are
difficult and delicate, involving as they do principles of law and equity, on
one hand, and deep emotions, on the other. Yet, we ardently hope that the peace
process will succeed soon. Final settlement of the Palestinian Question will be
a crowning achievement and a momentous contribution to peace in the Middle
East.
Security Council Resolutions 242,
338 and 425 are imbued with an irreplaceable international sanctity. Their
implementation involves the prestige and credibility of the United Nations. An
end to occupation and reversion of Holy Jerusalem to Palestinian sovereignty
will ensure reconciliation and durable peace in the Middle East.
Mr. President,
The Kashmir Question, involving the
life and future of the people of the State, has been the root cause of tensions
in South Asia since 1947. Its settlement is an indispensable condition for
peace and stability. Ten million people of the state will not be denied their
right to freedom. They seek nothing more than the fulfilment of the commitments
contained in the resolutions of the Security Council. Their right to decide
their own future cannot lapse. Passage of fifty-three years has only compounded
the tragedy of the Kashmiri people and prolonged their travail. The long delay
has only heightened the terrible dangers inherent in this festering dispute.
According to the All Parties
Hurriyet (Freedom) Conference, seventy-two thousand Kashmiris have been killed
since 1989. Thousands more have been tortured and maimed or disappeared. The
massive human right violation in Kashmir, and the repression and brutalities
perpetrated on the Kashmiri people by occupation forces are a grave crime of
state terrorism.
In a disparate attempt to undermine
and suppress Kashmiri Freedom Movement, the perpetrators of repression and
violence against the Kashmiri people have tried to portray the Kashmiri freedom
struggle as terrorism. Such propaganda did not carry credibility in the past.
It cannot do so now. It is familiar to all those who have won freedom after
protracted struggle against colonialism and foreign occupation.
Given that commitment, crises and
conflicts can be prevented and peace can be achieved. Peace is not merely
possible. It is realizable through a civilized approach to conflict resolution.
Based on justice and international law, and the principles of its Charter, the
United Nations can ensure effective remedial action to maintain peace and
security.
People watched with relief as the
world community joined to prevent genocide in Bosnia and Kosovo. We similarly
greeted settlement of the East Timor issue, with the commendable cooperation of
the Government of Indonesia and the imaginative contribution of the Secretary
General. The imaginative and diligent efforts of his Representative, Ambassador
Jamsheed Marker, to promote the settlement are a mater of pride for the people
of Pakistan. These are examples of how the United Nations and the international
community can and should act to address conflicts by implementing its principles
and decisions.
In the Middle East, too, the peace
process has made steady if agonizingly slow progress. For the gains so far
made, tribute is due to the idealistic efforts of peacemakers and the realistic
approaches of the Palestinian and Israeli leaders. The residual issues are
difficult and delicate, involving as they do principles of law and equity, on
one hand, and deep emotions, on the other. Yet, we ardently hope that the peace
process will succeed soon. Final settlement of the Palestinian Question will be
a crowning achievement and a momentous contribution to peace in the Middle
East.
Security Council Resolutions 242,
338 and 425 are imbued with an irreplaceable international sanctity. Their
implementation involves the prestige and credibility of the United Nations. An
end to occupation and reversion of Holy Jerusalem to Palestinian sovereignty
will ensure reconciliation and durable peace in the Middle East.
Mr. President,
The Kashmir Question, involving the
life and future of the people of the State, has been the root cause of tensions
in South Asia since 1947. Its settlement is an indispensable condition for
peace and stability. Ten million people of the state will not be denied their
right to freedom. They seek nothing more than the fulfilment of the commitments
contained in the resolutions of the Security Council. Their right to decide
their own future cannot lapse. Passage of fifty-three years has only compounded
the tragedy of the Kashmiri people and prolonged their travail. The long delay
has only heightened the terrible dangers inherent in this festering dispute.
According to the All Parties
Hurriyet (Freedom) Conference, seventy-two thousand Kashmiris have been killed
since 1989. Thousands more have been tortured and maimed or disappeared. The
massive human right violation in Kashmir, and the repression and brutalities
perpetrated on the Kashmiri people by occupation forces are a grave crime of
state terrorism.
In a disparate attempt to undermine
and suppress Kashmiri Freedom Movement, the perpetrators struggle as terrorism. Such
propaganda did not carry credibility in the past. It cannot do so now. It is
familiar to all those who have won freedom after protracted struggle against
colonialism and foreign occupation.
Pakistan has consistently vowed for a peaceful settlement of the Kashmir dispute. Two years ago, the Security Council once again emphasized the need for solving the dispute which has been the source of tension and conflict in the region. The provisions of Article 33 of the Charter place an obligation on Member States to settle disputes through recourse to negotiation, inquiry, conciliation, mediation, arbitration or adjudication. Each and all of these means are acceptable to Pakistan.
Faced with intransigent rejection of
peaceful means, the Security Council has a responsibility to act. The Charter
empowers the Security Council to do so. "What is needed is a stronger
commitment to action." In its absence, mere talk of crisis prevention and
dispute resolution will lack credibility.
Mr. President,
Afghanistan remains trapped in a
terrible tragedy. Its protracted war of liberation in the 1980s left it
devastated. The internecine war in the 1990s has inflicted further ravages. The
economy of the country is in shambles. Drought in Southern Afghanistan has
added to the misery of the people of this ancient land.
Tied to the Afghan people by bonds
of geography, history and culture, the people of Pakistan view the tragedy in
Afghanistan with a deep sense of sympathy. Despite economic stringency, we
continue to provide shelter to one and a half million Afghan refugees.
Interruption of food supply from or via Pakistan would further aggravate
hardship and trigger a fresh influx. That is why Pakistan is opposed to
sanctions that hurt people.
No other people except Afghans
themselves have suffered more from conflict and instability in Afghanistan than
the people of Pakistan. It is natural therefore that Pakistan supports all
efforts for peace and reconciliation in Afghanistan. We were encouraged to note
a similarity of approaches by the Foreign Ministers of the six contiguous
countries, the Russian Federation and the United States at the Six-plusTwo
Group meeting on September 15 convened by the Secretary General. Pooling their
resources and influence, we should make more energetic efforts to persuade the
Afghan parties and assist the Secretary General of the United Nations in his
efforts to promote a broad-based government acceptable to the Afghan political
parties and ethnic groups.
We support the Islamic Republic of
Iran for leading a parallel effort for peace in Afghanistan on behalf of the
OIC. We also appreciate the efforts recently undertaken by Turkmenistan. In our
view, all these efforts complement and reinforce each other.
In his Report, the Secretary General
has referred to influx of war material from outside. Pakistan urges not only a
cease-fire but also a ban on supply of military equipment to Afghan parties and
the establishment of a monitoring mechanism for its enforcement.
We also remain cognizant of the
imperative of respect for sovereignty. The Afghan people have a history of
fierce resistance against outside interference. Engagement with the Afghan
government offers better hope of amelioration than attempts to drive it into a
corner of isolation.
The United Nations has been
providing humanitarian relief in Afghanistan. Programmes aimed at
rehabilitation and reconstruction may help bring the country back into the
international mainstream sooner. It is also the more compassionate way.
Pakistan, itself a victim of
terrorism, condemns this evil in all its forms and manifestations whether
committed by individuals or groups or states. Our Government has ratified nine
international conventions against terrorism and we join all international
efforts to combat this menace.
Mr. President,
Pakistan has historically supported
all proposals and agreements aimed at the limitation, progressive reduction and
eventual elimination of weapons of mass destruction. For over a quarter
century, we made efforts and initiated proposals to keep our area free of
nuclear weapons. Also, Pakistan has been prepared to support universal and non-discriminatory
measures and proposals. Pakistan voted in favour of the Comprehensive Test Ban
Treaty in 1996 and intended to sign it along with all others, especially the
designated States. The process of bringing that treaty into force was derailed
due to events not of our making. Even then, Pakistan was not the first to
conduct tests in 1998. It will not be the first to resume them. We still hope
the treaty can be brought into force. Pakistan will not obstruct the
realization of that aim. Our Government continues efforts to build domestic
consensus in favour of the treaty.
Meanwhile, restraint and
responsibility remain the guiding principles of our nuclear policy. Pakistan
will not enter into any nuclear arms race. Our sole aim is to retain minimum
credible deterrence . I wish to reaffirm in this august assembly, our nuclear
capability is only meant to deter aggression against Pakistan, it poses a
threat to no country.
We support efforts aimed at prevention of vertical or horizontal proliferation of nuclear weapons. During the past year we have further strengthened domestic regulations against export of nuclear equipment or materials. Our power reactors are under international safeguards.
Pakistan is prepared to cooperate in
efforts for restraints in development, production and deployment of ballistic
missiles. To be successful, such efforts must be non-discriminatory. Their aim
must be stabilization of the situation.
Any use of nuclear weapons is
inconceivable. However, the Charter obliges us to refrain from the threat or
use of force. The world community should, therefore, emphasize No-First-Use of
force, nuclear or conventional.
At the global level, Pakistan
supports calls for continued observance of the ABM Treaty. Militarization of
outer-space will be a disservice to hopes for maintenance of existing restraint
and stability.
Pakistan will participate in
negotiations on the proposed Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty and make a positive
contribution to evolving a fair and equitable text which all countries can
support.
III - Achieving Development
In his address to the Millennium
Summit, the Chief Executive of Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf stated
"the best assurance for the consolidation of global peace lies in the
economic development and prosperity of all regions and all peoples. Economic progress
in one region supports and complements prosperity in the other."
Development is not a zero-sum game. Accordingly, the Millennium Declaration
commits the world leaders to "making the right to development a reality
for everyone" and freeing the entire human race from want.
Globalization had raised hopes as it
offered opportunities for faster economic growth, higher living standards and
accelerated benefits from free flow of knowledge and technology. But there have
been disappointments. Experience has shown that benefits of globalization have
been uneven and the number of people living in poverty has increased.
Technological and information revolutions have accentuated global inequality
and a new digital divide has led to marginalization of a large number of
developing countries. Global trade regimes benefit the rich and the South has
become poorer. Competition, standards, a variety of non-tariff barriers,
increasingly complex trading practices, protectionism in selected sectors such
as agriculture, restrictions on technology transfers, all militate against the
interests of the developing countries. They find it hard to secure adequate
returns for their produce or attract investment to improve their
competitiveness. As a result, economic disparities are widening. This belies
the promise of free market to ensure well being for all.
The failure of the World Trade
Organization meeting in Seattle last November and dissenting voices heard in
Washington last April make it clear that the international economic system
needs to be fixed. A concerted global action is required for sustained
development to benefit and protect weaker economies. The industrialized
countries have a special responsibility to adopt bold initiatives. Professions
for the eradication of poverty must first lead to the establishment of
international economic policy framework responsive to the needs of the
developing countries.
One important area is the debt
issue. In one of the interactive dialogues, the Secretary General had proposed
that the United Nations could mediate between creditors and debtors to address
the debt problem. We welcome this proposal. Our Chief Executive, speaking at
the same meeting had suggested that developing indebted countries should be
allowed to utilize resources allocated to debt servicing for development of
social sector, especially education and health care. Substantive debt relief through
innovative approaches, will go a long way to help developing countries, ensure
global harmony and regenerate new economic partnership between the North and
the South.
A holistic approach to deal with
problems of development and poverty eradication is necessary. While we welcome
the Secretary General's initiative to bridge the digital divide, the emphasis
must remain on addressing mass literacy, capacity building, infrastructure and
basic health facilities. Similarly, multilateral trade regimes should be
development oriented. Environmental concerns for prudent use of natural
resources must be pursued simultaneously with emphasis on sustained economic
growth in the South.
The High-level International Inter-governmental Event on
Financing for Development which will be held next year, must involve world's
finance, trade and development organizations to discuss the issue comprehensively.
This conference should promote good governance at international level. It must
address how we can manage globalization appropriately so that its benefits
reach everyone ensuring universal prosperity.
Mr. President,
The upsurge of democracy in the past
decade has been a good omen for the start of the new millennium. This salutary
trend can only be sustained through equitable economic development. Unless the
developing nations are able to have a fair share in rising levels of global prosperity,
the advocacy of democratic values and human and social standards will remain
hollow.
In Pakistan, we are addressing the
challenges of both economic revival and institutional reforms that emphasize
accountability, good governance and devolution of power to grass root level
political institutions. In this endeavour, the government is banking on the
support and enthusiasm of our people. We believe that democracy, first and
foremost, is empowerment of the people based on strong institutions.
Mr. President,
The world community is well aware of
the ravages inflicted on fragile economies of developing countries and their
poor people as a result of corruption and transfer of illegal funds to safe
havens abroad. They are often the worst sufferers of such malpractices due to
socio-economic forces within and banking practices outside their countries.
Welfare of humanity in developing
countries demands international cooperation for prevention of corruption. Such
cooperation was urged in General Assembly Resolutions 53/176 of 15 December
1998 and 54/205 of 23 December 1999. Tike South Summit in Havana in April 2000
requested remedial action.
Transfers of illicit funds from
developing countries will not make the rich countries much richer, but they do
make the poor countries poorer. It is a paradox that some rich countries have
such lax laws that provide safe havens and encourage private banks to launder
illicit funds looted by corrupt persons from poor countries by facilitating
establishment of secret accounts. That amounts to encouragement of plunder,
indeed of financial terrorism.
The nexus between corruption and failure of democracy has been recognized also in the Final Declaration issued by the meeting of the Community of Democracies in Warsaw on 25-27 June 2000. It emphasized the need to "combat corruption, which corrodes democracy." We need, therefore, to take effective action. We propose, the General Assembly should proclaim a policy of "Zero Tolerance" of all types of corruption and urge a ban on laundering of illicit funds.
IV- Strengthening of
the United Nations
The United Nations has emerged as
the only forum with universal recognition and authority to address the entire
spectrum of issues relating to human aspirations for peace, justice and
development.
To meet the growing expectations
this world body must be strengthened. Its role must be reinforced for ensuring
a better world future.
We support the call for enhancing
the capacity of the United Nation in the areas of conflict prevention and peace-keeping.
In this regard we commend Mr. Lakhdar Brahimi and members of the high level
Panel for their extensive report. As an important participant in the UN peace
keeping operations, we look forward to discussions on the useful ideas and
concepts that have been presented in the report for enabling the United Nations
to respond more effectively to the existing and incipient conflicts and threats
to international peace and security.
No other aspect of reform of the
United Nations merits as close attention as the need to make the Security
Council more democratic, transparent and accountable. Periodic elections of a
larger number of Members will make the Security Council not only more
representative but also more responsive to the aspirations of the world
community. That will enhance the capacity of this vital organ to contribute to the
maintenance of international peace and security and to the realization of the
purposes of the Organization. That objective will not be achieved by the
creation of new centers of privilege which detract from the cardinal principle
of sovereign equality of states. For the same reason, the decision-making
process needs to be made more democratic.
For the Security Council to command
universal respect, its reform should command the general agreement of the
membership. Nothing should be done in haste or in a manner that divides the
membership and impairs the authority and prestige of the Council.
Mr. President,
In the increasingly interactive
world, we share the desire with other nations for a peaceful environment and
mutually beneficial cooperation, and see a pivotal role for the United Nations.
The universality of the United Nations gives it the stature and legitimacy that
is unprecedented in history. The Organization should enter the 21 St century by demonstrating a clear
commitment to address, and resolve, the key delopmental and security challenges
facing our peoples. It must be enabled to apply its immutable principles and
iii decisions consistently and forcefully to ensure durable peace, sustained
economic progress and better fixture for all humanity.
Thank you Mr. President.