UNITED
NATIONS GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
STATEMENT
BY
THE PRESIDENT
OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
H.E. MR JULIAN R. HUNTE AT THE SPECIAL HIGH-LEVEL MEETING WITH THE
BRETTON WOODS INSTITUTIONS AND THE
WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION (WTO)
UNITED NATIONS
HEADQUARTERS
26 APRIL 2004
Madam President of
ECOSOC, Madam President of Finland, Distinguished Minister, Mr Secretary-General,
Excellencies, Representatives of Inter-governmental Organisations, Distinguished
Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Our Mission at the
2002 Monterrey International Conference on Financing for Development was
clear - to objectively review the full range of issues on financing for
development and to frame an effective strategy to address these issues.
The developing countries were to be the particular focus of our initiatives.
It is pragmatism and cooperation, I believe, that account for our successes,
embodied in the Monterrey Consensus.
This Special High-level
Meeting of ECOSOC with the international financial and trade institutions
has as its theme, "Coherence, coordination, and cooperation, in the
context of the implementation of the Monterrey Consensus". This calls
to mind Monterrey's focus on coherence, and its viewpoint on the essential
need for the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to be among those organisations
playing a critical role in the area of financing for development.
For the first time,
the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) is participating
in this high-level meeting. We have therefore added an important player
to the group of key organizations whose cooperation with United Nations
principal organs - the Economic and Social Council and the General Assembly
- and input into the Monterrey process, is critical to the success of
our initiatives.
All stakeholders -
Governments, international institutions, civil society, and the private
sector - committed themselves to the goals and objectives of the Monterrey
Consensus. Encouragingly, the partnerships we created then have remained
intact, and this augurs well for our capacity to deliver on the Consensus.
It was these partnerships that ensured a frank and open exchange on the
progress we had made at the High-level Dialogue on Financing for Development,
convened by the General Assembly in October 2003.
I commented during the High-level Dialogue on our "mixed report card"
on the implementation of the Monterrey commitments. The persistent and
critical issues requiring further and urgent attention are therefore well
know to us. We know, for example, that numerous developing countries have
made determined efforts to create an enabling environment for foreign
direct investment, including through strengthening democracy and democratic
governance. For many, however, foreign direct investment has not been
forthcoming.
In any event, foreign
direct investment cannot in and of itself help developing countries to
implement national strategies and policies to meet their development objectives.
Further, the reduction in the levels of Official Development Assistance
(ODA) in recent years has shown that this is not a source of development
financing on which developing countries may rely. Other effective development
financing strategies are required to improve development financing and
prospects.
International trade
is a key element of the international development framework. This is a
point which I emphasised two days ago in my address on the Commonwealth
Secretariat-commissioned "Stiglitz Plan" at a meeting jointly
hosted in Washington D.C. by the Centre for Global Development and the
Commonwealth Secretariat. The World Trade Organization (WTO), therefore,
must be a key stakeholder in our development financing initiatives.
For a majority of developing countries, trade can only become an engine
to drive growth and development in a dynamic and fair multilateral trading
system. Every indication, including developments at Cancun, underscore
that we are not yet there. We are, for example, far from reaching resolution
on the issue of special and differential treatment, be it in respect of
LDCs, landlocked developing countries, or within the wider context of
small economies, for Small Island Developing States (SIDS). Regarding
the SIDS, this is a matter which will no doubt receive additional focus,
in the run-up to the SIDS+10 Review meeting to be held in Mauritius in
August/September of this year.
Debt, of course, continues
to be an immediate, short and long-term challenge to many developing countries.
Those grappling with serous debt burden are finding it difficult to confront
dramatic decline or stagnation of their economies, and to meet the legitimate
expectations of their people. In the current global economic environment
debt cancellation - particularly for HIPC countries - might be a better
strategy than debt maintenance, for putting indebted developing countries
on the path to sustainable development.
I am pleased to note
that the three critical factors I have mentioned above - aid, trade and
debt - taken together with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), will
be discussed in detail in the roundtables of this High-level Meeting.
Regarding the MDGs, some would say that the targets set in the Millennium
Declaration are highly ambitious. If we are to silence the sceptics, we
must make a determined and urgent effort - through advocacy, mobilization
of resources and capacity building, in particular - to effectively review
the targets for 2005 with a view to improving our prospects for success
in meeting those of 2015.
My hope is that we
can all agree, soon, to a consensus resolution on the convening of a high-level
event in 2005, which would give impetus to our target-implementing and
review initiatives for that year, and for subsequent years.
Development challenges
are multifaceted and highly complex, and do not fit neatly into their
own discrete boxes - they are interconnected. The integrated approach
we took to development financing and development generally in Monterrey
underscores this point. Coherence is about maintaining the integrated
approach across concerned organisations and groups, to ensure, through
coordination and cooperation that our common objectives and complementary
interests converge for the best possible results.
In short, each of
the organisations engaged in this Special High-level Meeting should, within
its mandate and taking into account its comparative advantage, contribute
towards ensuring that development issues are viewed and addressed comprehensively,
and that the action take is consistent with Monterrey. This, in my view,
will be one of the most important aspects of the work of this Special
High-level meeting.
I wish to join in
welcoming the President of Finland and Ministers to this High-level Meeting.
Presidential and Ministerial participation in this meeting and the further
discussion by Ministers at the High-Level Segment of ECOSOC later this
year of the President of ECOSOC's summary of this meeting sets a firm
foundation for further work and gives political underpinning to the critical
work that must be done to ensure coherence, coordination, and cooperation,
in the context of the implementation of the Monterrey Consensus.
Needless to say, the
Economic and Social Council, in accordance with oversight responsibilities
and the General Assembly, in accordance with its policy setting role as
the sole universal organisation of the United Nations, and recognised
as such in the Millennium Declaration, must also play a critical role
in the delivery of the commitments of the Monterrey Consensus.
There is a growing sense of urgency, particularly in the developing world,
that the international community needs to move more quickly to assist
with national efforts for poverty eradication, sustainable economic growth,
sustainable development and for a more equitable global economic system.
I say to this Special High Level meeting that given the urgency with which
most developing countries view these matters, nothing short of a "sustainable
development offensive" will do.
I thank you
|