    

|
    
 |
 |

UN
- US SYMPOSIUM SERIES
Introductory Remarks
by H.E. Mr. Jan KAVAN
President of the 57th session of the UN General Assembly
Excellencies,
Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is a great pleasure for me to address the UN-US Symposium.
I believe that it is extremely important to have a dialogue about
how we may cooperate to advance a more effective and mutually
supportive relationship between the United Nations and the United
States. The nature and quality of this relationship is of immense
significance for all of us as the United Nations is the only legitimate
institution in the world to which all nations have subscribed
and in which we all have a stake. This discussion is more pertinent
today than ever, at a time when the United Nations is confronted
with one of the most serious debates about its role in future
international relations.
Recently,
the Iraqi crisis has seized - and rightly so - our attention as
the most outstanding issue before the United Nations. The Security
Council did not reach an agreement on how to proceed further in
Iraq. The inability of the Security Council to produce a workable
multilateral solution frustrated most UN Member States. We all
would have preferred if a consensus solution had been found. But
it was not the case. Did it make, however, the Security Council
or even the United Nations less relevant? I believe not. The lack
of consensus definitely showed how difficult and complicated the
situation in Iraq had been. It demonstrated how differently the
Member States understood and evaluated the situation in Iraq based
on their diverse perspectives, historical experience and cultural
backgrounds. It is also true that this crisis, once again, revealed
some weaknesses and shortcomings in our multilateral intergovernmental
processes that must be addressed in the future reform efforts.
In
this connection, I would caution, however, against the hasty and
often-quoted comparison with the fate of the League of Nations
and the frequently heard obituaries to the United Nations. Contrary
to the League of Nations that failed to prevent the World War
II and seased to exist after only 20 years, the United Nations
has been much more successful. In the course of its existence,
there has been no global or major regional war as it happened
twice in the first half of the 20th century. Over the past 57
years, the UN has been engaged in all major issues of peace and
security, massive decolonilization in the 50´s, development
assistance and economic cooperation, disarmament, large democratization,
pursuance of human rights and many other tasks. Its role in designing
and maintaining international order has always been indispensable
and irreplaceable. In brief, the 57 years history of the United
Nations has been marked by many "success stories" but
also by a great deal of inefficiency in many areas which calls
for fundamental reforms.
The
United Nations has always had a special relationship with the
United States. The United States´ support to the United
Nations has been crucial from the very inception of the Organization.
The United States has played a major role not solely because of
its being the host country and the largest single contributor
but also, and even more importantly, because of its conceptual
input in designing the Organization. It was President Roosevelt
and his vision of a peaceful "Post War World" that largely
influenced the conception of the United Nations. It was mostly
American values, values of a democratic and liberal society that
shaped the UN Charter. And last but not least, it was US leadership
that united the world in its endeavour to maintain peace and security,
to respect equal rights and promote the economic and social advancement
of all peoples. The global community needs similar determination
for democracy and international order today also since all nations
want to have a voice in decision-making processes on global issues.
The
US participation in the UN continues to be fundamental - not only
to the UN itself but also to America's global leadership. The
United States needs the legitimacy and existence of a world order
that the United Nations does provide. On the other hand, the absence
of the United States in the Organization´s activities would
substantially hold back the entire institution. The question before
us is how to make the relationship more constructive and beneficial
for both the UN and the US.
Now,
we live in a different, highly globalized, world. There still
prevails the need for peace and security, respect for equal rights,
as well as economic and social advancement. But besides these
goals that were set in the UN Charter, we face a number of new
challenges that relate to the fact that we live in an increasingly
interconnected and interdependent world. For instance some decisions
and actions taken by large countries or transnational corporations
usually have consequences on other countries. Due to the progress
of technology, it is easier than ever to accumulate power that
can destroy our environment or civilization. Threat of terrorism,
invisible and unidentifiable enemy, contributes substantially
to the growing feeling of global insecurity.
The
global community needs, more than ever before, to work together
intensively and courageously, in order to build more secure and
rule-based world, in which human freedom and dignity as well as
private enterprise can flourish. It is generally acknowledged
that the global community has become interdependent, be it for
trade and investments, or for solving the problems related to
climate change, or eradicating poverty and terrorism. Each nation,
even the United States, the sole superpower with its economic,
financial, military and technological dominance, is also interconnected
with and interdependent on others. The quality of the international
order, the good will and responsibility of all the nations, particularly
the most powerful ones are essential. We all have to work together
to transfer global insecurity into global responsibility. The
United Nations can and must be instrumental in this endeavour.
In
conclusion, let me re-iterate that in the inter-linked world,
no nation can pursue its aspirations towards economic prosperity
and sustainable development, towards human dignity, towards a
safe and secure environment in an isolated way and without the
cooperation and sound relations with other countries. The only
way to ensure global peace and security is to win the war against
poverty. That is why, our commitments for international development
cooperation are so important. Let me quote here what was recently
stated by John Snow, Secretary of the US Treasury, at the meeting
of the Development Committee: "The United States is committed
to helping the developing world - particularly the poorest countries
- increase economic growth, raise living standards, and eliminate
poverty. Developed and developing countries, together with the
international financial institutions, must redouble their efforts
toward achieving these goals." This is, in my view, the best
way to go.
I
hope that the outcome from this symposium will increase mutual
understanding and enhance closer collaboration between this universal
Organization and the United States. Let me wish you a very productive
discussion.
Thank
you.
|
 |