LITHUANIA
FIFTY-FIFTH
SESSION
OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS
GENERAL
DEBATE
STATEMENT
BY
HIS
EXCELLENCY DR. OSKARAS JUSYS
DEPUTY
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
check
against delivery
14
SEPTEMBER 2000
NEW
YORK
Mr. President,
I
would like to say that I have a special pleasure in seeing you preside over
this Millennium Assembly session. I wish to assure you of my delegations' full
support in all your endeavours. As one of vice-chairmen of the past
session, I want to convey my special appreciation' to my colleague and your
predecessor, Foreign Minister Theo Ben Gurirab.
I
would like to extend my gratitude to the Secretary General for presenting his
report "We the Peoples" to the World community.
Allow
me also convey my delegation's warm welcome to Tuvalu as a new member of the
United Nations.
Mr. President,
It
is both remarkable and profoundly logical that in the beginning of the new
millennium high representatives of almost two hundred nations have gathered for
one sole purpose - to comprehend challenges of the contemporary world.
The fact that we all have gathered here,
representing all regions of the world, cultures and religions, means that we
all share the belief in value, viability and potential of the United Nations.
Heads of State and Governments, during the course of the Millennium Summit,
have guided us to strengthen the United Nations, including its central role in
peacekeeping and poverty eradication. Our task now is to act upon their
guidance.
Globalisation, digital revolution, triumph of free
trade have transformed the world into a vibrant world-economy.
Interdependence within the world-economy emphasizes collective problems
and solutions. Thus, the United Nations, the Bretton Woods institutions, the
World Trade Organisation and many other international organisations have become
indispensable mechanisms if we are to achieve stable peace, to assist in
shaping the course of development, and to ensure that the world-economy
provides benefits for all.
Never has the world been so well-off. Yet,
never has it been confronted with so many problems of the global scale. The
nature of threats have entirely changed. The phenomena are so complex that they
defy easy generalisation: extreme poverty and marginalisation of entire
communities; gross violations of human rights; ethnic conflicts and genocide;
proliferation of arms; terrorism; environmental degradation.
Mr. President,
No effort should be spared to free people from
dehumanising conditions of extreme poverty. The goals adopted at the Millennium
Summit are challenging. Assistance, new trade arrangements, and debt relief
will hardly be a panacea unless necessary and strong commitments to poverty
reduction, economic equality, combating the HIV/AIDS pandemic, and supporting
education are reflected, first and foremost, in national policies of individual
states and concurrently on agendas of international organisations. Good health,
literacy, and education are critical assets for economic development. Human capital
combined with high level of economic equality, good governance, and abidance by
the rule of law can really make a difference. This is the course we strongly
uphold if we aim at reducing by half the level of extreme poverty by 2015 and
achieving sustainable development
The
realities are that most of the economic thinking and ruling is being done
within the Bretton
Woods
institutions, WTO or OECD. And a fully coordinated approach to problems
of peace and
development
should be sought between these international institutions and the UN.
Mr.
President,
We
have yet to learn how to manage the spin-offs of globalisation and how
best to make use of international mechanisms to address new forms of threats.
Better yet, a prevention is preferable to a cure. For a really effective
prevention a broader definition of security is vital, the one encompassing
pressing economic and social problems. The root causes of conflicts should be
addressed as a fundamental part of efforts to establish and secure peace and
stability.
Should
preventative strategies yield no results the United Nations must have a truly
effective peacekeeping capacity at its disposal. Lithuania will support every
effort to fix structural deficiencies within the UN, adequately stuff and
finance relevant departments. We are ready to pull our weight. Provided the
determination, resources, capacity and willingness are there, I believe,
humanitarian catastrophes and crises may be averted. Proposals to improve the
UN peacekeeping capacity and performance, especially those contained in the
Brahimi report were widely endorsed by our leaders. Now we have to work on it
with a view to shifting the
historically prevailing conception of peacekeeping as an ad hoc job to one of
the core functions of the United Nations.
Great
challenges to the new international way of containing and resolving ethnic
conflicts await in Africa. A perspective strategy could be to encourage and
assist regional organisations, especially the Organisation of African Unity and
ECOWAS; involve the civil society and business community; and, most notably,
enhance the UN, especially the Security Council's capacity to act well in
advance, before a crisis gets out of hand.
Pledges
to contribute to a safer world add up to nothing if mounting demands for
adequately trained and equipped peacekeepers and civilian policemen, judges and
administrators fall on deaf ears. East Timorese, Kosovars, Sierra Leoneans are
pinning their hopes on us. Failure to respond to them would mean in the end
that we do no more that celebrate our own individual security.
Mr.
President,
Lithuania
has always been and remains committed to building collective security.
On
the international level, Lithuania emphasises active participation in
international organisations and substantial contribution to peace-keeping
efforts, such as participation in the UN Standby Arrangements system, or from
the very beginning of international engagement in the Balkans, making our
civilian policemen and military available to missions in Bosnia and Kosovo.
Moreover, additional commitments will promptly follow as more highly trained
policemen and troops become available. In this regard, I wish to voice our
strong efforts to place a Lithuanian part of the joint Lithuanian‑Polish
peace-keeping battalion under the UN stand-by arrangements with a
view to joining the SHIRBRIG.
On
the regional level, we made membership in alliances of democratic nations -
European Union and NATO - our top priority. We regard the OSCE
principles, including a country's right to choose its own security
arrangements, to be of fundamental value to ensuring peace and security. We
believe that by taking this way we will meet our economic, cultural, social and
other concerns and enhance European security as a whole.
On
the sub‑regional level, we stress practical co‑operative efforts to
uphold democratic and economic transformation throughout the region. Over the
last decade our engagement with Poland turned into close partnership which has
already produced remarkable results. Good bilateral relations with the
neighbouring states of Latvia and Estonia have grown into a dynamic trilateral
Baltic co‑operation, what has subsequently expanded into a broader Baltic-Nordic
cooperation. We also seek to further develop mutually beneficial good
neighbourly relations with Russia. Joint Lithuanian-Russian projects on
cooperation with the Kaliningrad region is a good example of our
pursuance of policy of friendly relations, what also fully coincides with the
EU Northern Dimension policies endorsed at the Feira European Union Summit this
June.
Mr.
President,
Co‑operation
requires wisdom and patience. Yet, all too often guns have been a choice of
cure for ethnic strife, social or economic downfall. Vigorous and urgent
efforts are needed to curtail proliferation of small arms. We deem it is vital
for the 2001 UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons
to address critical issues in the field of transparency, legitimate transfers,
accountability, enforcement of sanctions, and observance of moratoria. A
commitment to elimination of land-mines should now be coupled with an
effort toward putting small arms off-limits to belligerent cause.
Against
the background of gains in disarmament, a number of setbacks make the picture less
encouraging. We share the profound concerns posed by the abundance of weapons
of mass destruction and proliferation of missiles. And I fail to see any other
way to a safer world rather than reducing, eliminating and outlawing weapons of
mass destruction. In the wake of the successful outcome of the 2000 NPT Review
Conference, Lithuania will work with other committed nations to have
unequivocal commitment to nuclear disarmament materialised.
Mr. President,
Certain
fundamental values are essential to international relations. Such are human
responsibility and human rights. At the Millennium Summit President of
Lithuania Valdas Adamkus spoke about his belief that "in the face of
globalized tomorrow, the United Nations would increase the scope of its human dimension
activities. Human rights should become a cornerstone of the emerging world
structure". The concept of human dimension must be at the centre of all UN
activities.
If
we are to address the root causes of conflicts we have to admit that respect
for human rights, protection of minority rights and institution of political
arrangements in which all groups are represented are vital. For my region, it
is of particular interest how the international community can promote the
rights of people coping with post-communist transition.
The
limits of human rights applicability are being constantly questioned. The
United Nations should advance in search for new and more effective instruments
to fend off the challengers of human rights. Persons responsible for genocide,
crimes against humanity, war crimes as well as for the crimes of aggression
should be brought to justice. And if that is a goal the international community is
after, an effective International Criminal Court should start working as soon
as possible. On its part, Lithuania will make good on its commitment to ratify
the Rome Statute by the end of this year.
Mr. President,
From experience of my own country, I wish to stress that increasing the equality of social, economic, educational, and political benefits across gender has a positive impact on economic development. These issues have been at the forefront on the agendas of all Lithuanian governments since regaining independence, which started working actively to help solve the question of equal rights and other problems which women face. One of our achievements is adoption of the Law on Equal Opportunities, which is the first law of this kind in Central and Eastern Europe. Being a signatory state to the Second Optional Protocol of the Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, I call on its early entry into force.
Mr.
President,
Attainment of
freedom, security and welfare for people is only feasible by embracing the
effects of globalisation and not defying it. We have a global instrument
readily available for that purpose. Yet, we keep arriving at the same
conclusion: we need the UN with greater capacity and better performance. A
number of measures have been carried out. Outstanding efforts by the Secretary
General can not be overestimated. Lithuania supports Secretary General's
greater emphasis on the UN as a results-based organisation. We also share
the stress on better management, mobilisation of new resources, and new forms
of partnership.
There needs to be a sharper sense of over-arching
UN identity. The Security Council should play its part in this regard. Lessons
drawn from the Secretary General reports on Srebrenica and Rwanda have to be
paid more than lip service.
Within the complex of measured design for the revitalisation
of the United Nations, our efforts to reform the Security Council occupy a
prominent place. The Security Council would only win, if acquired a new power
and authority base, and I would like to reiterate Lithuania's position that the
Security Council should be increased both in permanent and non permanent
membership categories, and that the Eastern European Group should be given one
additional non-permanent membership seat. In turn, even with a
revitalised Council, cooperation with regional organisations should be
strengthened.
The reforms, no matter how far-flung, may
remain a partial success so long as the UN is not given necessary resources.
The organisation needs sound and predictable financial footing. Therefore,
Lithuania strongly supports a comprehensive review of both the regular-budget
scale and the scale of assessment for peace-keeping operations. In the
latter case, an ad hoc arrangement of 1973 has lost its touch with present day
economic realities. We need to adjust the UN's peacekeeping scale of assessment
methodology to better reflect the current economic conditions of all member
states. I hope the revision will enjoy support by all countries of the UN and
will be carried out in an expeditious manner.
Mr. President,
The
United Nations symbolises and guards the humankind hope for better future.
Let's make it happen!