PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS
Statement
by H.E. Mr. Tang Jiaxuan
Minister
of Foreign Affairs
of the
People's Republic of China
at the 55th
Session of the UN General Assembly
13 September 2000
Mr. President,
Please
allow me to extend my warm congratulations on your assumption of the Presidency
of the current session of the UN General Assembly. I am confident that with
your wisdom and experience, and with the support and coordination of the member
states, the Millenium Assembly will successfully accomplish all its work. At
the same time, I would like to express my appreciation and thanks to Mr.
Gurirab for the contribution he made as President of the last session of the
General Assembly.
Mr. President,
The
Millenium Summit, which has attracted worldwide attention, has just concluded.
The United Nations Millenium Declaration is what world leaders at the Summit
agreed upon on how to meet the major challenges facing mankind today. The
Declaration reviews and sums up the course that the UN has traversed in the
past 55 years. More importantly, it offers a blueprint for the UN in the new
century and new millenium and important guidance to people around the world in
their pursuit of peace, development and common progress. I would like to add my
voice to the call to action made by Secretary-General Kofi Annan at the closing
ceremony of the Summit. We should work together to turn the consensus reached
at the Summit into actions and usher in a new era of peace and development for
people all over the world.
It is the
primary mission of the UN in the new century to hold fast to the purposes and
principles of the UN Charter, promote democracy in international relations,
maintain world peace and stability, and facilitate development and prosperity
of all countries. The UN Charter is a manifestation of the people's ideal and
pursuit of equality, justice and freedom. It is precisely because it has kept
to the purposes of the Charter in safeguarding peace, developing friendship and
promoting cooperation and its principles guiding international relations such
as the core principles of sovereign equality and non‑interference in each
other's internal affairs over the past 55 years that the UN has grown from
strength to strength and its membership from 51 to 189. This organization is
still playing an irreplaceable role in world affairs. The history of the past
55 years has amply proved the effectiveness of the purposes and principles of
the UN Charter. Today, global issues have made our interests intertwined and
modern technology has made our communication easier . In these circumstances,
we need, more than ever, to face up to the common challenges together on the
basis of equality, mutual respect and democratic consultation. The purposes and
principles of the Charter are by no means outdated, but rather, they are of
greater relevance today.
Democracy
in international relations requires compliance with the principle of sovereign
equality as provided for in the UN Charter. Countries do differ in terms of
size, strength and wealth, but they are all equal members of the international
community. None of them should be discriminated against and their state
sovereignty brooks no encroachment. The internal affairs of a country should be
managed by the people of that country and major world affairs should be decided
by all countries through consultation. Response to global challenges calls for
worldwide cooperation and coordination. This is required by progress of our
times and necessitated by the establishment of a fair and just new
international political order. It is also the foundation and source of vitality
for the UN in the new century.
The reform of the UN should give full expression to democracy in
international relations. The reform is aimed at better safeguarding the
fundamental rights and interests of all member states and, especially, truly
reflecting the will of developing countries, which make up the bulk of the UN
membership. It should not merely satisfy the needs of a few countries. And the
reform of the Security Council should primarily aim at increasing
representation of developing countries. And this reform should be based on
extensive deliberations among member states. It is against the will of the
overwhelming majority of the member states to arbitrarily set deadlines or
force the passage of immature plans. There is a general agreement among the UN
member states on basing the scale methodology of regular budget and
peacekeeping assessment on the principle of capacity to pay. This methodology
is also one that is confirmed time and again by the General Assembly through
its resolutions and, therefore, should be abided by in whatever circumstances.
To introduce any adjustments to this methodology, we must give full
consideration to the specific economic conditions in developing countries. Such
adjustments should be made only when there is consensus among all member states
through extensive consultation, thus facilitating the normal and sound
operation of the UN.
Another important historical task
facing the UN is to respond to globalization and realize common development of
mankind. The 20th century has seen both unprecedented economic
prosperity and the greatest polarization. In the last decade of the century,
economic globalization has advanced at the fastest speed while the gap between
the North and the South has continued to widen. The World Bank data shows that
the revenue of the low‑income countries accounts for only 6% of the
world's total though they take up more than half of the world's population
while that of the developed countries 80% with only one sixth of the world
population. It is especially worrisome that there is even a bigger gap between
developing countries and developed ones in the hi-tech field. The "New
Economy" is so far only prospering in rich countries. Most developing
countries are still information have‑nots. Should such a situation be
allowed to continue, many developing countries would, for a long time, be
deprived of the opportunity of being part of technological progress and
economic growth and the world would be further polarized.
To prevent
poverty from swallowing up achievements of development and to prevent social
injustice from shaking the basis of global stability, the UN must play its due
role in narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor and bringing about
common prosperity to the world. It is an unshirkable major responsibility of
the UN in the new century to promote the establishment of a new international
economic order based on cooperation on an equal footing and aimed at common
development, and ensure economic globalization benefit everybody in the world.
The UN should give top priority to the issue of development, make
efforts to change the current situation in which global economic affairs are
dominated by only a few countries and ensure developing countries their right
to equal participation in economic decision‑making. In making or revising
global economic rules of the game, consideration should first be given to the
need of developing countries in order to facilitate their development and
reduce the risks they might run when participating in globalization. The UN
should also mobilize all the resources available and encourage the
international community to narrow the "digital divide" and help
developing countries to seize, as far as they can, the opportunities brought
about by the scientific and technological advancement driven by the information
revolution. The UN also has the responsibility for introducing new rules to the
world to make science and technology truly serve all mankind and the lofty
cause of peace and development in the world.
Mr.
President,
As drastic and profound changes are taking place in the
international situation, what kind of security concept should be embraced is a
major subject before the UN and all its member states.
Global
strategic stability is the foundation on which world security rests. And the
1972 ABM Treaty is an important cornerstone for global strategic stability. Any
move to undermine the totality and effectiveness of the Treaty will have a
profound negative impact on world peace and security. The proposal for a
national missile defense system that is prohibited by the ABM Treaty is
essentially aimed at seeking unilateral military and strategic supremacy and
thus a typical example of the Cold War mentality. Such a plan, if implemented,
will only bring serious negative consequences to the security of the whole
world. The adoption by the General Assembly of the Resolution on Preservation
of and Compliance with the ABM Treaty at its 54th session with an
overwhelming majority is an indicator of the firm will of most countries in the
world to maintain and strictly observe the ABM Treaty. The UN should continue
to show serious concern over the attempt by a certain country to develop a
missile defense system to the detriment of the global strategic stability and
it should take necessary measures to stop this dangerous development.
Security
is mutual and relative. No country should enhance its security at the expense
of the others. To seek "absolute" unilateral security is not feasible
and will lead to greater insecurity. With increased international contacts and
exchanges, countries of the world will find themselves sharing more common
interests and facing more common challenges. Security can only be realized
through dialogue on an equal footing and in the spirit of mutual understanding
and mutual accommodation, maintained on the basis of mutual respect and
peaceful, coexistence, and consolidated through mutually‑beneficial
cooperation and common development. The only way to protect the fundamental
interests of all countries and enhance the universal security is to replace the
old security concept based on military alliances and military build‑up
with a new one that is characterized by equality, mutual trust, mutual benefit,
cooperation and settlement of disputes through dialogue.
In
recent years, China. Russia, Kazakstan. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan have reached,
within the framework of the Shanghai Five and through consultation and
cooperation based on equality, an agreement among themselves on confidence-building
in the military field and reduction of military forces in the border areas.
This offers something useful for the international community to draw upon in
its exploratory efforts for a new security concept.
We have
noted with pleasure the positive changes in the situation on the Korean
Peninsula and the positive outcome of the successful historic summit between
the DPRK and the Republic of Korea. It has shown once again that dialogue and
consultation based on equality serve to enhance mutual trust and improve
relations between states. We appreciate the efforts made by both the DPRK and the ROK to promote peace, stability and development on the Peninsula and
in the region. We deeply regret that the tripartite summit at Camp David failed
to produce any agreement. We believe that the Middle East peace process will
move forward, so long as the parties concerned earnestly, patiently and
unswervingly engage themselves in negotiating and seriously implement the
agreements that have already be reached among them on the basis of the relevant
UN resolutions, according to the principle of "Land for Peace" and in
the spirit of mutual trust and mutual accommodation.
In
the 20th century, mankind has suffered enough from the scourges of
war. In the 21st century, humanitarian crises of a massive scale
must be prevented and the tragedy of innocent people being slaughtered on a
large scale must not be allowed to repeat itself. The UN shoulders a primary
responsibility for the maintenance of world peace and, therefore, it should
work harder to stop conflicts and eliminate wars. In the present‑day
world, hegemonism and power politics still exist. Territorial disputes, ethnic
feuds and religious rifts have all led to incessant regional conflicts. Some
countries and regions hope that the UN will assist them in stopping conflicts,
which we fully understand. At the same time, we must not fail to see the
complexity of international intervention and the danger of inappropriate
intervention. The UN intervention should aim at eliminating the root causes of
a given conflict rather than delaying its settlement, facilitating reconciliation
between the conflicting parties rather than aggravating their hatred and
hostility. We are of the view that major powers and groups of countries should
respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the countries concerned
rather than meddling in their internal affairs or triggering new conflicts.
In the new circumstances, peacekeeping operations remain an important
means for the UN to fulfill its obligations in safeguarding world peace and
security. In this regard, it is essential to ensure and enhance the Security
Council's responsibility and political leadership in peacekeeping operations
and to ensure the observance of the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
The UN peacekeeping operations should be launched in light of the actual
conditions and within the capacities of the UN. The limited resources should be
put to where they are most needed.
Mr.
President,
Human beings are the most
valuable among all creatures on earth. To promote human development and protect
all the rights that human beings are entitled to are the common goal of
mankind. China is the most populous country in the world. The Chinese
Government has taken upon itself to safeguard the independence and dignity of
the Chinese nation and ensure the almost 1.3 billion Chinese the right to a
decent life and all‑round development. It has regarded this as its sacred
duty and will exert all its efforts to this end.
Human
rights improvement is an endless process. The human rights conditions of a
country are up to the people of that country to assess and improve. All people
live in a specific environment. The form in which human rights are embodied
changes with time arid circumstances. Therefore, how to protect and promote
human rights depends on the actual conditions and specific needs of a country.
To arbitrarily impose a fixed set of human rights rules regardless of the
differences in the specific environment and reality will not serve the
interests of the people of any country. To interfere in other countries'
internal affairs in the name of protecting human rights in order to advance
one's own political agenda is simply a blasphemy and betrayal of the human
rights cause.
The UN should vigorously encourage dialogues and
exchanges among different civilizations and countries on human rights and
discourage confrontation and exclusion, which represent the general trend of
the human rights cause. In providing humanitarian assistance, the LTN should
give equal priority to the prevention of conflicts and the protection of human
rights on the one hand and the reduction and elimination of poverty and the
promotion of human development on the other hand. In this context, the UN
should work in close coordination and cooperation with the governments
concerned, instead of bypassing them, and ensure human rights to the majority
of the people. Otherwise, such operations would trigger a humanitarian disaster
of a greater scale. Only when the above‑mentioned principles are abided
by, can the UN play a useful role in protecting human rights.
Mr.
President,
A few days
ago, Chinese President Jiang Zemin proclaimed at this solemn podium to the
whole world the Chinese people's firm determination to turn China into a strong,
prosperous and united country with a high degree of democracy and to promote
world peace and development. In the past 20 years and more since the inception
of reform and opening‑up, China completed its first and second phases of
modernization strategy. With the advent of the new century, China will begin
the third phase of the strategy and enter a new stage of accelerated
modernization. Once China becomes a member of the WTO, there will be major
breakthroughs in its opening‑up. China will honor its commitments and
seriously undertake its due obligations while enjoying its rights. Although there
will be difficulties, risks and challenges on the way ahead, China is capable
of removing every obstacle and achieving its grand objective of modernization.
China will unswervingly stick to its independent foreign policy of peace and
further develop friendly relations with the rest of the world on the basis of
the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. A strong and developed China will
not only benefit more than a billion Chinese people but also serve prosperity
and progress worldwide.
To resolve the question of Taiwan once and for all
and complete the reunification of the motherland is a shared aspiration of the
entire Chinese people including Taiwan compatriots. Adherence to the principle
of "peaceful reunification and one country, two systems" in resolving
the Taiwan question will serve the development of the two sides across the
Straits, contribute to amity and unity among compatriots on both sides and
facilitate peace and stability in the Asia‑Pacific region. The Chinese
Government and people have committed themselves more strongly than anyone else
to a peaceful reunification. They have demonstrated the utmost sincerity and
made the greatest efforts to this end. We are convinced that with concerted
efforts of the entire Chinese people including those living in Taiwan, China
will be able to realize its complete reunification at an earlier date.
Mr.
President,
We are entrusted with the important task of charting a
course for mankind for the coming century. Let us join hands and work together
to build a more secure, prosperous and progressive world in the new century.
Thank you.