at the International Conference on Financing for Development
Thank you very much, Madam President.
The Monterrey Consensus offers no mechanisms to mobilize new financial resources to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.
For this reason, the organizations participating in the Global Forum on Financing the Right to Equitable and Sustainable Development are NOT part of the Monterrey Consensus. The participating organizations of the Global Forum would like to share the declaration which resulted from three days of intense work and participation by 2600 persons, 700 organizations from all countries from all the regions of the world.
Our Monterrey Declaration is a review of the negative economic, social, environmental gender and cultural impacts of the current neo-liberal policies. These policies are repeated again in the Monterrey "consensus." Our Monterrey Declaration is a statement of the visions and,proposals for policies, which would serve humanity and the environment in which we live.
The City of Monterrey has been presented as a success story of globalization, but it is an example of the negative impacts of globalization on people, particularly the high social costs of production of the large-scale enterprises. These past days we heard testimonies of children dying of leukemia because of toxic waste in the environment, of sexual exploitation, of profit put ahead of humane working conditions, particularly those workers which served in the Fundidora of Monterrey. This is why we renamed the Coca-Cola Auditorium the Acero Fundidora (Steel Foundry), a monument to the surviving and the deceased workers of Monterrey, to the unemployed workers of Monterrey, to the displaced women workers.
The testimonies heard these past days demonstrate the vital need for a profound change in economic policies. An economy governed by human rights and environmental protections is an urgent necessity. The economy must serve society and fulfill and support human potential.
We do not approve the prevailing economic model as prescribed by the World Bank, the IMF and WTO, particulary because of its differentiated negative impacts on women and men, and this message was communicated directly to the IMF and the World Bank during the forum. The current model is not working for sustainable and equitable development. There is little evidence in the Monterrey Consensus of a will to change.
We emerged from the Global Forum
with a set of common proposals for an alternative economic model that puts
people in the center of development.
Mobilization of domestic resources and structural adjustment:
We demand that states maintain autonomy as a precondition for the attainment of their development. Moreover economic decision-making should be democratized within countries in such a way that parliaments approve the decision which are currently taken behind closed doors between ministries of economics and trade, and multilateral financial institutions. The active participation of civil society in these processes must be guaranteed.
The mobilization of domestic resources cannot be separated from any the other the other themes of the Financing for Development Conference, especially that of debt. The mobilization of financial resources must be carried out in a democratic and participatory manner at local, national, and international levels.
Debt and structural adjustment
We demand cancellation of the debts of the countries of the South.
Given that the co-responsibility for debt lies with the creditors we demand a fair and transparent process of arbitration that protects human rights and the environment
We call for a tax on currency transactions in that financing gender sensitive sustainable development for the benefit, particularly of indigenous peoples, blacks and women, children and which also contributes to financing of global public goods. We demand the immediate fulfillment of the commitment of 0.7 % of GDP on the part of industrialized countries for ODA in order to obtain the Millennium Development Goals. All forms of conditionality should be eliminated, such as tied aid, and food aid, which undermines the productive capacity, and food security of countries. We call for the effective participation of civil society in the formulation and implementation of ODA projects.
Investment and trade
Foreign investment has not been and will not be a panacea unless investment helps development rather than destroy it. We demand the elimination of speculative activities which enrich a small minority while creating crisis for humanity, such as that which the people of Argentina are suffering today. We demand that our countries maintain their own regulatory investment regime, accepting only those investments which contribute to the development of their peoples and the creation of decent work. Foreign investment must not denationalize our economies or destroy the national heritage, and it must operate according to performance requirements. Free trade agreements must make the rights of enterprises accountable to national laws, respecting the free movement of people and not only of capital and markets. We demand a universal minimum wage and the respect of universal conventions of the ILO. The investment of public funds should got to social benefit and not to volatile activities like the maquilas which harm people and their environment. It should go to investments in small-scale projects, especially for women and indigenous peoples.
We call for the conservation of biological and genetic resources. We firmly reject the introduction of genetically-modified seeds because destroy life. It is necessary to re-value the prices of primary products and promote the food security of peoples. We urge comprehensive agrarian reforms with access to land and investment in traditional agriculture.
We demand the protection of internal markets and national enterprises development strategies. We reject the imposition of products and prices by the multinationals. We demand immediate lifting of trade and tariff barriers and an end to the dumping of agricultural products on poor countries. We demand the financing of trade related capacity building, and more fair and equitable trade rules.
With respect to systemic issues, we affirm that the prevailing neo-liberal framework undermines sustainable development, and fails to address the needed reform of the system of global economic governance. Developing countries must have equal voice and vote in standard-setting and economic decision-making processes. These processes should ensure the effective participation of civil society organizations representing diverse sectors and interests, including workers', women's and indigenous and rural peoples organizations. Efforts to address recurrent financial crises have been inadequate and ineffective. We call for a new and stable global economic and social system. All stakeholders must commit to put in place debt workout mechanisms that uphold the following principles: neutral decision-making. protection of debtors' basic needs, co-responsibility of debtors and creditors, transparency and civil society participation. Developing countries must have the right to chose their own capital accounts and exchange rate regimes. Those countries under crisis must regain their autonomy to implement macroeconomic policies appropriate for recovery. Furthermore, all countries should have the right to implement policies which de-emphazise export-led development in favor of domestic demand-driven growth, regional integration and cooperation. We support the call for the adoption and implementation of a UN Convention on Corruption and the transfer of illegally acquired wealth to the countries of origin. Stakeholders must commit to the implementation of progressive taxation systems.
For us to be convinces that the financial institutions are ready to change, they must demonstrate this with concrete actions. Without imposing any conditionalities, they must help the people of Argentina to overcome the crisis which their policies have produced.
Madam President, these are our demands and proposals to attain an alternative economic model which puts people in the center of development.
Finally we criticize the lack of access of NGOs to the official process. Unlike past UN Conferences where we were aloud to participate actively. This is a cause of serious concern because it demonstrates a lack of transparency and trust.
Thank you very much.
Statements at the Conference