| April - June 1999
Welcome to the Bulletin Board on "Changing Consumption and
        Production Patterns"!This page provides selected information on projects, initiatives,
        suggestions, and ideas for making consumption and production patterns
        more sustainable.
 If you have any information on innovative policy instruments, a new
        publication or web-site related to "Changing Consumption and
        Production Patterns", a relevant business initiative, or any other
        idea or suggestion, do not hesitate to make it available to us. If we consider that the information is of general interest, we will
        post it on this page, or elsewhere on the Consumption and Production
        website. This Bulletin Board will be updated on a bi-monthly basis. Please send your inputs to Oleg
        Dzioubinski, Division for Sustainable Development, United Nations,
        Two UN Plaza Room DC2-2284, New York NY 10017, USA. Tel: +1 212 963 1859
        Fax: +1 212 963 4260 
         Germany's Karstadt launches ethical shopping initiativeKarstadt, Germany's second largest department store chain, has begun
        promoting foodstuffs from producers in developing countries in an effort
        to encourage consumers to make more ethical shopping decisions. Under
        the initiative Karstadt is buying coffee, tea, cocoa, orange juice,
        bananas and honey at above market prices to boost the producers' income,
        through a Cologne-based association devoted to helping the producers (TransFair).
        For example, Karstadt is paying TransFair $1.33 for a pound of coffee,
        or around 27 cents more than the current market price.
 As part of the promotion campaign, Karstadt has enlisted the support
        of Environment Minister Juergen Trittin of the Green party and featured
        women from Africa plugging the products. Flyers informing consumers
        about the Karstadt-TransFair arrangement are also handed out at the
        chain's stores. According to the head of Karstadt's environmental policy
        office, the campaign has been well received by the public, as the
        TransFair products currently make up about two percent of the group's
        $1.06 billion in food sales. For its part, TransFair ensures that the extra revenue generated by
        the higher prices goes to the producers in developing countries. Apart
        from improving their own quality of life, the producers often help to
        finance the building of schools and other important infrastructure,
        according to TransFair. The association also notes that more than half
        of the coffee and tea which it sells is organically grown. For further information, please contact Karstadt in Essen, Tel: +49
        201 727 1. Source: http://www.tomorrow-web.com/
        (June 1, 1999) Results American Survey on EnergyA national public opinion survey in the United States released on June
        3, 1999 confirms that most citizens believe renewable energy and energy
        efficiency should be given priority for federal energy funding and that
        nuclear power and fossil fuels should be the first technologies subject
        to budget cuts. Furthermore, by large margins, the public favors
        inclusion of provisions to promote sustainable energy technologies and
        consumer disclosure in federal electric utility restructuring
        legislation, and opposes having electricity customers pay for nuclear
        plants. Finally, Americans overwhelmingly support federal tax incentives
        to encourage the use of renewable energy in electricity production and
        to stimulate the purchase of energy-efficient automobiles, homes, and
        heating and cooling systems.
 The above are key findings from the survey, "America Speaks Out
        on Energy: Funding Priorities, Electric Utility Restructuring, and Tax
        Incentives" conducted for the Sustainable Energy Coalition by
        Research/Strategy/Management, Inc.of Sterling, Virginia from May 10-18
        among a sample of 1,029 Americans.The Sustainable Energy Coalition is a
        coalition of 35 national business, environmental, consumer, and energy
        policy organizations founded in 1992 to promote a shift in federal
        energy priorities away from nuclear and fossil fuels and towards
        renewables and energy efficiency. Copies of the 50-page survey are available for $15 (pre-paid). For
        more information, please contact Ken
        Bossong, Sustainable Energy Coalition, 315, Circle Avenue, #2,
        Takoma Park, MD 20912-4836, Tel: 301 270 22 58, Fax: 301 891 28 66. Source: SUN DAY Campaign, Sustainable Energy Coalition, June 3, 1999. Publication on Food Consumption and Traveling in SwedenIn her doctoral dissertation (1999), Ms. Annika Carlsson-Kanyama of the
        Department of Systems Ecology of Stockholm University analyzes how
        consumption patterns in Sweden affect the environment. One of the
        objectives of the thesis, which includes six separate papers, is to
        develop per capita environmental accounts for consumption patterns and
        to propose ways to evaluate such accounts. The author applies these
        methods to the analysis of food consumption and traveling patterns in
        Sweden, with a particular emphasis on energy use and greenhouse gas
        emissions. The thesis also proposes alternative scenarios for projecting
        future food consumption and traveling patterns, their environmental
        consequences, and measures required to make them more sustainable.
 In her analysis of travel behaviour, the author calculates per capita
        "accounts" for travel-related energy use and CO2 emissions.
        She then evaluates current accounts against a benchmark quota calculated
        on the basis of ecosystems' capacity to produce goods and services, and
        the principle of equity among current and future generations. The thesis
        thereby distinguishes travel accounts from population categories based
        on age, gender, and income. The main conclusion of these travel studies is that most population
        categories in Sweden use far more energy for travel than allowed by a
        sustainable quota, and that there are significant differences among age,
        gender, and income groups. The projections of future travel patterns
        indicate that more resource efficient vehicle technology alone will not
        be enough to meet sustainability goals, and that more substantial
        lifestyle changes would be needed. Ms.Carlsson-Kanyama applies Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods in
        her analysis of food consumption patterns. Per capita accounts for
        various food products are based on the calculation of greenhouse gas
        emissions, energy use, and other environmental impacts occurring in the
        life cycle. The author also examines how distances between consumers and
        producers have increased. Food consumption patterns that comply with the
        sustainability quota are composed of local grains, vegetables and small
        amounts of meat. Source: Annika Carlsson-Kanyama, Consumption Patterns and Climate
        Change: Consequences of eating and traveling in Sweden, Doctoral thesis
        in Natural Resources Management, Department of Systems Ecology,
        Stockholm University, Stockholm 1999. For more information, please contact Ms. Annika
        Carlsson-Kanyama, Natural Resources Management, Department of
        Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Sweden, Tel: +46 8 764 74 63,
        Fax: +46 8 15 84 17.
 UN Guidelines for Consumer Protection: The Road Ahead
 The Indian Consumer Unity and Trust Society (CUTS) initiated a programme
        two years ago to analyse the implementation of the UN Guidelines for
        Consumer Protection in India. The programme began with the objective to
        produce a comprehensive report on the state of the Indian consumer which
        would further provide inputs to a consumer policy statement. The
        analysis was done within the framework of the five sections of the UN
        Guidelines for Consumer Protection that address eight consumer rights,
        namely to basic needs, safety, choice, information, consumer education,
        redressal, representation, and a healthy environment.
 The basic approach was to document the legislative and administrative
        framework that existed in the country to protect each of these eight
        rights. These frameworks were further examined to point out lacunae and
        strengths. A detailed analysis of implementation was also undertaken.
        Under each of these rights, possibilities and processes for improvement
        were suggested. Drawing on the experience gained while conducting the
        above study, CUTS prepared a draft "Toolkit
        for operationalisation of the UN Guidelines for Consumer
        Protection" incorporating administrative and legislative
        prescriptions. In addition to the sections dealing with the above eight rights, the
        Toolkit also includes a section on the new components on sustainable
        consumption that have been incorporated in the Guidelines and recently
        passed by the UN Commission on Sustainable Development. The Toolkit also
        suggests measures to operationalise these new areas that will become
        part of the UN Guidelines for Consumer Protection after it is passed by
        ECOSOC and the General Assembly. The above study and Toolkit proposal
        were discussed and debated in various meetings during the 7th session of
        the Commission on Sustainable Development, and were generally well
        received. The Toolkit is an open document meant for review and
        improvement through inputs from all possible sources. In fact, a column
        for comments has been provided specifically for this purpose. Subject to availability of funds, CUTS plans to take this work
        forward by organising skillshare and training workshops in South Asian
        countries with respect to the methodologies used in the study, and to
        facilitate civil society groups in the South Asian region in preparing
        similar studies for country reports on implementation. CUTS also wants
        to continue with lobbying work at all levels for better implementation
        of the Guidelines and to involve other groups in the process. With these
        country reports and expert opinion as inputs, CUTS intends to facilitate
        the development of toolkits and model laws, and to act as a
        clearinghouse of information on status of implementation in the
        countries of the region. The study on implementation of the Guidelines was supported by a
        grant from the Consumer Welfare Fund, Ministry of Food and Consumer
        Affairs, Government of India. Any individual, organisation, government,
        or inter-governmental body interested in further information or willing
        to collaborate in any manner in this process are requested to contact
        Rajat Chaudhuri, Coordinator Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS),
        3B Camac Street Calcutta, Pin - 700 016, India, Tel: 91-33-229
        7391/229-2786, Fax: 91-33-249 6231, E-mail: cutscal@vsnl.com,Website:
        www.cuts-india.org [under construction]. New Consumers: A discussion with Professor Norman MyersThe topic "New Consumers" was discussed at a recent
        "Electronic Conference" held on the website of the
        International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). The debate
        was facilitated by Professor Norman Myers, one of the world's leading
        thinkers on environmental economics, and author of the 1998 publication
        "Perverse Subsidies: Tax $s Undercutting Our Economies and
        Environments Alike" (see News and Trends June-July 1998). "The
        New Consumers" will also be the title of Dr. Myers' next major
        book, to be published next year.
 Numerous reports to date have highlighted present consumption
        patterns and their harmful environmental effects. For example, a 1997
        report (Goodwin et al.) points out that since 1950 the global economy
        has quintupled, consumption of grain, beef, and lamb has almost tripled,
        while paper consumption has risen six times. The same report illustrates
        that the combustion of fossil fuels has grown nearly four times, and
        carbon emissions likewise since 1950. Inequality on a worldwide scale in the use of resources needed for
        production and consumption has also been at the forefront of the
        international debate on consumption patterns. The 1998 "Human
        Development Report" by the United Nations Development Programme
        notes for example that "Americans spend more on cosmetics ($8
        billion annually) and Europeans on ice cream ($11 billion) than the
        estimated cost of providing basic education ($6 billion) or water and
        sanitation ($9 billion) to the more than 2 billion people worldwide who
        are forced to go without schools and toilets". At present, increasing attention is being paid to the implications of
        the 800 million consumers in affluent nations being joined by 800
        million new affluent consumers in developing and transitional economies.
        In 1998, Americans, with one twentieth of the global population,
        contributed one quarter of the emissions of carbon dioxide in the global
        atmosphere. Their 270 million people accounted for more emissions than
        China's 1.2 billion people. However, if China goes ahead with its plan
        to build 20 coal-fired power plants per year, then by the year 2020 it
        will emit more carbon than all the OECD nations put together (Ehrlich
        and Ehrlich, 1996). Similarly, if China's per-capita consumption of beef, currently only
        4 kgs. per year, were to match the United States' 45 kgs., and if the
        additional beef came from feedlots, this would take almost 350 million
        tons of grain, equivalent to the entire United States grain harvest. If
        China were to seek extra animal protein through seafood at the
        per-capita level of Japan, it would need 100 million tons, more than
        today's entire ocean fish catch (Brown et al., 1999). The Electronic Conference discussed whether the new consumers could
        be enabled to engage in more sustainable consumption patterns, and what
        these consumers could learn from both the mistakes and positive
        experiences of the affluent nations in order to keep their environmental
        impacts at acceptable levels. The Conference also considered how far the
        established affluent consumers could be persuaded to adopt more
        sustainable lifestyles which could serve as models for the new
        consumers. Source: Websites: http://iisd.ca/susprod/newbackground.htm;
        http://iisd.ca/susprod/newconsumers.htm;
        and http://iisd.ca/susprod/newquestions.htm. Smart GrowthDr. Peter Newman, Professor at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia,
        recently launched his book "Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming
        Automobile Dependence", co-authored with Jeff Kenworthy, in the
        White House. "Smart Growth' is defined as the set of policy options
        that relates the reshaping of urban growth to transportation priorities.
        Urban sprawl follows freeways and beltways, whereas more compact urban
        development and revitalization of older areas in cities tend to be
        associated with development of public transit systems.
 On the basis of research on urban development patterns in a global
        sample of 44 cities - twelve cities each in the United States and
        Europe, six each in Canada and Australia, and eight in Asia, the authors
        conclude that "smart growth" is becoming an international
        trend. Metropolitan areas everywhere are beginning to reverse their
        historic trend towards sprawl. Densities are increasing or have stopped
        decreasing after a century of decline in all but two cities in the
        sample. This is happening mainly because cities are revitalizing older
        areas more than building on the urban fringe. Australian and New Zealand
        cities, for example, have in some cases doubled their central area
        populations in a decade, and their inner areas are now the most desirabe
        places to live and work. Drs. Newman and Kenworthy mention several reasons for positive trends
        in achieving "smart growth" in the world's cities. The
        principle "if you build it they will come" appears to hold
        true for transportation infrastructure: cities building beltways have
        sprawled, cities emphasizing transit have not. In addition, one of the
        underlying forces for sprawl, the need for large expanses of land for
        manufacturing, is declining. Jobs are increasingly being created in
        information-related services. Moreover, according to the authors, the political and environmental
        limits of car-based urban sprawl in the US and elsewhere are being
        reached. Cities require "smart growth" for many other reasons,
        including reducing greenhouse gases, facilitating the new economy, and
        saving landscapes. The autors point out, however, that one of the main
        reasons is the common desire to rebuild community. Finally, there is
        also an economic dimension to car-based sprawl. Data show that cities
        that prioritize freeways and sprawl spend a much higher proportion of
        their resources on transportation (12 to 16% of gross regional product),
        whereas cities which prioritize transit and more compact development
        spend a much lower proportion of their wealth on transportation (4 to 8%
        of gross regional product). Peter Newman and Jeff Kenworthy, Sustainability and Cities:
        Overcoming Automobile Dependence, Island Press, Washington D.C./Harcourt
        Brace, Sydney, 1999. For more information, please contact Professor Peter
        Newman, Director, Institute for Science and Technology Policy,
        Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Tel: 61 89 360 29 02, Fax:
        61 89 360 64 21.
        Peter Newman is also Visiting Professor in City and Regional Planning at
        the University of Pennsylvania (Tel (215) 573 79 77 or 898 83 29; Fax
        (215) 898 57 31). Drinking Water Campaign in UkraineDrinking water quality in Ukraine is adversely affected by the pollution
        of surface and groundwater resources. Though the slowdown in some
        industrial activities has led to a decrease in emissions of some
        pollutants, problems in waste water purification and sewerage systems
        tend to offset the "positive" environmental effects of the
        economic situation. Water leakages occur on a regular basis because of
        deteriorating water pipes, thereby contributing further to reduced
        availability of clean drinking water.
 Consumers' access to water is often interrupted because of general
        water scarcity problems. Consumers often enhance this problem by
        wasteful water consumption. Since households are not equipped with water
        meters, consumers have no incentive to economize on water use. For the above reasons, the NGO MAMA-86 has launched a campaign on
        consumption, supply, and distribution of drinking water in Ukraine.
        MAMA-86 conducts research on the quality of drinking water made
        available to consumers and its health impacts, monitors drinking water
        quality changes, and searches for alternatives to the centralized
        drinking water supply. The NGO also raises awareness at the grass-root
        level about the relation between clean drinking water and health, and on
        ways to consume water more efficiently. In addition, MAMA-86 conducts
        consumer surveys on awareness and knowledge about drinking water quality
        and sources among consumers in Ukraine, and on the extent to which
        consumers relate water quality to health problems. A recent example is a
        sociological study undertaken by MAMA-86 in five Ukrainian cities and
        towns. One of MAMA-86's long-term objectives is to influence the
        government's drinking water policy, which would include tightening of
        national standards on drinking water, adopting a law on drinking water,
        implementing the existing national programs on water supply, and
        rehabilitating surface water sources. These measures all presuppose the
        re-allocation of the budget resources in accordance with those new
        priorities. As a short term solution to the drinking water quality
        problems, MAMA-86 encourages local communities to install additional
        water purifying techniques. These citizen-run purification devices which
        service small entities such as hospitals and kindergartens, can be
        maintained with the support of consumers associations or clubs. For more information, please contact Yelena
        Panina. Journal of Industrial EcologyThe Journal of Industrial Ecology is an international, multidisciplinary
        quarterly designed to promote both understanding and practice in the
        emerging field of industrial ecology. It is edited by the Yale
        University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies and published by
        The MIT Press.
 Industrial ecology is a rapidly growing field that examines local,
        regional, and global material and energy uses and flows in products,
        processes, industrial sectors, and economies. It focuses on the role of
        industry in reducing environmental burdens throughout the product life
        cycle from the extraction of raw materials and energy, to the production
        and use of goods, to the management of the resulting wastes. Industrial ecology is ecological in that it places human activity in
        the larger context of the biophysical environment from which we obtain
        resources and into which we place our wastes, and looks to the natural
        world for models of efficient use of resources, energy, and by-products.
        Industrial ecology sees corporations as key players in the protection of
        the environment, particularly where technological innovation contributes
        to environmental improvement. The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses topics including material
        and energy flow studies, technological change, dematerialization and
        decarbonization, life cycle planning, design and assessment, extended
        producer responsibility, product-oriented environmental policy, and
        eco-efficiency. The Journal welcomes submissions in various editorial departments.
        The "Forum" section publishes papers related to the policy and
        strategic implications of industrial ecology as well as the conceptual
        development of the field. The "Applications and
        Implementation" section contains articles describing practices
        based on industrial ecological principles. The journal also has a
        "Research" section including articles that report findings
        from primary research of a more traditional academic nature. Finally,
        the "Book Reviews" section contains reviews of current
        publications related to industrial ecology. For more information, please visit the journal's website at http://mitpress.mit.edu/JIE. Mission PossibleNew ways are needed to communicate the challenge of sustainable
        consumption. Mission Possible is a 10 minute video which takes a fresh
        look at the issue and profiles examples of success. Commissioned by the
        Norwegian Ministry of the Environment and made by North-South
        Productions in association with the International Institute for
        Environment and Development (IIED), Mission Possible opens with a
        graphic presentation of the global consumption challenge. It then
        presents two pioneering examples of change.
 The first is the Mumbai Grahak Panchayat, a consumer cooperative in
        India which serves more than 100,000 people with high quality, locally
        produced food, at prices lower than conventional sources and with
        important environmental benefits. The video then turns to the role of
        the business sector, and profiles the flooring manufacture Interface in
        the UK and the way it is closing the waste loop and reinventing its
        products with sustainability in mind. Mission Possible is available from IIED Bookshop at £10, plus VAT
        where relevant and postage and package: E-mail bookshop@iied.org.
        For more information about IIED's work on sustainable consumption and
        trade, please contact Nick Robins
        or Sarah Roberts, or have a
        look at the website http://www.iied.org/scati. Ecological Footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica, and the
        NetherlandsThe "Ecological Footprint" (EF), was defined some years ago by
        Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees as the total amount of ecologically
        productive land required to support the consumption of a given
        population, wherever that land is located. The central metaphor of the
        EF is an important reason for its popularity: the expression of the
        impact of human consumption as a footprint on the land.
 Some feel the EF is an interesting indicator of sustainable
        consumption and production patterns, since it reflects relocation of
        environmental pressure to other countries, consumption of resources, and
        impacts of the use of renewable resources, trade, and changes in
        consumption patterns. Though the EF has already been calculated at different scales by
        several organisations, work on the indicator is still in an exploratory
        stage and has also received criticism from various corners. Problems
        associated with the EF are the aggregation methods used and the lack of
        commonly accepted methodologies. Concerns have also been expressed on
        how land productivity (i.e. land use per unit of production) is used in
        international comparisons. The use of "ecological deficits and
        surpluses" indicating the extent to which a country is able to
        supply itself with resources such as food and timber, or relies on
        "net imports of land" is also controversial. In a recent article, the National Institute of Public Health and the
        Environment (RIVM) in the Netherlands applies the EF to four different
        countries, Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica, and the Netherlands. The authors
        analyze how the EF changed over time from 1980 to 1987 to 1994. Based on
        a review of EF literature, the authors modified the orginal methodology
        for some elements. They focus on individual components of the EF (land
        and carbon dioxide emissions) instead of the aggregated EF. The authors
        also use local yields to calculate land use, instead of using global
        averages. Although per capita and total land use differ greatly among
        the four countries, available data suggests increases in total land use
        over time in all four countries while per capita land use decreases. The
        EF for carbon dioxide emissions increases for all four countries, both
        in per capita and absolute terms. The authors discuss potentials and limitations of the EF as a
        sustainable development indicator. The EF can be relevant for policy
        making if the indicator is part of a larger set of sustainable
        development indicators. One of the advantages of the EF is that it can
        encourage policy makers to consider effects of national consumption and
        production patterns on other countries, and provides an interesting
        basis for discussing environmental effects of consumption patterns as
        well as international equity in resource use. The authors point out that the interpretation of the EF is more
        ambiguous for international comparisons than for use at the national
        level. They also suggest that the per capita EF seems more appropriate
        for communicative purposes than the EF expressed in absolute terms. D.P. van Vuuren, E.M.W. Smeets, and H.A.M. de Kruijf, The Ecological
        Footprint of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands, RIVM,
        Bilthoven, The Netherlands. For more information, please contact D.P.
        van Vuuren, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment,
        PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 30 2742046, Fax:
        +31 30 2744435. 
 UNEP's activities on sustainable consumption
 UNEP's activities on sustainable consumption began in 1998, with the
        objective of developing a better understanding of the driving forces
        behind consumption patterns. Better insight into those forces can
        contribute to cost-effective and environmentally sound improvements in
        products, services, and infrastructure.
 In carrying out these activities, UNEP collaborates with business and
        industry, governments, international organizations, consumers, and civil
        society. An example of such a partnership is the joint organization with
        the Carl Duisberg Gesellschaft of the International Business Forum on
        Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns, to be held in Berlin,
        13-15 October 1999. The Forum will build upon the outcomes of the 7th
        session of the Commission on Sustainable Development and is intended to
        give participants from both industrialized and developing countries an
        opportunity to exchange information and experience in promoting
        sustainable consumption, and to develop new strategies in this field.
        Participants will be top level representatives from industry and
        business, business associations, development and environmental agencies,
        and consumer protection organizations. Issues discussed will include product and process innovation, such as
        eco-design and life cycle management, and the promotion of sustainable
        consumption by the information and communication sector, including
        advertising and marketing strategies. The Forum will also address the
        role of business as consumer and producer, and will look into supply
        chain management, green procurement, and the role of wholesale and
        retail industries. Other topics covered will be ways to promote
        sustainable consumption at the sectoral level, for example through codes
        of conduct and voluntary agreements, and globalization and changing
        international business conditions. UNEP has launched an initiative to explore how the advertising
        industry can contribute to the sustainable consumption agenda. Together
        with the UN Division for Sustainable Development, UNEP organized an
        International Expert Meeting on Advertising and Sustainable Consumption
        in Paris in January 1999. The meeting identified concrete
        recommendations on what can be done and who should be involved. More
        information on the sustainable consumption activities of UNEP's Division
        of Technology, Industry and Economics is available on the web page http://www.unepie.org In addition to highlighting the various initiatives underway, the
        UNEP web site provides a listing of other sustainable
        consumption-related web sites. Of particular interest is a topical
        overview of internet resources on sustainable consumption compiled by
        the UNEP Working Group on Sustainable Product Development. The complete Kabelvåg workshop report 'Consumption in a
        Sustainable World' and the CEE CAP report 'Impacts of Economic
        Globalisation and Changes in Consumption and Production Patterns' can be
        downloaded. More information is also available from: Sustainable Consumption
        Activities, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Division of
        Technology, Industry and Economics 39-43 Quai Andre Citroen, 75739 Paris
        CEDEX 15, France, Tel: (+33-1) 4437 14 50, Fax: (+33-1) 4437 14 74,
        E-mail: unepie@unep.fr . EU-US Consumer Dialogue to Look at Food and TradeThe Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) was formed in September 1998
        by consumer groups in the European Union and United States. The first
        formal activity of the TACD was preparing commentary on the
        Transatlantic Economic Partnership (TEP) Action Plan, which is part of
        the 1995 New Transatlantic Agreement between the United States and the
        European Union. TACD formally presented its comments on the TEP at the
        United States-European Union governmental summit held in Washington DC
        in December 1998.
 The second session of the TACD was held in Brussels on April 23-24
        1999. This conference, attended by some sixty European and American
        consumer representatives, aimed at developing a series of common
        positions on food safety, electronic commerce and international trade
        and standards. Some of the 21 recommendations of the Conference, based on a broad,
        transatlantic consensus among European and American consumer
        organisations, relate to sustainable consumption. In the area of food,
        recommendations addressed views on genetically modified organisms (GMO's),
        the use of bovine growth hormone and dietary supplements, and nutrition
        labelling. With regard to GMO's, TACD calls upon the governments of the
        United States and the European Union to establish effective and
        mandatory government approval systems for human health, safety, and
        enviromental protection. Goverments are also urged to require mandatory
        labelling of all genetically engineered foods and ingredients based on
        complete traceability of GMO's throughout the entire production,
        processing, and distribution chain. Consumer participation in the
        setting of international food standards in the Codex Alimentarius and
        the WTO, as well as application of the precautionary principle for
        protection of public health, safety, or the environment are also
        stressed in the recommendations on food. Under recommendations on trade, the TACD calls for application of
        international social, environmental, health and safety, and consumer
        protection rules to companies operating internationally, and welcomes
        the development of voluntary fair trade labelling. Finally, for
        autosafety standards, the TACD opposes any harmonization of motor
        vehicle and environmental standards that would merely integrate existing
        national standards or reduce the level of protection provided by any
        existing national standards. The TACD Secretariat is based at the Consumers International Office
        for Developed Economies in London.  For more information, please
        contact Nadia Chelafa in CI's London Office , E-mail: tacd@consint.org
        .Sources: World Consumer, No 232/March 1999, published by Consumers
        International, and Website: www.tacd.org
        .
 
 Factors 4 and 10 in the Nordic Countries
 The Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21, adopted at
        the Earth Summit + 5 in June 1997, refers to the importance of
        undertaking studies of efficiency improvements in resource use.
        Industrialized countries in particular are encouraged to increase their
        resource productivity by a factor 4 in the next two to three decades,
        and by a factor ten in the long run. In response, the Nordic Council of
        Ministers prepared a study on "Factors 4 and 10 in the Nordic
        Countries". This study was presented at the seventh session of the
        Commission on Sustainable Development as a contribution to the
        implementation of the International Work Programme on Changing
        Consumption and Production Patterns.
 The goal of the study was to identify opportunities and obstacles in
        the implementation of factor 4 and 10 targets at the sectoral level in
        four Nordic Countries. The report includes case studies on the transport
        sector in Denmark, the forestry sector in Finland, the real estate and
        building sector in Norway, and the food supply chain in Sweden. For each
        sector, the report analyzes the extent to which it is possible to
        implement eco-efficiency targets of factor 4 and 10. It then examines
        the role governments could play in promoting achievement of these
        targets, and how business and industry, academics, NGOs, and consumers
        could participate in this endeavour. The study considers various options
        for behavioural change, ranging from the introduction of new
        technologies, to radical changes in consumption and production patterns. The approach used in the case studies is still relatively new, the
        case studies are not comprehensive, and the approaches used differ
        slightly among sectors. The results should therefore be considered as
        exploratory. More comprehensive and detailed models and methods need to
        be developed for assessing the long-term impacts of the sectoral
        activities under consideration. The studies conclude that it would be
        difficult to reach the factor 4 target in two to three decades (i.e.
        2030) and the factor 10 target in the long run (i.e.2050) without
        considerable changes in individual and social values as well as
        regulatory regimes. For example, the Danish case study concludes that though it would be
        possible to reduce material and energy consumption as well as CO2
        emissions in the transport sector, substantial changes would be needed
        for achieving factor 4 and 10 goals within the above mentioned
        time-frame. They include changes in expected service from the transport
        system, in the organisation of related production processes, and in
        daily consumption patterns. According to the report, governments have an important role to play
        in implementing eco-efficiency strategies and factor 4 and 10 targets.
        The measures suggested in the case studies include a mix of economic,
        legal, and social instruments, and additional measures aimed at
        enhancing R&D. The report also stresses the importance of
        participation of all partners, including business, industry and trade,
        academics, NGOs, authorities at all levels, and consumers. For more information about this report, please contact the Nordic
        Council of Ministers, Store Strandstraede 18, DK-1255 Copenhagen, Tel:
        +45 3396 0200, Fax: +45 33 96 02 02. Sustainable Community IndicatorsWhat is a sustainability indicator? How do I know if my community is
        making progress towards becoming a sustainable community? Is there a
        right indicator for my community? How do I know if an indicator is
        really measuring sustainability? What is a sustainable community anyway?
 These questions are addressed in the 2nd edition of the "Guide
        to Sustainable Community Indicators". Like the first edition,
        published in 1995, the updated 1999 edition is for communities trying to
        build a better future. The audience includes people working on community
        economic development, grassroots activists, municipal and state agency
        staff, nonprofit organizations, and local businesses. The intent of the
        guide is to explain both sustainability and indicators, and to encourage
        the reader to begin to use indicators or improve indicators already in
        use. Like the first edition, the new edition is written to be easily
        understood and used by individuals at the community level. It explains
        concepts such as community capital and pressure-state-response
        indicators, has expanded information on the key issues of consumption,
        carrying capacity, and population, and includes indicators for topics
        including business, production, recreation, land use, and
        transportation. It also provides detailed examples of good
        sustainability indicators, explains how to identify good sustainability
        indicators for your community, and has a updated list of almost 700
        indicators being used by communities of all sizes. If you are interested in ordering this publication, please ask for an
        order form from Hart Environmental Data, PO Box 361, North Andover, MA
        01845, USA, E-mail: mhart@tiac.net,
        Website: http://www.subjectmatters.com/indicators. Research on Green Consumption and Public Voluntary Programs at
        the Center for the Study and Improvement of Regulation (CSIR)The Center for the Study and Improvement of Regulation (CSIR) is a new
        research center in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at
        Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburg, United States. CSIR's objective
        is to develop and promote strategies for improving regulatory processes
        at the federal, state and local levels.
 CSIR aims at developing more democratic, transparent, and flexible
        incentive structures and institutional arrangements, and at improving
        the integration of scientific knowledge into decision making processes.
        In carrying out its research activities, the CSIR draws on public values
        and preferences. Elements of the Center's research program include
        analyses of how institutions can learn from experience; examination of
        mechanisms for setting goals and priorities and for improving decision
        making processes; development of regulatory structures reflecting
        scientific knowledge; and exploration of alternative risk management
        strategies and institutions. CSIR's research activities also include work on green consumption and
        product ecolabelling. Ecolabels offer firms the opportunity to inform
        consumers that a labelled product is more environmentally friendly than
        other products in the same category, thereby allowing for product
        differentiation. Though firms are generally looking for ways to
        differentiate their products in order to defend or increase their market
        shares, many firms are opposed to the development of ecolabels. One of
        the objectives of CSIR's research work will be to increase understanding
        of corporate strategies vis-a-vis ecolabelling, in order to facilitate
        development of policies for improved design and use of ecolabels. Since the beginning of the nineties, ecolabelling programs have been
        implemented at the national and international level. Around twenty
        ecolabelling schemes are either under developent or already in place in
        a variety of OECD countries as well as in China, Brazil and India. In
        1992, the European Union issued a regulatory framework for the creation
        of an ecolabeling scheme. CSIR's research started with the experience
        from the European Union, and will be progressively expanded to include
        experience from the United States and evidence on other types of
        instruments, including quality-standards and other public environmental
        programs. For more information, please contact: Alain
        Nadai, CSIR/EPP, Carnegie Mellon University, 129 Baker Hall,
        Pittsburgh, PA-15213-3890, Tel 00 1 412 268 8099, Fax 00 1 412 268 3757.
 Contribution of Major Groups to Sustainable Consumption and
        Production
 For the seventh session of the Commission on Sustainable Development,
        the Stockholm Environment Institute prepared a background paper on
        "Case Studies on The Role and Contribution of Major Groups to
        Promoting Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns", in
        cooperation with the Division for Sustainable Development.
 The report includes 28 case studies on how the nine major groups of
        Agenda 21 contribute to sustainable consumption and production. The
        paper demonstrates the importance of the contributions of major groups
        in promoting sustainable development. The case studies focus on the five
        elements of the Commission's International Work Programme on Changing
        Consumption and Production Patterns. Examples involving women groups include solar electrification
        projects carried out by the Vietnam Women's Union, and a agroforestry
        project in Nicaragua undertaken by CARE-Denmark. Business and industry
        activities case studies include a Waste Recycling and By-product Synergy
        Scheme (STM Microelectronics, France), a Zero Emissions Project (Golden
        Hope Plantations, Malaysia), an Eco-Efficient Printing Process (Beacon
        Press, UK), and a By-Product Synergy project (Chaparral Steel Company,
        USA). For more information about the project, please contact Johannah
        Bernstein of the Stockholm Environment Institute, Rue du Taciturne,
        50, Brusseles, 1040 Belgium, Tel: +32-2-230 6589, Fax: +32-2-230 9530. Hard
        copies can be obtained from Alejandro
        Carpio, Division for Sustainable Development, United Nations, Two UN
        Plaza Room DC2-2258B, New York NY 10017, USA. Tel: +1 212 963 4606 Fax:
        +1 212 963 4260. Previous versions of
        "News and Trends" News and Trends
        February-March 1999 News and Trends
        December 1998-January 1999  News and Trends
        October-November 1998  News and Trends
        August-September 1998  News and Trends
        June-July 1998    |