REPRESENTATION OF MAJOR GROUPS IN NATIONAL
COUNCILS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
|
Institutional |
Chapters 23-32 |
Response |
1. Indicator
(a) Name: Representation of Major Groups in
National Councils for Sustainable Development.
(b) Brief Definition: The composition of national stakeholders in
sustainable development, including groups representing non-govermental
organizations (NGOs), academia, business, media, and grassroots
organizations.
(c) Unit of Measurement: The number of members representing major
groups in national councils for sustainable development, as a proportion
of the total.
2. Placement in the Framework
(a) Agenda 21: Chapters 23-32: Strengthening
the Role of Major Groups.
(b) Type of Indicator: Response.
3. Significance (Policy Relevance)
(a) Purpose: The indicator identifies the
involvement of major groups in institutional mechanisms that have been
created at the national level for the implementation of sustainable
development.
(b) Relevance to Sustainable/Unsustainable
Development: The genuine involvement and participation of all social
groups in decision making is critical to the achievement of sustainable
development. The participation of major groups through their
representation on national councils for sustainable development is one of
the ways of ensuring their involvement in decision making.
(c) Linkages to Other Indicators: Other
institutional indicators that are closely linked to this one include
national councils for sustainable development, and representatives of
ethnic and indigenous people in national councils for sustainable
development.
(d) Targets: Not available.
(e) International Conventions and Agreements:
Not available.
4. Methodological Description and Underlying
Definitions
(a) Underlying Definitions and Concepts:
Agenda 21 has distinguished nine major groups: Women, Trade Unions,
Children and Youth, Business and Industry, Indigenous People, Local
Authorities, NGOs, Scientific and Technological, and Farmers.
National councils for sustainable developments can
have a multitude of names: commission, committee, round table, forum, task
group or otherwise. Two types can be distinguished. Multi-sectoral bodies,
who's members include representatives from government agencies, NGOs,
academic and research institutions, the productive sector, and others.
This last sector includes both representatives from workers' unions and
organizations as well as companies and enterprises. Secondly, primarily
governmental initiatives consist largely of representatives of often more
than one ministry or governmental agency, and may include partial
participation of NGOs and other civil society groups.
(b) Measurement Methods: The information
needed for the composition of the Directory of National Councils of
Sustainable Development was gathered through contacts with United Nations
country missions, United Nations Development Programme regional offices,
embassy attaches, members and advisers of the Earth Council,
non-governmental organizations and national government officials. Contact
was made through letters, telephone calls and faxes.
(c) The Indicator in the DSR Framework:
Representation of major groups in national councils reflects a societal
Response to sustainable development.
(d) Limitations of the Indicator: The
information provided is still basic and does not necessarily reflect the
effectiveness of the participation of major groups in the process of
policy making within national councils. There may be other channels
through which major groups can participate in decision making related to
sustainable development, particularly at the local level. The type of
national council, its mandate, and the process of selecting members will
vary considerable among countries.
(e) Alternative Definitions: Not available.
5. Assessment of the Availability of Data from
International and National Sources
(a) Data Needed to Compile the Indicator:
The membership compositions of national councils for sustainable
development
(b) Data Availability: The data are limited.
Information is pending for most African countries, although updates have
been received for several countries after the printed edition of the
Directory Of National Councils for Sustainable Development was released.
This information can be accessed on the Internet, in which all new data
are incorporated.
(c) Data Sources: The Directory of National
Councils for Sustainable Development, 1st edition, April 1995, Earth
Council.
6. Agencies Involved in the Development of the
Indicator
(a) Lead Agency: The lead agency is the New
Economics Foundation, with the following contact point: Indicators
Programme Coordinator, fax no. (44 171) 377 5720.
(b) Other Organizations: Other organizations
include: the Earth Council in collaboration with the World Resources
Institute, and the Natural Resources Defence Council.
7. Further Information
Earth Council. Directory of National Councils for
Sustainable Development. 1st edition, April 1995.
REPRESENTATIVES
OF ETHNIC MINORITIES AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN NATIONAL COUNCILS
FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT |
Institutional |
Chapter 23-32 |
Response |
1. Indicator
(a) Name: Representatives of Ethnic
Minorities and Indigenous People in National Councils for Sustainable
Development.
(b) Brief Definition: If existing national councils for sustainable
development includes one or more representatives of ethnic minorities
and/or indigenous people.
(c) Unit of Measurement: Yes/no.
2. Placement in the Framework
(a) Agenda 21: Chapter 40: Information for
Decision Making.
(b) Type of Indicator: Response.
3. Significance (Policy Relevance)
(a) Purpose: This indicator determines the
participation by ethnic minorities and indigenous people in a country's
sustainable development planning and decision-making processes.
(b) Relevance to Sustainable/Unsustainable
Development: This indicator is relevant to sustainable development
from the following perspectives: (i) the overall emphasis of Agenda 21 on
broad-based participation in implementing and monitoring sustainable
development; (ii) capitalizing upon and further develop ethnic and
indigenous knowledge to reduce negative environmental, social, and
economic impacts of development strategies and plans; and (iii) increasing
participation of ethnic and indigenous people at the national level.
(c) Linkages to Other Indicators: Topical
linkages exist under such issues as land use, biodiversity, sustainable
agriculture, hazardous waste, human settlements and health. Linkages with
specific indicators include representatives of major groups in national
councils for sustainable development, sustainable development strategies,
and national councils for sustainable development.
(d) Targets: There are no existing
international targets to observe whether or not ethnic or indigenous
representation on national councils exists. An immediate target could be
to have at least one such representative in each national council. The
appropriate number of representatives should preferably reflect the ratio
of ethnic and indigenous people in the national population. This could
prompt a government to decide on a ratio of representation by population
as a measurement of this indicator.
(e) International Conventions and Agreements:
The following conventions and agreements are relevant to this indicator:
Human Rights Commission (HRC) 1995/28, 1995/32, and from the Economic and
Social Council 1992/256 of 20 July 1992; General Assembly Resolution
49/214 December 1994 on the International Decade of Indigenous Peoples
(particularly article 19d which "encourages governments to support
the decade by establishing national committees or other mechanisms
involving Indigenous People to ensure that the objectives and activities
of the decade are planned and implemented on the basis of full partnership
with Indigenous people."); Draft Declaration of the Rights of the
Indigenous People; and Convention No. 169 Concerning Indigenous and Tribal
Peoples in Independent Countries.
4. Methodological Description and Underlying
Definitions
(a) Underlying Definitions and Concepts: An
indigenous population are "peoples in independent countries who are
regarded as indigenous on account of their descent from the populations
which inhabited the country, or a geographical region to which the country
belongs, at the time of conquest or colonialisation or the establishment
of present state boundaries and who, irrespective of their legal status,
retain some or all of their own social, economic, cultural and political
institutions." (Convention 169). Ethnic minorities are people who
retain customs, habits, creeds, and institutions which distinguish them
from the rest of national society. A national council for sustainable
development is a body established to coordinate implementation of Agenda
21 at the national level. Experience to date shows that national councils
established so far are composed of representatives from national agencies
and in some cases non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and other major
groups.
(b) Measurement Methods: Currently there is
no mechanism that systematically takes stock of the composition of the
national councils in terms of ethnic and indigenous representation.
However, the on-going work of a non-governmental consortium of the
National Resources Defence Council (NRDC), World Resources Institute (WRI),
and the Earth Council provides information on the existing national
councils and their membership when the information is available.
(c) The Indicator in the DSR Framework:
Having ethnic and indigenous people or their representative in national
councils for sustainable development recognizes the contribution
Indigenous Peoples are making towards achieving sustainable development.
In the DSR Framework, the indicator is one of Response.
(d) Limitations of the Indicator: This
indicator will be difficult to quantify in many countries. It does not
reveal anything about the quality of the inputs of ethnic or indigenous
people, or the impact of their participation. The selection criteria will
vary from country to country.
(e) Alternative Definitions: Other potential
indicators of the participation of ethnic and indigenous people in
sustainable decision making could be the number of appointments to
relevant decision making positions, or the existence of networking and
capacity-building programs for ethnic and indigenous people.
5. Assessment of the Availability of Data from
International and National Sources
(a) Data Needed to Compile the Indicator:
Information on existing national councils and comparable government
institutions; and their composition.
(b) Data Availability: National reporting
and independent studies executed by NGOs such The Directory of National
Commissions on Sustainable Development compiled by World Resources
Institute, Earth Council, and Natural Resources Defence Council.
(c) Data Sources: Indigenous peoples,
national governments, and major ethnic groups.
6. Agencies Involved in the Development of the
Indicator
(a) Lead Agency: The lead agency is the
United Nations Department of Policy Coordination and Sustainable
Development (DPCSD). The contact point is the Director, Division of
Sustainable Development, DPCSD; fax no. (1 212) 963 4260.
(b) Other Organizations: The indicator will
be further developed in cooperation with the United Nations Environment
Programme, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, the United Nations
Commission on Human Rights, United Nations Centre for Human Settlements,
the International Labour Office (ILO), The World Bank, national councils,
indigenous and ethnic networks.
7. Further Information
(a) Further Readings:
Declaration of Principles of Indigenous Rights.
ILO, Convention No. 169: Concerning Indigenous and
Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries.
1994: International Year of the Family.
The United Nations Draft Declaration on the Rights
of Indigenous Peoples .
International Decade of the World's Indigenous
People.
Initiating Project for the United Nations'
International Decade of the World's Indigenous People.
(b) Other Contacts:
The Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources (CIER),
Canada.
Coordinating Body for the Indigenous Peoples
Organizations, Ecuador.
Earth Council, Costa Rica.
Indigenous Development International, England.
Indigenous Law Institute, USA.
Indigenous World Association, USA.
International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs,
Denmark.
Natural Resources Defence Council, USA.
New Economics Foundation, U.K.
Rainforest Foundation International, USA.
Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Sarawak), Malaysia.
Support Group of Indigenous Peoples (KWIA),
Belgium.
UNAAQ, Canada.
World Council of Indigenous Peoples, Canada.
World Resources Institute, USA.
CONTRIBUTION OF
NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT |
Institutional |
Chapters 23-32 |
Response |
1. Indicator
(a) Name: Contribution and role of
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that represent one or more major
groups in sustainable development.
(b) Brief Definition: The number of NGOs that represent one or more
major groups involved in the development, implementation and/or monitoring
of national strategies for sustainable development.
(c) Unit of Measurement: Number of groups.
2. Placement in the Framework
(a) Agenda 21: Chapters 23-32: Strengthening
the Role of Major Groups.
(b) Type of Indicator: Response.
3. Significance (Policy Relevance)
(a) Purpose: This indicator shows the level
of participation in sustainable development by major groups represented by
NGOs.
(b) Relevance to Sustainable/Unsustainable
Development: The genuine involvement and participation of all social
groups in decision making is critical to the achievement of sustainable
development. Chapter 23 of Agenda 21 calls for broad public participation
in decision making as a fundamental prerequisite for the achievement of
sustainable development. Chapter 27 advocates strengthening the role of
non-governmental organizations as partners for sustainable development in
a participatory democracy. The credibility of NGOs lies in the responsible
and constructive role they play in society. Governments are encouraged to
consult NGOs and establish mechanisms to ensure their participation in
decision-making processes at the national level.
(c) Linkages to Other Indicators: This
indicator is linked to other institutional measures including sustainable
development strategies, national councils for sustainable development, and
representation of major groups in national councils for sustainable
development.
(d) Targets: No targets exist for this
indicator.
(e) International Conventions and Agreements:
Not available.
4. Methodological Description and Underlying
Definitions
(a) Underlying Definitions and Concepts:
Major groups are distinguished by Agenda 21 as follows: Women, Trade
Unions, Children and Youth, Business and Industry, Indigenous People,
Local Authorities, NGOs, Scientific and Technological, and Farmers.
Participation is defined by the Human Development Report 1993 as follows:
"Participation means that people are closely involved in the
economic, social, cultural and political processes that affect their
lives...Participation...is an essential element of human
development."
(b) Measurement Methods: There is no
institutionalized measurement method for this indicator, but surveys such
as the one that has recently been carried out by the Commission on
Sustainable Development (CSD) could serve this purpose. The CSD Survey of
Major Groups has been sent to over 1100 NGOs and major group organizations
around the world. One section of the survey enquired which major group(s)
are represented in the NGO and which formal relationships it has with
several international bodies, including UN agencies. The third section
focused on the respondent's activities related to the individual chapters
of Agenda 21. The fourth and, for this indicator, most relevant section
contained detailed questions about the level and type of participation of
the respondent in national sustainable development strategies, and the
reasons, if applicable, why the respondent did not take part in these.
Further measurement methods could be the
investigation of participatory mechanisms in constituencies of both
governments and NGOs, and/or national reports related to sustainable
development reporting.
(c) The Indicator in the DSR Framework: The
indicator assesses the Response activities that are undertaken by major
groups, and particularly by their NGO representatives with respect to
sustainable development.
(d) Limitations of the Indicator: The main
limitation of this indicator is that measurement by surveys relies
entirely on the response to those surveys, which is unlikely to yield
representative samples on an individual country basis.
(e) Alternative Definitions: Mechanisms
established by government for the participation of NGOs at any stage in
national strategies for sustainable development, for example, in receiving
and commenting on drafts of national reports. Adopting this alternative
indicator would put the emphasis rather on the opportunities national
authorities create for NGOs to participate instead of the use that Major
Groups make of those opportunities.
5. Assessment of the Availability of Data from
International and National Sources
(a) Data Needed to Compile the Indicator:
The data needed for this indicator are twofold: first, which NGOs
represent major groups; and second, in what way are these NGOs
participating in national strategies for sustainable development.
(b) Data Availability: Currently no data are
available on a regular basis.
(c) Data Sources: The CSD represents a
potential source of data.
6. Agencies Involved in the Development of the
Indicator
(a) Lead Agency: The lead agency is the New
Economics Foundation, with the following contact point: Indicators
Programme Coordinator, fab no. (44 171) 377 5720.
(b) Other Organizations: Other organizations
include the CSD.
7. Further Information
Not available.
|