Home
About Us

-

National Sustainable Development Strategies

-

Indicators of Sustainable Development
Calendar
Documents
News/Media
Links

 

UN DESA |  UN Economic and Social Development | Contact Us |  FAQs |  Site Index | Site Map |  Search

 

   Indicators of Sustainable Development

 

United Kingdom

FIRST INTERIM REPORT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM FOR THE TESTING OF CSD INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

February 1997

Introduction

The United Kingdom is very keen to support the work of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) in its work to develop a set of indicators for use in national reporting on progress. At the Second International Workshop "Launching the Testing of the Indicators of Sustainable Development" held in Ghent (Belgium) on 20-22 November 1996, the UK agreed to participate in the testing of the CSD menu of indicators. This report sets out the organizational and implementation arrangements, as specified in the suggested Timetable.

    1. Organizational arrangements

      Organization with responsibility for overall coordination:
      Department of the Environment

      The focal point for the exercise is:
      Mr. Chris Morrey
      Environment Protection Statistics and Information Management Division
      Department of the Environment
      Romney House
      43 Marsham Street
      London SW1P 3PY
      United Kingdom
      Tel.: +44 171 276 8421
      Fax: +44 171 274 8748
      E-mail:
      cmorrey.epsim@gtnet.gov.uk

      Other contact point:
      Ms. Victoria Harris
      UK MIS
      1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
      New York, N.Y. 10017
      Tel.: 212 745 9200
      Fax: 212 745 9316

    2. Consultation arrangements

      The UN Commission has stressed that there should be consultation during the testing phase, to ensure that the indicators command wide acceptance and credibility. In the United Kingdom, there are already a number of mechanisms in place through which the Government consults or receives advice on sustainable development. The United Kingdom is also developing its own indicators, and has in place working groups and consultation mechanisms for the national indicators. Rather than set up additional mechanisms for the CSD exercise, our view is that it is more appropriate to use the existing bodies. The main ones are:

        • The Government Round Table on Sustainable Development - an independent body comprising senior representatives of non-governmental organizations, businesses and local authorities, to advise Government on policies to achieve sustainable development (see Annex A for membership).
        • The Environmental Statistics Advisory Group - comprising researchers, representatives of regulatory Agencies, non-governmental organizations, business and local authorities; this is a technical working group which advises on information, publications and statistical research (see Annex A for membership).
        • The Information Development and Liaison Group - comprising representatives of local authority associations and central government departments. Their primary role is to exchange views about exchange of information between central and local government.
        • The Indicators Working Groups - comprising representatives of central government departments, local authorities, regulatory agencies, non-governmental organizations and technical and scientific experts. Their primary function is to develop the national indicators.

    3. Implementation

      It is envisaged that the work will be carried out in three phases, as suggested in the guidelines.

      a. Selection of the indicators to be tested. The list of indicators suggested by CSD will be reviewed against the priorities set out in the UK National, against the existing national set of indicators and proposals for their amendment, and against availability or feasibility of collection of data. On this basis, the most appropriate indicators will be selected to be included in the test. The groups above will be consulted about the choice of indicators. It is anticipated this phase will be complete by the end of June 1997. Opportunities for twinning with other countries will also be considered, and this may influence the choice of indicators to be selected.

      b. Evaluation of the indicators to be tested. This phase will consist of drawing together the data to evaluate the indicators selected. In many cases, it is anticipated that data will be available from existing sources. The feasibility and cost of collecting data for other indicators will be assessed. It is anticipated that this phase will be complete by September 1997.

      c. Reporting. The final phase will be to produce a report, including the indicators themselves, and commentary about the values/trends, particularly in relation to nationally or internationally agreed targets/commitments. The report will also include commentary on the relevance, construction, ease of collection etc. of the individual indicators. It is anticipated that this phase will be complete by mid-1998. A substantive report on progress will be made to DPCSD in November 1997.

    4. National work on indicators of sustainable development

      The United Kingdom published a preliminary set of Indicators of Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom in March 1996 (ref). The Indicators will be available on the Internet by the end of March 1997 (site address: http://www.open.gov.uk/doe/epsim). Following a period of public consultation, a working group is being established to review the indicators, with a view to publishing a revised set in the Autumn 1998. The CSD menu of indicators will be used during the review process, to ensure that the CSD and national indicators correspond as closely as possible. UK experience in devising its own indicators will also usefully feed into the CSD testing exercise.

    5. Next progress report

      The guidelines suggest a further report at the end of March 1997, but given the timetable above and the need to consult on the selection of indicators, it is unlikely that there will be further substantive progress to report. We therefore propose to report at the end of phase 1 above, at the end of June.

      Report compiled by:
      Mr. Chris Morrey
      Focal point
      Department of the Environment
      20 February 1997

    Annex A
    Membership of Government Round Table on Sustainable Development
    Friends of the Earth
    English Nature
    Council for the Protection of Rural England
    World Wide Fund for Nature UK
    Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
    International Institute of Environment and Development
    Going for Green
    Local Agenda 21 Steering Group
    Dept. Of Geography, University of Cambridge
    Powergen
    Northern Foods plc
    Membership of Environmental Statistics Advisory Group
    Department of the Environment
    Department of Transport
    Department of Trade and Industry
    Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
    Scottish Office
    Welsh Office
    Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland
    Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution
    Environment Agency
    Local Government Management Board
    South East Region Planning Conference
    Lancashire County Council
    Building Research Establishment
    National Radiological Protection Board
    National Environmental Technology Centre
    Institute of Terrestrial Ecology
    Soil Survey and Land Research Centre
    Institute of Hydrology
    Water Services Association
    Countryside Commission
    Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    World Wide Fund for Nature
    Friends of the Earth
    British Trust for Ornithology
    UK Centre for Environmental and Economic Development
    New Economics Foundation
    Confederation of British Industry
    BOC Group Lancaster University
    Birbeck College London


    Report submitted by United Kingdom to the Workshop on the CSD Indicators of Sustainable Development
    hosted by the Government of the Czech Republic,
    in Prague from 19-21 January 1998

    Testing of the UN Comission on Sustainable Development (UN/CSD) Indicators of Sustainable Development

    Progress Report by the United Kingdom - January 1998

    1. Summary

    The work on the UK Pilot is being carried out in three phases, according to the guidelines.

    Phase I: Selection of the UN/CSD indicators to be tested in the UK.

    Phase II: Evaluation of the indicators to be tested.

    Phase III: Reporting to UN/CSD.

    A considerable number of organisations both within and outside Government have been consulted during the course of the UK pilot so far (see Annex A). Phase I has been completed and a provisional list of 51 indicators have been selected for testing (see Annex B). Work relevant to Phase II for many of the selected indicators is well advanced, but there is a considerable amount of work still to be done for the formal and systematic evaluation and reporting process. This will be completed in 1998.

    2. Introduction

    The UN Commission on Sustainable Development is developing a set of indicators for use in national reporting on progress towards sustainable development and the UK has agreed, along with a number of other countries, to participate in the pilot testing of the UN/CSD menu of indicators. This report sets out the organisational arrangements and the progress to date of the UK Pilot. It will be presented at the Workshop for piloting countries in Prague on 19-21 January 1998.

    3. Consultation arrangements

    The UN Commission has stressed that there should be consultation during the testing phase, to ensure that the indicators command wide acceptance and credibility. In the United Kingdom, there are already a number of mechanisms in place through which the Government consults or receives advice on sustainable development and on sustainable development indicators. Rather than set up additional mechanisms for the UN/CSD exercise, we have used and will continue to use existing bodies. The main groups used so far are:

    • The Indicators Advisory Groups - comprising representatives of central government departments, local authorities, regulatory agencies, non-governmental organisations and technical and scientific experts. Their primary function is to advise on the development of the next set of national indicators.
    • The Indicator Sub-Group of the UK Round Table on Sustainable Development - an independent body comprising senior representatives of non-governmental organisations, businesses and local authorities, to advise Government on policies to achieve sustainable development.

    A list of organisations which are members of the Advisory Groups are given in Annex A. Other groups we also intend to consult are:

    • The Environmental Statistics Advisory Group (ESAG) - comprising researchers, representatives of regulatory Agencies, non-governmental organisations, business and local authorities; this is a technical working group which advises on information, publications and statistical research.
    • The Central and Local Intelligence Partnership (CLIP) - comprising representatives of local authority associations and central government departments. Their primary role is to exchange views about exchange of information between central and local government.

    4. National work on indicators of sustainable development

    The United Kingdom published a preliminary set of Indicators of Sustainable Development for the UK in March 1996 following a commitment in the 1994 UK Sustainable Development Strategy. The Indicators are available on the Internet site address: http://www.environment.detr.gov.uk/epsim/indics/index.htm. Following publication, an extensive consultation process has been undertaken, involving experts, users and potential users of the indicators in the UK and overseas. In 1998, the Government intends to publish a revised Sustainable Development Strategy, together with a revised set of indicators, many of which will be linked to targets. The UN/CSD menu of indicators is being used during the process of revising the indicators, to ensure that where appropriate the UN/CSD and national indicators correspond as closely as possible, and also to fill some of the gaps in the UK 1996 indicator package (e.g., the lack of coverage of social dimension of sustainable development). It is hoped that the UK experience in devising its own indicators will also prove useful input to the UN/CSD testing exercise.

    5. Progress to date on the UK Pilot

    Phase I: Selection of the UN/CSD indicators to be tested in the UK

    Work to develop and refine the UK national set of indicators of sustainable development is being carried out by seven advisory groups of experts from both within and outside government. Each group is dealing with different families of indicators (e.g., water indicators, wildlife and habitat indicators, land use, waste indicators, etc.), although there are many overlapping issues. These same groups were tasked to review the full list of UN/CSD indicators and to recommend which might be included in the UK Pilot. A considerable number of different organisations have representatives on these advisory groups. These organisations are listed in Annex A.

    Each of the groups has produced recommendations for the UK Pilot. The UN/CSD indicators have been reviewed against: the priorities set out in the UK National Strategy2; the 1996 national set of indicators and early proposals for their amendment; and the availability or feasibility of collection of data. Consideration was also given to some indicators covering issues which were more relevant to sustainable development in some other UN countries than to sustainable development in the UK (e.g., arable land per capita, access to safe drinking water, etc.). In addition a few indicators were included which the groups’ experts thought might benefit from further study, development or possible refinement (e.g., changes in land condition, and net investment share in GDP which might be extended to cover other components of GDP). Following the groups’ deliberations a provisional list of 51 UN/CSD indicators have been selected for inclusion in the UK Pilot. These are given in Annex B and a summary of these indicators is given in Table 1 below.

    Table 1 Summary of UN/CSD Indicators provisionally selected for the UK Pilot

    Numbers of indicators

       

    UN/CSD aspects of sustainable development

    Economic

    Environmental

    Social

    Institutional

    Total

    Total UN/CSD indicators

    23

    55

    41

    15

    134

    Those selected for UK pilot

    9

    28

    12

    2

    51

    of which:
    Directly relevant to the UK

     

    7

     

    26

     

    8

     

    -

     

    45

    More relevant to other UN countries

    2

    2

    4

    2

    10

    Number with closely related indicators in 1996 UK publication

     

    5

     

    20

     

    4

     

    -

     

    29

    From the table it can be seen that the majority (ie 41) of the 51 indicators are of direct relevance to the UK Sustainable Development Strategy and 29 indicators are the same as or closely related to one of the indicators included in the UK’s first 1996 publication. In addition, 10 indicators were included because of their wider applicability in other countries. Most of the indicators selected were Environmental, Economic or Social indicators. There was very little support for the Institutional indicators from the UK consultees and so, as a result, only two of these indicators have been selected for the UK Pilot.

    Phase II: Evaluation of the indicators to be tested

    Considerable progress has been made during 1997 by the advisory groups and final reports covering the key sustainable development issues for the UK and recommended sets of indicators for the next UK Strategy will be completed in early 1998. Work will then start to collate data and to develop the national indicators. The groups’ reports and recommendations will be used to help the national consultation exercise on the new Strategy and we are also proposing to organise a Workshop in early May 1998 to provide a broader review of the groups’ recommendations. The second phase of the pilot consists of drawing together UK data to evaluate the selected UN/CSD indicators and will benefit considerably from the work being carried out on the next national set of indicators. In many cases, it is anticipated that data will be available from existing sources and, as has been noted above, 29 of the selected indicators are closely related to those included in the UK’s first package so the pilot will build on this work. Where data does not exist the feasibility and cost of collecting the data will be assessed and recommendations will be made on the feasibility of the indicators.

    Phase III: Reporting to UN/CSD

    The final phase will be to produce a report, including, where practical, the indicators themselves and commentary about the values/trends, particularly in relation to nationally or internationally agreed targets/commitments. The report will also include commentary on the relevance, construction, ease of collection, etc. of the individual indicators and, if appropriate, recommendations for further development or refinements. It is anticipated that this final phase will be complete by the end of 1998.

    6. Prague Workshop

    The Prague Workshop will provide an opportunity for comparing the selection of indicators in the UK with that in other piloting countries, and for learning rom the experiences of other countries in evaluating the indicators.

    Report compiled by:

    Mr. John Custance
    UK Focal point
    Environment Protection Statistics and Information Management Division
    Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
    Room A121, Romney House
    43 Marsham Street
    LONDON SW1P 3PY
    United Kingdom
    Tel.: +44 171 276 8421
    Fax: +44 171 274 8748
    E-mail: John.Custance@nfp-gb.eionet.eu.int


    List of Organisations represented on the UK Advisory Groups

    Annex A

    Central Government

    Department for International Development (DfID)

    Department of Health (DoH)

    Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR)

    Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)

    HM Treasury

    Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF)

    Office for National Statistics (ONS)

    Scottish Office

    Local Government

    Chichester DC

    Crawley Borough Council

    Lancashire County Council

    Local Government Management Board (LGMB)

    Scottish Local Agenda 21 Coordinating Network (SLACN)

    Somerset County Council

    South Gloucestershire Council

    Other Organisations

    Audit Commission

    British Geological Survey (BGS)

    British Trust for Ornithology (BTO)

    Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CESERGE)

    Council for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE)

    Countryside Commission

    English Nature (EN)

    Environment Agency (EA)

    Environmental Services Association (ESA)

    Environmental UK Plc

    Farming and Rural Conservation Agency

    Forestry Commission

    Forum for the Future

    Friends of the Earth

    Integrated Approach to Crop Research (IACR) - Rothamsted

    Institute of Hydrology (IH)

    Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE)

    Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC)

    Macaulay Land Use Research Institute

    National Environmental Technology Centre (NETCEN)

    New Economics Foundation (NEF)

    Plantlife

    Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP)

    Royal Society for the Protection of Bird (RSPB)

    Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA)

    Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH)

    University of Ulster

    Water Research Centre (WRc)

    World Wide Fund for Nature - UK (WWF - UK)

    Wye College

Quick Links

Report Submitted to the Fourth International Meeting on the CSD Indicators of Sustainable Development
 

Copyright © United Nations |  Terms of Use | Privacy Notice
Comments and suggestions
15 December 2004