CALENDAR OF EVENTS FROM THE UN SYSTEM ON INDIGENOUS ISSUES AND RELATED EVENTS

This Expert Group Meeting is being organized following a recommendation of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, approved by ECOSOC decision 2008/249, which authorized a three-day international expert group meeting on the implementation of Article 42 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and requested that the results of the meeting be reported to the Permanent Forum at its eighth session. The workshop will discuss the way in which the UNPFII should address its mandate under Article 42 of the Declaration.

The EGM will take place at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 14 to 16 January 2009 in conference room 5, and will start at 10 a.m. each day. It will be attended by indigenous experts and UNPFII members as well as interested Member States, UN Agencies and Indigenous Peoples' Organizations.

The Secretariat has received an unprecedented number of requests from indigenous peoples’ organizations to attend this meeting, which takes place in a room with limited capacity. Invitations have been extended to indigenous peoples’ organizations on a first come, first serve basis and the list of participating observers is now full. For this reason, the Secretariat is unable to issue further invitations or to admit organizations that do not have invitations.

Click here for further information and to view the documents of the meeting. 

This workshop is a collaborative effort between the United Nations University - Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS), Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (SPFII) and North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance.

The main objectives of the workshop are to consider:

· the effects of climate change on indigenous peoples;
· adaptation measures to climate change;
· carbon projects and carbon trading; and
· factors that enable or obstruct indigenous peoples’ participation in the climate change processes.

The Expert Group Meeting seeks to draw on the expertise of indigenous peoples, UNPFII members, relevant United Nations agencies, intergovernmental agencies, national and local governments, indigenous peoples' organizations, non-government organizations and academics that are active within the field of climate change.

SPFII has prepared a background paper. Climate Change an Overview

For information about the meeting, please contact the organizers:
Mr Sam Johnston United Nations University - Institute of Advanced Studies, email: johnston@ias.unu.edu

Ms. Sonia Smallacombe, Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, email: smallacombe@un.org

Mr Joe Morrison North Australian Indigenous Land & Sea Management Alliance (NAILSMA) Charles Darwin University, Darwin NT, email: joe.morrison@cdu.edu.au

For administrative arrangements, contact Ms. Rahera Noa, United Nations University - Institute of Advanced Studies, email: noa@ias.unu.edu

Click here to view the documents from the meeting 

This Expert Group Meeting is being organized in accordance with ECOSOC decision 2007/244, which authorized a three-day international expert group meeting on indigenous languages and requested that the results of the meeting be reported to the Permanent Forum at its seventh session.

In addition, the Permanent Forum stated the following in its report:

"Considering that 2008 is the International Year of Languages, the Permanent Forum recommends holding an expert group meeting on indigenous languages that will call upon States, the United Nations system and indigenous peoples and their organizations to consider the following elements:

(a) Working towards concrete actions and legislative development aimed at eliminating discrimination against the current use of indigenous languages;

(b) Developing programmes aimed at promoting the empowerment of indigenous languages through all mediums, including radio and television;

(c) Supporting and increasing the number of centres for the study of indigenous languages;

(d) Financing and supporting schemes for special projects that are formulated by indigenous peoples and are focused on revitalization and rescue of threatened languages;

(e) Designing, in consultation with indigenous peoples and the Permanent Forum, the organization of a world conference on linguistic diversity, indigenous languages, identity and education, as a contribution to the programme of the Second International Decade of the World’s Indigenous People."

The Agenda of the Meeting will be based on the above mentioned recommendation of the forum.

The EGM will be attended by indigenous experts, UNPFII members as well as interested Member States, UN Agencies, Indigenous Peoples' Organizatinos, AND Non-Governmental Organizations. Interested parties should contact the Secretariat about participating in the EGM as observers. Please note that space in the conference room is limited and the Secretariat may not be able to accommodate all requests for participation.

Contact: Broddi Sigurdarson (sigurdarson[at]un.org)

Click here to read more about the Meeting and to view the meeting documents.

Click here to view the documents from the meeting.

Some 80 persons participated at the workshop, including 13 Members of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, indigenous experts from the Pacific Region, Central and South America, Africa, the Arctic, North America, and the Russian Federation, representatives of 7 companies operating in the Russian Federation, representatives of the Government of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, the Government of the Russian Federation and the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, and representatives of national and international non-governmental organizations.

Click here to view the documents from the workshop

A. OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP

The Expert Group Meeting is intended to:

• Promote an opportunity to evaluate current negotiation and agreement-making practices in terms of effective participation of indigenous peoples and their ability to produce outcomes which adequately take into account indigenous peoples’ concerns and rights;
• Promote an opportunity to exchange information of ABS processes currently operating in various regions that take into account the rights of indigenous peoples;
• Promote an opportunity to formulate benchmarks for agreement-making and;
• Highlight good practice models;
• Identify gaps and challenges and a possible way forward.

B. PROPOSED THEMES FOR DISCUSSION

Four major themes of discussion are proposed as follows:

Theme 1: International Standards and policies on agreement-making with reference to indigenous peoples.

Theme 2: Areas in which indigenous peoples’ participation is relevant to any ABS arrangements.

Theme 3: Factors that enable or obstruct indigenous peoples’ participation in the CDB processes.

Theme 4: Good examples of indigenous participation in negotiating ABS processes in other arenas.

Click here to view the documents of the Expert Group Meeting

A. OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP

The Expert Group Meeting is intended to:

• Promote an opportunity to evaluate current negotiation and agreement-making practices in terms of effective participation of indigenous peoples and their ability to produce outcomes which adequately take into account indigenous peoples’ concerns and rights;
• Promote an opportunity to exchange information of ABS processes currently operating in various regions that take into account the rights of indigenous peoples;
• Promote an opportunity to formulate benchmarks for agreement-making and;
• Highlight good practice models;
• Identify gaps and challenges and a possible way forward.

B. PROPOSED THEMES FOR DISCUSSION

Four major themes of discussion are proposed as follows:

Theme 1: International Standards and policies on agreement-making with reference to indigenous peoples.

Theme 2: Areas in which indigenous peoples’ participation is relevant to any ABS arrangements.

Theme 3: Factors that enable or obstruct indigenous peoples’ participation in the CDB processes.

Theme 4: Good examples of indigenous participation in negotiating ABS processes in other arenas.

Click here to view the documents of the Expert Group Meeting

Migration, especially the movement of people across national borders, has risen to the top of the development agenda in recent years. This is a result of the recognition of the far-reaching development implications of migrant flows for both sending and receiving communities. A review by the Global Commission on International Migration (GCIM) has observed that migration has generally not been considered an integral component of the development agenda. While this neglect is evident across countries and various population groups, it is even more acute with respect to indigenous populations.

The SPFII, with the collaboration and assistance of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), is organizing a meeting to address some of the gaps in knowledge with respect to indigenous peoples and migration. It is expected that the conclusions and recommendations of this meeting will feed into discussions at the Fifth Session of the UNPFII in May and also provide inputs into the UN High Level Dialogue on International Migration in September 2006.

Click here for additional information about the workshop

The UN system and a significant number of its Member States have been gearing their programming at the national level for the achievement of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 18 targets and 48 indicators. The formulation of the Goals and the targets and indicators, however, did not include the participation of or consultation with indigenous peoples, thus resulting in a situation where the goals, targets and indicators do not capture or inadequately capture the situation of indigenous peoples. At its Fourth Session in 2005, the Permanent Forum stated that “…Poverty indicators based on indigenous peoples’ own perception of their situation and experiences should be developed jointly with indigenous peoples”

In order to assist in this effort, the Secretariat of the Permanent Forum is organizing a series of meetings of indigenous experts on indicators and seeks to build on the challenges, gaps, and existing work on global and regional indicators across the mandated areas of the Permanent Forum.

Click here to view the Meeting Report and the papers submitted at the meeting

The panelists of this session will present the political advances of women in the Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC) Region, the opportunities and challenges that they face, and the importance of adhering to a commitment to gender equality and women’s participation during the ongoing debates and transformation of the United Nations System and its role in development cooperation.

Organised by: UNIFEM and the Permanent Mission of Mexico to the United Nations for the GRULAC Missions

Chair:

H.E. Ms. Carmen María Gallardo Hernández, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, El Salvador; Chairperson, Bureau of the Commission on the Status of Women (fiftieth and fifty-first sessions)

Speakers:

Patricia Espinosa, President, National Institute of Women, MEXICO (INMUJERES)

H.E. Ms. Rosalyn Hazelle, Ambassador Plenipotentiary, Ministry of Industry and Commerce

Mirian Masaquiza, Associate Social Affairs Officer, UN Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, DSPD – DESA

Marijke Velzeboer-Salcedo; UNIFEM Chief Latin America and the Caribbean Section

For more information on this event please contact

Anabelle.lugo@unifem.org

This workshop was organized in accordance with the recommendation of the United
Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at its Fourth Session and as decided by
the Economic and Social Council at its substantive session of 2005(decision 2005/252).
The overall objectives of the workshop were:
1) Highlight the importance of indigenous representation in decision-making processes within the context of the MDGs and the Millennium Declaration overall, as well as the broader context of the current socio-economic and political transformations, the World Summit Outcome and the broader UN development agenda.

2) Examine linkages between indigenous presence in governance and other decision-making bodies at all levels and their impact on policy formulation and the conduct of public institutions.

3) Consider the interplay between indigenous economic and political participation and the development of indigenous communities and their economic empowerment, focusing on persisting barriers to indigenous entry into politics and public representative institutions in light of their economic empowerment in the past decades.

4) Propose strategies to advance indigenous participation through capacity-building, coalition-building and indigenous and gender-sensitive institutional policies, programmes and mechanisms.

Click here to view the Workshop Documents

The workshop was organized as follow up to the recommendations of the Permanent Forum (E/2005/43) and hosted by the UNICEF's Regional for Latin American and the Caribbean. The workshop was attended by 12 indigenous experts from various regions (Latin America, Asia, Pacific, Africa, North America, the Arctic and Russian Federation), representatives from 9 UN agencies, 2 members of the Permanent Forum and the Chairperson / Rapporteur of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations.

During the two and half day workshop, participants exchanged information and extensively discussed ways on how different United Nations entities working on traditional knowledge can better integrate a more collaborative, complementary and holistic approach to traditional knowledge in order to enhance better understanding of indigenous concerns and their possible solution. The outstanding quality of papers presented by indigenous experts were highly appreciated, they have substantively contributed towards the formulation of specific recommendations to the UN system and other inter-governmental organizations with a view to better integrating indigenous perspectives in their work on traditional knowledge. The report and recommendations were adopted by the workshop and will be submitted to the Fifth Session of the Permanent Forum.

View all of the papers from the workshop here

The workshop was organized as follow up to the recommendations of the Permanent Forum (E/2005/43) and hosted by the UNICEF's Regional for Latin American and the Caribbean. The workshop was attended by 12 indigenous experts from various regions (Latin America, Asia, Pacific, Africa, North America, the Arctic and Russian Federation), representatives from 9 UN agencies, 2 members of the Permanent Forum and the Chairperson / Rapporteur of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations.

During the two and half day workshop, participants exchanged information and extensively discussed ways on how different United Nations entities working on traditional knowledge can better integrate a more collaborative, complementary and holistic approach to traditional knowledge in order to enhance better understanding of indigenous concerns and their possible solution. The outstanding quality of papers presented by indigenous experts were highly appreciated, they have substantively contributed towards the formulation of specific recommendations to the UN system and other inter-governmental organizations with a view to better integrating indigenous perspectives in their work on traditional knowledge. The report and recommendations were adopted by the workshop and will be submitted to the Fifth Session of the Permanent Forum.

View all of the papers from the workshop here

This workshop was held at the International Conference on Engaging Communities in Brisbane Australia. Click here to view all of the Workshop Documents.

>>Guidelines for engagement with indigenous peoples

>>Background Paper: Engaging Indigenous Peoples in governance processes

This workshop was held at the International Conference on Engaging Communities in Brisbane Australia. Click here to view all of the Workshop Documents.

>>Guidelines for engagement with indigenous peoples

>>Background Paper: Engaging Indigenous Peoples in governance processes

The International Workshop on Methodologies regarding Free, Prior and
Informed Consent and Indigenous Peoples was convened in accordance with
Economic and Social Council decision 2004/287 of 22 July 2004, following a
recommendation of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at its third session.
The principle of free, prior and informed consent had been identified as a major
challenge by the Forum at its first, second and third sessions. In response to the
Council’s decision, the Workshop was held from 17 to 19 January 2005.
The Workshop was attended by 67 experts and observers from the United
Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations, Governments and
indigenous organizations. The Workshop examined the international and domestic
instruments and practices relevant to the principle of free, prior and informed
consent, heard examples of the application of the principle, identified challenges, and
made recommendations about free, prior and informed consent and indigenous
peoples.
In its conclusions and recommendations, the Workshop identifies elements of a
common understanding of free, prior and informed consent and indigenous peoples,
promoting better methodologies regarding free, prior and informed consent and
indigenous peoples for the consideration of the Forum at its fourth session.

Click here to view all of the Workshop documents 

The International Workshop on Methodologies regarding Free, Prior and
Informed Consent and Indigenous Peoples was convened in accordance with
Economic and Social Council decision 2004/287 of 22 July 2004, following a
recommendation of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at its third session.
The principle of free, prior and informed consent had been identified as a major
challenge by the Forum at its first, second and third sessions. In response to the
Council’s decision, the Workshop was held from 17 to 19 January 2005.
The Workshop was attended by 67 experts and observers from the United
Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations, Governments and
indigenous organizations. The Workshop examined the international and domestic
instruments and practices relevant to the principle of free, prior and informed
consent, heard examples of the application of the principle, identified challenges, and
made recommendations about free, prior and informed consent and indigenous
peoples.
In its conclusions and recommendations, the Workshop identifies elements of a
common understanding of free, prior and informed consent and indigenous peoples,
promoting better methodologies regarding free, prior and informed consent and
indigenous peoples for the consideration of the Forum at its fourth session.

Click here to view all of the Workshop documents 

The Workshop on Data Collection and Disaggregation for Indigenous Peoples
was convened in accordance with Economic and Social Council decision 2003/300,
following a recommendation of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at its
second session. Data collection was identified as an urgent priority by the Permanent
Forum on Indigenous Issues at both its first and second sessions. In response to the
Council’s decision the Workshop was held from 19 to 21 January 2004.

The Workshop was attended by 36 experts from the United Nations system and
other intergovernmental organizations, Governments, indigenous organizations and
academia. The Workshop discussed a number of case studies and examined
challenges and made recommendations concerning data collection and disaggregation
concerning indigenous peoples.

In its recommendations, the Workshop promotes better data collection and disaggregation concerning indigenous peoples for the consideration of the Permanent
Forum at its third session.

The Workshop on Data Collection and Disaggregation for Indigenous Peoples
was convened in accordance with Economic and Social Council decision 2003/300,
following a recommendation of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at its
second session. Data collection was identified as an urgent priority by the Permanent
Forum on Indigenous Issues at both its first and second sessions. In response to the
Council’s decision the Workshop was held from 19 to 21 January 2004.

The Workshop was attended by 36 experts from the United Nations system and
other intergovernmental organizations, Governments, indigenous organizations and
academia. The Workshop discussed a number of case studies and examined
challenges and made recommendations concerning data collection and disaggregation
concerning indigenous peoples.

In its recommendations, the Workshop promotes better data collection and disaggregation concerning indigenous peoples for the consideration of the Permanent
Forum at its third session.

This event was hosted by the NGO Committee on the Decade of the World's Indigenous Peoples (Mr. Roberto Mulato Borrero - Taino) and sponsored by this Committee, the Secretariat of the Permanent Forum, DPI and the American Museum of Natural History. It was opened by the Kahurangi Maori Dance Theatre from New Zealand, who performed a number of Maori dances and songs that conveyed traditional stories and beliefs, as well as the proud, warrior tradition of the Maori People. Their performance also highlighted the central place of Maori women in cultural expression, who performed their own elaborate dances and songs alongside the men.

El Grupo Cultural Nunkui from the Amazon region of Ecuador followed with a performance of their traditional dance to welcome visitors and greet strangers to their community. Ms Allison Warden from Alaska then performed a traditional Inuit dance, followed by some of her own contemporary songs about the struggle that many Indigenous Peoples experience when they try to establish their own identity and place in a multi-cultural society. Mr Roberto Borrero was inspired by the celebratory mood that prevailed, and gave an impromptu performance of a traditional Puerto Rican song of greeting to close the event.

This event was organized by the South Asia Indigenous Women's Forum and Nepal Tamang Women Ghedung, with support from IWGIA. It was facilitated by Ms Stella Tamang, and the panelists were Vicky Tauli Corpuz (Philippines), Leonor Zalabata (Columbia); and Lucy Mulenkei (Kenya). ps@tamang.wlink.com.np All too often indigenous women are the victims of many conflicts. Aggression, foreign occupation, ethnic and various forms of conflicts are an ongoing reality affecting indigenous women in all regions. Armed conflicts continue to occur in many parts of the world and have escalated over the last decade. Indigenous peoples have had their land snatched away, their resources robbed, their languages banned, their culture destroyed, their existence rejected and their fundamental rights denied.

All manner of conflicts gender conflicts, conflicts for civil and political rights, conflicts against colonization, globalization, national security, terrorism, armed conflicts subjugate indigenous women and girls. Exclusion, suppression, exploitation and a dearth of power are the harsh realities of indigenous women and girls. Rape of women and girls by parties to conflict which occur with impunity.

Prompted to take some action on the above concerns the South Asia Indigenous Women Forum SAIWF and Nepal Tamang Women Ghedung jointly organized the panel discussion on "IndigenousWomen and Peace Building", on May 22nd, 2003 at 13.00 hrs at United Nation as side event during the 2nd Session of UN Permanent forum On Indigenous Issues. The cost for the hall and the interpreters was supported by IWGIA. Indigenous women because of their practices, tradition and culture in resolving conflicts, were invited to discuss issues of peace building.

Stella Tamang of Nepal was the facilitator and the panelists were:

1. Victoria Tauli Corpuz
2. Lucy Mulenkei
3. Leonor Zalabata/Maria Eugenia Choque
4. Ms. Njuma Ekundanayo, Member, Permanent Forum
5. Mililani Trask, Vice President, Permanent forum Member

This side event was very successful and was attended by many indigenous women and men, state representatives and representatives of the UN Agencies. The panel discussion was very interactive and lively. It is regretted that Leonor Zalabata could not attend and Maria Eugenia presented on her behalf.

1. Formation of an Independent International Commission of Indigenous Peoples for the Mediation and Resolution of Conflicts based on traditional resources and methods for the handling and resolution of conflicts and provide assistance whenever requested by indigenous peoples.
2. Condemn the inhumane act in Democratic Republic of Congo because of which our indigenous sisters are suffering and dying and call for the immediate halt.
3. Condemn violence against indigenous women and girls and exercise due diligence to prevent, investigate and punish acts of violence against women, whether those acts are perpetrated by the State or by private persons.
4. Strengthen the role of indigenous women and ensure equal representation of indigenous women at all decision-making levels in national and international institutions which may make or influence policy with regard to matters related to peace-keeping, preventive diplomacy and related activities and in all stages of peace mediation and negotiations.
5. Take measure to reduce the excessive military expenditures including trade in arms, investment for arms productions and acquisition so as to permit the possible allocation of additional funds for social and economic development, in particular for the advancement of indigenous women.
6. Support, strengthen and promote the indigenous knowledge, tradition, customs and practices that contribute to conflict resolution.
7. Support and promote the implementation of the rights of self-determination of all peoples as enunciated, inter alia, in the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action by providing special programmes in leadership and in training for decision-making.
8. Offer adequate protection and assistance to indigenous women and children displaced and find solutions to the root causes of their displacement with a view to preventing it and, when appropriate, facilitate their return or resettlement.
9. Request Permanent Forum to consider Indigenous Women as the theme for its 3rd Session, 2004.

This event was co-hosted by UNESCO (UN Representative, Mr. Jones Kyazze) and Yachay Wasi (President, Mr. Luis Delgado) to celebrate World Day for Cultural Diversity for Dialogue and Development. Panelists included H.E. Mr. Gert Rosenthal (President, ECOSOC), Ms. Njuma Ekundanayo (Permanent Forum), and Commissioner Sayu Bhojwani (Major's Office of Immigrant Affairs, New York City).

To promote the linguistic heritage of humanity and raise awareness about the vast number of languages that are endangered, UNESCO, UN Works and the Discovery Communications Inc. joined forces to co-produce a documentary about nine of these languages and the people who speak them. The documentary is also being screened on the Discovery Channel to raise awareness about this issue with its 100 million viewers internationally. Following the screening of the short film, the participants heard from the panelists about the range of initiatives they are involved in to promote languages as a key means of safeguarding, transmitting and promoting cultural heritage. There was an opportunity for some questions and feedback from the participants. For more information, visit www.unesco.org and www.un.org/works

The event began with a mihi (acknowledgement of the history and genealogy of the world's beginnings and its relevance to the presentation) Three Maori representatives presented. The event was held in Conference room 2 with translation in Spanish and English. Dr Cathy Irwin, from the Kohanga Reo Trust (Language Nest Trust) gave a paper on the Reclamation and survival of the Maori Language in New Zealand today. Te Toki Black and Phillip Marshall both from the Kohanga Reo Trust, New Zealand, assisted Dr Irwin.

Four Maori also assisted with a waiata (song) after the presentation, they were, Adriana Edwards, a lecturer from Auckland Law School, Moana Sinclair from the secretariat for the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Sarah Smith from the New Zealand Mission to the UN and John Paki, Deputy Director from the Ministry of Maori Development, New Zealand. A background for the paper started with how the Maori Language Reclamation began, starting with Maori mothers and grandmothers taking back control of their children and grandchildren's education, The Reclamation of Maori Language Movement via the Kohanga Reo (Language Nest) from a time when Maori children were punished for speaking their mother tongue.

In forty years from the 1963 - 2003 Maori language reclamation contributed to,

• Nation building of Maori and non Maori
• Self - determination and Maori control and realization of the dreams of Maori ancestors
• The development of the existing leadership of elders;
• Development of policy on Maori issues, excluding ideas of assimilation or integration;
• Maori social theory, not deficit or cultural derivation theories;
• Initiatives that are authentic articulations of Maori knowledge which exist in Maori families, sub-tribes and tribes;
• The promotion of Maori becoming native speakers or fluent second language speakers;
• The harnessing of `the power of the people' through family development;
• A future so that Maori are able to sustain authentic intergenerational, lifelong learning for centuries to come.

Slides were shown on the overhead projector. The event was well-attended including New Zealand government officials. A Q and A was given after each presentation with participants and observers eager to share their experiences in their particular countries or organizations. A UNESCO representative attended and said it was an important project of UNESCO's to identify all languages under threat of being lost.

He talked of how the indigenous languages throughout South America were still being used in every day life, but that they as a people were for the most part dealing with literacy issues, also that he thought it was important to have literacy in both indigenous languages and the dominant language, so although their language was still the main language being used, they were concerned with the basics of getting a rudimentary education. Indigenous language in Ecuador is not a priority because its still being used a lot but in isolation, not in mainstream matters. They were concerned about getting more indigenous peoples educated in a general way.

The assistance they had from the government of Ecuador was limited in regard to assisting them with keep their indigenous language thriving. They said they needed specific programs. They noted also that many indigenous peoples speak Spanish and Spanish would override their indigenous language eventually and that already the indigenous language is becoming more and more a mix of Spanish and the indigenous language. They noted also that the Government was slow to incorporate their indigenous languages into the national education plan.

The two different presentations highlighted the gap between the developed and developing countries in terms of how to protect the human rights of indigenous peoples. What emerged was the international standard setting that is essential in order to address the gaps that exist between the developed and developing countries. When drawing conclusions it seems clear from the presentations, that in the process of being developed as is the category the New Zealand Maori fall into, the indigenous language is still under threat regardless of being from a developed country because such is the impact of the dominant culture and education and then in the experience of being an indigenous people from a developing country, indigenous languages are also under threat, because if one follows through the process of development as defined by a western paradigm, the people will at some point be educated into the western paradigm. It is a question of time before their language is lost, unless measures, programs, plans of action are put into place at the national level and monitored by international mechanisms such as the UN agencies work. Indigenous languages cannot be seen as separated out from other aspects of indigenous cultures, they are all inextricably linked.

This event was jointly hosted by the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe and Central Michigan University, who are working together on initiatives to integrate Indigenous science and knowledge into the mainstream education curriculum. Their common goal is to work collectively with Indigenous Peoples and mainstream educators to strengthen and validate Indigenous knowledge systems and research methodology within the education system at all levels. To further this goal, these two groups are jointly hosting an 'Indigenous Ways of Knowing Conference' to be held at both Michigan University and on the reservation in October 2003. For further information contact Wilma Henry at whenry@sagchip.org or Ms Lungie (Ivy) Goduka at goduk1in@cmich.edu.

After talking about their own education experience, or experience as teachers, the participants at this event agreed it would be beneficial to establish an Indigenous Educators Caucus and to have this group active for the PFIII. Some of the common areas of concern were the need for bilingual education for Indigenous students to reinforce identity, language and culture; the need for informal methods of teaching; and the importance of removing racism in all its forms from school curricula.

The Indigenous youth delegation from Newcastle (New South Wales, Australia) hosted this event to showcase the collaborative project they developed as a grassroots initiative to give voice to some of the issues facing Indigenous youth in their region. Delegates included Jason De Santolo (Umulliko, Indigenous Higher Education Research Centre, University of Newcastle (UoN), Joel Wenitong (Indigenous Health and Education Unit, UoN) and Astro Brim (Arwarbukarl Cultural Resource Centre).

They presented a brief documentary titled AwabakalYOUTHVISIONS: Intervention Report Brief which provided an overview of the history of the Awabakal community and discussed key Indigenous Youth initiatives including the School to Work Orientation Program (SWOP), the Experienced Hands Project and hip-hop music therapy workshops. A talking circle followed, allowing participants to discuss grassroots issues and insights raised in the presentation and from their own communities. A key component of the project involves taking a message back to the Awabakal (and wider) community about the Permanent Forum. This will take shape in the form of a brief documentary as part of a new media enhanced workshop presentation. It is hoped that this independent media strategy will form part of ongoing trilogy that enhances community voices and understanding of Permanent Forum outcomes. For further information, contact

Studio 4 was packed with indigenous journalists from the globe. Jose Borrero chaired the side event and presented the newspaper Indian Country Today, with an explanation of what the paper tried to achieve for native Indians generally. He described the content and the nature of the paper, stating that the paper tried to capture all issues important to indigenous peoples, employment, achievements, notices, announcements, and advertisements. The paper he said was not different to most papers, but focussed on indigenous peoples issues. He spoke also of the magazine Akwesasne, which is a publication from the American House in Cornell. He noted that this journal was devoted to serious articles on indigenous politics, issues, legalities in terms of the US context. He then asked the participants who were mainly indigenous journalists from print, radio, television or internet publications, to introduce themselves and to give a background of their respective journalism.

Many of the journalists talked of the need to have a strong indigenous network, which could link to mainstream media and that although there were many websites they are not really linked with the UN. A journalist noted that they wanted to be linked to the website that Moana Sinclair had coordinated in the first session of the Permanent Forum, 2002 www.indigenousmedia.org That the project of coordinating 4 indigenous journalists in the First Session of the Permanent Forum was an important achievement and that it should be strengthened and developed.

Mr. Miguel Alfonso Martinez, Chairperson-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations (WGIP), invited interested representatives of Member States, indigenous peoples and members of the Permanent Forum to participate in a discussion on new working methods for the WGIP. Participants were provided with a copy of the draft document produced by the WGIP Secretariat on new methods of work to stimulate discussion. The aim of the new working methods is to create a more inter-active dialogue between Working Group experts, governments and indigenous peoples, and thereby more effectively protect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples.

During the discussion amongst participants it was suggested that the WGIP should cooperate more closely with the human rights treaty bodies as they have produced important and concrete recommendations regarding indigenous peoples' rights in their concluding observations. The Secretariat of the WGIP informed participants that the OHCHR website on indigenous issues (www.unhchr.ch/indigenous/main) now has a section including "latest news" which provides up-dated information and advanced copies of most background documents of the WGIP.

This event examined how Indigenous Peoples can develop strategies for social and economic transformation through human rights based approaches and human rights education. The panel of experts consisted of Shulamith Koenig (People's Movement for Human Rights Education); Kathleen Modrowski (Anthropologist, Long Island University); Craig Mokhiber (Acting Deputy Director, OHCHR New York Office); and Clarence Dias (Institute of Law in Development).

It was noted there are development 'predators' and 'victims', with Indigenous Peoples tending to fall into the latter category. This disparity has been heightened by the process of globalization and the associated commercialization of the natural environment and traditional knowledge. However, existing human rights instruments can act as a shield against the further victimization of Indigenous Peoples. Rights based approaches that emphasis meaningful participation, accountability, non-discrimination, attention to vulnerability, empowerment and explicit linkage to international human rights instruments and standards offer the best hope of avoiding unintentional harm to Indigenous communities and fostering their true development.

Panelists stressed the importance of existing human rights legal instruments (such as the International Bill of Rights) as legally binding standards that Indigenous Peoples can use to bring governments to account. These instruments and standards can be incorporated into development plans and used as a vehicle for social transformation and empowerment, providing Indigenous Peoples are joint partners with governments and agencies in the development, implementation and monitoring of these plans. It was also noted that any education or development program will only be effective if it is inclusive of the rights, needs and aspirations of Indigenous Peoples and expressed in a language and terminology that they understand and relate to.

This briefing was chaired by Mr. Hjalmar Dahl (Inuit Circumpolar Conference) and provided an opportunity for delegates to discuss the conclusions and recommendations of the Indigenous Peoples' meeting on the DD that took place in Copenhagen from 3-5th May, 2003. The Copenhagen Meeting was prompted by the slow progress of the Working Group on the Draft Declaration (WGDD) over the last 8 years, and the concern on the part of those Indigenous organizations and individuals who attended, that unanimous support for the final text may not be achieved.

Among the points of discussion at this briefing was the conclusion at the Copenhagen Meeting that "if the Declaration cannot obtain unanimity in the WGDD, it might prove necessary to adopt it on the basis of substantial support among Indigenous Peoples and participating states in the WGDD." The Copenhagen Meeting agreed on some principles and criteria to guide future discussions on the DD, which were also discussed and debated at this briefing. There was also a call by some delegates for the OAS Declaration to be brought before the Permanent Forum for review before it is finalized. The Copenhagen Meeting document will also be presented on approval at the 9th Session of the WGDD in Geneva in September 2003, and other relevant meetings and fora.

This briefing session was jointly hosted by Tebtebba Foundation (Ms. Vicky Tauli Corpuz) and the Indigenous Peoples' Caucus of the Commission on Sustainable Development. Participants were updated on the key outcomes of the WSSD that are directly related to the work of the Permanent Forum including: Johannesburg Declaration from the WSSD, which "reaffirmed the vital role of Indigenous Peoples in sustainable development";

• Johannesburg Plan of Action (JPOI);
• Kimberley Declaration and the Indigenous Peoples' Plan of Implementation, prepared by the Indigenous Peoples' Caucus attending the WSSD; and
• 11th Session of the CSD, which established the future programme, organization and methods of work of the CSD for the next 12 years to implement the JPOI.

Other members of the panel were:

• Ms Lucy Mulenkei (African Women's Indigenous Organisation), who spoke about the difficulties of involving African Indigenous Peoples in the WSSD and the importance of donor support to ensure broader African participation in future conferences;
• Mr. Marcial Arias (International Alliance of Indigenous/Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests) who provided an update on the work of the UN Permanent Forum on Forests (PFF), noting that the focus in 2004 will be on forests and traditional knowledge;
• His Excellency Ambassador Tyge Lehman (Ambassador of Denmark) and Ms Tove Sovndahl Pedersen (Adviser to Greenland Home Rule Government), who outlined the Partnership on Indigenous Peoples Rights and Sustainable Development, Capacity Building for Dialogue.

This partnership was launched in Johannesburg under the leadership of the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, together with representatives of Indigenous organizations; like-minded countries, institutions and organizations. It aims to promote Indigenous Peoples' rights across UN agencies and exchange information on good policies and practices that advance Indigenous rights and contributions to sustainable development. Following its launch, a workshop was held in Copenhagen in March 2003 to identify a range of specific activities and actions to build the partnership relationship. Visit www.um.dk for a report of the workshop and information about becoming involved in the partnership.

This event was jointly hosted by UNDP (Mr. Pierre Quiblier, Liaison Officer, NYO) and the Heifer Project International (Dr James De Vries, Vice President for International Programs and Dr Mahendra Lohani, Asia and South Pacific Program Director). It provided Heifer International an opportunity to screen the short film, Remedies: Healing the Earth by award-winning producer, Dick Young. The film showed farmers who have benefited from the work of Heifer in a range of countries. Farmers improved their livelihood, while at the same time improving the environment.

Following this introduction, Heifer International briefed participants on its work over the last 59 years to address hunger, poverty and environmental degradation in grass-roots communities by providing gifts of farm animals and training in their care. Heifer emphasizes care for the earth's natural resources through training in livestock management, pasture improvement, soil conservation, forestation and water harvesting. The simple requirement that each recipient pass on to others some of the offspring of the farm animals they receive has assisted many communities in over 115 countries to become self-sustaining and to do so with dignity rather than dependence. For more information on Heifer's work, visit www.heifer.org

This event, jointly hosted by Mr. Sleman Erguden (UN-HABITAT) and Ms Isabell Kempf (OHCHR), provided an overview of this programme, which is a joint initiative of the two agencies. It was launched in 2002 and is designed to assist States with their commitments under international human rights law generally, and the Habitat Agenda in particular, to ensure the full and progressive realization of the right to adequate housing. It operates as a fundamental tool for the Global Campaign to Secure Tenure and is implemented in close cooperation with the Special Rapporteur on Housing and relevant UN treaty bodies.

The programme is currently circulating a questionnaire on Indigenous Peoples' housing rights amongst over 180 Indigenous Peoples' organizations in English, Spanish and French. The study will provide a compilation of information, an analysis of the existing situation and a forward looking perspective on actions at various levels which can contribute to improvements in the lives of Indigenous Peoples. Particular attention is being paid to the housing rights of Indigenous women. It is recognized that the right to housing must be delivered in a manner that recognizes and respects the distinct lifestyles and practices of Indigenous Peoples if appropriate legislation and policies are to be developed at the national level. Responses to the questionnaire are sought by 7 July 2003 and more information is available at www.unhabitat.org/programmes/housingrights

This seminar panel featured Special Ambassador for the World Summit on the Information Society (Mr. Guy-Oliver Segond), UN Permanent Forum members (Mr. Fotunato Turpo and Mr. Marco Matias), the Head of the Canadian Delegation to the Forum (Mr. John Sinclair), the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples (Mr. Jay Roberts), the Inuit Tapariit Kanatami (Mr. Craig Clark), and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs/Aboriginal Canada Portal Working Group (Mr. Ian McArthur).

Much of the discussion with the panel focused on the need to increase Indigenous participation in the December 2003 WSIS Summit. There was considerable support for the proposal to hold a one-day Indigenous Information Summit immediately preceding the main Summit. The Aboriginal Canadian Portal Working Group (a collective of 9 government departments and 6 national Indigenous organizations that manage ICT issues in Canada) volunteered to facilitate and champion such an "Indigenous Peoples and the Information Society" session. The ACP also offered to assist other countries to develop internet portals based on partnerships between government and indigenous peoples. Other issues raised during panel discussions that are affecting Indigenous peoples regardless of their location were the need to:

• extend telecom infrastructure to communities;
• create Indigenous content;
• develop and deploy on-line social services and e-commerce; and
• promote computer literacy and on-line skills.

This debate was facilitated by AICH Youth representative Carrese Gullo (East Cherokee) and Elisabeth Garrett (Cherokee) (Youth Representative on the High Level Panel Discussion). Chaired by Elisabeth Garrett, the debate was well attended with many film crews in the room The topic was on the advantages and disadvantages of being either an urban indigenous youth or a reservation/rural Indigenous Youth. Introductions of representatives from Hawaii, Asia, Aboriginal Australia, Peru, Africa, and Cherokee were made.

Apache Heather Lightning gave a well-articulated presentation, focussing on how important it was to remember they were the Indians of this country and that they were fighting for their survival as young Indians. Youth from the AICH delivered statements on work they do with AICH, some of the programmes they have on youth employment, AIDS, education programmes. They said it was not easy but they had the support of their community in New York and that AICH was a positive place to be in with many other indigenous events being organized there.

The Hawaiian youth representative talked of the impact of the tourist industry on native Hawaiians and how it had seriously damaged the identity of Hawaiian youth, further that the positive side of the tourist industry meant that the dance and languages were being revived because the Hawaiian culture was a commodity of some monetary value. She pointed out however that this touristic driven training in Hawaiian dance and their language was not rooted in community development, but rather to build the "tourist dollar"

The Aboriginal youth representative speaking to the topic mentioned how hard it was to go back to his ancestral lands where his people were from because where he was from, was all fenced off by the Government and no one was allowed access to it anymore, further, that it had been like this for 50yrs, well before his birth. His family had moved to the city to look for work and education. He was fortunate in that his uncle still makes and teaches the digeridoo and therefore he was still able to be taught Aboriginal customs and thinking. He noted that most Aboriginal youth want to link back with their roots and that the didgeridoo was an important link for them in the city because it was all they had. He noted that tourist outlets used his people as tourist attractions but did not know how to recognize their right to their lands, resources, and languages. That their youth were in crisis because of racist Australian policies.

The Asian representative spoke of problems in Nepal because of civil war and divisions amongst the indigenous peoples. His language was still being spoken in the mountains and also in the city, but the gap between young and old was widening because it's essential for people to go to the city for work or to sell their vegetables and craft. Modern cheap versions of what they spend many hours weaving or making by hand were impacted on and took away the livelihood and knowledge of years of practice The Peruvian spokesperson spoke from the floor, congratulating the Side Event for indigenous youth and said that they should network and talk outside of this forum because he did not trust the objectives of governments. The African spokesperson also spoke from the floor, making similar comments as his Peruvian friend. Feedback from the participants was lively and animated. Many of the indigenous organizations congratulated those of the panelists on their initiative to hold such a debate for youth, because they were essential to the future work of indigenous peoples rights in the international community.

Filming of the event was carried out.

This screening was hosted by the American Indian Law Alliance and Thunderstorm. Focusing on one of the world's last wild places, this film told the story of the Indigenous people of the Gwich'in Nation who are working to protect their territories from protracted oil drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge. The film put a personal face on the importance of human rights regarding the use, protection and management of the natural resources of Indigenous Peoples.

Following the film, a panel of Indigenous leaders outlined some examples of best practice natural resource management on Indian territory. Other panelists from UN Agencies such as UNEP and the CSD, as well of members of the Permanent Forum, discussed how partnership arrangements are being developed with Indigenous Peoples to protect their lands and resources for future generations.

Anna Pinto (COIH/CORE) and Elisabeth Garrett (Indigenous Youth Caucus) hosted this event. Ms Ida Nicholaison addressed the meeting in her capacity as the focal point on the Permanent Forum for children and youth issues. She outlined some of the challenges facing the Forum and invited participants to suggest appropriate strategies to address them. One suggestion was to organize a meeting for Indigenous youth prior to the next Permanent Forum so their recommendations can be fed into the main meeting. This might also provide an opportunity for Elders and Members of the Forum to brief and mentor Indigenous youth on the methods of work of the Forum.

There was agreement among participants that if the Permanent Forum is committed to giving Indigenous youth a voice and empowering them, that requires a significant presence of youth delegates and the opportunity for meaningful input into the Forum's work as experts on these issues. Youth participants in the audience were interested in working towards the nomination of a youth representative to the Permanent Forum to more effectively promote and raise Indigenous youth issues within the UN system.

The meeting was informed of the existence of an interactive computer resource that has been developed by the UN for primary and secondary school age children and their teachers, and can be accessed at www.cyberschoolbus.un.org This site provides resources on global issues and can also be used as a direct communication point for Indigenous youth from around the world. Managers of the site are open to suggestions about adaptation of the site to better meet the needs of Indigenous youth.

This briefing by the World Bank was co-chaired by Mr. Viktor Kaisiepo (an Indigenous Leader from Dewan Adat Papua) and Mr. Ian Johnson (World Bank Vice President for the Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development).

The session was organized as a follow-up to the October 2002 Roundtable and the February 2003 meeting in which there was agreement that there would be annual discussions between Indigenous Peoples and the World bank around the time of the Permanent Forum. There was also agreement that this discussion would be used as an opportunity to review ongoing and future collaborations.

The Indigenous Peoples Council on Bio-Colonialism screened this film. It provided a forum for Indigenous peoples to voice their views on Western science - its vision of a genetically engineered future and its inter-relationship with corporate profits, globalization and colonization.

Combining passionate critiques of our potential futures and living alternatives to the globalize monoculture with music and visuals from around the world, this film sought to inspire and educate the audience to ask serious questions of 'the collective illusion we call progress'. For more information visit www.ipcb.org

Mr. Stavenhagen provided an overview of his mandate from the Commission on Human Rights, following his appointment in 2001. He explained that he has sought to focus on a key thematic issue in his annual reports to the CHR, commencing with major development projects that impact on Indigenous rights in his April 2003 report, and following with his next report on the administration of justice and human rights violations within national justice systems. Mr. Stavenhagen took the opportunity to call on Indigenous Peoples to provide him with information on their experiences of their national justice systems, and circulated a brief guide on what type of information is most useful.

Whilst the Special Rapporteur is only able to make formal visits to States that invite him (such as his recent visits to Guatemala and the Philippines), he stressed that informal visits are also possible if Indigenous Peoples invite him. Most recently this type of invitation has allowed him to draw the CHR's attention to Indigenous human rights concerns in Botswana, Japan and Canada. Both official and unofficial visits are critical to his ability to have a direct dialogue with Indigenous Peoples, and to take up their concerns with the CHR and Governments.

The International Indian Treaty Council hosted this event. Ms Elisabeth Garrett addressed the group as the Chairperson of the Indigenous Youth Caucus and spoke about issues of concern to children and youth, noting in particular that the USA and Somalia are yet to ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child. She also spoke of the contamination of breast milk caused by persistent organic pollutants in the environment.

Mr. Antonio Gonzales spoke about environmental health issues, particularly the impact of mercury contamination on Indigenous Peoples as a result of gold mining. UNEP was called upon to include Indigenous Peoples in its newly-formed working group and to prepare studies to take action on Indigenous health conditions attributed to mercury contamination.

There was broad support among the meeting for the Permanent Forum's adoption of a recommendation that would extend the existing Decade on Indigenous Peoples for a further ten years to ensure that outstanding work could be completed, and to include the implementation of the Millennium Development Goals in the work plan for the Decade.

This briefing was provided by members of the Norwegian Saami Parliament and outlined the 23-year process that has given rise to the Finnmark Bill. Finnmark County covers some 47,000 square kilometers in the northernmost part of Norway where Saami constitute a majority of the population in many municipalities.

The speakers pointed out that after 23 years of negotiations with the Saami People, the Norwegian Government announced in April 2003 that it had "chosen to present a totally new model of its own, not based on any of the previous suggestions." The Norwegian Government was advocating a policy of equal treatment of all citizens in Finnmark County, rather than any special measures for Saami. Based on statements by the Norwegian Government, the Bill was designed to set out a means of sharing the land so that everyone in Finnmark County have access to its natural resources, and a set of rules to resolve conflict with Saami People.

The manner in which the Norwegian Government had handled this matter has caused great concern amongst the members of the Saami Parliament as rather than strengthening their rights and safeguarding their culture, they believed it would further disempower them and expose their territories to greater development pressures. As a result, the Saami Parliamentarians were working to persuade the Norwegian Parliament to redraft the Bill to reflect the spirit and substance of the fruitful negotiations to date.

At this meeting the secretariat of the Funds and Boards of Trustees together with the Chairpersons of both Boards, informed the participants on the mandate of the Funds and their activities. Relevant documents were also distributed, including application forms.

The UN Voluntary Fund for Indigenous Populations was established by the General Assembly in 1985 to provide financial assistance to representatives of indigenous communities and organizations to participate in the deliberations of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations. The General Assembly later extended this mandate so that the Fund can also assist indigenous representatives to attend sessions of the Working Group of the Commission of Human Rights on the Draft UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.

The UN Voluntary Fund for the International Decade of the World's Indigenous People was established by the General Assembly in 1993 to fund initiatives during the Decade. This Fund provides project grants for indigenous communities and organizations.