REPLACEMENT MIGRATION: IS IT A SOLUTION TO
DECLINING AND AGEING POPULATION?
United Nations Population Division
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The United Nations Population Division monitors
fertility, mortality and migration trends for all countries of the world, as a basis for
producing the official United Nations population estimates and projections. Among the
demographic trends revealed by those figures, two are particularly salient: population
decline and population ageing.
Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the present study
addresses the question of whether replacement migration is a solution to declining and
ageing populations. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that would
be needed to offset declines in the size of population, the declines in the population of
working age, as well as to offset the overall ageing of a population.
The study computes the size of replacement migration and investigates
the possible effects of replacement migration on the population size and age structure for
a range of countries that have in common a fertility pattern below the replacement level.
Eight countries are examined: France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian
Federation, United Kingdom and United States. Two regions are also included: Europe and
the European Union. The time period covered is roughly half a century, i.e., from 1995 to
2050.
According to the United Nations population projections (medium
variant), Japan and virtually all the countries of Europe are expected to decrease in
population size over the next 50 years. For example, the population of Italy, currently 57
million, is projected to decline to 41 million by 2050. The Russian Federation is expected
to decrease from 147 million to 121 million between 2000 and 2050. Similarly, the
population of Japan, currently 127 million, is projected to decline to 105 million by
2050.
In addition to the decrease in population size, Japan and the countries
of Europe are undergoing a relatively rapid ageing process. In Japan, for example, over
the next half century the median age of the population is expected to increase by some
eight years, i.e., from 41 to 49 years. And the proportion of the Japanese population 65
years or older is expected to increase from its current 17 per cent to 32 per cent.
Similarly in Italy, the median age of the population increases from 41 years to 53 years
and the proportion of the population 65 years or older goes from 18 per cent to 35 per
cent.
Building upon these estimates and projections, the present study
considers five different scenarios with regard to the international migration streams
needed to achieve specific population objectives or outcomes for the eight countries and
two regions mentioned above. The five scenarios are:
| Scenario I. |
The medium variant of the projections from the United
Nations World Population Prospects: 1998 Revision. |
| Scenario II. |
The medium variant of the 1998 Revision, amended by
assuming zero migration after 1995. |
| Scenario III. |
This scenario computes and assumes the migration required
to maintain the size of the total population at the highest level it would reach in the
absence of migration after 1995. |
| Scenario IV. |
This scenario computes and assumes the migration required
to maintain the size of the working-age population (15 to 64 years) at the highest level
it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995. |
| Scenario V. |
This scenario computes and assumes the migration required
to maintain the potential support ratio (PSR), i.e., the ratio of the working-age
population (15 to 64 years) to the old-age population (65 years or older), at the highest
level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995. |
The total and average annual numbers of migrants for the
period 2000-2050 for each scenario are presented in table 1. Scenario I shows the numbers
of migrants assumed for the eight countries and two regions in the medium variant of the
United Nations projections. For example, the total number of migrants for the United
States for the fifty-year period is 38 million; and the average annual number is 760
thousand. Scenario II assumes zero migration for the entire period; the resulting
populations and age structures are given in the text of this report.
Table 1. Net
number of migrants by country or region and scenario, 2000-2050
(Thousands) |
Scenario |
I |
II |
III |
IV |
V |
| Country or region |
Medium
variant |
Medium
variant with
zero migration |
Constant
total
population |
Constant
age group
15-64 |
Constant
ratio
15-64/65 years
or older |
A. Total
number |
| France |
325 |
0 |
1 473 |
5 459 |
89
584 |
| Germany |
10 200 |
0 |
17
187 |
24
330 |
181
508 |
| Italy |
310 |
0 |
12
569 |
18
596 |
113
381 |
| Japan |
0 |
0 |
17
141 |
32
332 |
523
543 |
| Republic of Korea |
-350 |
0 |
1 509 |
6 426 |
5 128
147 |
| Russian Federation |
5 448 |
0 |
24
896 |
35
756 |
253
379 |
| United Kingdom |
1 000 |
0 |
2 634 |
6 247 |
59
722 |
| United States |
38 000 |
0 |
6 384 |
17
967 |
592
572 |
| Europe |
18 779 |
0 |
95
869 |
161
346 |
1 356
932 |
| European Union |
13 489 |
0 |
47
456 |
79
375 |
673
999 |
B.
Average annual number |
| France |
7 |
0 |
29 |
109 |
1 792 |
| Germany |
204 |
0 |
344 |
487 |
3 630 |
| Italy |
6 |
0 |
251 |
372 |
2 268 |
| Japan |
0 |
0 |
343 |
647 |
10
471 |
| Republic of Korea |
-7 |
0 |
30 |
129 |
102
563 |
| Russian Federation |
109 |
0 |
498 |
715 |
5 068 |
| United Kingdom |
20 |
0 |
53 |
125 |
1 194 |
| United States |
760 |
0 |
128 |
359 |
11
851 |
| Europe |
376 |
0 |
1 917 |
3 227 |
27
139 |
| European Union |
270 |
0 |
949 |
1 588 |
13
480 |
Except for the United States, the numbers of migrants needed to
maintain the size of the total population (scenario III) are considerably larger than
those assumed in the medium variant of the United Nations projections (scenario I). In
Italy, for example, the total number of migrants is 12.6 million (or 251 thousand per
year) in scenario III versus 0.3 million (or 6 thousand per year) in scenario I. For the
European Union, the respective numbers are 47 million versus 13 million (or 949 thousand
per year versus 270 thousand per year).
In scenario IV, that is in order to keep constant the size of the
working-age population (15 to 64 years), the numbers of migrants are even larger than
those in scenario III. In Germany, for instance, the total number of migrants is 24
million (or 487 thousand per year) in scenario IV versus 17 million (or 344 thousand per
year) in scenario III.
Figure 1 provides a standardised comparison by presenting the migration
flows expressed in per million inhabitants in 2000. This comparison shows that relative to
country size the number of migrants between 2000-2050 needed to maintain the size of the
working-age population (scenario IV) is the highest for Italy, with 6,500 annual
immigrants per million inhabitants, followed by Germany, with 6,000 annual immigrants per
million inhabitants. Among the countries and regions studied in this report, the United
States would require the smallest number of immigrants, approximately 1,300 per million
inhabitants to prevent the decline of its working-age population.
The numbers in scenario V, which keeps the potential support ratio
constant, are extraordinarily large. In Japan, for example, the total number of migrants
in scenario V is 524 million (or 10.5 million per year). For the European Union, the total
number of migrants in this scenario is 674 million (or 13 million per year).

Major findings of this study include:
During the first half of the 21st century,
the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a
result of below-replacement fertility and increased longevity.
In the absence of migration, the declines in
population size will be even greater than those projected and population ageing will be
more rapid.
Although fertility may rebound in the coming decades,
few believe that fertility in most developed countries will recover sufficiently to reach
replacement level in the foreseeable future, thus, making population decline inevitable in
the absence of replacement migration.
The projected population decline and population ageing
will have profound and far-reaching consequences, forcing Governments to reassess many
established economic, social and political policies and programmes, including those
relating to international migration.
For France, United Kingdom, the United States and the
European Union, the numbers of migrants needed to offset population decline are less than
or comparable to recent past experience. While this is also the case for Germany and the
Russian Federation, the migration flows in the 1990s were relatively large due to
reunification and dissolution, respectively.
For Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Europe, a
level of immigration much higher than experience in the recent past would be needed to
offset population decline.
The numbers of migrants needed to offset declines in
the working-age population are significantly larger than those needed to offset total
population decline. Whether those larger numbers of migrants are within the realm of
options open to Governments depends to a great extent on the social, economic and
political circumstances of the particular country or region.
If retirement ages remain essentially where they are
today, increasing the size of the working-age population through international migration
is the only option in the short to medium term to reduce declines in the potential support
ratio.
The levels of migration needed to offset population
ageing (i.e., maintain potential support ratios) are extremely large, and in all cases
entail vastly more immigration than occurred in the past.
Maintaining potential support ratios at current levels
through replacement migration alone seems out of reach, because of the extraordinarily
large numbers of migrants that would be required.
In most cases, the potential support ratios could be
maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population
to roughly 75 years of age.
The new challenges being brought about by declining
and ageing populations will require objective, thorough and comprehensive reassessments of
many established economic, social and political policies and programmes. Such
reassessments will need to incorporate a long-term perspective. Critical issues to be
addressed in those reassessments would include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement;
(b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health-care benefits for the elderly;
(c) the labour-force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers
and employers to support retirement and health-care benefits for the increasing elderly
population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration, in
particular replacement migration, and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants
and their descendants.
|