ISO: NOR *************************************************************************** The electronic version of this document has been prepared at the Fourth World Conference on Women by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in collaboration with the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women Secretariat. *************************************************************************** AS WRITTEN Grete Berget Minister of Children and Family Affairs Norway, THE FOURTH WORLD CONFERENCE ON WOMEN, Beijing 1995 Madam Chair, When Prime Minister Ms Gro Harlem Brundtland in 1986 announced the first government in Norway, m which nearly half the members were women, she said these words: It is in the interest of society as a whole that women's values and women's sense of justice be integrated into political life. For a few weeks people thought that this government looked strange. But we soon became used to it. By now it has become the normal pattern. A government with only a few women members would not be considered quite legitimate. It would be thought to be undemocratic, and even look a bit silly. Women have become entrenched everywhere in the political structure. Nearly 40% of the members of parliament are women, and the President of Parliament is a woman. In the last general elections two years ago all three candidates for prime minister were women. How did we get this far? Let me state at the outset that equal and justice for women does not come by itself. It involves changes in deeply rooted attitudes. It requires political will and dedicated work on the part of political parties, NGO's, trade unions and many others. And it takes time. Rome was not built in one day. We started our steady march towards equality more than 20 years ago. The process is nearly complete in political life, but we still have a long way to go in other areas. The adoption of gender quotas was important to ensure women their fair share of political posts. By now all major political parties behave as if they had a quota system, whether or not they have formally adopted such rules. At first quotas were controversial, as they still are in many countries. By now they are widely accepted, because we have seen the good results. We have never been accused of having to elect less qualified women simply because they are women. There are plenty of talented and qualified women around. Quota- systems simply mean that you have to look a little bit harder. The large number of women in political posts has changed the political agenda, and issues that tend to be of particular interest b women, have high priority. How to strengthen the family and safeguard the welfare of children take centre stage in our election campaigns. A number of concrete reforms have been introduced over the last years. Family values and concern for children are important to us. There was concern in the beginning that children would suffer when their mothers took up employment outside the home in the 1970's and 80's. Our answer was to adopt various mechanisms that would make it easier to combine work outside the home and family life for both men and women Working life has to adapt to the needs of families with small children, rather than vice versa. Working parents with small children have a number of legally protected rights. After the birth of a child they may take one year of parental leave with 80% of their normal pay. This leave can be taken out flexibly, as a so called time- account scheme, so that the parents may work for instance a 6-hour day until the child is more than 2 years old without loss of income. The parental leave is paid by the government. Both parents may also take one year unpaid leave each in addition to the paid leave, With job security and protection of seniority. Parents with children under the age of 12 may also stay at home with full pay for 10 days each when their children are ill. And they may ask for reduced working hours. The establishment of child care centre is progressing rapidly. In Norway we spend more money on children and family affairs than on National defence. We all work hard to complete our dream of a society where men and women with small children both work a shorter day outside the home, their children spend part of the day in a stimulating environment outside the home, and there is enough time for family life. The one unfulfilled part of this dream is the role of men, and particularly their role as fathers. All over the world children see too little of their fathers. This is especially true in industrialised societies. Men have left the home, and now it is time for them to come back. The absence of fathers in the everyday life of children is harmful both to the children, to women and to the family. We now pay much more attention to this problem, and we even use some gentle coercion. Fathers must take a minimum of four weeks of the paid parental leave after the birth of a child. Most Norwegian men fully agree with the need for equality also in the home, but as yet they do not quite live up to their own ideals. A major reason for divorce is frustration on the part of women because men do not take their share. Both the joy of having children and the responsibility for housework should be equally shared between man and wife. We are on our way towards a new family pattern adapted to modern life. Family values and equality for women are two sides of the same coin. But, we will not reach equality if we do not make men move also. The first Nordic conference on men took place in Stockholm earlier this year. The father role, men's sexuality and sexual violence were discussed, and the need to arouse global interest was stressed. We want to firmly establish men's gender role on the global agenda for equality, development and peace. Norway has proposed that the Beijing Platform for Action shall call for decriminalisation of women who have had an illegal abortion. We hope that delegations seriously consider this proposal. Resorting to an illegal and dangerous abortion is a desperate act on the part of the unhappy woman. To treat her with compassion and care seems to be the only humane way to deal with the situation. The large number of women who die or are seriously injured from dangerous abortions is similar to a major war that goes on quietly, year in and year out. This vast problem must be given its due place at this Global Women's Conference. In my own country we have been able to eliminate this problem completely. For close to twenty years the woman herself has had the last word in the decision to have an abortion or not. There was fear, including among those agreeing with the new law, that the number of abortions would rise. This did not happen, the number has remained at the same level. the only change was that by now all abortions are safe. Norway was very pleased when it was decided to include a section on the girl child in the Plan of Action. This section should be required reading for anyone who might still question the seriousness and extent of discrimination against girls and women. Gender-selective abortions are tragic testimonies to the fact that girls in large parts of the world are considered to have less value than boys and to be a burden to their parents. New-born girl babies may be killed or seriously neglected Girls may be given less and poorer food than their brothers. They receive less health care and less education, and are expected to carry a heavy work load from early years. They may be subjected to the inhuman tradition of genital mutilation and to sexual exploitation. The heart-rendering and dramatic stories of what happens to girls demonstrate the root causes of discrimination of adult women. The Vienna Declaration states that the human rights of girls and women are an inalienable, integral and indivisible part of universal human rights. Fundamental freedoms and human rights are the birthright also of girls - and our common responsibility to protect. The 1995 Human Development report documents that 70 per cent of the world’s poor are women. And there seems to be a trend towards increasing feminizabon of poverty. This will not change until girls and women get equal access to education, until their special health needs are taken care of, until women can participate fully in politics and have equal access to economic resources. An important barrier to economic equality in my country was done away with in 1974. Until then, the right to take over farm land was for the oldest son. Now the firstborn child, regardless of sex, is entitled to take over the farm.. We have a clear strategy also in our development co-operation (aid) to ensure that programmes benefit women and help to improve women's economic opportunities, their access to education and health services. In order to achieve is required. The 20/20 principle, which was adopted on voluntary basis at the Social Summit, could be an important tool if implemented with a gender approach. Norway is ready to realise a tenderised 20/20 contract, and I hope this conference will bring us closer to make this a truly global commitment. The high social and economic returns of investing in women is now fully documented, not least by the recent World Bank report on gender. The consequences should be that ministers of finance and planning throughout the world take the lead in implementing the Platform for Action from Beijing - for the benefit of their own country’s economy, and a better life for women, children and men. We can only reach gender equality by taking action in a range of fields. It will not do to commit ourselves only to a limited number of measures. The Government of Norway will, as a matter of course, commit itself to the entire Platform for Action. Thank you for you attention.