ESA home Search Parliamentary services Research and analysis National governments Regional cooperation Development issues

National Implementation of Agenda 21

BELGIUM

COUNTRY PROFILE

IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
REVIEW OF PROGRESS MADE SINCE THE
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, 1992

Information Provided by the Government of BELGIUM to the
United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development
Fifth Session
7-25 April 1997
New York

United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development
Division for Sustainable Development
The Information contained in this Country Profile is also available on the World Wide Web, as follows:
http://www.un.org/dpcsd/earthsummit

BELGIUM

This country profile has been provided by:

Name of Ministry/Office:

Date:

Submitted by:

Mailing address:

Telephone:

Telefax:

E-mail:

Note from the Secretariat: An effort has been made to present all country profiles within a common format, with an equal number of pages. However, where Governments have not provided information for the tables appended to Chapters 4 and 17, those tables have been omitted entirely in order to reduce the overall length of the profile and save paper. Consequently, there may be some minor inconsistencies among the formats of the different country profiles.

All statistics are rendered as provided by the respective Governments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACRONYMS
OVERVIEW
FACT SHEET
AGENDA 21 CHAPTERS
2. International cooperation to accelerate sustainable development in developing countries and related domestic policies
3. Combating poverty
4. Changing consumption patterns
5. Demographic dynamics and sustainability
6. Protecting and promoting human health
7. Promoting sustainable human settlement development
8. Integrating environment and development in decision-making
9. Protection of the atmosphere
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources
11. Combating deforestation
12. Managing fragile ecosystems: combating desertification and drought
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development
15. Conservation of biological diversity
16. Environmentally sound management of biotechnology
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources
18. Protection of the quality and supply of freshwater resources: application of integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, including prevention of illegal international traffic in hazardous wastes
21. Environmentally sound management of solid wastes and sewage-related issues
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes
23-32. Major groups
33. Financial resources and mechanisms
34. Transfer of environmentally sound technology, cooperation and capacity-building
35. Science for sustainable development
36. Promoting education, public awareness and training
37. National mechanisms and international cooperation for capacity-building in developing countries
38. International institutional arrangements
39. International legal instruments and mechanisms
40. Information for decision-making

ACRONYMS

APELL Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at Local Level
CFC chlorofluorocarbon
CGIAR Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research
CILSS Permanent Inter-State Committee on Drought Control in the Sahel
EEZ exclusive economic zone
ECA Economic Commission for Africa
ECE Economic Commission for Europe
ECLAC Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean
ELCI Environmental Liaison Centre International
EMINWA environmentally sound management of inland water
ESCAP Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific
ESCWA Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
GAW Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO)
GEF Global Environment Facility
GEMS Global Environmental Monitoring System (UNEP)
GEMS/WATER Global Water Quality Monitoring Programme
GESAMP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution
GIPME Global Investigation of Pollution in Marine Environment (UNESCO)
GIS Geographical Information System
GLOBE Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment
GOS Global Observing System (WMO/WWW)
GRID Global Resource Information Database
GSP generalized system of preferences
HIV human immunodeficiency virus
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
IAP-WASAD International Action Programme on Water and Sustainable Agricultural Development
IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer
IBSRAM International Board of Soil Resources and Management
ICCA International Council of Chemical Associations
ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
ICPIC International Cleaner Production Information Clearing House
ICSC International Civil Service Commission
ICSU International Council of Scientific Unions
IEEA Integrated environmental and economic accounting
IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development
IGADD Intergovernmental Authority for Drought and Development
IGBP International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (ICSU)
IGBP/START International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme/Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training
ILO International Labour Organisation
IMF International Monetary Fund
IMO International Maritime Organization
INFOTERRA International Environment Information system (UNEP)
IOC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IPCS International Programme on Chemical Safety
IPM integrated pest management
IRPTC International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals
ITC International Tin Council
ITTO International Tropical Timber Organization
IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships
OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
PGRFA plant genetic resources for agriculture
PIC prior informed consent procedure
SADCC South African Development Co-ordination Conference
SARD sustainable agriculture and rural development
UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNDRO Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund
UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization
UNU United Nations University
WCP World Climate Programme (WMO/UNEP/ICSU/UNESCO)
WFC World Food Council
WHO World Health Organization
WMO World Meteorological Organization
WWF World Wide Fund for Nature (also called World Wildlife Fund)
WWW World Weather Watch (WMO)

FACT SHEET

BELGIUM

A. Name of Key National Sustainable Development Coordination Mechanism(s)/Council(s).

Since 1993, Belgium is a Federal state with several levels of power (the Federal and the 5 Federated levels : the Flemish Community and the Flemish Region which have been merged, the Walloon Region, the Brussels Capital City Region, the French-speaking Community and the German-speaking Community. Each level of power is entitled to create its own co-ordinating structure for implementing the action plans of Agenda 21.

1. Contact Points

a. International Features :

-Diplomatic Focal Point : Miss M. Claeys, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Topical Coordination P62.A, Rue Belliard - Belliardstraat, 65. B 1040 Brussels.

Tel : 00 32 2 501 37 10

Fax : 00 32 2 230 02 80

-Sustainable Development Focal Point : Mrs N. Gouzée/Mr. J. Verschooten, p.a. Federal Planning Office, Kunstlaan/Avenue des Arts 47-49 B 1040 Brussels.

Tel : 00 32 2 507 73 11

Fax : 00 32 2 507 73 73

b. National Features :

-Federal level :

* M. F. Chemay, Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Public Health and Environment, Service of Environmental Affairs, Service of Studies and Coordination, C.A.E./R.A.C Vesalius/Vésale 722

Pachecolaan/Boulevard Pachéco, 10 Bus/Bte 7 B 1010 Brussels Tel : 00 32 2 210 45 43 Fax : 00 32 2 210 48 52

* M. Ziarko, Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs (OSTC), Wetenschapsstraat/Rue de la Science, 8 B 1000 Brussels Tel : 00 32 2 238 34 11 Fax : 00 32 2 230 59 12

* M. J. Buys, Belgian Agency For Development Cooperation, Brederodestraat, 6, Rue Brederode, B 1000 Brussels

Tel 00 32 2 500 63 11. Fax 00 32 2 500 65 30

-Regional level :

* Flemish Focal Point : Mr. M. Merckx, Ministry of the Flemish Community, Environment, Nature, Land and Water Management Adminstration (AMINAL), Belliardstraat, 14-18 B 1040 Brussels. Tel : 00 32 2 507 30 30 Fax : 00 32 2 507 6732

* Walloon Focal Point : Mr M. Pignolet, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Directorate General for Natural Resources and the Environment (DGRNE), Avenue Prince de Liège, 15 B 5100 Jambes. Tel : 00 32 81 32 57 84 Fax : 00 32 81 32 59 84

* Brussels Focal Point : M. A. Lesne, Brussels Institute for Environmental Management (IBGE/BIM), Gulledelle, 100 B 1200 Brussels. Tel : 00 32 2 775 76 06 Fax : 32 2 775 76 11

-Community level :

* Flemish Community : see above.

* The French and the German-speaking Communities : no mechanisms

2. Membership/Composition/Chairperson

a. International Features : (environmental aspects) Coordination Committee for International Environmental Policy (CCIEP). Chairperson : M. J.P. Samain, Director general, Federal Ministry of the Environment ; 15 official members ( 4 representatives of the Federal and Regional Ministers of the Environment, 1 representative of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, 1 representative of the Minister for the Development Cooperation, 1 representative of the Topical Coordination mentioned above as diplomatical focal point, 1 representative of the Permanent Mission of Belgium at the European Union, 6 civil servants of the Federal and Regional Ministries of the Environment and 1 representative of the Belgian Agency for Development Cooperation ; several invited members of other Ministries (Agriculture, Economical Affairs, Scientifical Policy, Federal Planning Office, etc.)

(Cont.)

b. National Features

- Federal level : Interdepartemental Commission on Sustainable Development (proposed to Parliament). Chairperson : State Secretary for Environmental Affairs. Co-Chairs : representatives of the Federal Minister for Scientific Policy and the State Secretary for Development Aid. Members : representatives of each Federal minister and state secretary, representatives of the governments of Regions and Communities.

- Flemish Region : coordinating Ad Hoc Working Group of the Flemish Government and its 19 subgroups. Chairperson :

M. H. De Wel, Environment, Nature, Land and Water Management Administration. Members : representatives of the entire Flemish Government and the Flemish representatives in the National Council for Sustainable Development (NCSD)

- Walloon Region : an Environment Plan for Sustainable Development exists and will be updated every five years

- Brussels Capital City Region : a Regional Development Plan does exist since 1995.

3. Mandate/Role of above Mechanisms/Councils

a. International Features, (environmental aspects) CCIEP : political decision-making body based on a intersectoral and interdepartemental cooperation and coordination initiated between the Federal and Regional Governments since April 1995 on environmental matters, nature conservation, and sustainable development.

b. National Features, Federal level : the Interdepartemental Commission (proposed to Parliament) will give guidelines to the Federal Planning Office in its mission as laid down in the draft of law on the Federal coordination on sustainable development for the preparation of a preliminary draft of a quadriannual Federal Plan of Sustainable Development. The Federal Planning Office will establish every two years a Federal Report on Sustainable Development.

c. National Features, Flemish Region : examine the possibilities for new concrete policy measures and implement the recommandations of the UNCED and the Agenda 21.

B. Key National Sustainable Development CONSULTATIVE Mechanisms/Councils.

1. Contact Points

a. National Council for Sustainable Development (NCSD) ; Mr.G.Vansintjan, permanent secretary, Ms Catherine Mertens, permanent secretary, Mailing address NCSD, Wetstraat/Rue de la Loi 56 B1040 Brussels

Tel. : 00 32 2 287 06 76 Fax : 00 32 2 280 14 27 e-mail:nrdo @skynet.be

b. Milieu en Natuurraad Vlaanderen (MINA-Raad) ;

Kliniekstraat, 25, 4de verdieping, B.1070 Brussels

Tel.: 00 32 2 219 96 40 Fax : 00 32 2 219 97 15

c. Conseil Wallon de l'Environnement pour le Développement durable (CWEDD)

CWEDD, rue du Vertbois 13 C, B.4000 Liège

Tel. : 00 32 4 232 98 61 Fax : 00 32 4 232 98 10

d. Conseil de l'Environnement pour la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale/Raad voor het Leefmilieu van het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest (RLBHG/CERBC)

Hertogstraat/rue Ducale 61, B1000 Brussels

Tel. : 00 32 2 513 17 87

Fax : 00 32 2 513 91 41

(Cont.)

2. Memberships/Compositions/Chairpersons

a. NCSD

Chairman : His Royal Highness Prince Philip

-Federal ministers : Prime Minister and Ministers for Economic Affairs and Telecommunications, Internal Affairs, Finance and External Trade, Budget, Scientific Policy, Public Health and Pensions, Foreign Affairs, Employment, Social Affairs, Agriculture and Small & Medium-sized Business, Transport, Justice, the Civil Service, Defence, State Secretaries for Development Aid, Security, Social Integration and Environment;

-Regiogal ministers : Minister-Presidents of Flanders, of the Walloon Region, and of the Brussels' Capital City Region;

-Business and industry: 2 companies;

-Scientific community : 3 Dutch-speaking universities, 3 French-speaking universities;

-Non-governmental organizations : 6 NGO's for environmental protection, 6 NGO's for development aid, and 2 NGO's for consumer protection;

-Workers and trade unions : 3 major trade unions;

-Federations of employers : 6 major federations.

b. MINA-Raad

Chairman : Prof. R. Verheyen

24 members of the Environmental Nature Conservation associations ; 6 of the trade unions, 2 of the employers'organizations, 2 of the business community, 2 of the agricultural organizations, 8 of the environmental councils, 4 of the Association of Flemish Provinces, Towns and Municipalities, and 10 of the Flemish Research Policy Council.

c. CWEDD

Chairman : Mr. J. Smitz

3 members representing the Walloon employers' organization, 2 the national union of farmers, 2 the trade unions, 2 the most representative organizations of the business community, 4 the nature conservation organizations, 1 the most representative consumer associations, 2 the Association of Walloon Towns and Municipalities, 3 French-language university institutions, the chairmen or deputy-chairmen of the Regional Waste Commission, the Advisory Commission on the Protection of Surface Water against Pollution, the Regional Town and Country Planning, the Regional Consultative Commission on the Exploitation of Quarries, the High Walloon Nature Conservation Council, the High Walloon Forest and Wood Council, the High Walloon Agriculture, and the Food Industry and Foodstuff Council.

d. RLBHG/CERBC

Chairman : Mr. R. Gillet

5 members representing the non-profit association, 3 officials representing the Ministries dealing with town and country planning, the protection of historic monuments and areas of outstanding natural beauty, and public transport, 3 members representing the most representative workers' organizations, 3 the most representative employers organizations, 1 the business community , 3 experts in environmental protection problems, appointed by the universities, 3 members representing the Union of Towns and Municipalities, 3 the waste incinerators, the water purification plants and the water companies , 3 the consumer associations, 3 members appointed by the Regional council because of their scientific expertise.

3. Mandate/Role of above Mechanisms/Councils

a. NCSD ; advises the Federal Government on each measure concerning sustainable development, particularly for the implementation of the European Unions Fifth Action Program on Environmental Issues and the implementation of Agenda 21. It proposes studies on all subjects related to sustainable development, organizes discussion fora, and will obtain the broadest possible public participation concerning sustainable development.

b. MINA-Raad ; advises the Flemish Government and the Flemish Parlement on all matters relating to the environment or the protection of nature. It carries out research.

c. CWEDD ; assesses the impact on the environment in the Walloon Region, the annual "State of the Environment in the Walloon Region" report, gives its opinion on the draft Environment Plan for Sustainable Development.

d. BHG/CERBC ; the Brussels Regional Government on all environmental matters.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 2: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION TO ACCELERATE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND RELATED DOMESTIC POLICIES (with special emphasis on TRADE)

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Belgium is committed to a high level of environmental protection and to an open equitable and non-discriminatory multilateral system. These are equally important objectives. In this respect, Belgium considers that trade and environment policies can play a mutually and supportive role in favour of sustainable development.

In OECD, UNEP, UNCTAD and WTO, Belgium positioned definitely in favour of the adoption of core labour standards and social standards within trade agreements in order to accelerate sustainable social development in developing countries.

The country has therefore played an active role in economic and trade fora such as OECD and WTO (CTE), as well as in international and environmental oriented fora like CSD and UNEP.

1. WTO (CTE)

Since the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE) has been set up in 1995, Belgium together with all European member states has considered the principle 12 of the Rio Declaration as a central reference in the CTE discussions, considering that the most effective way of dealing with transboundary environmental problems is through international and multilateral agreements (MEA's), not by unilateral trade measures.

We believe that the multilateral trading system, and the WTO framework rules, should be supportive of MEA's when they include restricted trade measures that may be necessary for the achievement of the environmental goals they intend to protect.

Further work will be required to determine whether any modifications of the WTO provisions are necessary to accommodate, among others, with MEA's and new instruments of environmental policy like eco-labelling. Belgium gives also great attention to further market access for LDC's with a view to support development prospects and improve export performance of LDC's.

2. OECD

Concerning non-binding analytical work in international fora, Belgium participates in OECD joint session on trade and environment, asking for quantitative analysis exploring the linkages between DC's market access improvements and tariff escalation, international trade in waste, DPG's, competitiveness.

3. UNEP

Belgium supports the UNEP activities as complementary activities of the CTE work program, especially these concerning the assessement of the trade measures of the main MEA's (Basel, Montreal & Cites), and these concerning the studies and workshops on well targeted sectors.

4. CSD

Belgium welcomes the fact that the Declaration of Rio and Agenda 21 have broadened the scope of discussion on trade and environment and sustainable development. Belgium believes that the debate on trade and environment could be based on the principles provided in Chapter 2 from Agenda 21.

Within this context, Belgium attaches special importance to the decisions from CSD IV. Especially the decision on the relationship between environmental policy and competitiveness, in which the lack of indication that environmental policy in general has detrimental effects on competitiveness is acknowledged, and the problem that environmental regulations from importing countries may cause to developing countries in transition, is underlined. The principle of cost internalisation is explicitly referred to and green countervailing duties are firmly rejected.

Concerning future work, Belgium would like to introduce the precautionary principle (Rio Declaration, Principle 15) in the debate on the accomodation of the multilateral trade system to the environmental needs.

Belgium supports enhanced policy coordination at the national level in the area of trade and environment, and, at the international level, whishes to develop a holistic approach between international organisations; WTO/CTE, OECD, UNCTAD, UNEP and CSD.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure

According to article 113 of the Treaty of the European Union, trade policy is an exclusive competence of the Commission. In its legally binding aspects, the trade and environment policy is defined by the European member states in the so called "113 Committee".

The Committee for Coordination in International Environmental Policy (CCIEP) has established a Working Group Trade and Environment in 1995 under the presidency of the Ministry of Foreign Trade. Its missions are the preparation at the national level (with the Federated entities) and the follow-up of the decisions and activities of the Committee 113 of the EU as well as the CSD sessions, the UNCTAD, UNEP and the OECD work related to trade and environment.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues

See Chapter 34/37

3. Major Groups

As a reminder

4. Finance

See Chapter 33

5. Regional/International Cooperation

See Status Report.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 3: COMBATING POVERTY

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

Poverty in Belgium

In Belgium 6 % of the population is poor. This percentage was calculated according to the usual EU norm, indicating that 6 % of the households do not have half the average income of a single at their disposal. This figure is low in European perspective. It is mainly due to the system of Social Security that exists in Belgium, insuring employees and their families for unemployment, sickness and retirement. For those who cannot work or could not work long enough there is a system of social assistance, that guarantees a minimum income that is fixed by law and in case of dispute is settled in labour court.

Policies for minimum allowances are a Federal competence, while next to it the Regions are competent for many policy issues related to poverty such as educational policies, housing, culture and welfare, all of them important parts of employment policy. In order to allow for a coordinated poverty policy the ministers competent for poverty on Federal and Regional level meet several times a year to decide on policy proposals concerning poverty.

Last year a variety of measures was taken and implemented. A law was passed allowing for debts to be centralized with one particular judge who can impose a plan for debt relief and who can cancel debts.

In several Regions laws were past to guarantee a minimum provision of electricity, gas and water in case of payment difficulties.

Measures were elaborated to better protect people in case of eviction procedures for non-payment of their rent.

For the time being, negotiations are conducted on several proposals to improve the access of the poorest to public health and the administration of law.

Measures were taken to stimulate social employment.

Within each Region considerable budgets were freed in order to cope with social discrimination in the cities.

Poverty policy in Belgium is developed in close cooperation with the poorest themselves, and relies on a combination of improvement of the income position and of abolishment of social discrimination in different sectors.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

As a reminder

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

As a reminder

3. Major Groups:

As a reminder

4. Finance:

As a reminder

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

NB: Developed countries, where domestic poverty alleviation is not a major concern may wish to briefly describe their position regarding global poverty alleviation.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
1992
1994
Unemployment (%)
13.6
9.6
11.2
13.9
Population living in absolute poverty
Public spending on social sector %
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 4: CHANGING CONSUMPTION PATTERNS

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

1. National Policy Objective/Focus

The Federal ecotax law was introduced in 1993 and acts as a "stick behind the door" pressing stakeholders to take environmentally friendly actions such as selective waste collection and recycling, ecologically acceptable waste treatment and more rational use of consumer goods. As the tax is levied at the earliest possible stage of the distribution cycle, this new law does not impose any constraint to trade. On the other hand, energy levies and charges were introduced and others raised during 1993; this led to a significant reduction in CO2 emissions in 1994. Part of the additional proceeds is used to protect employment in the context of market competition.

Furthermore, in the whole area of ozone depleting substances, Belgium actively applies the EU regulations phasing out or reducing ozone depleting substances and contributes actively in toughening these standards on EU level, which happens almost every two years.

A decree of 19 April 95 of the Flemish Region should also be mentioned which stimulates and regulates "responsible-care" initiatives by enterprises. An analogous initiative in the Walloon Region, to integrate environmental concerns in firms' behaviour, is in a well advanced stage.

2. National Targets

The Federal eco-tax law contains a general framework and time table for the introduction of a number of eco-taxes. The timetable was found to be too stringent to be feasible and had to be eased by Parliament.

In 1991, Belgium decided to reduce its CO2 emission in 2000 by 5% compared to 1990. This decision is to be seen in the light of the European Union Strategy to limit CO2 emission, whereby :

- CO2 emission in the EU need to be stabilised in 2000 at teir level of 1990;

- EU measures are needed to achieve that target. In particular, Belgium

considers that a carbon/energy tax, coordinated at least at the EU level, is needed to reach in Belgium the target of 5% reduction by 2000.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

Decision-Making Structure

The Federal Government has tried to integrate environmental and fiscal policy through inter alia the eco-tax law of 1993. The Eco-tax Commission has broad powers to propose amendments to the existing law, to propose new eco-taxes, and to propose eliminating others. Parliament takes the final decision, with no legal obligation to consult the Eco-tax Commission. Parliament is presently reviewing a third revision to the Eco-tax law. The Regional Governments have the authority to regulate impacts of eco-taxes on their revenue.

The Government of the German-speaking Community set up a consumer's information (Verbraucherschutzzentrale East-Belgium). It informs about eco-consumption as well as about environment and the protection of nature.

Capacity-Building/Technology Issues

The Federal Government is preparing a framework programme for research on specific topics pertaining to sustainable development, such as marine sciences, transportation systems, and social and economic issues aimed at helping develop measures to change production and consumption patterns. An information campaign is part of the implementation and enforcement of the eco-tax law.

Major Groups

A policy debate on consumption and production patterns was held at the Federal level involving most Government ministries, Parliament, industry, consumer groups and media. NGOs, universities and local authorities were less involved. It resulted in the adoption of some pieces of legislation.

Finance

A few programmes have been implemented to help the poor, including measures to guarantee a minimum supply of electricity to all households, subsidies for home improvements for energy efficiency (max. of Bfr. 50,000 or US$ 1,500) and measures to limit the total amount of loans.

Regional/International Cooperation

The Federal Government is involved in the implementation of the EU's Eco-labelling Scheme. An appropriate agency would grant producers the authorization to use the EU logo.

Initiated by the German-speaking Community, a frontier-crossing, euregional consumer's information has been set up. EUROKON informs consumers in the Province de Liège and the German-speaking Community in Belgium, the Limburg Provinces in Belgium and the Netherlands and Aachen Region in Germany.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
1992
1995
GDP per capita (current US$)
8,099
19,294
21,935
26,344
Real GDP growth (%)
0.8
3.4
1.4
1.9
Annual energy consumption per capita (Kg. of oil equivalent per capita)
4,621(1)
4,680
4,810
4,825
Motor vehicles in use per 1000 inhabitants
367.2
422.5
450.3(2)
485.2
Other data

(1) 1989

(2) 1993

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 5: DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

Belgium does not have explicit and integrated population policies. However, many policy measures, especially within the framework of social security and family policy, have direct and indirect repercussions on demographic dynamics. In general, policies for welfare, family, health, education, environment, immigration, data collection, research and development aid are largely in accordance with the recommendation of the three international conferences on population.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1.Decision-Making Structure

The decline in the immigration rate is largely due to restrictive measures taken within the framework of immigration legislation.

2.Capacity-Building/Technology Issues

As a reminder.

3.Major Groups

As a reminder.

4.Finance

As a reminder.

5.Regional/International Cooperation

Belgium is an active member of the Commission on Population and Development which is responsible for the follow-up of the International Conference on Population and Development or ICPD (Cairo, September 1994). At its yearly meetings, the country is represented by the Head of the Population and Family Study Centre (CBGS, Centrum voor Bevolkings- en Gezinsstudie) or his replacement.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1990
1992
1994
1995
1996
Population (thousands) on 1st january
Total
Males
Females
Kingdom as a whole
9947.8
10022.0
10100.6
10130.6
10143.0
4.958.8
5184.3
Brussels Region
948.0
Flemish Region
5880.0
Walloon Region
3314.6
Annual rate increase (1990-1996)
0.32%
Surface area (Km2)
30.528
Population density (inhabitants/Km2)
326
328
331
332
332
Other data
TFR (Total fertility rate per woman)
1.62
Mortality (life expectancy at birth in years)

-male

-female

73.9

80.6

(Source : "Recent Demographic Developments in Europe", Strasbourg : Council of Europe)

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 6: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING HUMAN HEALTH

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

Belgium consists of three language communities : the French Community, the Flemish Community and the German-speaking Community. The Communities are responsible for the policy of care in and outside hospitals, with exception of the responsibilities of the Federal Government. The Communities are also responsible for health education and promotion, as well as for preventive medecine (except national measures of profylaxis).

The Communities are specifically responsable for :

- the application of agreement standards,

- the application of program standards,

- subsidization,

- preventive medicine (AIDS, alcoholism, vaccinations, ...),

- frontline care,

- inspections,

- sport medical controls,

- school medical controls,

- follow-up programs for little children.

The responsibilities of the Federal Government are :

a) organic legislation,

b) finance requirements by organic legislation,

c) national health insurance,

d) base rules for program standards,

e) base rules for financing infrastructure and expensive medical equipement,

f) national agreement standards, only when repercussion on b) c) d) and e),

g) fixing conditions university hospitals.

The policies for institutional care are undergoing a continuous dynamic evolution. Over the past ten years different major reforms have been aimed at reducing the supply of hospital services, i.e. the number of beds and hospitalisation days, in favour of alternative and better adapted forms of health care, more particularly for chronic patients. These reforms have been implemented at the same time in acute hospitals, institutions for ongoing care or chronic hospitals, and in psychiatric hospitals.

However, modifying only hospital structures was not enough : the financing system is also being revised, although this onerous task is far from completed. The financing system which took into account hospitalisation days was replaced by a system of budgets per hospital.

The former budget based only on structural elements has gradually made way for an adapted budget based on structural elements as well as on activity-related data.

The implementation of this financing system required the installation of various databases, such as the registration of minimum nursing data, minimum clinical data, and minimum psychiatric data. At this moment, one is considering to which point social data should be included. The registration of these data should not only be useful for the fine tuning of budgets, but should eventually lead to better management and improved health care practice.

(Cont)

The creation of special structures to promote the dialogue between hospital managers, doctors and insurers brings another challenge, and that is harmo-nizing the policies of health insurance and the policies of the Ministry of Social Affairs, Public Health and the Environment. In addition, these policies should benefit from a more efficient use of available data.

During the past years the Directorate of Medical Practice has also proposed several important new laws, such as the law on blood and the law on physio-therapy. The regulations for general practitioners too have undergone impor-tant modifications. In addition, new specialities have been created such as emergency specialist and intensive care specialist. The art of nursing has not been neglected : new titles and special professional qualifications have been created.

A permanent evaluation of the number of doctors and dentists needed in function of the demografic and sociological developments is planned since 1996. Rules concerning the evaluation of medical practice can be fixed.

Several important projects are being developed and should be implemented in the years to come, such as the High Council for Dental Care, management of available medical services and the evaluation of medical practice. The Directo-rate of Medical Practice also has the task of examining important questions of bioethics.

Norms for accrediation of emergency services, MES services (Medical Emer-gency Services), and intensive care units will be developed. Furthermore, the law relating to the "Emergency Service 100" has been modified with a view to create provincial schools for ambulance paramedics. The policy for emergency services is supported by the National Council for Emergency Services and by the future Provincial Councils, which are currently under development.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure

See above-cited

2. Capacity-Building/Technology-Issues

Official hospital beds 1 January 1993 : 75.360

i.e. 7,43 beds for every 1.000 inhabitants :

- 5,75 in general hospitals

- 1,68 in psychiatric hospitals.

3. Major Groups

Subdivided in

a) general hospitals :

- general hospitals,

- general hospitals with a university character,

- university hospitals

- exclusively geriatric hospitals

- specialized hospitals

b) psychiatric hospitals

c) rest homes and homes for the elderly

d) psychiatric rest homes and protected living systems

4. Finance

Overall national hospital budget; 144,88 billion Bfr in 1977

5.Regional/International Cooperation

Almost the entire budget for Belgian bilateral cooperation concerning population is comprised of programmes for primary health care in gene-ral, and for maternal and infant health care in particular. The Belgian contribution to UNFPA in 1993 was Bfr.75 million (US$ 2.3 million)

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
1994
Life expectancy at birth

Male

Female

69.1

75.7

71.9

78.5

76

M+F
Infant mortality (per 1000 live births)
14
9
8
Maternal mortality rate (per 100000 live births)
8
3 1
Access to safe drinking water (% of population)
Access to sanitation services (% of population)
Other data

1 1986

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 7: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE HUMAN SETTLEMENT DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

Belgium has a strong and unique human settlements and habitat identity (high degree of urbanization ; urbanization of rural areas ; predominance of medium-size and small towns ; a regionally differentiated approach to human settlements and habitat policies ; tradition of socially redistributive human settlements and housing policy with high infrastructural services...).

Although the population may be slow in growth, household unit requirements are still substantially growing.

Urban physical expansion, to the detriment of agricultural land and green areas, has been considerable in the past through the sub-urbanization tendency and undiscriminating commercial expansion.

The principles of Sustainable Development, particularly since the 1992 Rio UNCED conference, are increasingly influencing the national decision-making in its international responsibilities as well as in its role of co-ordinating Regional Government initiatives.

The 1993 Constitution explicitly states the "right to decent housing" as a constitutional right in Belgium. Each Region further details the modalities and implementation priorities.

The Regions are to a very large degree responsible for policies and implementation related to human settlements, housing matters and urban development.

International co-operation in the human settlements and habitat field is, in Belgium, organised on several institutional levels : the Federal Government, the Regional Governments, the local governments (municipalities, provinces) and a good number of non-government organizations.

All these bodies provide substantial contributions to habitat through multilateral and bilateral co-operation channels. The Belgian development co-operation stimulates training and capacity-building programmes and assists international courses and research programmes initiated by universities and contributes to other training and educational activities (f.e. localising Agenda 21 programme).

In execution of the decisions of the United Nations a Belgium National Committee for Human Settlements was established under the chairmanship of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

3. Major Groups:

4. Finance:

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1990
1995
Urban population in % of total population
96,5
97,0
Annual rate of growth of urban population (%)
0,3
0,4
Largest city population (in % of total population)
11,5
11,1
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 8: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN DECISION-MAKING

(See pages vii and viii at the beginning of the profile)

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The review and revision of legislative, regulatory and administrative guidelines have, since UNCED, been a permanent process. The Regional Governments of Flanders and Wallonia have adopted Regional laws as the framework for the integration of this process regarding environment. The main environmental competence of the Federal Government is coordination and interface with international authorities and a part of social and economic responsibilities lies at the Federal level. The Regional Governments are also responsible for a large part of social and economic affairs and the Community Governments for personal and cultural affairs.

At the end of 1996, the Federal Government has decided to propose to the Federal Parliament a new law improving the planning and management of sustainable development at the Federal level. This law brings institutional changes and introduces new procedures so as to facilitate the integrated consideration of social, economic and environmental issues. Its main innovation is the organization of the quadrennial planning of Federal policies and measures for sustainable development under the leadership of a Federal Interdepartmental Commission. The Federal Planning Office will be in charge of the secretariat of this commission, of publishing a Federal report on sustainable development, monitoring the state of development every other year (including business as usual and their impacts compared to alternative scenarii), and of planning a sustainable development Federal strategy. This strategy will be subjected to the examination and advice of the National Council of Sustainable Development, where major groups of the society are represented, and take this advice into account before being adopted by the Government.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a Topical Coordination Division (TCD) which coordinates consensus on environmental matters among Federal, Regional and Community authorities. It also coordinates the drafting of the Belgian report on sustainable development. Cross-sectorial and inter-departmental cooperation and coordination was initiated between the Federal Government and the three Regional Governments in the context of the cooperation on international environmental policy. The Coordination Committee for International Environmental Policy (CCIEP) was established to systematically review the relationsship and overlaps between international agreements, and became fully operational in 1995.

It is charged with coordination and consultation activities to ensure vertical and horizontal integration regarding environmental policy. It also decides on Belgium's international environmental policy.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

As described above, the decision-making stuctures regarding sustainable development are far from being fully integrated in Belgium. At the regional level, though, Regional laws and frameworks regarding environment policy in Belgium have been permanently improved since UNCED, and a coordinating mechanism decides on Belgim's international environment policy with the Federal level. Regarding integration between environment and development, the Federal Government has decided at the end of 1996 to propose to the Federal Parliament a new law improving the planning and management of sustainable development at the Federal level. This law brings institutional changes and introduces new procedures so as to facilitate the integrated consideration of social, economic and environmental issues.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

An interdepartmental commission is in charge of the scientific aspects of sustainable development. The Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs (OSTC) is preparing a framework for research on sustainable development. One programme under this framework aims to improve communication on the subject of implementing sustainable development among scientists, decision makers and NGO's. Activities include a discussion platform for policy proposals, carrying out studies and small research projects to integrate results for multi-disciplinary approaches, and all-inclusive database pertaining to sustainable development.

3. Major Groups:

As a reminder

4. Finance:

As a reminder

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

As a reminder

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 9: PROTECTION OF THE ATMOSPHERE

NATIONAL PRIORITY:

Status Report-The Vienna Convention (1985) signed in 1985 and ratified in 1988.-Montreal Protocol (1987) signed in 1987 and ratified in December 1988.-London Amendment (1990) signed in 1990 and ratified in October 1993.-Copenhagen Amendment (1992) signed in 1992.-The latest report to the Montreal Protocol Secretariat was prepared in 1996.

1.Depletion of the Ozone LayerThe Federal and the Regional Governments actively support the development of more progressive EU legislation for control measures on ozone depleting substances and are actively involved in EU working groups, i.a. concerning illegal imports of CFCs. In coordination with the Regional authorities, a system for monitoring and data gathering on imports, exports and use of ozone depleting substances is being put in place in view of improving the waste management of used ODS (recovery, recycling and destruction) as well as the control on illegal import of CFCs. A transition strategy is being developed for CFC containing MDI's. Moreover, a number of studies have been undertaken on ozone depletion.

Status Report

-UNFCCC signed in 1992. Ratified in January 1996.

-The latest report to the UNFCCC Secretariat was submitted in 1997.2.Climate ChangeClimate change policy is focussed on CO2 emissions, with no policy objectives as yet determined for the other GHG. While a number of measures have been taken in the energy and transportation sector, by industry and by local authorities, no significant changes have been observed in the emissions from these sectors.The Belgian National Programme for the Reduction of CO2 emissions (NPRCE) was adopted in 1994 to reduce emissions by 5% by the year 2000,as related to 1990 levels, based on a mix of policies and measures, including fiscal and non fiscal measures. Apart from those some measures exist, aimed at reducing GHG emissions, other than CO2, and include, for example, incineration and methane recuperation systems at landfills. A new national policy plan on the reduction of GHG emissions will be prepared by 1999. This plan will also contain policy objectives and measures for other GHG than CO2.Within the context of the first Belgian national communication under the UNFCCC, both CO2 emissions and carbon sink inventories have been established for the 1990-1994 period, as well as inventories for CH4 and N2O emissions. The Federal Government has committed itself to the adoption of a carbon and energy tax in close consultation with other European countries concerned. Non-fiscal measures such as energy efficiency standards regulation,voluntary agreements and promotion of mass transit systems are proposed in the NPRCE. Some energy standards have been implemented. Flanders has a tax allowance scheme to encourage energy saving investments by enterprises. Wallonia has developped local energy offices to inform the public on rational use of energy.

(Cont.)Status Report-Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (1979) signed in 1979 and ratified in July 1982.

-EMEP Protocol (1984) signed in 1984 and ratified in July 1987.-Helsinki Protocol on SO2 (1985) signed in 1985 and ratified in April 1989. -Sofia Protocol on NOX (1988) signed in 1988.-Geneva Protocol on VOC (1991) signed in 1991.-Oslo Protocol on SO2 (1994) signed in 1994.

3.Transboundary Air PollutionBelgium follows the EU directives on air quality and pollutants emission control from mobile and fixed sources. For tropospheric ozone, the Ministers Council adopted (summer 1996) a set of measures related to the ozone problem and its effects on public health, including measures concerning air pollution modelling, use of solvent containing products, the transport sector, industrial emissions etc. Belgium participated at the Ministerial Tropospheric Ozone in North West Europe Conference (May 1996) where the ministers or their representatives adopted a common statement in which they commit themselves to take measures now to eliminate ozone episodes in the region by 2005.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1.Decision-Making Structure

The Coordinating Committee on International Environmental Policies (CCIEP) is a forum for negotiation between the various Federal and Regional Government Departments involved in environmental policy and has a number of working groups, e.g. on climate change, depletion of the ozone layer, protection of the atmosphere and emission inventories.

The Federal Government carried out activities to sensitize industry by means of voluntary agreements in specific sectors and a number of studies have been undertaken. Parallel to the Federal actions to protect the atmosphere, the Regional Governments of Brussels, Flanders and Wallonia are implementing their own programmes and regulations, such as EIA. In the Flemish Region the maximum allowed emission and immission levels of different air pollutants are given by the official environmental legislation Vlarem, the latest updated version of which was published in 1996. A decree of the Flemish Government calls for an Environmental Policy Plan (EPP) every 5 years and an Environment Report every 2 years. The first report, published in 1994, describes the different social activities causing pressure on the environment and their effects and gives an overview of possible improving measures. A second version, published in 1996, is based on a more strictly structured and modellation-driven approach. The first EPP was drafted in 1996 and will be officially approved in the beginning of 1997. The 1994 Wallonia Environmental Plan for Sustainable Development develops actions in the field of climate change, air pollution, energy and transport among others. Each year a report of the environment in Wallonia in a specified area is published. In 1993 air pollution has been addressed, in 1994 climate change ; in 1995 the sectors energy, industry and transport have been examined.

The Federal Government is adressing aspects such as the cost-effectiveness of alternative transportation systems and the environmental impacts and safety of transportation technologies. Flemish traffic policy is aimed at improving safety, and the efficient transport of passengers and goods in order to reduce traffic congestion and an environmentally sound transportation system. Railroads and inland waterways are to be developed as alternative transportation systems. The goal of Wallonia's transportation policy is to reduce energy consumption and detrimental environmental impacts. Overall, progress has been slight to fair in improving the transportation systems in Belgium.

2.Capacity-Building / Technology IssuesThe Regional Governments carry out emission and air quality inventories according to international obligations, especially with respect to EU directives for the CORINAIR database and international conventions such as EMEP. The Regions have developed a network of stations measuring ambient air pollution. They also established an Interregional Cell for the Environment (IRCEL) whose main duties are the supervision of atmospheric emissions, the management of a data bank for ambient air quality and which serves as focal point for the European Environment Agency. IRCEL is the National Reference Center for the thematic Centers "Air quality" and "Atmospheric Emissions" of the EEA. The Cell also monitors pollution episods and particularly tropospheric ozone.The National Impulse Programme on Global Change contributes to the international research effort and is done in collaboration with projects of the IGBP, WRCP, the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Changes and the EU programme Environment and Climate. In the Flemish Region, a centre of excellence for best available technologies is carrying out a number of research projects for developing clean technologies as well as a monitoring system for GHG for the IPCC.

(Cont.)

3.Major GroupsIndustry and transport are the major targets of government efforts to use new and environmentally sound technologies. Environmental NGO's, business and professional organisations and trade unions participate on both the Federal and the Regional levels in policy making on sustainable development, through a number of advisory bodies, such as the National Council for Sustainable Development (Federal), the Environment and Nature Council (MINA-Raad, Flanders) and the Walloon Environment Council for Sustainable Development (CWEDD, Wallonia).

4.Finance

The Federal Government contributed US$ 8.59 million towards the implementation of developing country efforts under the Montreal Protocol for the period 1991-1996.National Research Impulse Programmes are Global Change (US$ 16.4 million for the period 1991-1996 and US$ 17.1 million for a second phase), Transport and Mobility (US$ 11.3 million for 1990-1996) and Sustainable Mobility (US$ 10.9 million for 1996-2000).5. Regional/ International CooperationBelgian scientists have participated in various IPPC assessments, the WMO's Panel for the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion and the European Programme on the Transport and Transformation of Trace Gases in the Troposphere over Europe (EUROTRAC). This last programme provides substantive input into other international negotiations on transboundary air pollution and ozone depletion. One spot in the Walloonforest is also a study center for the EUROCRAFT and EUROFLUX EU research programmes in the field of the impact of climate change on forestal ecosystems.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
1994
CO2 emissions (eq. million tons)
111.349
118.336
SOx "
0.828
0.317
0.253
NOx "
0.442
0.353
0.345
CH4 "
0.634
0.635
Consumption of ozone depleting substances (Tons)
Expenditure on air pollution abatement in US$ equivalents (million)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 10: INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF LAND RESOURCES

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

The Regional Governments are carrying out a number activities to manage land resources sustainably, including formulating appropriate policies, improving information systems, public awareness campaigns, and pilot projects.

The evolutionary options of Regional policies concern the management of land resources in the following way ;

- define territorial planning zones and infrastructural zones and defining their relations

- define town and village planning, in order to reinforce the densification of urban areas, in order to obtain more urban and rural specificity

- organize parsimonious management of soil and natural resources while allowing for a harmonious life style development

- propose the localization of transport infrastructure, a hierarchy of transport modes and the implementation of complementarity between them.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure

The Regional Governments of Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels Capital City are each responsible for the integrated planning and management of land resources. The Regional Governments are the most competent authorities as regards territorial planning ; however, the local authorities do have certain important prerogatives in this area, in a context of participation and decentralization.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues

Education and training on integrated approaches to land management, instutitional strengthening and strengthening of technological capacities are important activities which are not being implemented by all Regional Governments.

3. Major Groups

As a reminder.

4. Finance

As a reminder.

5. Regional/International Cooperation

The BADC contributed Bfr. 24 million (US$ 720,000) for the establishment of a centre for remote -sensing under the Moroccan Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Research. The Federal Government also co-financed a project on aerial photography of Cambodia to the order of Bfr.16.5 million (US$ 500,000). The Regional Governments participate in a number of European initiatives, such as the elaboration of a framework for the development of the European Area, among others. They participate in a number of inter-regional projects within the framework of the European region and have cooperative agreements with the cities of Berlin and Beijing.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 11: COMBATING DEFORESTATION

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

There is not one definition of forest for Belgium as a whole at the Federal level. Forestry is a fully regionalised matter wich means that the three Regions of the country are politically responsable for forestry affairs. Forests in general are considered to be surfaces covered with trees which function as ecosystems and that can fulfill several functions (wood production, recreation, nature conservation, landscape, soil- and/or water protection, shelter functions,...). However, the simple alignment of trees, orchards and gardens are not considered as forests.

The forest area in the Brussels Capital City Region has been classified as a forest zone. Forests can have in the land use management programmes several protected statuses (reserve, nature area, forest area). In addition to these zoning plans forests can have a juridical status such as protected landscape, forest reserve or nature reserve. Next to these regulations in the Walloon Region there is a working definition for forests that is used for the forest inventories according to the international agreed definitions. In the Flemish Region there is a juridical definition as well.

The primary obstacle to reforestation and afforestation efforts are the attitude of agriculturalists, limited available land areas and limited financial rentability of forest estates. This is aggravated by the long-term nature of forest investments, high maintenance charges, inappropiate taxation structures, fragmentation of forests and silviculture practices not always adapted to the site.

Forest inventories have been prepared for the three Regions, carried out annually for the Brussels Capital City Region, and about every ten years for the Flemish and Walloon Regions. Wallonia's forest inventory is presently being updated. The first overall Flemish forest inventory programme started in 1996.

Wallonia's forests do not suffer significantly from deforestation. In fact, the forest cover has increased from 300,000 hectares to 500,000 hectares over the past 150 years. Although the Flemish Region's forests also have shown a continual increase in area, particular attention is given to afforestation and forest protection in the urban areas and around historically old forests. Flanders still remains a Region with low forest cover (about 8%).

Since UNCED, (Rio, June 1992) a number of forest-related activities have been fully addressed by the Regional Governments, including promoting extension services, public awareness campaings, research projects, geographical information systems, remote-sensing, national plans, multiple roles of forests, land classification and EIA's.

The adoption of EU regulation on forestry measures on agricultural land is expected to encourage more agricultural land to be forested.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure

The Regional Governments are the focal points of authority and competence with respect to managing forests, with forest services being fairly decentralized. The various Ministries of Environment of each Region are represented in the National Council for Sustainable Development. Forests and related legislation have been in existence in the regions since as early 1854. Since 1992 several amendments and specifications have been adapted (e.g. public accessibility, inventarisation, forest reserves, support for private forest sector). A number of Regional laws ensure that conflicting uses of the forests do not occur. The Environmental Plan for the Sustainable Development of the Walloon Region has given particular attention to forest issues. The Flemish Government developed in 1993 a long-term strategic forestry plan. A Forest Actionplan is due to be approved in early 1997.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues

Efforts have been undertaken to improve the qualifications of forestry personnel. The Flemish and Walloon Regions have institutions which focus on forestry research and high level education (university level). Training and extension services are important in the three Regions.

3. Major Groups

The private forest owners, rural cooperatives, local authorities and communities, youth and NGO's are among those which play an important role in sustainable forest management. Women, however, do not play a role as a special group in forestry. Overall social actions for equality and emancipation include the forest sector.

Consultative mechanisms have been created, such as the ministerial advisory councils in both the Walloon and Flemish Regions, in wich also stakeholders of the wood sector are represented.

4. Finance

The 1996 budget for forest management (wages and research not included) was Bfr. 1.22 billion (US$ 39.40 million). In 1995 this was Bfr 1.15 billion (US$ 37.21 million). The national revenue from the forest sector (including wood processing industries) is approximately Bfr. 117 billion (US$ 3.55 billion). The Regional Governments provide subsides under objective criteria for the sustainable management of forests.

5. Regional/International Cooperation

Belgium participates actively in a number of regional and international organisations on forest policy, such as the EU, BENELUX and International Tropical Timber Organization ITTO. Belgium also participates actively in the Ministerial Conference for the Protection of European Forests to develop criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of forests. The Federal and Regional Governments carry out a number of programmes and projects in other countries on a bilateral basis, such as with Morocco on forest information systems and an afforestation and forestry research projects in China. Special attention is given to countries with economies in transition.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
1996
Forest Area (Km2) 1
6,950
6,990
Protected forest area 2
1,798 ha
Roundwood production (solid volume of roundwood without bark in mill m3)
3.3
5.6
Deforestation rate (Km2/annum)
Reforestation rate (Km2/annum)
52.103
Other data

1 Belgium-Luxembourg

2 Strictly forest reserves. Some forests also have a nature reserve status (see chapter 15)

3 Estimation based on forest inventory of the Walloon Region. In the case of land subject to

forestry regulations, reforestation is obligatory.

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 12: MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING DESERTIFICATION AND DROUGHT

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Drought and/or Desertification

Particularly in Africa

Although Belgium wasn't able to sign the Convention before the deadline, the process of accession is well underway. Deposition of the instruments of accession is expected in the first semester of 1997, in order to participate in the First Conference of the Parties as a Party to the Convention.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure

The Belgian Agency for Development Co-operation (BADC) is in charge of elaborating bilateral development projects and of co-ordinating Belgian contributions to multilateral interventions. It does so through government to government agreements or agreements with international organizations. BADC has a long-standing record of actions in the field of combating desertification and drought within both frameworks, especially in Africa.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues

In its bilateral projects BADC usually includes activities that relate to capacity development and technology transfer, either locally, through training programmes in Belgium, or both.

As a result of the Convention, the Belgian scientific community has established a national group of desertification experts to be included in the future European network that will contribute to the Committee on Science and Technology (CST) of the Convention.

3. Major Groups

Target populations of development projects in the field of combating desertification and drought are mainly situated at the grass-root level, with an increasing attention being paid to women. Local governments are also the aim of capacity building, through an objective oriented project cycle which intends to take up all major groups in the decision-making process, thus promoting the participatory approach at all levels. In addition to its direct bilateral projects, BADC also finances NGOs that are active in combating desertification and drought.

4. Finance

New projects financed by BADC from 1992 on, i.e. disregarding projects started before 1992 and completed after that year or still running, can be summarized as follows :

-direct bilateral 11.22 million US$ (excluding SADC, see below)

-NGOs 2.04 million US$

-multilateral 5.00 million US$ (excluding IFAD, see below)

-universities 1.27 million US$ (see below)

-financial 14.24 million US$

The total BADC funding for combating desertification and drought for the period 1992-1996, thus amounts to 94.42 million US$, including all expenditures cited under 5. below.

5. Regional/International Cooperation

For the period 1987-1996 Belgium has contributed a total amount of 52 million US$ to IFAD's Special Programme for Sub-Saharan Africa, of which many projects belong to the realm of combating desertification and drought.

The SADC region has received financing for water programmes, drought monitoring, forest inventory and soil improvement to the overall amount of 8.65 million US$ for the period 1993-1996.

Belgian universities also participate in international projects, such as the conservation of pastoral resources and integrated approach to combat desertification in Tunesia. These two projects have budgets of 750,000 US$ and 515,000 US$ respectively.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
199_
Land affected by desertification (Km2)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: SUSTAINABLE MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

As a reminder

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

3. Major Groups:

4. Finance:

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 14: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

The pursuit of sustainable agriculture is the basis for agricultural policy for Belgium. Particular attention is given to integrating the linkage between environnement and agriculture into economic and political objectives. To this end, a number of activities have been implemented, including regulation (for exemple the approval of phytopharmaceuticals), agronomic research, training and financial assistance.

The European Commission approved in 1994 an agri/environmental programme which contains Federal and Regional measures. The Federal measures consist in assistance for organic farming and for demonstration projects on reduced use of fertilizer and pesticide in agriculture and on organic farming. Regulations were taken to enforce the evolution towards integrated pest management in apple and pear production. In the Flemish Region new regulations entered into force in 1995 to encourage investments in agricultural production with sound environmental practices. In 1996 the new regulation on fertilizer use is being implemented. Flanders at this moment is preparing a code of good agricultural practices which consider sustainability to be one of the key elements of a sound and responsable agriculture. The Walloon Governement is developing an Environmental Plan for Sustainable Development, which includes sustainable agriculture.

Many of the recommendations of Agenda 21 for activities promoting sustainable agriculture have been or are being implemented. These include measures which take account of demographic trends, studies on land taxation structures, linkage with international trade and agricultural production, strengthening farmers' rights, developing databases and developing policy to rehabilitate degraded lands, among others. These are being achieved by legislative and regulatory reforms, pilot projects, training and the development of national plans.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

Agricultural and rural development policies are the responsibilities of the Middle Class and Agriculture (MMCA), the Ministry of the Walloon Region and the Ministry of the Flemish Region. The MMCA is represented in the National Council for Sustainable Development. The reformed Common Agricultural Policy provides the basis for new activities for agricutural production methods compatible with the environmental protection. The three Communities are responsible for the post-schoolish education of the regional farmers. This education integrates especially the sustainable agriculture.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

As a reminder

3. Major Groups:

The Belgian Survival Fund is responsable for a cooperative programme with Belgian NGOs to implement international projects. The objectives of these projects are food security and awareness-building of local communities in rural areas about sustainable development.

4. Finance:

Agricultural development in 1993 costed the BADC 7,25 % of its budget, down from 10,5 % in 1992. The international projects being implemented with Belgian NGOs have a budget of Bfr. 1 billion (US$ 30 million). The BADC provided Bfr. 1.1 billion (US$ 34 million) for rural development in nine African countries.

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

The BADC implemented agricultural projects in 11 African countries, 3 Asian countries and 3 Latin American countries. Belgian universities also contribute to international projects. The Belgium Governement participates in a number of international organizations with sustainable agriculture objectives, such as IFAD, FAO, the WFP and the International Rice Research Institute, among others.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1985
1990
1995
Agricultural land (Km2)
13,899
13,573
13,681
Agricultural land as % of total land area
45.5
44.7
44.8
Agricultural land per capita
1,410
1,364
1,350
1985
1990
1994
Consumption of nitrogen fertilizers (Kg N/Km2 of agricultural land)
15,900
15,500
14,200
Consumption of fosfate fertilizers (Kg P2O5/Km2 of agricultural land)
6,200
5,800
3,900
Consumption of potase fertilizers (Kg K2O/Km2 of agricultural land)
8,300
8,500
6,700

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 15: CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) signed in 1992, ratified on 22 November 1996, Contracting Party on 20 February 1997.
First national report to be submitted not later than 1st January 1998

Additional comments relevant to this chapter

The decline of animal diversity is due primarily to human activity, especially land-use, leading to natural habitat destruction. Pollution and the introduction of exotic plant species are also threats to maintaining animal diversity. Over-exploitation appears to play a minor role but the introduction of exotic animal species is a problem.

Natural habitat desctruction and pollution are the primary causes for the loss of plant diversity in Belgium. The introduction of exotic plant species is also considered a threat. The introduction of exotic animal species and over-exploitation are considered minor to the loss of plant diversity.

Scientific studies demonstrate that from 1950 onwards certain invertebrate groups showed a significant and sometimes dramatic decline in populations and in numbers of species. The phenomenon was particularly well documented for vertebrates, diurnal butterflies, some families of beetles and wasps, dragonflies and damselflies, terrestrial snails and spiders. A similar trend exists for plants, fungi and lichens. On the other hand, there are many scientific papers dealing with recently introduced invertebrate species, some of which are invasive species e.g. wasps and other insects, terrestrial slugs, crustaceans, etc.

A number of measures are undertaken for the in-situ conservation (and restoration) of ecosystems and their components and ex-situ conservation of biological and genetic resources. At the Regional level, the in-situ conservation of ecosystems is mainly assured by the creation and management of nature reserves. These were and are being developed by the three Regional Government and by private organizations as well. Each year, new areas are designated as nature reserves or existing ones are enlarged. A complementary nature conservation policy has also been developed outside reserves in order to notably maintain or restore the ecological corridors. In the Flemish Region efforts are being made to create a Green Main Structure, that can be integrated in the development of an Pan-European Ecological Network. This Flemish Structure is designed as a coherent network. It will be built from core areas, rich in biodiversity, corridors or steppings stones and areas where nature conservation, forestry and agriculture are combined in a sustainable way. In the Walloon Region, an ecological network has been set up as well as a partnership for managing the rural environment. The Brussels Capital Region developed a bio-indicator information network based on birds, amphibians, reptiles, higher plants and mosses.

A number of institutions play an important role in the ex-situ conservation of biological and genetic resources. Conservation is maintained in botanical and zoological gardens. As regards to micro-organisms, four collections form the basis of an important network coordinated by the Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs.

The Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, has been designated as the CBD-National Focal Point. This Focal Point has launched in October 1996 a Belgian Clearing-House Mechanism on the Internet. The homepage address is :
http://www.kbinirsnb.be/bch-cbd/homepage.htm

The first part of the homepage deals with Belgium : on one hand, services given by the National Focal Point (e.g. addresses and competences, expertise, bibliography, collections); on the other hand, the ratification process and in future, step by step, the whole story of the Belgian implementation of the CBD. The second part presents a selection of useful hyperlinks.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

The Regional Governments and the Federal Ministries of the Environment, Science Policy, Social Affairs, Public Health and Environment, Agriculture and Development Cooperation are the principal bodies in charge of different aspects of the conservation of biological diversity and genetic resources. A number of Regional laws on the conservation of nature include provisions for the conservation of biological diversity and the Regional Governments have developed strategies and action plans dealing with conservation of biological diversity. The follow-up of these action plans at the national level is coordinated by the Steering Committee "Biodiversity Convention" under the authority of the Coordination Committee for International Environmental Policy; it is carried out in the context of implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

National capacities for studying, assessing and monitoring biological diversity need to be strengthened; Belgian research institutes and universities do carry out a large number of activities at the Regional, national and international levels. An inventory of Belgian professionals participating in studying, assessing and monitoring biological diversity is available (1995). The possibilities of biotechnology in assessing biological diversity are being considered.

3. Major Groups:

The participation and input of local authorities is considered to be essential to the success of efforts for the conservation of biological and genetic resources. A public awareness campaign is under way in rural areas for the conservation of landscapes, species and varieties within species.

4. Finance:

The Belgian Agency for Development Cooperation contributed :
- to the GEF : Bfr 85 million in 1994; Bfr 235 million in 1995; Bfr 390 million in 1996;
(the contribution for 1997 will be Bfr 390 million);
- to the CGIAR and its international research centers : US$ 6.7 million in 1994.

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

Belgian universities and research institutes carry out many projects at the Regional and international level, the most distinctive of which are the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, the National Botanical Garden, the Royal Museum for Central Africa, the Institute of Nature Conservation and the Scientific Centre of the Walloon Region. Long term scientific studies under national and international collaborations are carried out in the tropics (e.g. Central Africa, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Galapagos, the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean), the Lake Baïkal, the Antarctic, Atlantic archipelagos, the Mediterranean, the Red Sea and in Europe. Belgium participates actively in the CGIAR.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1992
1996
Protected area as % of total land area
2.4
(*)
1990
1996
Number of threatened species
(?)24
Many more
species!

(*)
Other data
- Number of species known to live in Belgium (*)
- Number of species known to have disappeared from Belgium
(*) Will be assessed inter alia in the first national report to COP-4 (1998)

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 16: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

The management of biotechnologies has been coordinated at the Regional and Federal levels by setting up and implementing an integrated biosafety regulatory framework. It also includes the implementation of the European Union's directives on the contained-use and the deliberate release of genetically-modified organisms (GMO's) in the environment. Indeed, not only the European provisions have been integrated but also all uses of human, animal and plant pathogens and the protection of biodiversity for when GMO's are used in the environment or placed on the market.

Extensive coordination with sectorial regulations on medicinal, food/feed and raw material products was carried out. The center of this coordination is the Advisory Biosafety Council, whose executive staff coordinates within the Service for Biosafety and Biotechnology (SBB), located in Brussels.

The Council is a collegium of representatives of the various competent authorities from Regional and Federal levels. The Council is sustained by ad hoc experts groups focusing on specific areas of biotechnology.

The SBB is a contact point for both internal and international scientific and regulatory interactions. Governmental experts of the SBB are national contacts for UNEP, OECD and the EU. The experts of the SBB are responsible for the risk assessment of all contained-use activities, on mandate of the Regional authorities. Occasionaly, the advice of the Biosafety Council is requested for sensitive matters such as gene therapy and recombinant viruses. The introduction of GMO's is presently being reviewed by the Biosafety Council, noteworthy the experimental GMO's tested in Europe and the GMO-based products submitted to the consent of the European Commission.

The SBB is a scientific center helping all scientists involved in recombinant DNA pathogen research to fulfil the regulations where applicable. It is also a center for biosafety documentation and archives. As information provider, the SBB is currently managing Internet services to the public and the users, on matters of local and international interest (http : //biosafety.ihe.be). Whereas contained-use activities are now fully controlled on basis of Regional regulations, some juridical acts must still be finalized for field testing and placing on the market of GMO's. All in all, a very flexible and speedy, users- and public-friendly regulatory interface has been developed.

Such a coordinated regulation fully complements the important investments and R&D networking management made by the Flemish Government. The Flemish biotechnology has a coherent structure from academic research up to patent technology and biotechnological financement mechanisms, based on R&D-industry networking, including technolgy assessment at its disposal. Noteworthy is the special emphasis laid on transgenic plants, diagnostics and gene therapies.

A similar management of biotechnologies is carried out in Wallonia around the genome research program, the recombinant vaccines, the bioremediation, the heteroprotein production and the bioluminescence technologies.

In Brussels, the same occurs for gene- and immuno-therapeutics, for GMP production of transplantable human cells and for gene therapy vectors intended for clinical research and therapies.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

The Regional Governments are responsible for economics, science policy, prenormative-research and environmental regulations of the contained use of GMO's and pathogens. They provide for the safety of the field testing of GMO's together with the Federal Government. The Federal Government is responsible of norms, normative research, implementation of international norms and the related coordination with specific ad hoc bodies.

As the Federal ministries are responsible for product and market regulations, they are more and more involved in international experts meetings and coordinate the information fluxes through common contact points. The Regional Ministries of the Environment control the application of the biosafety regulations through focal agencies. All contained installations are submitted to environmental clearance, whereas any projected activities must be either declared or authorized according to the biosafety level involved.

At the Federal level, all experimental releases of GMO's must be authorized before they are carried out. Consent must also be delivered for GMO-based products proposed to be placed on the European market

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

A Biosafety Council comprised of competent Belgian authorities on environment and biotechnology products is charged with providing advice on biotechnology safety, such as on the use of appropriate technology and techniques. The Walloon Region has over three hundred clinical laboratories, universities and companies, as well as high schools which are active in the biotechnology sector. The presence of the European Commission in Brussels catalyses the interaction between the local scientific community and the international scientific and biotechnology milieux. Three large universities and five scientific institutions have made important contributions to the education and training in related sciences. The Brussels Capital City Region has some 40 public and private institutions which carry out activities related to state-of-the art technology on biology, genetics, pharmacology and medicine, among others. About 2.000 academic and industrial researchers work in the Brussels Capital City area, of which about one-quarter come from the European Union member countries, Eastern Europe and developing countries.

3. Major Groups:

As a reminder

4. Finance:

As a reminder

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

At the international level, businesses and research centers are subjected to administrative controls to ensure protection of the environment. This is also in keeping with directives of the European Union. The Walloon Government participates in a number of bilateral initiatives.

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 17: PROTECTION OF THE OCEANS, ALL KINDS OF SEAS, INCLUDING ENCLOSED AND SEMI-ENCLOSED SEAS, AND COASTAL AREAS AND THE PROTECTION, RATIONAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR LIVING RESOURCES

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea

The precautionary approach is the leading principle upon which Belgium bases its commitments, and particularly in the international conferences on the protection of the North Sea. The dialogue between the Federal authorities and the Regional Governments has improved considerably because the contamination of the sea from land-based sources is the major factor and most of the related actions are responsibilities of the Belgian Regions.

Important activities to protect the oceans include, among others :

- the development of Best Environmental Practice (BEP) concerning dredging activities. This was approved by the OSPAR Commission in 1993;

- the development of Best Available Technology (BAT) to reduce polluting effluents from the textile industry in 1995. This work resulted in the approval by the OSPAR Commission in 1995 of a recommendation on BAT and in 1996 of a recommendation on emission limits for that sector;

- the establishment of an extensive aerial surveillance programme to monitor illegal discharges by ships, with further attention being paid to the follow-up, including lawsuits;

- the fulfillment of a programme for the reduction of inputs of 36 hazardous substances (metals, solvents, pesticides, dioxines) in the North Sea (50 % reduction between 1985-1995). The opportunity has been taken in this context to develop a comprehensive dataset of the emissions of these substances in the environment which is now considered as a basis for further decision-making processes;

- the establishment of a multi-year research programme on marine sciences related to the protection of the North Sea.

A number of sustainable development indicators pertaining to the coastal and marine environment are applied in Belgium (e.g. algae index; releases of nutrients, metals and POP's; contamination of biota; quality of bathing water).The indicators related to marine species have been developed and quantified by the European Union.

There are no Belgian vessels which fish the High Seas.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

The Federal Government and Regional Governments share responsibilities for ensuring integrated planning and implementation of Belgium's national policy on oceans. To a large extent, the Technical Commission for the North Sea coordinated this work, and participates on an ad hoc basis in the National Council for Sustainable Development.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

Belgium carries out an assessment of the major types of land-based sources of marine pollution through the use of appropriate monitoring technology and mathemathical modelling. Belgium's marine database of the Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models (MUMM) is considered as an adequate integrated coastal zone management database. It does not cover cultural and socio-economic activities or protected areas. Comprehensive assessments on the state of the coastal and marine environments are carried out every five years (Quality Status Reports of the North Sea).

3. Major Groups:

Industry associations and official organizations of fishermen, representing small-scale artisanal fishermen mainly, participate in an advisory capacity in national processes.

4. Finance:

A number of eco-taxes recently entered into force which aim to reduce polluting effluents and to promote investments in environmentally sound technology. See chapters 4 and 34 for further information. Belgium submits a number of projects to the EU for funding.

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

Belgium participates actively in regional conventions (e.g. the OSLO and PARIS Conventions - OSPAR Convention), International Conferences on the Protection of the North Sea, the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and the European research programmes "Environment and Climate" and "Marine Sciences and Technologies (MAST)".

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
199-
Catches of marine species (metric tons)
Population in coastal areas
Population served by waste water treatment (% of country's

total population)

Discharges of oil into coastal waters (metric tons)
Releases of phosphate into coastal waters (metric tons)
Releases of nitrate into coastal waters (metric tons)
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 18: PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND USE OF WATER RESOURCES

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

Framework of the water policy in Belgium

Water policy in Belgium follows the competences of the Flemish, Walloon and Brussels Regions. This leads to Regional differentiation in the field of legislation, administration and monitoring systems. European and international legislation in the various aspects of water policy remains however a common basis to all Regions.

Quality and monitoring of fresh water, groundwater and drinking water are based on Regional ministerial orders or decrees, which do implement EU-directives

a. Flanders

Water policy is an integrated part of the global environment policy of Flanders. The policy options are outlined in a Five Year Environment Policy Plan, called MINA. Every two years a State of the Environment Report is made, called MIRA. Each year an Environment Programme is issued. Especially for surface water General Water Treatment Programmes, called AWP, are being designed.

Drinking water supplies resort under the authority of the municipalities. However the larger part of drinking water is supplied by 5 major companies. Total drinking water consumption in Flanders amounts to 439 mio m3 per year (40 % from surface water, 40 % from ground water and 20 % from the Walloon Region).

b. Wallonia

The Walloon Environment Plan for Sustainable Development (PEDD) was passed on 9 March 1995 setting in particular the guidelines for a Water Action Programme. The PEDD also introduced the principle of the actual water price.

In the Walloon Region about 400 mio m3 of water are annually abstracted (320 mio m3 of ground water and 80 mio m3 of surface water) for supply to the drinking water distribution network. 242 mio m3 are distributed in Wallonia through 90 public companies. 148 mio m3 are supplied to the other two regions in Belgium.

The installed water treatment capacity amounts to 1,800,000 i.e. for a population of 3,200,000 inhabitants.

c. Brussels

One of the major objectives of the Brussels Region is the construction of adequate sewerage and waste water treatment facilities. The Region has to take care of the quality of small watercourses, e.g. a section of the river Senne, a sub-basin of the river Scheldt, in the framework of regional programmes and international commitments. Frequent local innundations reflect water quantity problems. This will be resolved by the construction of reservoirs.

The construction of the main water treatment plant for the northern part of the Region is foreseen by the year 2010 (1,3 mio i.e.). The plant for the Southern part of the Region (360,000 i.e.) is under construction.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

a. Flanders

In Flanders decision-making is rather decentralized. Policy-making and policy-shaping in environmental matters takes place in various public bodies in charge of different sectors. Environment and water policy is integrated via programmes rather than by a centralized body. Policy options are formulated by the Flemish Governement and enacted by the Flemish Parliament.

b. Wallonia

Water policy in Wallonia is based on the decree of 7 Octobre 1985 for the protection of surface water and on the decree of 30 April 1990 for the protection and use of ground water.

c. Brussels

Legislation was passed regarding integrated permits for the release of waste waters (Ordonnance 30/07/92) and taxation of waste water (Ordonnance 29/03/96).

The construction programme for sewerage and waste water treatment plants is covered by the Planning Decree of the Brussels Region.

Decisions regarding legislation and investment are taken by the Regional Council based on proposals from the minister in charge of water policy.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

a. Flanders

The Environment Department (LIN) is in charge of policy-making for drinking water, ground water and fresh surface water quantity. Fresh surface water quality is being covered by the Flemish Environment Agency (VMM). Investments in the necessary infrastructure are handled by Aquafin.

b. Wallonia

The General Direction for Natural Resources and Environment (DGRNE) is the competent authority enforcing the Walloon water policy and legislation (permitting, monitoring, control of water supply and waste water treatment companies, etc).

c. Brussels

The Brussels Institute for Management of the Environment is the competent authority enforcing the water policy of the Brussels Region.

3. Major Groups:

a. Flanders

The main target groups are : households, agriculture, industry, transport, energy supply and water supply. When major environmental decrees are launched the Flemish Governement provides for a period of consultation of the general public, prior to finalizing the formulation and prior to enactment by the Flemish Parliament.

b.Wallonia

The various target groups (industry, agriculture, water companies, NGO's) are consulted through the Water Commission. The Walloon Region favours "river contracts", where all parties can contribute to achieve sustainable improvements of the condition of these rivers.

c.Brussels

The different target groups aimed at in the Water Programme are consulted through the Committee for Environmental Affairs. Industry is consulted through the local sectoral professional associations.

(Cont.)

4. Finance:

a. Flanders

The budget for drinking water companies in Flanders can be estimated to exceed 20 bn Bfr. per year. The investment and operating budget for water treatment and sewerage amounts to 10 bn Bfr. per year.

b. Wallonia

The Walloon Region intends to spend 40 bn Bfr. during the next ten years in municipal waste water treatment. At the moment a waste water release tax of 16 Bfr./m3 is raised. This tax will in future increase as a consequence of internalizing all the cost components of water.

c. Brussels

The global budget for investment and operation of the water infrastructure amounts to 25 bn Bfr. for the next ten years. The major part is covered by the Regional budget. The other part comes from collection of waste water release taxes.

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

Co-ordination among the Regions, in the field of water policy takes place whenever a "Belgian" standpoint shall be communicated in a European or international forum. This co-ordination has been institutionalized by the creation of a Co-ordination Committee on International Environment Policy.

Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels are Parties in the International Commissions for the Protection of the Rivers Meuse and Scheldt, together with the Netherlands and France.

Federal and Regional authorities participate in the activities of PARCOM and the Northsea Conferences.

STATISTICAL DATA

Figures for Belgium (estimated)
L.t. annual average
1994
Precipitation (mio m3)
27,100
Evapotranspiration (mio m3)
14,700
Annual inflow (mio m3)
4,100
Annual outflow (mio m3)
8,400
Ground water available for abstraction (mio m3)
900
National resident population (000)
10,101

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS
1980
1990
199-
Fresh water availability (total domestic/external in million m3)
Annual withdrawal of freshwater as % of available water
Other data

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 19: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF TOXIC CHEMICALS, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN TOXIC AND DANGEROUS PRODUCTS

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Belgium's activities within the six programme areas presented in Chapter 19 are developed in the first place in the context of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety (IFCS) and are for the most part carried out within the European Union (EU) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

1. Expansion and acceleration of international risk assessment as a result of exposure to chemical substances

Belgium takes part in this programma through its participation in the assessment of risks caused by existing chemicals within the framework of the EU and of the OECD's High Production Volume programme. This involved, inter alia, the establishment of a group consisting of experts from various universities, scientific institutes and the scientific and administrative units of government bodies.

In the context of CICAD (Concise International Chemical Assessment Documents), Belgium organised and co-financed one of the meetings held in Brussels.

2. Harmonisation of classification and labelling of chemical substances

Belgium engages in this action programme as a member of the Senior Officials Group of the EU and of the Advisory group on Harmonisation of Classification and Labelling Systems of the OECD; it shoulders the responsibility, with other members, for clarifying long-term toxicity criteria.

With regard to the future international instrument for the implementation of relevant rules, Belgium is of the opinion that the strictest possible obligation should be applied rather than a non-committal choice, otherwise the objective of this item of Agenda 21 will not be attained.

3. Exchange of information on dangerous substances and risks as a result of exposure to substances

The London Guidelines for the Exchange of Information on Chemicals in International Trade and the procedures relating to the Prior Informed Consent are implemented within the relevant EU rules and regulations. In addition, Belgium organised and financed the first meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee charged with the task of establishing a legally binding instrument for the implementation of the PIC procedure in Brussels in March 1996.

4. Introduction of risk reduction programmes

In this area also, Belgium participates in the work undertaken at EU and OECD levels (Ad Hoc Group on Risk Reduction). In addition, a national machinery was set up - the Coordinating Committee on International Environmental Policies -, under which a number of working parties closely monitor the environmental problems; a working party on Risk Reduction, for example, is part of the larger umbrella group on Dangerous Products and Chemical Risks. Another initiative involves a draft law imposing product standards to protect health and the environment; once enacted, these provisions should make it possible to mount a quick and efficient - both preventive and curative - response to any harmful substance.

5. Extension of national capacities and potentialities for managing chemical substances

In 1996, a study called "Crossroads Bank" was initiated, whose primary aim was to make an inventory of the needs for information about chemicals (environmental affairs, public health, health of workers, intoxications, accidents,...) and on the available information. This is an initiative in the context of GINC, the Global Information Network on Chemicals of the IFCS. Belgium participates in the work of the OECD/UNEP Group on Information Management.

6. Preventing international illegal trade in dangerous products

We think that provisions on measures should be considered, such as export notification requirements, phase-out mechanisms and framework provisions for the possible adoption of protocols on further measures. One may seize the opportunity offered by the negotiations in the context of the binding PIC instrument to ensure that such an instrument should be sufficiently forward looking and provide a flexible legal framework that is capable of responding to new needs and challenges as they arise, without having to go through a whole treaty-making process again.

7. Improving international cooperation on the various programme areas

Belgium takes part in international cooperative efforts mainly through the European Union; it also participates in the relevant actions initiated by the OECD and the IFCS. It supports the IOMC (Interorganisation Management Committee) coordination efforts.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

As mentioned above, there is a Coordinating Committee on International Environmental Policies (CCIEP), which has a number of working groups acting as a negotiating forum between the various Federal and Regional Ministries involved. Political decisions are approved at ministerial level by the Interministerial Commission for the Environment.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

Extending staff, getting expertise from universities and scientific institutions; establishing technical interdepartmental working parties.

3. Major Groups:

Federal Departments of Health, Employment, Environmental Affairs, Economic Affairs, Transport, Regional Environmental Units; also industry, particularly the Federation of Chemical Industries.

4. Finance:

Financing or co-financing some international initiatives; introducing a system of fees to be paid by the persons responsible for marketing dangerous substances or preparations; the proceeds are intended to contribute towards the costs of the Risk Control Division of the Ministry of the Environment.

5. Regional/International Cooperation:

EU, OECD, UNEP, IFCS, ...

STATISTICAL DATA/INDICATORS

AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 20: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN HAZARDOUS WASTES

NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:

The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal

Basel Convention signed in 1989, ratified in 1993.

The latest information was provided to the Basel Convention Secretariat in 1997.

In Belgium, the environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes is consistent with the regulations and with the directives of the European Union, as well as with the international legal instruments to which Belgium is a party.

This especially includes the implementation of the regulation concerning the shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Union, the European directives concerning waste, dangerous waste, used oils, PCB-PCT's batteries, animal waste, incineration of hazardous waste.

The Belgian waste management plans, elaborated by the Regions, are in line with the European strategy on waste management.

The first priority is the prevention of waste and the reduction of the hazardousness of wastes. The introduction of new techniques and technologies that reduce the use of dangerous products, is one issue in the prevention of dangerous wastes.

Ecotaxes are applied on i.a. pesticides and batteries. Material recovery, production of secondary raw materials and development of new waste treatment techniques are encouraged.

The landfilling of non-treated dangerous waste is prohibited if the dangerous waste does not comply with the severe acceptance criteria of the authorized landfill.

Environmental taxes on the landfilling and the disposal by incineration of waste are used to encourage the prevention and the recovery of waste.

Cross-Sectoral Issues

1. Decision-Making Structure:

Dangerous waste management, including import and export of dangerous waste, is a competence of the Regional Governments of Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels Capital City. The transit of waste through Belgium is a competence of the Federal Government.

The Coordinating Committee of International Environmental Policy (CCIEP) is charged with coordination and consultation activities between the different actors.

2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:

An agreement between the three Regional Governments and the Federal Government regulates the control of the transboundary movements of hazardous waste. Customs and national Gendarmerie are fully involved in the control system.

A data collecting system is developed. The Flemish Region has developed and uses a full-automated system (ASB) for the administration and control on import and export of waste, including on-line consultation