|
National Implementation of Agenda 21
|
Information Provided by the Government of BELGIUM to the
United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and
Sustainable Development
|
This country profile has been provided by:
Name of Ministry/Office:
Date:
Submitted by:
Mailing address:
Telephone:
Telefax:
E-mail:
Note from the Secretariat: An effort has been made to present all country profiles within a common format, with an equal number of pages. However, where Governments have not provided information for the tables appended to Chapters 4 and 17, those tables have been omitted entirely in order to reduce the overall length of the profile and save paper. Consequently, there may be some minor inconsistencies among the formats of the different country profiles.
All statistics are rendered as provided by the respective Governments.
|
| APELL | Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at Local Level |
| CFC | chlorofluorocarbon |
| CGIAR | Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research |
| CILSS | Permanent Inter-State Committee on Drought Control in the Sahel |
| EEZ | exclusive economic zone |
| ECA | Economic Commission for Africa |
| ECE | Economic Commission for Europe |
| ECLAC | Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean |
| ELCI | Environmental Liaison Centre International |
| EMINWA | environmentally sound management of inland water |
| ESCAP | Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific |
| ESCWA | Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia |
| FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
| GATT | General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade |
| GAW | Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO) |
| GEF | Global Environment Facility |
| GEMS | Global Environmental Monitoring System (UNEP) |
| GEMS/WATER | Global Water Quality Monitoring Programme |
| GESAMP | Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution |
| GIPME | Global Investigation of Pollution in Marine Environment (UNESCO) |
| GIS | Geographical Information System |
| GLOBE | Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment |
| GOS | Global Observing System (WMO/WWW) |
| GRID | Global Resource Information Database |
| GSP | generalized system of preferences |
| HIV | human immunodeficiency virus |
| IAEA | International Atomic Energy Agency |
| IAP-WASAD | International Action Programme on Water and Sustainable Agricultural Development |
| IARC | International Agency for Research on Cancer |
| IBSRAM | International Board of Soil Resources and Management |
| ICCA | International Council of Chemical Associations |
| ICES | International Council for the Exploration of the Sea |
| ICPIC | International Cleaner Production Information Clearing House |
| ICSC | International Civil Service Commission |
| ICSU | International Council of Scientific Unions |
| IEEA | Integrated environmental and economic accounting |
| IFAD | International Fund for Agricultural Development |
| IGADD | Intergovernmental Authority for Drought and Development |
| IGBP | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (ICSU) |
| IGBP/START | International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme/Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training |
| ILO | International Labour Organisation |
| IMF | International Monetary Fund |
| IMO | International Maritime Organization |
| INFOTERRA | International Environment Information system (UNEP) |
| IOC | Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission |
| IPCC | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
| IPCS | International Programme on Chemical Safety |
| IPM | integrated pest management |
| IRPTC | International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals |
| ITC | International Tin Council |
| ITTO | International Tropical Timber Organization |
| IUCN | International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources |
| MARPOL | International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships |
| OECD | Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development |
| PGRFA | plant genetic resources for agriculture |
| PIC | prior informed consent procedure |
| SADCC | South African Development Co-ordination Conference |
| SARD | sustainable agriculture and rural development |
| UNCTAD | United Nations Conference on Trade and Development |
| UNDP | United Nations Development Programme |
| UNDRO | Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator |
| UNEP | United Nations Environment Programme |
| UNESCO | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization |
| UNFPA | United Nations Population Fund |
| UNICEF | United Nations Children's Fund |
| UNIDO | United Nations Industrial Development Organization |
| UNU | United Nations University |
| WCP | World Climate Programme (WMO/UNEP/ICSU/UNESCO) |
| WFC | World Food Council |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
| WMO | World Meteorological Organization |
| WWF | World Wide Fund for Nature (also called World Wildlife Fund) |
| WWW | World Weather Watch (WMO) |
A. Name of Key National Sustainable Development Coordination Mechanism(s)/Council(s). Since 1993, Belgium is a Federal state with several levels of power (the Federal and the 5 Federated levels : the Flemish Community and the Flemish Region which have been merged, the Walloon Region, the Brussels Capital City Region, the French-speaking Community and the German-speaking Community. Each level of power is entitled to create its own co-ordinating structure for implementing the action plans of Agenda 21.
1. Contact Points a. International Features :
-Diplomatic Focal Point : Miss M. Claeys, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Topical Coordination P62.A, Rue Belliard - Belliardstraat, 65. B 1040 Brussels.
Tel : 00 32 2 501 37 10
Fax : 00 32 2 230 02 80
-Sustainable Development Focal Point : Mrs N. Gouzée/Mr. J. Verschooten, p.a. Federal Planning Office, Kunstlaan/Avenue des Arts 47-49 B 1040 Brussels. Tel : 00 32 2 507 73 11
Fax : 00 32 2 507 73 73
b. National Features :
-Federal level : * M. F. Chemay, Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Public Health and Environment, Service of Environmental Affairs, Service of Studies and Coordination, C.A.E./R.A.C Vesalius/Vésale 722 Pachecolaan/Boulevard Pachéco, 10 Bus/Bte 7 B 1010 Brussels Tel : 00 32 2 210 45 43 Fax : 00 32 2 210 48 52 * M. Ziarko, Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs (OSTC), Wetenschapsstraat/Rue de la Science, 8 B 1000 Brussels Tel : 00 32 2 238 34 11 Fax : 00 32 2 230 59 12 * M. J. Buys, Belgian Agency For Development Cooperation, Brederodestraat, 6, Rue Brederode, B 1000 Brussels Tel 00 32 2 500 63 11. Fax 00 32 2 500 65 30
-Regional level : * Flemish Focal Point : Mr. M. Merckx, Ministry of the Flemish Community, Environment, Nature, Land and Water Management Adminstration (AMINAL), Belliardstraat, 14-18 B 1040 Brussels. Tel : 00 32 2 507 30 30 Fax : 00 32 2 507 6732 * Walloon Focal Point : Mr M. Pignolet, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Directorate General for Natural Resources and the Environment (DGRNE), Avenue Prince de Liège, 15 B 5100 Jambes. Tel : 00 32 81 32 57 84 Fax : 00 32 81 32 59 84 * Brussels Focal Point : M. A. Lesne, Brussels Institute for Environmental Management (IBGE/BIM), Gulledelle, 100 B 1200 Brussels. Tel : 00 32 2 775 76 06 Fax : 32 2 775 76 11
-Community level : * Flemish Community : see above. * The French and the German-speaking Communities : no mechanisms
2. Membership/Composition/Chairperson
a. International Features : (environmental aspects) Coordination Committee for International Environmental Policy (CCIEP). Chairperson : M. J.P. Samain, Director general, Federal Ministry of the Environment ; 15 official members ( 4 representatives of the Federal and Regional Ministers of the Environment, 1 representative of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, 1 representative of the Minister for the Development Cooperation, 1 representative of the Topical Coordination mentioned above as diplomatical focal point, 1 representative of the Permanent Mission of Belgium at the European Union, 6 civil servants of the Federal and Regional Ministries of the Environment and 1 representative of the Belgian Agency for Development Cooperation ; several invited members of other Ministries (Agriculture, Economical Affairs, Scientifical Policy, Federal Planning Office, etc.)
|
| (Cont.) b. National Features - Federal level : Interdepartemental Commission on Sustainable Development (proposed to Parliament). Chairperson : State Secretary for Environmental Affairs. Co-Chairs : representatives of the Federal Minister for Scientific Policy and the State Secretary for Development Aid. Members : representatives of each Federal minister and state secretary, representatives of the governments of Regions and Communities.
- Flemish Region : coordinating Ad Hoc Working Group of the Flemish Government and its 19 subgroups. Chairperson : M. H. De Wel, Environment, Nature, Land and Water Management Administration. Members : representatives of the entire Flemish Government and the Flemish representatives in the National Council for Sustainable Development (NCSD)
- Walloon Region : an Environment Plan for Sustainable Development exists and will be updated every five years
- Brussels Capital City Region : a Regional Development Plan does exist since 1995.
3. Mandate/Role of above Mechanisms/Councils
a. International Features, (environmental aspects) CCIEP : political decision-making body based on a intersectoral and interdepartemental cooperation and coordination initiated between the Federal and Regional Governments since April 1995 on environmental matters, nature conservation, and sustainable development.
b. National Features, Federal level : the Interdepartemental Commission (proposed to Parliament) will give guidelines to the Federal Planning Office in its mission as laid down in the draft of law on the Federal coordination on sustainable development for the preparation of a preliminary draft of a quadriannual Federal Plan of Sustainable Development. The Federal Planning Office will establish every two years a Federal Report on Sustainable Development.
c. National Features, Flemish Region : examine the possibilities for new concrete policy measures and implement the recommandations of the UNCED and the Agenda 21.
B. Key National Sustainable Development CONSULTATIVE Mechanisms/Councils. 1. Contact Points
a. National Council for Sustainable Development (NCSD) ; Mr.G.Vansintjan, permanent secretary, Ms Catherine Mertens, permanent secretary, Mailing address NCSD, Wetstraat/Rue de la Loi 56 B1040 Brussels Tel. : 00 32 2 287 06 76 Fax : 00 32 2 280 14 27 e-mail:nrdo @skynet.be
b. Milieu en Natuurraad Vlaanderen (MINA-Raad) ; Kliniekstraat, 25, 4de verdieping, B.1070 Brussels Tel.: 00 32 2 219 96 40 Fax : 00 32 2 219 97 15
c. Conseil Wallon de l'Environnement pour le Développement durable (CWEDD) CWEDD, rue du Vertbois 13 C, B.4000 Liège Tel. : 00 32 4 232 98 61 Fax : 00 32 4 232 98 10
d. Conseil de l'Environnement pour la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale/Raad voor het Leefmilieu van het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest (RLBHG/CERBC) Hertogstraat/rue Ducale 61, B1000 Brussels Tel. : 00 32 2 513 17 87 Fax : 00 32 2 513 91 41
|
| (Cont.) 2. Memberships/Compositions/Chairpersons a. NCSD Chairman : His Royal Highness Prince Philip -Federal ministers : Prime Minister and Ministers for Economic Affairs and Telecommunications, Internal Affairs, Finance and External Trade, Budget, Scientific Policy, Public Health and Pensions, Foreign Affairs, Employment, Social Affairs, Agriculture and Small & Medium-sized Business, Transport, Justice, the Civil Service, Defence, State Secretaries for Development Aid, Security, Social Integration and Environment; -Regiogal ministers : Minister-Presidents of Flanders, of the Walloon Region, and of the Brussels' Capital City Region; -Business and industry: 2 companies; -Scientific community : 3 Dutch-speaking universities, 3 French-speaking universities; -Non-governmental organizations : 6 NGO's for environmental protection, 6 NGO's for development aid, and 2 NGO's for consumer protection; -Workers and trade unions : 3 major trade unions; -Federations of employers : 6 major federations.
b. MINA-Raad Chairman : Prof. R. Verheyen 24 members of the Environmental Nature Conservation associations ; 6 of the trade unions, 2 of the employers'organizations, 2 of the business community, 2 of the agricultural organizations, 8 of the environmental councils, 4 of the Association of Flemish Provinces, Towns and Municipalities, and 10 of the Flemish Research Policy Council.
c. CWEDD Chairman : Mr. J. Smitz 3 members representing the Walloon employers' organization, 2 the national union of farmers, 2 the trade unions, 2 the most representative organizations of the business community, 4 the nature conservation organizations, 1 the most representative consumer associations, 2 the Association of Walloon Towns and Municipalities, 3 French-language university institutions, the chairmen or deputy-chairmen of the Regional Waste Commission, the Advisory Commission on the Protection of Surface Water against Pollution, the Regional Town and Country Planning, the Regional Consultative Commission on the Exploitation of Quarries, the High Walloon Nature Conservation Council, the High Walloon Forest and Wood Council, the High Walloon Agriculture, and the Food Industry and Foodstuff Council.
d. RLBHG/CERBC Chairman : Mr. R. Gillet 5 members representing the non-profit association, 3 officials representing the Ministries dealing with town and country planning, the protection of historic monuments and areas of outstanding natural beauty, and public transport, 3 members representing the most representative workers' organizations, 3 the most representative employers organizations, 1 the business community , 3 experts in environmental protection problems, appointed by the universities, 3 members representing the Union of Towns and Municipalities, 3 the waste incinerators, the water purification plants and the water companies , 3 the consumer associations, 3 members appointed by the Regional council because of their scientific expertise.
3. Mandate/Role of above Mechanisms/Councils a. NCSD ; advises the Federal Government on each measure concerning sustainable development, particularly for the implementation of the European Unions Fifth Action Program on Environmental Issues and the implementation of Agenda 21. It proposes studies on all subjects related to sustainable development, organizes discussion fora, and will obtain the broadest possible public participation concerning sustainable development.
b. MINA-Raad ; advises the Flemish Government and the Flemish Parlement on all matters relating to the environment or the protection of nature. It carries out research.
c. CWEDD ; assesses the impact on the environment in the Walloon Region, the annual "State of the Environment in the Walloon Region" report, gives its opinion on the draft Environment Plan for Sustainable Development.
d. BHG/CERBC ; the Brussels Regional Government on all environmental matters.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 2: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
TO ACCELERATE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND RELATED DOMESTIC POLICIES (with special
emphasis on
TRADE)
In OECD, UNEP, UNCTAD and WTO, Belgium positioned definitely in
favour of the adoption of core labour standards and social
standards within trade agreements in order to accelerate
sustainable social development in developing countries.
The country has therefore played an active role in economic and
trade fora such as OECD and WTO (CTE), as well as in international
and
environmental oriented fora like CSD and UNEP.
1. WTO (CTE)
Since the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE) has been set
up in 1995, Belgium together with all European member states
has considered the principle 12 of the Rio Declaration as a central
reference in the CTE discussions, considering that the most
effective way
of dealing with transboundary environmental problems is through
international and multilateral agreements (MEA's), not by
unilateral trade
measures.
We believe that the multilateral trading system, and the WTO
framework rules, should be supportive of MEA's when they include
restricted
trade measures that may be necessary for the achievement of the
environmental goals they intend to protect.
Further work will be required to determine whether any
modifications of the WTO provisions are necessary to accommodate,
among others,
with MEA's and new instruments of environmental policy like
eco-labelling. Belgium gives also great attention to further market
access for
LDC's with a view to support development prospects and improve
export performance of LDC's.
2. OECD
Concerning non-binding analytical work in international fora,
Belgium participates in OECD joint session on trade and
environment, asking for
quantitative analysis exploring the linkages between DC's market
access improvements and tariff escalation, international trade in
waste, DPG's,
competitiveness.
3. UNEP
Belgium supports the UNEP activities as complementary activities of
the CTE work program, especially these concerning the assessement
of
the trade measures of the main MEA's (Basel, Montreal & Cites),
and these concerning the studies and workshops on well targeted
sectors.
4. CSD
Belgium welcomes the fact that the Declaration of Rio and Agenda 21
have broadened the scope of discussion on trade and environment and
sustainable development. Belgium believes that the debate on trade
and environment could be based on the principles provided in
Chapter 2 from
Agenda 21.
Within this context, Belgium attaches special importance to the
decisions from CSD IV. Especially the decision on the relationship
between
environmental policy and competitiveness, in which the lack of
indication that environmental policy in general has detrimental
effects on
competitiveness is acknowledged, and the problem that environmental
regulations from importing countries may cause to developing
countries
in transition, is underlined. The principle of cost internalisation
is explicitly referred to and green countervailing duties are
firmly rejected.
Concerning future work, Belgium would like to introduce the
precautionary principle (Rio Declaration, Principle 15) in the
debate on the
accomodation of the multilateral trade system to the environmental
needs.
Belgium supports enhanced policy coordination at the national level
in the area of trade and environment, and, at the international
level, whishes
to develop a holistic approach between international organisations;
WTO/CTE, OECD, UNCTAD, UNEP and CSD.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Belgium is committed to
a high level of environmental protection and to an open equitable
and non-discriminatory
multilateral system. These are equally important objectives. In
this respect, Belgium considers that trade and environment policies
can play a
mutually and supportive role in favour of sustainable
development.
1. Decision-Making Structure
According to article 113 of the Treaty of the European Union, trade policy is an exclusive competence of the Commission. In its legally binding aspects, the trade and environment policy is defined by the European member states in the so called "113 Committee".
The Committee for Coordination in International Environmental Policy (CCIEP) has established a Working Group Trade and Environment in 1995 under the presidency of the Ministry of Foreign Trade. Its missions are the preparation at the national level (with the Federated entities) and the follow-up of the decisions and activities of the Committee 113 of the EU as well as the CSD sessions, the UNCTAD, UNEP and the OECD work related to trade and environment.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues
See Chapter 34/37
3. Major Groups
As a reminder
4. Finance
See Chapter 33
5. Regional/International Cooperation
See Status Report.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 3: COMBATING POVERTY
Poverty in Belgium
In Belgium 6 % of the population is poor. This percentage was
calculated according to the usual EU norm, indicating that 6 % of
the households do not have half the average income of a single at
their disposal. This figure is low in European perspective. It is
mainly due to the system of Social Security that exists in Belgium,
insuring employees and their families for unemployment,
sickness and retirement. For those who cannot work or could not
work long enough there is a system of social assistance, that
guarantees a minimum income that is fixed by law and in case of
dispute is settled in labour court.
Policies for minimum allowances are a Federal competence, while
next to it the Regions are competent for many policy issues
related to poverty such as educational policies, housing, culture
and welfare, all of them important parts of employment policy.
In order to allow for a coordinated poverty policy the ministers
competent for poverty on Federal and Regional level meet several
times a year to decide on policy proposals concerning poverty.
Last year a variety of measures was taken and implemented. A law
was passed allowing for debts to be centralized with one
particular judge who can impose a plan for debt relief and who can
cancel debts.
In several Regions laws were past to guarantee a minimum provision
of electricity, gas and water in case of payment difficulties.
Measures were elaborated to better protect people in case of
eviction procedures for non-payment of their rent.
For the time being, negotiations are conducted on several proposals
to improve the access of the poorest to public health and the
administration of law.
Measures were taken to stimulate social employment.
Within each Region considerable budgets were freed in order to cope
with social discrimination in the cities.
Poverty policy in Belgium is developed in close cooperation with
the poorest themselves, and relies on a combination of
improvement of the income position and of abolishment of social
discrimination in different sectors.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure:
As a reminder
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
As a reminder
3. Major Groups:
As a reminder
4. Finance:
As a reminder
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
NB: Developed countries, where domestic poverty alleviation is not
a major concern may wish to briefly describe their position
regarding global poverty alleviation.
| Unemployment (%) | |||||
| Population living in absolute poverty | |||||
| Public spending on social sector % | |||||
| Other data
| |||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 4: CHANGING CONSUMPTION
PATTERNS
1. National Policy Objective/Focus
The Federal ecotax law was introduced in 1993 and acts as a "stick
behind the door" pressing stakeholders to take
environmentally friendly actions such as selective waste collection
and recycling, ecologically acceptable waste treatment and
more rational use of consumer goods. As the tax is levied at the
earliest possible stage of the distribution cycle, this new law
does
not impose any constraint to trade. On the other hand, energy
levies and charges were introduced and others raised during 1993;
this led to a significant reduction in CO2 emissions in 1994. Part
of the additional proceeds is used to protect employment in the
context of market competition.
Furthermore, in the whole area of ozone depleting substances,
Belgium actively applies the EU regulations phasing out or
reducing ozone depleting substances and contributes actively in
toughening these standards on EU level, which happens almost
every two years.
A decree of 19 April 95 of the Flemish Region should also be
mentioned which stimulates and regulates "responsible-care"
initiatives by enterprises. An analogous initiative in the Walloon
Region, to integrate environmental concerns in firms' behaviour,
is in a well advanced stage.
2. National Targets
The Federal eco-tax law contains a general framework and time table
for the introduction of a number of eco-taxes. The
timetable was found to be too stringent to be feasible and had to
be eased by Parliament.
In 1991, Belgium decided to reduce its CO2 emission in 2000 by 5%
compared to 1990. This decision is to be seen in the light of
the European Union Strategy to limit CO2 emission, whereby :
- CO2 emission in the EU need to be stabilised in 2000 at teir
level of 1990;
- EU measures are needed to achieve that target. In particular,
Belgium
considers that a carbon/energy tax, coordinated at least at the
EU level, is needed to reach in Belgium the target of 5%
reduction by 2000.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
Decision-Making Structure
The Federal Government has tried to integrate environmental and fiscal policy through inter alia the eco-tax law of 1993. The Eco-tax Commission has broad powers to propose amendments to the existing law, to propose new eco-taxes, and to propose eliminating others. Parliament takes the final decision, with no legal obligation to consult the Eco-tax Commission. Parliament is presently reviewing a third revision to the Eco-tax law. The Regional Governments have the authority to regulate impacts of eco-taxes on their revenue.
The Government of the German-speaking Community set up a consumer's information (Verbraucherschutzzentrale East-Belgium). It informs about eco-consumption as well as about environment and the protection of nature.
Capacity-Building/Technology Issues
The Federal Government is preparing a framework programme for research on specific topics pertaining to sustainable development, such as marine sciences, transportation systems, and social and economic issues aimed at helping develop measures to change production and consumption patterns. An information campaign is part of the implementation and enforcement of the eco-tax law.
Major Groups
A policy debate on consumption and production patterns was held at the Federal level involving most Government ministries, Parliament, industry, consumer groups and media. NGOs, universities and local authorities were less involved. It resulted in the adoption of some pieces of legislation.
Finance
A few programmes have been implemented to help the poor, including measures to guarantee a minimum supply of electricity to all households, subsidies for home improvements for energy efficiency (max. of Bfr. 50,000 or US$ 1,500) and measures to limit the total amount of loans.
Regional/International Cooperation
The Federal Government is involved in the implementation of the EU's Eco-labelling Scheme. An appropriate agency would grant producers the authorization to use the EU logo.
Initiated by the German-speaking Community, a frontier-crossing, euregional consumer's information has been set up. EUROKON informs consumers in the Province de Liège and the German-speaking Community in Belgium, the Limburg Provinces in Belgium and the Netherlands and Aachen Region in Germany.
|
| GDP per capita (current US$) | 26,344 | ||||
| Real GDP growth (%) | |||||
| Annual energy consumption per capita (Kg. of oil equivalent per capita) | |||||
| Motor vehicles in use per 1000 inhabitants | |||||
| Other data (1) 1989 (2) 1993 | |||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 5: DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS AND
SUSTAINABILITY
Belgium does not have explicit and integrated population policies.
However, many policy measures, especially within the
framework of social security and family policy, have direct and
indirect repercussions on demographic dynamics. In general,
policies for welfare, family, health, education, environment,
immigration, data collection, research and development aid are
largely in accordance with the recommendation of the three
international conferences on population.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1.Decision-Making Structure
The decline in the immigration rate is largely due to restrictive
measures taken within the framework of immigration legislation.
2.Capacity-Building/Technology Issues
As a reminder.
3.Major Groups
As a reminder.
4.Finance
As a reminder.
5.Regional/International Cooperation
Belgium is an active member of the Commission on Population and
Development which is responsible for the follow-up of the
International Conference on Population and Development or ICPD
(Cairo, September 1994). At its yearly meetings, the country
is represented by the Head of the Population and Family Study
Centre (CBGS, Centrum voor Bevolkings- en Gezinsstudie) or his
replacement.
| Population (thousands) on 1st january | ||||||||
| Kingdom as a whole | ||||||||
| Brussels Region | ||||||||
| Flemish Region | ||||||||
| Walloon Region | ||||||||
| Annual rate increase (1990-1996) | ||||||||
| Surface area (Km2) | ||||||||
| Population density (inhabitants/Km2) | ||||||||
| Other data | ||||||||
| TFR (Total fertility rate per woman) | ||||||||
| Mortality (life expectancy at birth in years) -male -female |
|
|
| |||||
(Source : "Recent Demographic Developments in Europe", Strasbourg : Council of Europe)
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 6: PROTECTING AND PROMOTING
HUMAN HEALTH
Belgium consists of three language communities : the French
Community, the Flemish Community and the German-speaking
Community. The Communities are responsible for the policy of care
in and outside hospitals, with exception of the
responsibilities of the Federal Government. The Communities are
also responsible for health education and promotion, as well
as for preventive medecine (except national measures of
profylaxis).
The Communities are specifically responsable for :
- the application of agreement standards,
- the application of program standards,
- subsidization,
- preventive medicine (AIDS, alcoholism, vaccinations, ...),
- frontline care,
- inspections,
- sport medical controls,
- school medical controls,
- follow-up programs for little children.
The responsibilities of the Federal Government are :
a) organic legislation,
b) finance requirements by organic legislation,
c) national health insurance,
d) base rules for program standards,
e) base rules for financing infrastructure and expensive
medical equipement,
f) national agreement standards, only when repercussion on b)
c) d) and e),
g) fixing conditions university hospitals.
The policies for institutional care are undergoing a continuous
dynamic evolution. Over the past ten years different major
reforms have been aimed at reducing the supply of hospital
services, i.e. the number of beds and hospitalisation days, in
favour
of alternative and better adapted forms of health care, more
particularly for chronic patients. These reforms have been
implemented at the same time in acute hospitals, institutions for
ongoing care or chronic hospitals, and in psychiatric hospitals.
However, modifying only hospital structures was not enough : the
financing system is also being revised, although this onerous
task is far from completed. The financing system which took into
account hospitalisation days was replaced by a system of
budgets per hospital.
The former budget based only on structural elements has gradually
made way for an adapted budget based on structural elements
as well as on activity-related data.
The implementation of this financing system required the
installation of various databases, such as the registration of
minimum
nursing data, minimum clinical data, and minimum psychiatric data.
At this moment, one is considering to which point social
data should be included. The registration of these data should not
only be useful for the fine tuning of budgets, but should
eventually lead to better management and improved health care
practice.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
| (Cont) The creation of special structures to promote the dialogue between hospital managers, doctors and insurers brings another challenge, and that is harmo-nizing the policies of health insurance and the policies of the Ministry of Social Affairs, Public Health and the Environment. In addition, these policies should benefit from a more efficient use of available data.
During the past years the Directorate of Medical Practice has also proposed several important new laws, such as the law on blood and the law on physio-therapy. The regulations for general practitioners too have undergone impor-tant modifications. In addition, new specialities have been created such as emergency specialist and intensive care specialist. The art of nursing has not been neglected : new titles and special professional qualifications have been created.
A permanent evaluation of the number of doctors and dentists needed in function of the demografic and sociological developments is planned since 1996. Rules concerning the evaluation of medical practice can be fixed.
Several important projects are being developed and should be implemented in the years to come, such as the High Council for Dental Care, management of available medical services and the evaluation of medical practice. The Directo-rate of Medical Practice also has the task of examining important questions of bioethics.
Norms for accrediation of emergency services, MES services (Medical Emer-gency Services), and intensive care units will be developed. Furthermore, the law relating to the "Emergency Service 100" has been modified with a view to create provincial schools for ambulance paramedics. The policy for emergency services is supported by the National Council for Emergency Services and by the future Provincial Councils, which are currently under development.
|
1. Decision-Making Structure See above-cited
2. Capacity-Building/Technology-Issues Official hospital beds 1 January 1993 : 75.360 i.e. 7,43 beds for every 1.000 inhabitants : - 5,75 in general hospitals - 1,68 in psychiatric hospitals.
3. Major Groups Subdivided in
a) general hospitals : - general hospitals, - general hospitals with a university character, - university hospitals - exclusively geriatric hospitals - specialized hospitals b) psychiatric hospitals c) rest homes and homes for the elderly d) psychiatric rest homes and protected living systems
4. Finance Overall national hospital budget; 144,88 billion Bfr in 1977
5.Regional/International Cooperation Almost the entire budget for Belgian bilateral cooperation concerning population is comprised of programmes for primary health care in gene-ral, and for maternal and infant health care in particular. The Belgian contribution to UNFPA in 1993 was Bfr.75 million (US$ 2.3 million)
|
| Life expectancy at birth Male Female |
|
|
| |
| Infant mortality (per 1000 live births) | ||||
| Maternal mortality rate (per 100000 live births) | ||||
| Access to safe drinking water (% of population) | ||||
| Access to sanitation services (% of population) | ||||
| Other data 1 1986 | ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 7: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE HUMAN
SETTLEMENT DEVELOPMENT
Belgium has a strong and unique human settlements and habitat
identity (high degree of urbanization ; urbanization of rural areas
; predominance of medium-size and small towns ; a regionally
differentiated approach to human settlements and habitat policies
;
tradition of socially redistributive human settlements and housing
policy with high infrastructural services...).
Although the population may be slow in growth, household unit
requirements are still substantially growing.
Urban physical expansion, to the detriment of agricultural land and
green areas, has been considerable in the past through the
sub-urbanization tendency and undiscriminating commercial
expansion.
The principles of Sustainable Development, particularly since the
1992 Rio UNCED conference, are increasingly influencing the
national decision-making in its international responsibilities as
well as in its role of co-ordinating Regional Government
initiatives.
The 1993 Constitution explicitly states the "right to decent
housing" as a constitutional right in Belgium. Each Region further
details the modalities and implementation priorities.
The Regions are to a very large degree responsible for policies and
implementation related to human settlements, housing matters
and urban development.
International co-operation in the human settlements and habitat
field is, in Belgium, organised on several institutional levels :
the
Federal Government, the Regional Governments, the local governments
(municipalities, provinces) and a good number of non-government
organizations.
All these bodies provide substantial contributions to habitat
through multilateral and bilateral co-operation channels. The
Belgian
development co-operation stimulates training and capacity-building
programmes and assists international courses and research
programmes initiated by universities and contributes to other
training and educational activities (f.e. localising Agenda 21
programme).
In execution of the decisions of the United Nations a Belgium
National Committee for Human Settlements was established under
the chairmanship of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure:
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
3. Major Groups:
4. Finance:
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
| Urban population in % of total population | |||
| Annual rate of growth of urban population (%) | |||
| Largest city population (in % of total population) | |||
| Other data
| |||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 8: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT IN DECISION-MAKING
At the end of 1996, the Federal Government has decided to propose
to the Federal Parliament a new law improving the planning
and management of sustainable development at the Federal level.
This law brings institutional changes and introduces new
procedures so as to facilitate the integrated consideration of
social, economic and environmental issues. Its main innovation is
the
organization of the quadrennial planning of Federal policies and
measures for sustainable development under the leadership of a
Federal Interdepartmental Commission. The Federal Planning Office
will be in charge of the secretariat of this commission, of
publishing a Federal report on sustainable development, monitoring
the state of development every other year (including business
as usual and their impacts compared to alternative scenarii), and
of planning a sustainable development Federal strategy. This
strategy will be subjected to the examination and advice of the
National Council of Sustainable Development, where major
groups of the society are represented, and take this advice into
account before being adopted by the Government.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a Topical Coordination Division
(TCD) which coordinates consensus on environmental
matters among Federal, Regional and Community authorities. It also
coordinates the drafting of the Belgian report on sustainable
development. Cross-sectorial and inter-departmental cooperation and
coordination was initiated between the Federal Government
and the three Regional Governments in the context of the
cooperation on international environmental policy. The Coordination
Committee for International Environmental Policy (CCIEP) was
established to systematically review the relationsship and
overlaps between international agreements, and became fully
operational in 1995.
It is charged with coordination and consultation activities to
ensure vertical and horizontal integration regarding environmental
policy. It also decides on Belgium's international environmental
policy.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: The review and revision
of legislative, regulatory and administrative guidelines have,
since UNCED, been
a permanent process. The Regional Governments of Flanders and
Wallonia have adopted Regional laws as the framework for the
integration of this process regarding environment. The main
environmental competence of the Federal Government is
coordination and interface with international authorities and a
part of social and economic responsibilities lies at the Federal
level.
The Regional Governments are also responsible for a large part of
social and economic affairs and the Community Governments
for personal and cultural affairs.
1. Decision-Making Structure:
As described above, the decision-making stuctures regarding
sustainable development are far from being fully integrated in
Belgium. At the regional level, though, Regional laws and
frameworks regarding environment policy in Belgium have been
permanently improved since UNCED, and a coordinating mechanism
decides on Belgim's international environment policy with
the Federal level. Regarding integration between environment and
development, the Federal Government has decided at the end
of 1996 to propose to the Federal Parliament a new law improving
the planning and management of sustainable development at
the Federal level. This law brings institutional changes and
introduces new procedures so as to facilitate the integrated
consideration of social, economic and environmental issues.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
An interdepartmental commission is in charge of the scientific
aspects of sustainable development. The Federal Office for
Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs (OSTC) is preparing a
framework for research on sustainable development. One
programme under this framework aims to improve communication on the
subject of implementing sustainable development
among scientists, decision makers and NGO's. Activities include a
discussion platform for policy proposals, carrying out studies
and small research projects to integrate results for
multi-disciplinary approaches, and all-inclusive database
pertaining to
sustainable development.
3. Major Groups:
As a reminder
4. Finance:
As a reminder
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
As a reminder
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 9: PROTECTION OF THE
ATMOSPHERE
Status Report-The Vienna Convention (1985) signed
in 1985 and ratified in 1988.-Montreal Protocol (1987) signed
in 1987 and ratified in December 1988.-London Amendment (1990)
signed in 1990 and ratified in October 1993.-Copenhagen Amendment
(1992) signed in 1992.-The latest report to the Montreal Protocol
Secretariat was prepared in 1996.
1.Depletion of the Ozone LayerThe Federal and the
Regional Governments actively support the development of more
progressive EU legislation for control
measures on ozone depleting substances and are actively involved in
EU working groups, i.a. concerning illegal imports of
CFCs. In coordination with the Regional authorities, a system for
monitoring and data gathering on imports, exports and use of
ozone depleting substances is being put in place in view of
improving the waste management of used ODS (recovery, recycling
and destruction) as well as the control on illegal import of CFCs.
A transition strategy is being developed for CFC containing
MDI's. Moreover, a number of studies have been undertaken on ozone
depletion.
Status Report
-UNFCCC signed in 1992. Ratified in January 1996.
-The latest report to the UNFCCC Secretariat was submitted in
1997.2.Climate ChangeClimate change policy is focussed on
CO2 emissions, with no policy objectives as yet determined for the
other GHG. While a
number of measures have been taken in the energy and transportation
sector, by industry and by local authorities, no significant
changes have been observed in the emissions from these sectors.The
Belgian National Programme for the Reduction of CO2
emissions (NPRCE) was adopted in 1994 to reduce emissions by 5% by
the year 2000,as related to 1990 levels, based on a mix
of policies and measures, including fiscal and non fiscal measures.
Apart from those some measures exist, aimed at reducing
GHG emissions, other than CO2, and include, for example,
incineration and methane recuperation systems at landfills. A new
national policy plan on the reduction of GHG emissions will be
prepared by 1999. This plan will also contain policy objectives
and measures for other GHG than CO2.Within the context of the first
Belgian national communication under the UNFCCC, both CO2 emissions
and carbon sink
inventories have been established for the 1990-1994 period, as well
as inventories for CH4 and N2O emissions. The Federal
Government has committed itself to the adoption of a carbon and
energy tax in close consultation with other European countries
concerned. Non-fiscal measures such as energy efficiency standards
regulation,voluntary agreements and promotion of mass
transit systems are proposed in the NPRCE. Some energy standards
have been implemented. Flanders has a tax allowance
scheme to encourage energy saving investments by enterprises.
Wallonia has developped local energy offices to inform the
public on rational use of energy.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
| (Cont.)Status Report-Convention on Long Range
Transboundary Air Pollution (1979) signed in 1979 and ratified in
July 1982. -EMEP Protocol (1984) signed in 1984 and ratified in July 1987.-Helsinki Protocol on SO2 (1985) signed in 1985 and ratified in April 1989. -Sofia Protocol on NOX (1988) signed in 1988.-Geneva Protocol on VOC (1991) signed in 1991.-Oslo Protocol on SO2 (1994) signed in 1994. 3.Transboundary Air PollutionBelgium follows the EU directives on air quality and pollutants emission control from mobile and fixed sources. For tropospheric ozone, the Ministers Council adopted (summer 1996) a set of measures related to the ozone problem and its effects on public health, including measures concerning air pollution modelling, use of solvent containing products, the transport sector, industrial emissions etc. Belgium participated at the Ministerial Tropospheric Ozone in North West Europe Conference (May 1996) where the ministers or their representatives adopted a common statement in which they commit themselves to take measures now to eliminate ozone episodes in the region by 2005. |
1.Decision-Making Structure The Coordinating Committee on International Environmental Policies (CCIEP) is a forum for negotiation between the various Federal and Regional Government Departments involved in environmental policy and has a number of working groups, e.g. on climate change, depletion of the ozone layer, protection of the atmosphere and emission inventories.
The Federal Government carried out activities to sensitize industry by means of voluntary agreements in specific sectors and a number of studies have been undertaken. Parallel to the Federal actions to protect the atmosphere, the Regional Governments of Brussels, Flanders and Wallonia are implementing their own programmes and regulations, such as EIA. In the Flemish Region the maximum allowed emission and immission levels of different air pollutants are given by the official environmental legislation Vlarem, the latest updated version of which was published in 1996. A decree of the Flemish Government calls for an Environmental Policy Plan (EPP) every 5 years and an Environment Report every 2 years. The first report, published in 1994, describes the different social activities causing pressure on the environment and their effects and gives an overview of possible improving measures. A second version, published in 1996, is based on a more strictly structured and modellation-driven approach. The first EPP was drafted in 1996 and will be officially approved in the beginning of 1997. The 1994 Wallonia Environmental Plan for Sustainable Development develops actions in the field of climate change, air pollution, energy and transport among others. Each year a report of the environment in Wallonia in a specified area is published. In 1993 air pollution has been addressed, in 1994 climate change ; in 1995 the sectors energy, industry and transport have been examined.
The Federal Government is adressing aspects such as the cost-effectiveness of alternative transportation systems and the environmental impacts and safety of transportation technologies. Flemish traffic policy is aimed at improving safety, and the efficient transport of passengers and goods in order to reduce traffic congestion and an environmentally sound transportation system. Railroads and inland waterways are to be developed as alternative transportation systems. The goal of Wallonia's transportation policy is to reduce energy consumption and detrimental environmental impacts. Overall, progress has been slight to fair in improving the transportation systems in Belgium. 2.Capacity-Building / Technology IssuesThe Regional Governments carry out emission and air quality inventories according to international obligations, especially with respect to EU directives for the CORINAIR database and international conventions such as EMEP. The Regions have developed a network of stations measuring ambient air pollution. They also established an Interregional Cell for the Environment (IRCEL) whose main duties are the supervision of atmospheric emissions, the management of a data bank for ambient air quality and which serves as focal point for the European Environment Agency. IRCEL is the National Reference Center for the thematic Centers "Air quality" and "Atmospheric Emissions" of the EEA. The Cell also monitors pollution episods and particularly tropospheric ozone.The National Impulse Programme on Global Change contributes to the international research effort and is done in collaboration with projects of the IGBP, WRCP, the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Changes and the EU programme Environment and Climate. In the Flemish Region, a centre of excellence for best available technologies is carrying out a number of research projects for developing clean technologies as well as a monitoring system for GHG for the IPCC. |
| (Cont.) 3.Major GroupsIndustry and transport are the major targets of government efforts to use new and environmentally sound technologies. Environmental NGO's, business and professional organisations and trade unions participate on both the Federal and the Regional levels in policy making on sustainable development, through a number of advisory bodies, such as the National Council for Sustainable Development (Federal), the Environment and Nature Council (MINA-Raad, Flanders) and the Walloon Environment Council for Sustainable Development (CWEDD, Wallonia). 4.Finance The Federal Government contributed US$ 8.59 million towards the implementation of developing country efforts under the Montreal Protocol for the period 1991-1996.National Research Impulse Programmes are Global Change (US$ 16.4 million for the period 1991-1996 and US$ 17.1 million for a second phase), Transport and Mobility (US$ 11.3 million for 1990-1996) and Sustainable Mobility (US$ 10.9 million for 1996-2000).5. Regional/ International CooperationBelgian scientists have participated in various IPPC assessments, the WMO's Panel for the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion and the European Programme on the Transport and Transformation of Trace Gases in the Troposphere over Europe (EUROTRAC). This last programme provides substantive input into other international negotiations on transboundary air pollution and ozone depletion. One spot in the Walloonforest is also a study center for the EUROCRAFT and EUROFLUX EU research programmes in the field of the impact of climate change on forestal ecosystems. |
| CO2 emissions (eq. million tons) | ||||
| SOx " | ||||
| NOx " | ||||
| CH4 " | ||||
| Consumption of ozone depleting substances (Tons) | ||||
| Expenditure on air pollution abatement in US$ equivalents (million) | ||||
| Other data | ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 10: INTEGRATED APPROACH TO
THE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF LAND
RESOURCES
The Regional Governments are carrying out a number activities to
manage land resources sustainably, including formulating
appropriate policies, improving information systems, public
awareness campaigns, and pilot projects.
The evolutionary options of Regional policies concern the
management of land resources in the following way ;
- define territorial planning zones and infrastructural zones and
defining their relations
- define town and village planning, in order to reinforce the
densification of urban areas, in order to obtain more urban and
rural
specificity
- organize parsimonious management of soil and natural resources
while allowing for a harmonious life style development
- propose the localization of transport infrastructure, a hierarchy
of transport modes and the implementation of complementarity
between them.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure The Regional Governments of Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels Capital City are each responsible for the integrated planning and management of land resources. The Regional Governments are the most competent authorities as regards territorial planning ; however, the local authorities do have certain important prerogatives in this area, in a context of participation and decentralization.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues Education and training on integrated approaches to land management, instutitional strengthening and strengthening of technological capacities are important activities which are not being implemented by all Regional Governments.
3. Major Groups As a reminder.
4. Finance As a reminder.
5. Regional/International Cooperation The BADC contributed Bfr. 24 million (US$ 720,000) for the establishment of a centre for remote -sensing under the Moroccan Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Research. The Federal Government also co-financed a project on aerial photography of Cambodia to the order of Bfr.16.5 million (US$ 500,000). The Regional Governments participate in a number of European initiatives, such as the elaboration of a framework for the development of the European Area, among others. They participate in a number of inter-regional projects within the framework of the European region and have cooperative agreements with the cities of Berlin and Beijing.
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 11: COMBATING
DEFORESTATION
There is not one definition of forest for Belgium as a whole at the
Federal level. Forestry is a fully regionalised matter wich
means that the three Regions of the country are politically
responsable for forestry affairs. Forests in general are considered
to be
surfaces covered with trees which function as ecosystems and that
can fulfill several functions (wood production, recreation,
nature conservation, landscape, soil- and/or water protection,
shelter functions,...). However, the simple alignment of trees,
orchards and gardens are not considered as forests.
The forest area in the Brussels Capital City Region has been
classified as a forest zone. Forests can have in the land use
management programmes several protected statuses (reserve, nature
area, forest area). In addition to these zoning plans forests
can have a juridical status such as protected landscape, forest
reserve or nature reserve. Next to these regulations in the Walloon
Region there is a working definition for forests that is used for
the forest inventories according to the international agreed
definitions. In the Flemish Region there is a juridical definition
as well.
The primary obstacle to reforestation and afforestation efforts are
the attitude of agriculturalists, limited available land areas and
limited financial rentability of forest estates. This is aggravated
by the long-term nature of forest investments, high maintenance
charges, inappropiate taxation structures, fragmentation of forests
and silviculture practices not always adapted to the site.
Forest inventories have been prepared for the three Regions,
carried out annually for the Brussels Capital City Region, and
about
every ten years for the Flemish and Walloon Regions. Wallonia's
forest inventory is presently being updated. The first overall
Flemish forest inventory programme started in 1996.
Wallonia's forests do not suffer significantly from deforestation.
In fact, the forest cover has increased from 300,000 hectares to
500,000 hectares over the past 150 years. Although the Flemish
Region's forests also have shown a continual increase in area,
particular attention is given to afforestation and forest
protection in the urban areas and around historically old forests.
Flanders
still remains a Region with low forest cover (about 8%).
Since UNCED, (Rio, June 1992) a number of forest-related activities
have been fully addressed by the Regional Governments,
including promoting extension services, public awareness campaings,
research projects, geographical information systems,
remote-sensing, national plans, multiple roles of forests, land
classification and EIA's.
The adoption of EU regulation on forestry measures on agricultural
land is expected to encourage more agricultural land to be
forested.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure
The Regional Governments are the focal points of authority and
competence with respect to managing forests, with forest
services being fairly decentralized. The various Ministries of
Environment of each Region are represented in the National
Council for Sustainable Development. Forests and related
legislation have been in existence in the regions since as early
1854.
Since 1992 several amendments and specifications have been adapted
(e.g. public accessibility, inventarisation, forest reserves,
support for private forest sector). A number of Regional laws
ensure that conflicting uses of the forests do not occur. The
Environmental Plan for the Sustainable Development of the Walloon
Region has given particular attention to forest issues. The
Flemish Government developed in 1993 a long-term strategic forestry
plan. A Forest Actionplan is due to be approved in early
1997.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues
Efforts have been undertaken to improve the qualifications of
forestry personnel. The Flemish and Walloon Regions have
institutions which focus on forestry research and high level
education (university level). Training and extension services are
important in the three Regions.
3. Major Groups
The private forest owners, rural cooperatives, local authorities
and communities, youth and NGO's are among those which play
an important role in sustainable forest management. Women, however,
do not play a role as a special group in forestry. Overall
social actions for equality and emancipation include the forest
sector.
Consultative mechanisms have been created, such as the ministerial
advisory councils in both the Walloon and Flemish Regions,
in wich also stakeholders of the wood sector are represented.
4. Finance
The 1996 budget for forest management (wages and research not
included) was Bfr. 1.22 billion (US$ 39.40 million). In 1995
this was Bfr 1.15 billion (US$ 37.21 million). The national revenue
from the forest sector (including wood processing industries)
is approximately Bfr. 117 billion (US$ 3.55 billion). The Regional
Governments provide subsides under objective criteria for the
sustainable management of forests.
5. Regional/International Cooperation
Belgium participates actively in a number of regional and
international organisations on forest policy, such as the EU,
BENELUX and International Tropical Timber Organization ITTO.
Belgium also participates actively in the Ministerial
Conference for the Protection of European Forests to develop
criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of forests.
The Federal and Regional Governments carry out a number of
programmes and projects in other countries on a bilateral basis,
such as with Morocco on forest information systems and an
afforestation and forestry research projects in China. Special
attention is given to countries with economies in transition.
| Forest Area (Km2) 1 | ||||
| Protected forest area 2 | ||||
| Roundwood production (solid volume of roundwood without bark in mill m3) | ||||
| Deforestation rate (Km2/annum) | ||||
| Reforestation rate (Km2/annum) | ||||
| Other data 1 Belgium-Luxembourg 2 Strictly forest reserves. Some forests also have a nature reserve status (see chapter 15) 3 Estimation based on forest inventory of the Walloon Region. In the case of land subject to forestry regulations, reforestation is obligatory. | ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 12: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING DESERTIFICATION AND
DROUGHT
International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries
Experiencing Drought and/or Desertification
Particularly in Africa
Although Belgium wasn't able to sign the Convention before the
deadline, the process of accession is well underway. Deposition
of the instruments of accession is expected in the first semester
of 1997, in order to participate in the First Conference of the
Parties as a Party to the Convention.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure
The Belgian Agency for Development Co-operation (BADC) is in charge
of elaborating bilateral development projects and of co-ordinating
Belgian contributions to multilateral interventions. It does so
through government to government agreements or
agreements with international organizations. BADC has a
long-standing record of actions in the field of combating
desertification
and drought within both frameworks, especially in Africa.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues
In its bilateral projects BADC usually includes activities that
relate to capacity development and technology transfer, either
locally, through training programmes in Belgium, or both.
As a result of the Convention, the Belgian scientific community has
established a national group of desertification experts to be
included in the future European network that will contribute to the
Committee on Science and Technology (CST) of the
Convention.
3. Major Groups
Target populations of development projects in the field of
combating desertification and drought are mainly situated at the
grass-root level, with an increasing attention being paid to women.
Local governments are also the aim of capacity building, through an
objective oriented project cycle which intends to take up all major
groups in the decision-making process, thus promoting the
participatory approach at all levels. In addition to its direct
bilateral projects, BADC also finances NGOs that are active in
combating desertification and drought.
4. Finance
New projects financed by BADC from 1992 on, i.e. disregarding
projects started before 1992 and completed after that year or
still running, can be summarized as follows :
-direct bilateral 11.22 million US$ (excluding SADC, see
below)
-NGOs 2.04 million US$
-multilateral 5.00 million US$ (excluding IFAD, see
below)
-universities 1.27 million US$ (see below)
-financial 14.24 million US$
The total BADC funding for combating desertification and drought
for the period 1992-1996, thus amounts to 94.42 million US$,
including all expenditures cited under 5. below.
5. Regional/International Cooperation
For the period 1987-1996 Belgium has contributed a total amount of
52 million US$ to IFAD's Special Programme for Sub-Saharan Africa,
of which many projects belong to the realm of combating
desertification and drought.
The SADC region has received financing for water programmes,
drought monitoring, forest inventory and soil improvement to the
overall amount of 8.65 million US$ for the period 1993-1996.
Belgian universities also participate in international projects,
such as the conservation of pastoral resources and integrated
approach to combat desertification in Tunesia. These two projects
have budgets of 750,000 US$ and 515,000 US$
respectively.
| Land affected by desertification (Km2) | ||||
| Other data | ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING FRAGILE
ECOSYSTEMS: SUSTAINABLE MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT
As a reminder
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure:
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
3. Major Groups:
4. Finance:
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 14: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
| NATIONAL PRIORITY: | |
| STATUS REPORT: The pursuit of sustainable agriculture is the basis for agricultural policy for Belgium. Particular attention is given to integrating the linkage between environnement and agriculture into economic and political objectives. To this end, a number of activities have been implemented, including regulation (for exemple the approval of phytopharmaceuticals), agronomic research, training and financial assistance.
The European Commission approved in 1994 an agri/environmental programme which contains Federal and Regional measures. The Federal measures consist in assistance for organic farming and for demonstration projects on reduced use of fertilizer and pesticide in agriculture and on organic farming. Regulations were taken to enforce the evolution towards integrated pest management in apple and pear production. In the Flemish Region new regulations entered into force in 1995 to encourage investments in agricultural production with sound environmental practices. In 1996 the new regulation on fertilizer use is being implemented. Flanders at this moment is preparing a code of good agricultural practices which consider sustainability to be one of the key elements of a sound and responsable agriculture. The Walloon Governement is developing an Environmental Plan for Sustainable Development, which includes sustainable agriculture. Many of the recommendations of Agenda 21 for activities promoting sustainable agriculture have been or are being implemented. These include measures which take account of demographic trends, studies on land taxation structures, linkage with international trade and agricultural production, strengthening farmers' rights, developing databases and developing policy to rehabilitate degraded lands, among others. These are being achieved by legislative and regulatory reforms, pilot projects, training and the development of national plans.
|
1. Decision-Making Structure:
Agricultural and rural development policies are the
responsibilities of the Middle Class and Agriculture (MMCA), the
Ministry
of the Walloon Region and the Ministry of the Flemish Region. The
MMCA is represented in the National Council for
Sustainable Development. The reformed Common Agricultural Policy
provides the basis for new activities for agricutural
production methods compatible with the environmental protection.
The three Communities are responsible for the post-schoolish
education of the regional farmers. This education integrates
especially the sustainable agriculture.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
As a reminder
3. Major Groups:
The Belgian Survival Fund is responsable for a cooperative
programme with Belgian NGOs to implement international projects.
The objectives of these projects are food security and
awareness-building of local communities in rural areas about
sustainable
development.
4. Finance:
Agricultural development in 1993 costed the BADC 7,25 % of its
budget, down from 10,5 % in 1992. The international projects
being implemented with Belgian NGOs have a budget of Bfr. 1 billion
(US$ 30 million). The BADC provided Bfr. 1.1 billion
(US$ 34 million) for rural development in nine African
countries.
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
The BADC implemented agricultural projects in 11 African countries,
3 Asian countries and 3 Latin American countries.
Belgian universities also contribute to international projects.
The Belgium Governement participates in a number of international
organizations with sustainable agriculture objectives, such as
IFAD, FAO, the WFP and the International Rice Research
Institute, among others.
| Agricultural land (Km2) | ||||
| Agricultural land as % of total land area | ||||
| Agricultural land per capita | ||||
| Consumption of nitrogen fertilizers (Kg N/Km2 of agricultural land) | ||||
| Consumption of fosfate fertilizers (Kg P2O5/Km2 of agricultural land) | ||||
| Consumption of potase fertilizers (Kg K2O/Km2 of agricultural land) | ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 15: CONSERVATION OF
BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) signed in 1992,
ratified on 22 November 1996, Contracting Party on 20 February
1997.
Additional comments relevant to this chapter
The decline of animal diversity is due primarily to human activity,
especially land-use, leading to natural habitat destruction.
Pollution and the introduction of exotic plant species are also
threats to maintaining animal diversity. Over-exploitation appears
to play a minor role but the introduction of exotic animal species
is a problem.
Natural habitat desctruction and pollution are the primary causes
for the loss of plant diversity in Belgium. The introduction of
exotic plant species is also considered a threat. The introduction
of exotic animal species and over-exploitation are considered
minor to the loss of plant diversity.
Scientific studies demonstrate that from 1950 onwards certain
invertebrate groups showed a significant and sometimes dramatic
decline in populations and in numbers of species. The phenomenon
was particularly well documented for vertebrates, diurnal
butterflies, some families of beetles and wasps, dragonflies and
damselflies, terrestrial snails and spiders. A similar trend
exists
for plants, fungi and lichens. On the other hand, there are many
scientific papers dealing with recently introduced invertebrate
species, some of which are invasive species e.g. wasps and other
insects, terrestrial slugs, crustaceans, etc.
A number of measures are undertaken for the in-situ conservation
(and restoration) of ecosystems and their components and ex-situ
conservation of biological and genetic resources. At the Regional
level, the in-situ conservation of ecosystems is
mainly assured by the creation and management of nature reserves.
These were and are being developed by the three Regional
Government and by private organizations as well. Each year, new
areas are designated as nature reserves or existing ones are
enlarged. A complementary nature conservation policy has also been
developed outside reserves in order to notably maintain or
restore the ecological corridors. In the Flemish Region efforts
are being made to create a Green Main Structure, that can be
integrated in the development of an Pan-European Ecological
Network. This Flemish Structure is designed as a coherent
network. It will be built from core areas, rich in biodiversity,
corridors or steppings stones and areas where nature conservation,
forestry and agriculture are combined in a sustainable way. In the
Walloon Region, an ecological network has been set up as
well as a partnership for managing the rural environment. The
Brussels Capital Region developed a bio-indicator information
network based on birds, amphibians, reptiles, higher plants and
mosses.
A number of institutions play an important role in the ex-situ
conservation of biological and genetic resources. Conservation is
maintained in botanical and zoological gardens. As regards to
micro-organisms, four collections form the basis of an important
network coordinated by the Federal Office for Scientific, Technical
and Cultural Affairs.
The Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, has been
designated as the CBD-National Focal Point. This Focal
Point has launched in October 1996 a Belgian Clearing-House
Mechanism on the Internet. The homepage address is :
The first part of the homepage deals with Belgium : on one hand,
services given by the National Focal Point (e.g. addresses and
competences, expertise, bibliography, collections); on the other
hand, the ratification process and in future, step by step, the
whole story of the Belgian implementation of the CBD. The second
part presents a selection of useful hyperlinks.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
First national report to be submitted not later than 1st January
1998
http://www.kbinirsnb.be/bch-cbd/homepage.htm
1. Decision-Making Structure:
The Regional Governments and the Federal Ministries of the
Environment, Science Policy, Social Affairs, Public Health and
Environment, Agriculture and Development Cooperation are the
principal bodies in charge of different aspects of the
conservation of biological diversity and genetic resources. A
number of Regional laws on the conservation of nature include
provisions for the conservation of biological diversity and the
Regional Governments have developed strategies and action plans
dealing with conservation of biological diversity. The follow-up
of these action plans at the national level is coordinated by the
Steering Committee "Biodiversity Convention" under the authority
of the Coordination Committee for International
Environmental Policy; it is carried out in the context of
implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
National capacities for studying, assessing and monitoring
biological diversity need to be strengthened; Belgian research
institutes and universities do carry out a large number of
activities at the Regional, national and international levels. An
inventory of Belgian professionals participating in studying,
assessing and monitoring biological diversity is available (1995).
The possibilities of biotechnology in assessing biological
diversity are being considered.
3. Major Groups:
The participation and input of local authorities is considered to
be essential to the success of efforts for the conservation of
biological and genetic resources. A public awareness campaign is
under way in rural areas for the conservation of landscapes,
species and varieties within species.
4. Finance:
The Belgian Agency for Development Cooperation contributed :
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
Belgian universities and research institutes carry out many
projects at the Regional and international level, the most
distinctive of
which are the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, the
National Botanical Garden, the Royal Museum for Central Africa,
the Institute of Nature Conservation and the Scientific Centre of
the Walloon Region. Long term scientific studies under national
and international collaborations are carried out in the tropics
(e.g. Central Africa, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Galapagos, the
Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean), the Lake Baïkal, the
Antarctic, Atlantic archipelagos, the Mediterranean, the Red Sea
and in
Europe. Belgium participates actively in the CGIAR.
- to the GEF : Bfr 85 million in 1994; Bfr 235 million in 1995; Bfr
390 million in 1996;
(the contribution for 1997 will be Bfr 390 million);
- to the CGIAR and its international research centers : US$ 6.7
million in 1994.
| Protected area as % of total land area | |||
| Number of threatened species |
| ||
| Other data - Number of species known to live in Belgium (*) - Number of species known to have disappeared from Belgium (*) Will be assessed inter alia in the first national report to COP-4 (1998) | |||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 16: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
The management of biotechnologies has been coordinated at the
Regional and Federal levels by setting up and implementing an
integrated biosafety regulatory framework. It also includes the
implementation of the European Union's directives on the
contained-use and the deliberate release of genetically-modified
organisms (GMO's) in the environment. Indeed, not only the
European provisions have been integrated but also all uses of
human, animal and plant pathogens and the protection of
biodiversity for when GMO's are used in the environment or placed
on the market.
Extensive coordination with sectorial regulations on medicinal,
food/feed and raw material products was carried out. The center
of this coordination is the Advisory Biosafety Council, whose
executive staff coordinates within the Service for Biosafety and
Biotechnology (SBB), located in Brussels.
The Council is a collegium of representatives of the various
competent authorities from Regional and Federal levels. The
Council is sustained by ad hoc experts groups focusing on specific
areas of biotechnology.
The SBB is a contact point for both internal and international
scientific and regulatory interactions. Governmental experts of
the
SBB are national contacts for UNEP, OECD and the EU. The experts
of the SBB are responsible for the risk assessment of all
contained-use activities, on mandate of the Regional authorities.
Occasionaly, the advice of the Biosafety Council is requested for
sensitive matters such as gene therapy and recombinant viruses.
The introduction of GMO's is presently being reviewed by the
Biosafety Council, noteworthy the experimental GMO's tested in
Europe and the GMO-based products submitted to the consent
of the European Commission.
The SBB is a scientific center helping all scientists involved in
recombinant DNA pathogen research to fulfil the regulations
where applicable. It is also a center for biosafety documentation
and archives. As information provider, the SBB is currently
managing Internet services to the public and the users, on matters
of local and international interest (http : //biosafety.ihe.be).
Whereas contained-use activities are now fully controlled on basis
of Regional regulations, some juridical acts must still be
finalized for field testing and placing on the market of GMO's.
All in all, a very flexible and speedy, users- and public-friendly
regulatory interface has been developed.
Such a coordinated regulation fully complements the important
investments and R&D networking management made by the
Flemish Government. The Flemish biotechnology has a coherent
structure from academic research up to patent technology and
biotechnological financement mechanisms, based on R&D-industry
networking, including technolgy assessment at its disposal.
Noteworthy is the special emphasis laid on transgenic plants,
diagnostics and gene therapies.
A similar management of biotechnologies is carried out in Wallonia
around the genome research program, the recombinant
vaccines, the bioremediation, the heteroprotein production and the
bioluminescence technologies.
In Brussels, the same occurs for gene- and immuno-therapeutics,
for GMP production of transplantable human cells and for
gene therapy vectors intended for clinical research and
therapies.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure:
The Regional Governments are responsible for economics, science
policy, prenormative-research and environmental regulations
of the contained use of GMO's and pathogens. They provide for the
safety of the field testing of GMO's together with the
Federal Government. The Federal Government is responsible of
norms, normative research, implementation of international
norms and the related coordination with specific ad hoc bodies.
As the Federal ministries are responsible for product and market
regulations, they are more and more involved in international
experts meetings and coordinate the information fluxes through
common contact points. The Regional Ministries of the
Environment control the application of the biosafety regulations
through focal agencies. All contained installations are submitted
to environmental clearance, whereas any projected activities must
be either declared or authorized according to the biosafety level
involved.
At the Federal level, all experimental releases of GMO's must be
authorized before they are carried out. Consent must also be
delivered for GMO-based products proposed to be placed on the
European market
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
A Biosafety Council comprised of competent Belgian authorities on
environment and biotechnology products is charged with
providing advice on biotechnology safety, such as on the use of
appropriate technology and techniques. The Walloon Region has
over three hundred clinical laboratories, universities and
companies, as well as high schools which are active in the
biotechnology
sector. The presence of the European Commission in Brussels
catalyses the interaction between the local scientific community
and the international scientific and biotechnology milieux. Three
large universities and five scientific institutions have made
important contributions to the education and training in related
sciences. The Brussels Capital City Region has some 40 public
and private institutions which carry out activities related to
state-of-the art technology on biology, genetics, pharmacology and
medicine, among others. About 2.000 academic and industrial
researchers work in the Brussels Capital City area, of which
about one-quarter come from the European Union member countries,
Eastern Europe and developing countries.
3. Major Groups:
As a reminder
4. Finance:
As a reminder
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
At the international level, businesses and research centers are
subjected to administrative controls to ensure protection of the
environment. This is also in keeping with directives of the
European Union. The Walloon Government participates in a number
of bilateral initiatives.
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 17: PROTECTION OF THE
OCEANS, ALL KINDS OF SEAS, INCLUDING ENCLOSED AND
SEMI-ENCLOSED SEAS, AND COASTAL AREAS AND THE PROTECTION, RATIONAL
USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR LIVING RESOURCES
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea
The precautionary approach is the leading principle upon which
Belgium bases its commitments, and particularly in the
international conferences on the protection of the North Sea. The
dialogue between the Federal authorities and the Regional
Governments has improved considerably because the contamination of
the sea from land-based sources is the major factor and
most of the related actions are responsibilities of the Belgian
Regions.
Important activities to protect the oceans include, among others
:
- the development of Best Environmental Practice (BEP) concerning
dredging activities. This was approved by the OSPAR
Commission in 1993;
- the development of Best Available Technology (BAT) to reduce
polluting effluents from the textile industry in 1995. This work
resulted in the approval by the OSPAR Commission in 1995 of a
recommendation on BAT and in 1996 of a recommendation
on emission limits for that sector;
- the establishment of an extensive aerial surveillance programme
to monitor illegal discharges by ships, with further attention
being paid to the follow-up, including lawsuits;
- the fulfillment of a programme for the reduction of inputs of 36
hazardous substances (metals, solvents, pesticides, dioxines) in
the North Sea (50 % reduction between 1985-1995). The opportunity
has been taken in this context to develop a comprehensive
dataset of the emissions of these substances in the environment
which is now considered as a basis for further decision-making
processes;
- the establishment of a multi-year research programme on marine
sciences related to the protection of the North Sea.
A number of sustainable development indicators pertaining to the
coastal and marine environment are applied in Belgium (e.g.
algae index; releases of nutrients, metals and POP's; contamination
of biota; quality of bathing water).The indicators related to
marine species have been developed and quantified by the European
Union.
There are no Belgian vessels which fish the High Seas.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure: The Federal Government and Regional Governments share responsibilities for ensuring integrated planning and implementation of Belgium's national policy on oceans. To a large extent, the Technical Commission for the North Sea coordinated this work, and participates on an ad hoc basis in the National Council for Sustainable Development.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues: Belgium carries out an assessment of the major types of land-based sources of marine pollution through the use of appropriate monitoring technology and mathemathical modelling. Belgium's marine database of the Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models (MUMM) is considered as an adequate integrated coastal zone management database. It does not cover cultural and socio-economic activities or protected areas. Comprehensive assessments on the state of the coastal and marine environments are carried out every five years (Quality Status Reports of the North Sea).
3. Major Groups: Industry associations and official organizations of fishermen, representing small-scale artisanal fishermen mainly, participate in an advisory capacity in national processes.
4. Finance: A number of eco-taxes recently entered into force which aim to reduce polluting effluents and to promote investments in environmentally sound technology. See chapters 4 and 34 for further information. Belgium submits a number of projects to the EU for funding.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Belgium participates actively in regional conventions (e.g. the OSLO and PARIS Conventions - OSPAR Convention), International Conferences on the Protection of the North Sea, the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and the European research programmes "Environment and Climate" and "Marine Sciences and Technologies (MAST)". |
| Catches of marine species (metric tons) | ||||
| Population in coastal areas | ||||
| Population served by waste water treatment (% of
country's total population) | ||||
| Discharges of oil into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
| Releases of phosphate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
| Releases of nitrate into coastal waters (metric tons) | ||||
| Other data | ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 18: PROTECTION OF THE
QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES:
APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT,
MANAGEMENT AND USE OF WATER RESOURCES
Framework of the water policy in Belgium
Water policy in Belgium follows the competences of the Flemish,
Walloon and Brussels Regions. This leads to Regional
differentiation in the field of legislation, administration and
monitoring systems. European and international legislation in the
various
aspects of water policy remains however a common basis to all
Regions.
Quality and monitoring of fresh water, groundwater and drinking
water are based on Regional ministerial orders or decrees, which
do implement EU-directives
a. Flanders
Water policy is an integrated part of the global environment policy
of Flanders. The policy options are outlined in a Five Year
Environment Policy Plan, called MINA. Every two years a State of
the Environment Report is made, called MIRA. Each year an
Environment Programme is issued. Especially for surface water
General Water Treatment Programmes, called AWP, are being
designed.
Drinking water supplies resort under the authority of the
municipalities. However the larger part of drinking water is
supplied by
5 major companies. Total drinking water consumption in Flanders
amounts to 439 mio m3 per year (40 % from surface water, 40
% from ground water and 20 % from the Walloon Region).
b. Wallonia
The Walloon Environment Plan for Sustainable Development (PEDD) was
passed on 9 March 1995 setting in particular the
guidelines for a Water Action Programme. The PEDD also introduced
the principle of the actual water price.
In the Walloon Region about 400 mio m3 of water are annually
abstracted (320 mio m3 of ground water and 80 mio m3 of surface
water) for supply to the drinking water distribution network. 242
mio m3 are distributed in Wallonia through 90 public companies.
148 mio m3 are supplied to the other two regions in Belgium.
The installed water treatment capacity amounts to 1,800,000 i.e.
for a population of 3,200,000 inhabitants.
c. Brussels
One of the major objectives of the Brussels Region is the
construction of adequate sewerage and waste water treatment
facilities.
The Region has to take care of the quality of small watercourses,
e.g. a section of the river Senne, a sub-basin of the river
Scheldt,
in the framework of regional programmes and international
commitments. Frequent local innundations reflect water quantity
problems. This will be resolved by the construction of
reservoirs.
The construction of the main water treatment plant for the northern
part of the Region is foreseen by the year 2010 (1,3 mio i.e.).
The plant for the Southern part of the Region (360,000 i.e.) is
under construction.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure:
a. Flanders
In Flanders decision-making is rather decentralized.
Policy-making and policy-shaping in environmental matters takes
place in
various public bodies in charge of different sectors. Environment
and water policy is integrated via programmes rather than by a
centralized body. Policy options are formulated by the Flemish
Governement and enacted by the Flemish Parliament.
b. Wallonia
Water policy in Wallonia is based on the decree of 7 Octobre
1985 for the protection of surface water and on the decree of 30
April 1990 for the protection and use of ground water.
c. Brussels
Legislation was passed regarding integrated permits for the
release of waste waters (Ordonnance 30/07/92) and taxation of waste
water (Ordonnance 29/03/96).
The construction programme for sewerage and waste water treatment
plants is covered by the Planning Decree of the Brussels
Region.
Decisions regarding legislation and investment are taken by the
Regional Council based on proposals from the minister in charge
of water policy.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
a. Flanders
The Environment Department (LIN) is in charge of policy-making
for drinking water, ground water and fresh surface water
quantity. Fresh surface water quality is being covered by the
Flemish Environment Agency (VMM). Investments in the
necessary infrastructure are handled by Aquafin.
b. Wallonia
The General Direction for Natural Resources and Environment (DGRNE)
is the competent authority enforcing the Walloon water
policy and legislation (permitting, monitoring, control of water
supply and waste water treatment companies, etc).
c. Brussels
The Brussels Institute for Management of the Environment is the
competent authority enforcing the water policy of the Brussels
Region.
3. Major Groups:
a. Flanders
The main target groups are : households, agriculture, industry,
transport, energy supply and water supply. When major
environmental decrees are launched the Flemish Governement provides
for a period of consultation of the general public, prior to
finalizing the formulation and prior to enactment by the Flemish
Parliament.
b.Wallonia
The various target groups (industry, agriculture, water companies,
NGO's) are consulted through the Water Commission. The
Walloon Region favours "river contracts", where all parties can
contribute to achieve sustainable improvements of the
condition of these rivers.
c.Brussels
The different target groups aimed at in the Water Programme are
consulted through the Committee for Environmental Affairs.
Industry is consulted through the local sectoral professional
associations.
| (Cont.) 4. Finance: a. Flanders
The budget for drinking water companies in Flanders can be estimated to exceed 20 bn Bfr. per year. The investment and operating budget for water treatment and sewerage amounts to 10 bn Bfr. per year.
b. Wallonia The Walloon Region intends to spend 40 bn Bfr. during the next ten years in municipal waste water treatment. At the moment a waste water release tax of 16 Bfr./m3 is raised. This tax will in future increase as a consequence of internalizing all the cost components of water.
c. Brussels The global budget for investment and operation of the water infrastructure amounts to 25 bn Bfr. for the next ten years. The major part is covered by the Regional budget. The other part comes from collection of waste water release taxes.
5. Regional/International Cooperation: Co-ordination among the Regions, in the field of water policy takes place whenever a "Belgian" standpoint shall be communicated in a European or international forum. This co-ordination has been institutionalized by the creation of a Co-ordination Committee on International Environment Policy.
Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels are Parties in the International Commissions for the Protection of the Rivers Meuse and Scheldt, together with the Netherlands and France. Federal and Regional authorities participate in the activities of PARCOM and the Northsea Conferences.
|
| Figures for Belgium (estimated) | ||
| Precipitation (mio m3) | ||
| Evapotranspiration (mio m3) | ||
| Annual inflow (mio m3) | ||
| Annual outflow (mio m3) | ||
| Ground water available for abstraction (mio m3) | ||
| National resident population (000) |
| Fresh water availability (total domestic/external in million m3) | ||||
| Annual withdrawal of freshwater as % of available water | ||||
| Other data | ||||
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 19: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF TOXIC CHEMICALS, INCLUDING
PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN TOXIC AND DANGEROUS
PRODUCTS
1. Expansion and acceleration of international risk assessment
as a result of exposure to chemical substances
Belgium takes part in this programma through its participation
in the assessment of risks caused by existing chemicals within
the framework of the EU and of the OECD's High Production Volume
programme. This involved, inter alia, the establishment
of a group consisting of experts from various universities,
scientific institutes and the scientific and administrative units
of
government bodies.
In the context of CICAD (Concise International Chemical
Assessment Documents), Belgium organised and co-financed one of
the meetings held in Brussels.
2. Harmonisation of classification and labelling of chemical
substances
Belgium engages in this action programme as a member of the
Senior Officials Group of the EU and of the Advisory group
on Harmonisation of Classification and Labelling Systems of the
OECD; it shoulders the responsibility, with other members, for
clarifying long-term toxicity criteria.
With regard to the future international instrument for the
implementation of relevant rules, Belgium is of the opinion that
the
strictest possible obligation should be applied rather than a
non-committal choice, otherwise the objective of this item of
Agenda
21 will not be attained.
3. Exchange of information on dangerous substances and risks as
a result of exposure to substances
The London Guidelines for the Exchange of Information on
Chemicals in International Trade and the procedures relating to
the Prior Informed Consent are implemented within the relevant EU
rules and regulations. In addition, Belgium organised and
financed the first meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating
Committee charged with the task of establishing a legally binding
instrument for the implementation of the PIC procedure in Brussels
in March 1996.
4. Introduction of risk reduction programmes
In this area also, Belgium participates in the work undertaken
at EU and OECD levels (Ad Hoc Group on Risk Reduction). In
addition, a national machinery was set up - the Coordinating
Committee on International Environmental Policies -, under which a
number of working parties closely monitor the environmental
problems; a working party on Risk Reduction, for example, is part
of the larger umbrella group on Dangerous Products and Chemical
Risks. Another initiative involves a draft law imposing
product standards to protect health and the environment; once
enacted, these provisions should make it possible to mount a quick
and efficient - both preventive and curative - response to any
harmful substance.
5. Extension of national capacities and potentialities for
managing chemical substances
In 1996, a study called "Crossroads Bank" was initiated, whose
primary aim was to make an inventory of the needs for
information about chemicals (environmental affairs, public health,
health of workers, intoxications, accidents,...) and on the
available information. This is an initiative in the context of
GINC, the Global Information Network on Chemicals of the IFCS.
Belgium participates in the work of the OECD/UNEP Group on
Information Management.
6. Preventing international illegal trade in dangerous
products
We think that provisions on measures should be considered, such
as export notification requirements, phase-out mechanisms
and framework provisions for the possible adoption of protocols on
further measures. One may seize the opportunity offered by
the negotiations in the context of the binding PIC instrument to
ensure that such an instrument should be sufficiently forward
looking and provide a flexible legal framework that is capable of
responding to new needs and challenges as they arise, without
having to go through a whole treaty-making process again.
7. Improving international cooperation on the various programme
areas
Belgium takes part in international cooperative efforts mainly
through the European Union; it also participates in the relevant
actions initiated by the OECD and the IFCS. It supports the IOMC
(Interorganisation Management Committee) coordination
efforts.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT: Belgium's activities
within the six programme areas presented in Chapter 19 are
developed in the first
place in the context of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical
Safety (IFCS) and are for the most part carried out within the
European Union (EU) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD).
1. Decision-Making Structure:
As mentioned above, there is a Coordinating Committee on
International Environmental Policies (CCIEP), which has a number
of working groups acting as a negotiating forum between the various
Federal and Regional Ministries involved. Political
decisions are approved at ministerial level by the Interministerial
Commission for the Environment.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
Extending staff, getting expertise from universities and scientific
institutions; establishing technical interdepartmental working
parties.
3. Major Groups:
Federal Departments of Health, Employment, Environmental Affairs,
Economic Affairs, Transport, Regional Environmental
Units; also industry, particularly the Federation of Chemical
Industries.
4. Finance:
Financing or co-financing some international initiatives;
introducing a system of fees to be paid by the persons responsible
for
marketing dangerous substances or preparations; the proceeds are
intended to contribute towards the costs of the Risk Control
Division of the Ministry of the Environment.
5. Regional/International Cooperation:
EU, OECD, UNEP, IFCS, ...
|
AGENDA 21 CHAPTER 20: ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES,
INCLUDING PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN HAZARDOUS
WASTES
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of
Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal
Basel Convention signed in 1989, ratified in 1993.
The latest information was provided to the Basel Convention
Secretariat in 1997.
In Belgium, the environmentally sound management of hazardous
wastes is consistent with the regulations and with the directives
of the European Union, as well as with the international legal
instruments to which Belgium is a party.
This especially includes the implementation of the regulation
concerning the shipments of waste within, into and out of the
European Union, the European directives concerning waste, dangerous
waste, used oils, PCB-PCT's batteries, animal waste,
incineration of hazardous waste.
The Belgian waste management plans, elaborated by the Regions, are
in line with the European strategy on waste management.
The first priority is the prevention of waste and the reduction of
the hazardousness of wastes. The introduction of new techniques
and technologies that reduce the use of dangerous products, is one
issue in the prevention of dangerous wastes.
Ecotaxes are applied on i.a. pesticides and batteries. Material
recovery, production of secondary raw materials and development
of new waste treatment techniques are encouraged.
The landfilling of non-treated dangerous waste is prohibited if the
dangerous waste does not comply with the severe acceptance
criteria of the authorized landfill.
Environmental taxes on the landfilling and the disposal by
incineration of waste are used to encourage the prevention and the
recovery of waste.
NATIONAL PRIORITY:
STATUS REPORT:
1. Decision-Making Structure:
Dangerous waste management, including import and export of
dangerous waste, is a competence of the Regional Governments of
Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels Capital City. The transit of waste
through Belgium is a competence of the Federal
Government.
The Coordinating Committee of International Environmental Policy
(CCIEP) is charged with coordination and consultation
activities between the different actors.
2. Capacity-Building/Technology Issues:
An agreement between the three Regional Governments and the Federal
Government regulates the control of the transboundary
movements of hazardous waste. Customs and national Gendarmerie are
fully involved in the control system.
A data collecting system is developed. The Flemish Region has
developed and uses a full-automated system (ASB) for the
administration and control on import and export of waste, including
on-line consultation