| |
DPI/NGO Briefing
The Psychological Impacts of Natural Disasters
In Observance of the International Day for Natural
Disaster Reduction (10 October) and World Mental Health Day (10October)
Summary
This week’s briefing focused on the “Psychological
Impacts of Natural Disasters.” Critical issues such as psychological
support systems, relief coordination efforts, and the needed contribution
of NGOs were addressed. Dr. Gerard A. Jacobs, Director,
Disaster Mental Health Institute, Ms. Anne Cubile,
Policy & Guidance Management, Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Mr. Charles P. Bernimolin,
Officer, United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs (OCHA), and Mr. Nassim Agazade, Critical
Incident Stress Management Unit, Department of Safety of Security,
United Nations provided the audience with a balanced and informative
understanding of the subject.
Dr. Gerard A. Jacobs began his presentation
by describing the difference between direct and indirect victims
in a disaster. Those directly affected were the victims who lost
their lives and the survivors. Indirect victims included rescue
workers, the families of direct victims, and those involved in international
humanitarian relief efforts. Dr. Jacobs added that International
relief efforts rarely took into account the psychological trauma
of the event.
He added that psychological support should be included in the response
efforts because those who experienced traumatic stress had trouble
contributing to the recovery, which then created operational problems.
Dr. Jacobs described the main areas people turned to for psychological
support, which was family and friends, medical doctors, and spiritual
professionals. He referred to that support as “Psychological
first aid” which provided a sufficient method for minor injuries
and triage. “Disaster mental health” referred to more
serious psychological trauma that needed to be handled by mental
health professionals. He pointed out that serious problems arose
when people viewed their own traumatic stress as personal weakness,
as opposed to an appropriate response to the trauma. He added that
educating the general public on the importance of psychological
support might be the most important thing that could be done. Mr.
Jacobs emphasized the need for the general population to be prepared
to give psychological support when a crisis occurred, and further
added that preparedness was much more effective than reacting to
a trauma. In closing, he commented on the importance of the Inter-Agency
Standing Committee Guidelines, which provided both a theoretical
basis as well as field guidelines for the provision of services
for emergencies around the world.
Ms. Anne Cubilie emphasized the value of
the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Guidelines. She noted
that they were important for practitioners, NGOs, and humanitarian
personnel because they provided a series of steps to monitor and
evaluate one’s own responses. In addition, they provided indicators
for measurements, and dealt with the stress of the workers themselves.
Psychological support and traumatic stress counseling were areas
of work that were still being developed in the humanitarian field
and unfortunately, received little field support. To add to this
problem, there were very few specialists in the field that could
handle coordinating people at the national level and had the expertise
to work with survivors. Very few specialists were actually trained
to take testimony from survivors about their experience, she said.
Ms. Cubilie concluded by saying, “we need a lot more work
done on training the people who in a daily way participate in working
with survivors on recovery issues.”
Mr. Charles P. Bernimolin addressed the
difficulties of coordinating relief efforts. Both at Headquarters
and in the field, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs (OCHA) needed to work together effectively in coordinating
response teams. He pointed out that as the world had become more
connected, more people were involved in the relief efforts, and
therefore, more coordination was needed. Mr. Bernimolin went on
to say that often the role of coordinating fieldwork meant providing
a forum for response management teams to meet throughout the process
to discuss an appropriate plan of action. He added that humanitarian
assistance came at the request of the Government involved. OCHA
was there to support the government in their efforts. He referred
to the Central Emergency Relief Fund as a means of acquiring additional
financial support. Mr. Bernimolin then turned his attention to the
victims of natural disasters and the difficult psychological impacts
that needed to be dealt with. He acknowledged that OCHA was better
equipped to handle to the physical impact of disasters, but unfortunately,
not as prepared to deal with these psychological consequences. However,
he added that if you involved the local people, the government and
those on the ground, in addressing the crisis, it helped them to
better cope with the situation.
Nassim Agazade focused on the work of the
Critical Incident Stress Management Unit (CISMU) of the United Nations
Department of Safety and Security (UNDSS). This Unit was responsible
for coordinating and implementing the global stress management-training
program, as well as coordinating the response to critical incidents
worldwide within the UN system. Their goal was to construct a global
stress management system for the United Nations. The objectives
of CISMU included, bringing mental health issues to the agenda of
decision makers, to build operational and fully functional critical
incident stress management cells in various selected areas of the
world, and to respond to psychosocial needs of UN staff. Mr. Agazade
went on to explain that these objectives were met through several
strategies such as organizing the different global parties involved
in a crisis and sending counselors to help the UN staff in the field.
They also provided technical support to the country experiencing
the emergency. The United Nations Standard of Procedure for Critical
Stress Management focused on assembling United Nations officers
and staff prior to a crisis. During an emergency, attention is turned
to the psychosocial needs of United Nations workers, and in the
aftermath, new and emerging needs were attended to. As an example
of CISMU in action, Mr. Agazade described an earthquake in Pakistan
and the objectives involved with this crisis and most emergencies
in general. Strategies for achieving these objectives and the results
obtained were also explained. CISMU was able to reach about 50%
of all the United Nations workers in Pakistan after the earthquake,
which was about 1,500 people.
During the question-and-answer period, Dr. Jacobs
clarified the IASC Guideline on expatriates not providing psychological
support to those affected by trauma because they did not understand
all the local cultures and customs sufficiently. Local staff should
provide that type of support. In addition, if international experts
trained to local staff in counseling, the support could continue
after the international staff left the country. All the panelists
agreed that the international community had come a long way in acknowledging
the importance of psychological support before, during and after
a crisis but there was much more to be done.
A video from the “UN in the 21 Century”
series entitled, Aftershock: The Earthquake in Pakistan,
as well as two “UN in Action” videos, Nias Rebuilds
After Earthquake, and UN Project Aims to Prevent Loss of
Life When Natural Disasters Strike were screened at 10:00 a.m.
The briefing was attended by about 150 representatives
of NGOs, United Nations and Permanent Mission staff.
|
|