| United Nations | A/50/374 |
General Assembly
Distr. GENERAL
24 August 1995
ORIGINAL:
ENGLISH
Fiftieth session
Item 107 of the provisional agenda*
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING QUESTIONS RELATING TO
THE WORLD SOCIAL SITUATION AND TO YOUTH, AGEING,
DISABLED PERSONS AND THE FAMILY
Monitoring the implementation of the Standard
Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for
Persons with Disabilities
Note by the Secretary-General
1. At its forty-eighth session, the General Assembly adopted the Standard
Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities,
contained in the annex to its resolution 48/96 of 20 December 1993. In
paragraph 4 of that resolution, the Assembly requested the Secretary-
General to promote the implementation of the Standard Rules and to report
thereon to the General Assembly at its fiftieth session.
2. Since the adoption of the Rules, the following activities have been
undertaken to promote their dissemination and understanding worldwide:
(a) Distribution of the Rules to Governments, specialized agencies and
other organizations and bodies of the United Nations system in the six
official languages of the United Nations;
(b) Encouragement of translation of the Rules into other languages. The
Rules are also currently available in Czech, Danish, Estonian, Finnish,
German, Hindi,Icelandic, Italian,Japanese, Korean,Slovak, Swedish andTamil;
(c) Translation of the Rules into Braille in English, French, Italian
and Spanish by the World Blind Union;
(d) Making the Rules available through the INTERNET.
* A/50/150.
95-26067 (E) 220995/...
*9526067*
3. Attention is drawn in particular to the call for the promotion of the
Rules, and the development of strategies for implementing them, in the
Programme of Action adopted by the World Summit for Social Development,
held at Copenhagen from 6 to 12 March 1995. 1/
4. Pursuant to section IV, paragraph 2, of the Rules, which envisages the
appointment of a Special Rapporteur to monitor their implementation within
the framework of the Commission for Social Development, the Secretary-
General appointed to that position Mr. Bengt Lindqvist (Sweden). The
Special Rapporteur, who is based in Stockholm, receives a substantial
amount of support from the Government of Sweden (including office
facilities and secretarial assistance). The Department for Policy
Coordination and Sustainable Development has assisted the Special
Rapporteur in carrying out the following activities:
(a) An address to the Third Committee of the General Assembly, in
October 1994;
(b) Convening of the first meeting of the panel of experts to assist the
Special Rapporteur in the implementation of the Standard Rules (New York,
15-16 February 1995);
(c) Attendance at several meetings, conferences and congresses in
Africa, Asia and Europe;
(d) The mobilization of financial resources to support the work of the
Special Rapporteur;
(e) Elaboration of a questionnaire which was sent to Governments,
together with a note verbale introducing the Special Rapporteur and
informing them about the monitoring exercise in connection with the
Standard Rules;
(f) Preparation of a report for consideration by the Commission for
Social Development at its thirty-fourth session.
5. Pursuant to section IV, paragraph 11, of the Standard Rules, the
Commission for Social Development established an open-ended working group
to examine the Special Rapporteur's report and make recommendations on how
to improve the application of the Rules. On the basis of the work of the
working group, the Commission adopted resolution 34/2 entitled "Monitoring
the implementation of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of
Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities". 2/ In that resolution, the
Commission took note with appreciation of the report of the Special
Rapporteur and of his recommendations, and welcomed his general approach to
monitoring, including the emphasis to be placed on advice and support to
States in the implementation of the Rules. The Commission requested the
Secretary-General to circulate the report of the Special Rapporteur as an
official document of the General Assembly, at its fiftieth session, under
item 107 of the provisional agenda.
6. The report of the Special Rapporteur, setting out in detail both the
activities undertaken and recommendations for future action, is annexed to
the present note, together with summaries of the submissions received in
response to his questionnaire.
Notes
1/ Report of the World Summit for Social Development, Copenhagen, 6-12
March 1995 (A/CONF.166/9), chap. I, resolution 1, annex II, para. 75 (k).
2/ Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 1995, Supplement
No. 4 (E/1995/24), chap. I, sect. E.
ANNEX
Report of the Special Rapporteur of the Commission for
Social Development on monitoring the implementation of
the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities
for Persons with Disabilities
In my capacity as Special Rapporteur for the monitoring of the
implementation of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities
for Persons with Disabilities, I have the honour to deliver my first report
to this Commission. I do it with some satisfaction, as the monitoring
mechanism is now running fairly well. At the end of my report, I will
present for your consideration some recommendations concerning the
continuation of the monitoring exercise. These recommendations have to a
large extent been worked out in close cooperation with the panel of experts
now functioning as part of the monitoring mechanism. I am, however, also
going to draw your attention to some problems, which we will have to deal
with in order to make the remaining two years of this first monitoring
exercise as effective as possible.
Before I enter into the discussion concerning the implementation of the
Rules, I should like to offer you some comments on the general development
of policy in the disability field.
BACKGROUND
The International Year of Disabled Persons was a great success in so far
as it meant the international recognition of the human rights perspective
in the disability field. Both the theme of the Year - full participation
and equality - and the even more important World Programme of Action
concerning Disabled Persons were important contributions in this respect.
Full participation and equality for persons with disabilities is a
farreaching and powerful message. It emphasizes a comprehensive disability
approach, which takes into account all aspects of life and society.
Rehabilitation, technical aids and other forms of personal support are
necessary preconditions for good living conditions. But they are not
enough. Even integration, that is, leaving institutions and living in an
open society, is not sufficient. Full participation on equal terms is more
than that. It means creating opportunities for real and meaningful
participation and sharing in all the different spheres of society. This
new dimension in disability policy focuses on the lack of attention to the
needs of persons with disabilities and the shortcomings of society, which
up to now have been prevailing conditions in all parts of the world.
An important contribution of the World Programme of Action in the
clarification of disability policy is that the Programme structures
disability policy in three main areas - prevention, rehabilitation and
equalization of opportunities. Prevention and rehabilitation are already
well-known areas. The third area, equalization of opportunities, is new
and brings into focus the many obstacles to participation in our societies.
Another important contribution of the World Programme of Action is the
emphasis on the involvement of organizations of persons with disabilities
in matters concerning disability.
The International Year was a great success ideologically and meant
important progress in the development of disability policy. This resulted
in enthusiasm and high expectations in the international community. At the
same time, the breakthrough in ideas created a considerable gap between the
new and internationally adopted policy and the reality in which persons
with disabilities lived. Neither the physical environment nor activities,
services or information systems designed for the general population have
been shaped with these needs in mind.
The expectations generated from the celebration of the Year have not been
fulfilled. In the middle of the decade (1983-1992), international non-
governmental organizations had already started to request stronger
leadership from the United Nations in the implementation of the new
disability policy. The new United Nations instrument in the disability
field, the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons
with Disabilities, was elaborated in response to that request for a
stronger leadership.
STANDARD RULES - a new type of instrument
There are important differences between the Rules and the World Programme
of Action:
(1) The Rules carry the development of the human rights perspective
further. This is, to a large extent, due to the development that has taken
place since the International Year in 1981.
(2) The Rules convey a much clearer message in the area of "equalization
of opportunities".
(3) The language of the Rules is generally more concentrated and shorter
in form than that of the World Programme. This makes the message of the
Rules more obvious.
(4) The Rules generally address Governments of Member States directly,
which is not the case in the World Programme.
(5) The implementation of the Rules will be actively monitored through a
monitoring mechanism established especially for that purpose.
BUILDING A MONITORING MECHANISM
The Rules were adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in December
1993. During the spring of 1994, the Rules were translated into the
official languages of the United Nations and distributed to Member States.
In March 1994, the Secretary-General announced his intention to appoint me
as Special Rapporteur, subject to my approval. However, the General
Assembly did not allocate the necessary financial resources for monitoring
through the regular budget of the United Nations. Instead, the Assembly
declared that the work of the Special Rapporteur should be financed by
extrabudgetary funds. My reply to the Secretary-General took this into
account. I said that I would be honoured to serve as United Nations
Rapporteur in this context, if sufficient funding for a meaningful
monitoring exercise could be secured. After having received assurance from
the Government of Sweden that it would be willing to provide office
facilities for the Rapporteur and after having received information that
there were a number of other Governments that would be willing to
contribute to the funding of the monitoring exercise, I accepted the
appointment.
One interesting innovation in the monitoring mechanism of the Rules is
the invitation by the United Nations to international organizations of
persons with disabilities to establish among themselves a panel of experts
to serve as an active part of the monitoring system. During the second
half of 1994, Disabled Peoples' International, the International League of
Societies of Persons with Mental Health, Rehabilitation International, the
World Blind Union, the World Federation of the Deaf and the World
Federation of Psychiatric Users decided to form this panel of experts.
Budgetary constraints have limited the number of members of the panel to 10
persons. The panel consists of five men and five women, with various
disabilities or experiences of disabilities, from all parts of the world.
The panel members are: Monica Bartley (Jamaica), Joshua Malinga
(Zimbabwe), Victor Wahlstrom (Sweden), Gabriela Fabila de Zaldo (Mexico),
John Scott (New Zealand), Penny Hartin (Canada), William Rowland (South
Africa), Liisa Kauppinen (Finland), Mohamed Sazali Shaari (Malaysia) and
Mary O'Hagan (New Zealand).
Budget and funding
During 1994, a cost plan for the activities of the Special Rapporteur was
prepared in cooperation with the Secretariat. Except for the contribution
of the Government of Sweden concerning office facilities, which is being
given in kind, the total cost for travel, the three meetings of the panel,
fees for the Rapporteur and limited amounts for regional activities and
professional assistance would amount to $581,000 for the entire three-year
period. Up to the present time, $350,000 has been received or secured.
The following countries have made voluntary contributions: Austria,
Canada, China, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Japan, Monaco, Norway, Republic of
Korea, Spain and Sweden. In addition, the United Nations Secretariat is
supporting the monitoring exercise as part of its regular activities.
Though it is encouraging that so many countries have decided to
contribute to the funding of the monitoring mechanism, there is still a
serious shortage of funds. I would therefore appeal to other Member
States, which have not already done so, to make voluntary contributions to
this monitoring exercise, which is developing in a promising way.
Activities during the first year
First letter to Governments
In November 1994 a note verbale was sent to Member States, introducing
the Special Rapporteur and informing them about the monitoring exercise in
connection with the Standard Rules. A first letter from the Rapporteur to
Governments was attached to the note verbale. The letter included four
general questions on the manner in which Governments and other interested
entities in the countries received, promoted and began implementation of
the Standard Rules. Member States were asked to reply before 15 February
1995. A reminder to Governments was sent out by the Secretariat shortly
before the final date for replies. In addition, the 10 members of the
panel of experts were asked by the Rapporteur to distribute the above-
mentioned letter to their national organizations.
By 10 April, a total of 29 replies had been received. (Subsequently, by
the end of July 1995, 13 additional replies were received.) Such a low
response rate seems to correspond well with the earlier experience of the
Secretariat concerning questionnaires to Member States on disability
matters. With regard to those experiences, I invite the Commission to
discuss the use of questionnaires to Governments as a tool in the current
monitoring project.
Result of the questionnaire
As mentioned earlier, the letter from the Rapporteur to Governments
included the following four questions:
1. What has been done to make the Rules better known to concerned bodies
and organizations in your country?
2. How have the Rules been used to date, for instance, in connection
with your legislation or other measures?
3. How do you plan to use the Rules?
4. In this first phase of monitoring, would your Government wish to
receive more information or assistance to introduce the Rules?
A summary of country replies can be found in the appendix.
Rapporteur's activities, June 1994-June 1995
At the Disability Conference in Iceland in June 1994, the United Nations
Secretariat announced that I would serve as Special Rapporteur-designate
until the formalities in connection with the organization of the monitoring
mechanism had been finalized. I participated in two meetings at the United
Nations, in August and November 1994, to plan and organize the monitoring
activities together with representatives of the Secretariat. The formal
agreement between the Secretariat and me was finally signed in November,
but runs from August 1994.
During the first phase of monitoring, my main function as Rapporteur was
to make the Rules better known. I also discussed with international non-
governmental organizations various possibilities of cooperation, methods
for implementing the Rules and ways in which non-governmental organizations
at various levels could cooperate with the Rapporteur and the United
Nations Secretariat to achieve maximum results.
As Rapporteur, I participated in a large number of conferences and
seminars organized by Governments and/or organizations. On all those
occasions, I made speeches and participated in workshops and discussion
groups. There was great interest in the contents of the Rules and the
opportunities for development that they offer. The presentations of the
Rules attracted large audiences and the discussions were intense.
First meeting of the panel of experts
The first meeting of the panel of experts was held from 15 to 17 February
1995 at United Nations Headquarters. All 10 members attended the first
meeting. They were briefed on the progress of the monitoring project and
on other United Nations activities in the disability field. The meeting
focused on the future activities of the monitoring exercise. The panel of
experts adopted a report containing a number of recommendations.
Future activities
Future activities are based on the guidelines set out in paragraph 1,
section IV of the Standard Rules, as follows:
"The purpose of a monitoring mechanism is to further the effective
implementation of the Rules. It will assist each State in assessing its
level of implementation of the Rules and in measuring its progress. The
monitoring should identify obstacles and suggest suitable measures that
would contribute to the successful implementation of the Rules. The
monitoring mechanism will recognize the economic, social and cultural
features existing in individual States. An important element should also
be the provision of advisory services and the exchange of experience and
information between States."
To summarize, the overall goal is to further the effective implementation
of the Rules. The monitoring should also measure the level of
implementation, identify obstacles and suggest suitable measures to remove
them. Another important task is to provide advisory services and to
promote an exchange of experience and information between States.
Again, regarding budgetary matters, the monitoring project was funded for
rather limited activities. My time is shared between the task of
Rapporteur and my work as a member of the Swedish Parliament. I have an
excellent assistant on a half-time basis and, through the Swedish in-kind
contribution, part-time professional assistance. I also benefit from the
support and advice of both the panel and the United Nations Secretariat.
Should additional funding be provided, it is my intention to develop
regional activities utilizing regional expertise. It is against this
background that I will discuss the various future activities for the
remaining two years of the monitoring project.
Measuring the level of implementation
As stated earlier, the response to the first letter to Governments was
very disappointing. With better preparation, especially in obtaining the
active cooperation of interested non-governmental organizations, it should
be possible to get more replies. Though the response rate to
questionnaires is traditionally low, it is clearly indicated in the
monitoring guidelines that questionnaires to Member States should form an
important part of the monitoring exercise.
Based on the recommendations of the panel of experts, it is my intention
to send a second letter in 1995 to Member States concentrating on the
following six strategically important areas: legislation (rule 15),
coordination of work (rule 17), organizations of persons with disabilities
(rule 18), accessibility (rule 5), education (rule 6) and employment (rule
7). The specialized agencies, especially the International Labour
Organization and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization, will be consulted on the areas relevant to their mandates.
Building on the experiences of the first two questionnaires, consideration
will be given to devising a third set of questions before the end of the
monitoring period.
The panel has also offered to serve as the evaluating body in this
context. It has recommended the development of an index based on the
Standard Rules. Therefore, the elaboration of the questionnaire and of such
an index for structuring the replies must be coordinated.
In connection with the World Summit for Social Development, held at
Copenhagen, the Danish organizations of persons with disabilities, in
cooperation with the Nordic disability organizations, organized a
conference on the development of a disability index. The idea was to
develop such an index on the basis of the Standard Rules. In this way the
international community would get an instrument to measure and compare
development in the disability field both over a period of time and between
countries. A first version of such an index was presented at the Summit.
The discussion proved that there is considerable interest in such an index,
especially among organizations. It also indicated that much work remains
to be done before such an index can be integrated into the international
evaluation activities. It is also obvious that the solution developed by
the Danes is formed in such a way that it cannot be used to evaluate the
implementation level in a single Rule area. If an index technique is
desired in connection with the evaluation of an investigation of the kind
recommended by the panel, we will have to develop our own solution for that
purpose.
Identifying obstacles and suggesting measures to remove them
The most obvious contribution of the Standard Rules to disability policy
is the concept of identifying and removing obstacles that prevent the full
participation in society of persons with disabilities. For some groups and
in some cases, such obstacles are easily identified. In other cases they
are less tangible. The discussion of this topic in relation to the
situation in developing countries is an almost untouched area. In this
regard, I look to the Commission for advice and guidance.
It is important to use all available opportunities to discuss these
matters with the representatives of both Governments and organizations. I
intend to use the various seminars, congresses etc. in which I participate
to bring this matter to their attention. I will also continue to encourage
members of the panel of experts and representatives of organizations of
disabled persons to contribute their innovative ideas to this process.
Advisory services
Countries are already asking for advice in implementing the Rules. The
possibilities of assisting countries within the monitoring project are, of
course, very limited. Nevertheless, it is important to respond positively
to such requests, since one of the most important functions of the
monitoring exercise is to create opportunities for development and
cooperation. I would appreciate a discussion in the Commission on how such
advisory services could be linked to the monitoring exercise. I firmly
believe that we should seek cooperation with the specialized agencies, the
United Nations Development Programme and other funding agencies to develop
advisory or consultative services in the area of legislation and policy
development.
One interesting idea is to develop "good country models" of
implementation. The selection of the models can be based on a fair regional
distribution, using the experiences of the regional commissions and other
regional organizations.
Promoting an exchange of information
One of the most obvious results of the first letter to Governments is
their request for information about how other countries have used the
Rules. This is in itself a strong motive for continuing to send questions
to Governments. High priority should therefore be given to compiling and
distributing examples of good country models.
The replies to the first letter contain a number of interesting examples
of what has been done or is being planned. As can be seen in the appendix,
we have chosen to report country by country in order to make it easier for
those interested in acquiring more information.
I invite the Commission to discuss how an exchange of information can
best be promoted through the activities of this monitoring project. The
discussion could concern both the ways in which results and findings are
reported and special measures taken to stimulate and facilitate an exchange
of information.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In the first part of my report, I described the role of the Standard
Rules in the development of policy and thinking in the disability field. I
also indicated the reasons why this instrument was elaborated and why it is
important to achieve results in the implementation of the Rules.
I also described the way in which the monitoring mechanism has been built
up by the Secretariat during 1994 and the efforts made to find sufficient
funding for the activities.
In the second part of the report, I discussed the activities of the
first year of the monitoring exercise.
In the third section, I reported on the various tasks of the monitoring
project. As we have limited resources, it is important to discuss various
possible activities with the funding situation in mind.
The Rules are being introduced in a large number of countries. They
already play an important role in influencing policy and thinking both
internationally and at the national level. However, much remains to be
done to implement the Rules -especially the role and use of the Rules in
developing countries.
Now, I would like to make some recommendations for the consideration of
the Commission. Some of them are concrete suggestions for the continuation
of the monitoring exercise. In some cases, I seek the advice and
experience of the Commission in order to improve policy and action.
Recommendations
1. As a general approach to the monitoring, emphasis should be placed on
advice, support and encouragement rather than on measuring, comparing and
controlling.
2. In the future, the major emphasis in the monitoring activity should
be on assisting developing countries in their implementation efforts.
3. Although the overall goal of the monitoring activity is to implement
all the Rules, the monitoring efforts during the remaining two years should
concentrate mainly on the following six areas: legislation (rule 15),
coordination of work (rule 17), organizations of persons with disabilities
(rule 18), accessibility (rule 5), education (rule 6) and employment (rule
7).
4. In these six areas, measurable goals (or indicators) should be
derived from the contents of the Rules.
5. The Rapporteur should distribute a second letter to Member States,
making in-depth inquiries in the first four areas: legislation,
coordination, organizations of persons with disabilities and accessibility.
6. Concerning the survey in the areas of education and employment, the
Rapporteur should consult with the United Nations Educational, Scientific
and Cultural Organization and the International Labour Organization in
their respective fields.
7. The possibility of using a simple index technique in the evaluation
of the results from this second questionnaire should be considered.
8. The offer made by the panel of experts to perform the evaluation of
the survey should be accepted.
9. International disability organizations (especially those
constituting the panel of experts) should be invited to participate in the
survey. Their national members could remind Governments to reply. They
could reply themselves or, if possible, comment on the replies of their
Governments.
10. The Commission is invited to discuss what could be done to improve
the response rate from Governments.
11. Efforts should be made by the Secretariat and the Rapporteur to
involve the specialized agencies and the regional commissions in the
implementation of the Rules. Among other things, the following measures
should be considered:
(a) A letter with general questions, similar to those contained in the
first letter to Governments, should be sent to these entities;
(b) The inter-agency meetings on disability should be reopened by the
Secretariat in order to exchange information, coordinate measures and
explore the possibilities of joint action;
(c) International non-governmental organizations should be invited to
participate in the inter-agency meetings;
(d) Inter-agency meetings should also be held at the regional level.
12. When Member States ask for more extensive advisory services, the
Rapporteur should seek the cooperation of the Secretariat, the United
Nations Development Programme, the specialized agencies, the regional
commissions and other agencies in the field of technical cooperation.
Measures to encourage cooperation between the Rapporteur and these agencies
should be developed.
13. The Commission should consider encouraging the development of
regionally distributed "good country models", which, during a later stage
in the monitoring exercise, could be used for reference.
14. In response to the requests from Member States, good examples of
measures should be registered for publication towards the end of the
monitoring period.
15. The Commission is asked to consider further measures to stimulate
the exchange of experience and information between countries.
16. Further measures to promote awareness-raising in connection with the
Rules should be considered. Among those measures, the following are
recommended:
(a) The wider circulation of the Standard Rules;
(b) A broad circulation of the brochure on the Standard Rules;
(c) The distribution of a list of United Nations documents that could
support the implementation of the Rules;
(d) A request to international non-governmental organizations to
circulate their support material;
(e) The design of a poster on the message of the Rules, to be made
available for awareness campaigns.
17. The Commission should consider the funding situation and suggest
measures to secure the necessary resources for the monitoring activities.
Among other things, the Commission is asked to consider the possibility of
reopening the discussion on funding the monitoring mechanism through the
regular budget of the United Nations.
APPENDIX
Summaries of replies from Governments to the questionnaire of the
Special Rapporteur of the Commission for Social Development on
the Implementation of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of
Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities
Argentina
At a regional meeting for Latin America regarding national legislation
and programmes for disabled persons in 1994, the Governments of the region
discussed possibilities for applying the Standard Rules. The Rules will
serve as a fundamental guide in the creation of basic jurisprudence,
providing an opportunity for affirmative action programmes.
The Government of Argentina developed a Plan of Action for 1994-1995, the
application of which was evaluated by the Third Argentinean Congress on
Disability, held at Buenos Aires in December, with the participation of
1,700 persons. The Standard Rules were disseminated by the Argentinean
Federation for the Mentally Disabled.
The experience gained during the United Nations Decade of Disabled
Persons has shown the way for pursuing the application of the equalization
of opportunities under the Standard Rules. Furthermore, the rights of
persons with disabilities, embodied in international instruments, are
complemented by the rights and guarantees recognized in the National
Constitution, recently reformed in 1994.
Argentina has a national commission that assists the Government in
integrating disabled persons into society by studying the special needs of
persons with disabilities. The commission includes representatives from
various areas of the Government and works in collaboration with non-
governmental organizations.
Australia
A considerable amount of work has been done to make the Rules known to
authorities, agencies and organizations. The Rules are often referred to
in federal documents.
A handbook for regional use on how to plan and design an accessible
environment has been elaborated. During the drafting of the Rules, drafts
were being used as a basis for new federal legislation, for example, the
Disability Discrimination Act (1992). A disability strategy has also been
elaborated after consultation with non-governmental organizations, staff
and other concerned groups.
The Australian Disability Council has a key role in the monitoring and
further development of the strategy. A national campaign has been launched
in support of the strategy.
The Australian Government welcomes more information, especially
practical examples from other countries.
Austria
In December 1992 a policy was adopted by the Austrian Government which,
to a large extent, coincides with the Rules.
Concerning future activities, Austria will endeavour to incorporate the
principles of the Rules in new policy.
Belarus
The Republic of Belarus pays considerable attention to the problems of
persons with disabilities and undertakes a number of measures for their
protection, including legislation on the prevention of disability and
rehabilitation of persons with disabilities, which aims at protecting the
rights and freedoms of disabled persons. However, the difficult economic
situation in Belarus constitutes a major obstacle for funding disability
programmes.
The International Day of Persons with Disabilities, on 2 December 1992,
was also proclaimed the Day of Persons with Disabilities of the Republic of
Belarus.
The Republic of Belarus would like to receive information on the
implementation of the Rules in other States.
Benin
The Government of Benin plans to elaborate a strategy in order to
introduce the Rules and to speed up their implementation. The Government
works in cooperation with the African Rehabilitation Institute. The
Government would like to receive more information.
Bolivia
The Rules have been handed over to a group of disability advocates. New
legislation concerning persons with disabilities will be elaborated, in
cooperation with all concerned. Several of the paragraphs in the Rules
will be used in the new law. The Government of Bolivia would welcome more
information.
Colombia
The Rules were presented at a meeting in November 1994. In January 1995
a plan of action was adopted. The national Constitution of 1991 includes
several paragraphs on the rights and needs of persons with disabilities.
The Government would like to use the Rules and a seminar will be organized
to promote them. Various ministries are being informed about the Rules.
The Government would like to receive more information.
Cyprus
The Standard Rules have been translated into Greek and distributed to the
Organization for Disabled Persons, to Social Partners and to other
interested government services.
The Standard Rules and the World Programme of Action have served as
guidelines for the development of government policies for disabled persons
and have helped to provide a framework for disability legislation.
The Government is interested in obtaining information on how other
countries have used the Rules in national legislation, particularly in the
European Union.
Denmark
The Rules have been translated and presented at a press conference in
1994. Copies of the Rules have been distributed to ministries, Parliament
and regional and local agencies. The Danish Council of Organizations of
Disabled People distributed 1,500 copies of the Rules to its members. The
Danish translation of the Rules is also available on tape and in Braille.
In April 1993, a resolution was adopted, recommending that both public
and private sectors comply with the principle of equal treatment of
disabled and non-disabled citizens. An Equal Opportunity Centre for
Disabled Persons was established.
Communication and information are considered important and some 100,000
Danish kroner has been allocated for information purposes.
Estonia
The Estonian Disabled Person's Board had the Rules translated into
Estonian and widely distributed, including at the provincial and local
levels. In December 1994, a workshop on the Rules was organized. The
Government plans to hold an electronic-mail conference, at which one theme
will be the Rules.
At present, a special commission is drafting an Estonian policy based on
the Rules. The Estonian Foundation of Disabled People was formed in 1994.
Its main purpose is to fund programmes and projects to integrate persons
with disabilities and increase their independence. The Foundation receives
49 per cent of gambling taxes from the State budget.
Finland
The Rules have been translated into Finnish and distributed to disability
organizations and regional and local authorities.
The Finnish National Council on Disability, which is a coordinating body
in accordance with the principles of the Rules, has started to draft a
Finnish policy based on the Rules. On two occasions during 1994 the
National Council on Disability launched information programmes on the
Rules. The Finnish Government would like to maintain close contact with
the Special Rapporteur.
Germany
The translation of the Rules into German will soon be completed and will
be published as a brochure. The principles of the Rules correspond well
with German legislation on rehabilitation.
Ghana
The Government of Ghana is committed to ensuring the mainstreaming of
persons with disabilities into the economic, social and political life of
Ghana. Towards that end, the Government has established a National Advisory
Committee on Rehabilitation Policy, whose terms of reference are based on
the Standard Rules, the Salamanca Statement and the Framework for Action on
Special Needs Education.
The 1992 Constitution of Ghana meets the necessary provisions for most of
the requirements of the Standard Rules. The Government has proposed a bill
for the enactment of the Disabled Persons Act, fully addressing the legal
elements of the Standard Rules. The Government also intends to publish the
rules to raise the awareness of the community and make society accessible
to persons with disabilities.
Iceland
The Rules have been translated into Icelandic and distributed to
concerned authorities and organizations.
The Rules have already been used to improve services.
The Government would appreciate additional information.
Iraq
The Rules are well in keeping with national legislation.
the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs has the main responsibility for
disability policy.
The Government of Iraq considers that paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule 9 should
be deleted as they do not correspond with Islamic law and Arab tradition.
It is important to designate an international organization to study
experiences in different countries and to give advice to other countries.
Iraq has long experience in disability services of various types,
particularly with reference to employment.
Luxembourg
The Ministry of Family and Solidarity has disseminated the text of the
Rules to interested parties in order to increase awareness and sensitize
the public to the problems of disabled persons.
On 30 July 1993, the Government adopted a national programme concerning
disabled persons.
Malaysia
The Rules have been circulated to all bodies and organizations. They
have been used as a guide to introduce and implement programmes and other
measures to improve the socio-economic status of persons with disabilities.
These include a 1 per cent minimum quota of public sector jobs reserved for
persons with disabilities, and amendments to building codes to improve
access.
In the future, the Rules will be effectively implemented in all relevant
sectors. The Government of Malaysia wishes to receive more information and
assistance in introducing the Rules.
Mexico
The Government of Mexico has approved a national programme on disability
and has created a National Coordinating Commission.
Five federal laws have been modified during the past two years.
The Rules constitute the framework and recommendations for the present
administration.
Morocco
The Rules have been distributed to all concerned organizations and
institutions. They have been used in awareness-raising campaigns. An
international seminar was held in December 1994. A High Commissioner on
Disability was appointed in March 1994 in order to ensure integration of
disabled persons into society.
A large number of specialists participated in the international seminar
on equality for persons with disabilities, at which the Rabat Declaration
was adopted.
Two new laws, one on the visually impaired and the other on the
protection of disabled persons from discriminatory treatment, have recently
been enacted.
A plan of action will be elaborated in cooperation with ministries, the
private sector and national organizations and in consultation with
international bodies.
The Government of Morocco would appreciate information from other
countries.
Netherlands
The Rules have been translated into Dutch and distributed to ministries,
Parliament, various organizations and the media.
The Rules can be seen as a frame of reference for policy development.
They correspond well with the approach taken in Dutch legislation and
practice.
At present, an Action Plan on Care for Disabled Persons is being
elaborated on the basis of the Rules. A long-term programme for the
coordination of disability issues is being drafted for the years 1995-1998.
New Zealand
The Standard Rules have been given to the Ministry of Health and the
Department of Social Welfare, both of which have responsibility for
providing policy advice and maintaining income levels for people with
disabilities. In addition, the Assembly for People with Disabilities has
disseminated theRules tointeresteddisability-related entitiesin NewZealand.
The Rules have been used in promoting the need for a government strategy
to ensure that people with disabilities have equal opportunity to access
state services. Also, the Rules have contributed to the ongoing conceptual
development regarding a definition of disability support services.
The Government would be pleased to receive any further information
regarding the Rules.
Norway
The Rules correspond with the overall political goals of the Government's
action plan. Each ministry is responsible for implementing the Rules
within its area of responsibility. The Ministry of Health and Social
Affairs is responsible for coordination.
A special committee of state secretaries has been appointed to deal with
policy relating to disabled persons.
A National Council on Disability has been established which, among other
things, will present proposals to the ministries and monitor the
implementation of the Rules.
The Government of Norway is interested in receiving further information
on the way the implementation of the Rules is being effected
internationally and in individual countries.
Peru
The Rules have been distributed to concerned ministries, organizations
and institutions in the disability field. The Rules will be incorporated
in ongoing activities. The implementation of the Rules will, to a large
extent, depend on the availability of resources.
The Government is interested in additional information, especially from
other countries in the region.
Philippines
The Government is currently distributing copies of the Rules to all
concerned. A conference will be organized for staff within the National
Council for the Welfare of Disabled Persons and the Ministry. They will be
responsible for distributing information to the 15 regions of the country.
The Government is elaborating a Magna Carta for Disabled Persons which is
well in keeping with the Rules.
The Disability Unit in the Ministry has used the Rules in formulating its
Plan of Action for 1995.
The Rules will be used as guidelines when planning policy both locally
and regionally. Non-governmental organizations will be represented in this
process.
The Government would appreciate information and assistance in introducing
and interpreting the Rules.
Romania
The Standard Rules were disseminated by radio and television and at
meetings of disability organizations.
The State Secretariat for Disabled Persons has regular meetings with non-
governmental organizations. Most of the Rules are included in a law
concerning the protection of disabled persons. The institutions for
children have been reformed.
The Rules will be used to improve legislation, encourage early detection,
increase the degree of independence of disabled persons, and initiate
vocational training programmes.
The Government would appreciate more information about activities in
other countries and monitoring mechanisms.
Russian Federation
A Russian club named "Adventure" held a marathon for disabled persons in
1994. The marathon adopted the United Nations slogan "Society for All",
from the Decade of Disabled Persons. This event helped strengthen
relationships between the people of the Commonwealth of Independent States
and the Baltic States and was a valuable contribution to the plans and
programmes for disabled persons.
Slovakia
The Government of Slovakia printed 2,500 copies of the Standard Rules and
disseminated them throughout the country, including to governmental and
non-governmental organizations and health and educational institutions.
The Rules were published in newspapers and magazines for disabled persons.
The Government is interested in integrating the Standard Rules into new
legislation. The Government wishes to improve the integration of disabled
persons into society and has discussed establishing a "project for the
coordination of activities for the integration of disabled people in
everyday life in every district". The project is expected to become an
instrument for local policy-making.
Although the Government abolished the Committee for Disabled Persons in
1995, it hopes to establish another coordinating body. In previous years,
this Committee, consisting of governmental and non-governmental
organizations and disabled persons, strove to enable disabled persons to
take part in the community and to have the right to education, employment
and housing.
Slovenia
The Standard Rules have been translated into Slovenian and distributed to
relevant ministries, organizations for the disabled and institutions
responsible for developing national legislation on disability issues. The
Government plans to publish and distribute the Rules to local communities
to assist them in developing local policy.
The Government plans to modify and amend the existing legal framework
which impedes or prevents the full participation and equal status of
disabled persons within society. The Government also intends to amend
legislation concerning housing and construction policy to assist disabled
persons in acquiring housing and to introduce provisions for removing
architectural barriers.
The Rules will serve as a guide for developing employment policies for
persons with disabilities. Additionally, the Rules will serve as a
reference for the drafting of national programmes on social welfare for
disabled persons.
The Government would like to be updated on the activities of the
Commission for Social Development regarding the implementation of the Rules
in other countries.
South Africa
The Government has put considerable effort into creating a National
Coordinating Committee on Disability and developing a network of committees
in the areas of prevention, rehabilitation and equal opportunities. The
goal is to undertake a total review of legislation and services in the
disability field. This should help professionals develop skills based on
the Rules.
The Government would appreciate more information.
Spain
The Rules have been widely distributed among professionals of the
National Institute for Social Affairs, with a view to their consideration
within the framework of the concepts, planning and management of policies
for disabled persons. The Rules have been taken into consideration within
the framework of the plan of action for the integration of disabled persons
and will be used as a reference for future actions of the Institute.
The Government of Spain would be interested in receiving additional
information on the development and impact of the Rules in other countries.
Sri Lanka
The Rules have been translated into Sinhalese and distributed to all
concerned authorities and institutions.
Legislation on the establishment of a National Council on Disability has
been drafted, with disability organizations represented at all levels.
The Government would appreciate additional information.
Sweden
A disability ombudsman was appointed in 1994. The ombudsman will ensure
that disabled persons are not treated unfavourably, will serve in an
advisory capacity and scrutinize and evaluate current legislation. The
Government considers it important to take measures to develop general
accessibility and responsibility in various parts of society.
The Rules have been translated into Swedish. The Government has
allocated 10 million Swedish kronor for disseminating information about the
Rules.
The Government welcomes the proposal in the White Paper on European
Social Policy to prepare an appropriate instrument endorsing the United
Nations Standard Rules.
Switzerland
The Rules will be translated into German. They have been distributed to
disability organizations. The Rules, which have just recently been
introduced, have not yet had any concrete effect at the federal or regional
level. Disability organizations will consider how the Rules can be used in
various contexts.
The Swiss Government would appreciate additional information about how
the Rules are used in other countries.
Syrian Arab Republic
The Government of the Syrian Arab Republic has fully agreed to the
Standard Rules on the condition that these Rules do not contradict Islamic
law. So that the Rules can be better known, the Ministry for Social
Affairs and Labour will disseminate them to the competent authorities for
implementation. The authorities will study legislation in order to update
it in accordance with the Rules, provided that the Rules do not contradict
public legislation.
In the future, the ministries will include in their related five-year
plans, new projects that will comply with the Rules, keeping within
affordable resources.
Induecourse,theSyrianauthoritieswillseekanyneededassistanceorinformation.
Trinidad and Tobago
During 1993, a committee consisting of representatives from government
and disability organizations elaborated a draft policy on the basis of the
Rules. The committee has continued to formulate a plan of action. Measures
have been taken to raise awareness.
It has been proposed that a National Coordinating Committee be
established during 1995, to be followed by a disability unit in 1996, which
would function as the secretariat of the Committee.
Copies of the Rules and the policy statement will be distributed.
The Government would appreciate information about activities in other
countries.
Turkey
The National Coordinating Committee, established in 1981, has translated
the Rules into Turkish and distributed them to concerned institutions and
organizations. The Rules are on the Committee's agenda.
General policy on the Rules will be included in the five-year plan, which
is currently being drafted. The intention of the Government is to include
the Rules in discussions with institutions and organizations.
Efforts to eliminate physical obstacles will be increased. Personnel
and families will be trained and statistics will be collected through a
database.
The Government would like additional information.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Concerned ministries have been informed about the Rules and the Rules
have also been distributed to concerned organizations.
The Rules have been scrutinized and concerned ministries will take
account of the principles.
United States of America
The Standard Rules have been incorporated into recommendations made to
the President and Congress by the National Council on Disability, an
independent federal agency that works to increase the inclusion and
empowerment of persons with disabilities.
During the past 20 years, the United States has passed legislation, which
embodies many of the principles articulated in the Standard Rules,
including the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which contains non-discrimination
provisions for promoting equality and opportunities for persons with
disabilities. The Act also includes provisions for the hiring and
advancement of employees with disabilities in the Federal Government and
affirmative action plans for federal contractors. Recommendations by the
National Council on Disability led to the Federal Government passing the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, creating a wide range of civil
rights that prohibit discrimination against people with disabilities.
Information submitted by non-governmental organizations
China
China Disabled Persons' Federation
Brochures in Chinese have been printed and distributed throughout the
country. The message of the Rules has been made known through the media.
The Rules are often used for reference. The present Chinese legislation is
in accordance with the Rules. Two inspection tours have been made to
monitor the implementation of the Rules. China has a five-year programme
on disability, in which most areas of the Rules are included.
Brochures will be distributed at the grass-roots level. The Rules will
be incorporated in the formulation of the next five-year programme. The
main target in that five-year programme will be poverty relief in the
market economy, especially for the poorest citizens.
China would like to exchange information with the United Nations and with
other countries concerning the implementation of the Rules.
France
Union nationale des associations de parents et amis de personnes
handicapees mentales - National Union of Associations of Parents and
Friends of Persons with Mental Deficiency (UNAPEI)
Paragraph 7 of rule 7 states that "the aim should always be for persons
with disabilities to obtain employment in the open labour market. For
persons with disabilities whose needs cannot be met in open employment,
small units of sheltered or supported employment may be an alternative".
In our capacity as representatives of persons with mental deficiency in
France, we are of the opinion that there should be an adapted response to
each type of disability. One must be realistic, and restrictive as well as
mistrustful attitudes towards sheltered workshops may lead to the exclusion
of persons with mental deficiency; for a great number of those persons,
access to specialized structures is the way to greater inclusion. Our aim
is to temper exchanges of views in international organizations where theory
does not necessarily correspond to reality.
India
National Forum for Welfare of the Mentally Handicapped
The Ministry of Welfare will print the Rules in Hindi and distribute them
throughout the country. At the government level, the question of
translating the Rules into other vernacular languages is being discussed.
The Government has prepared comprehensive legislation.
The National Council for the Welfare of the Handicapped will be
encouraged to discuss the Standard Rules and to use them for policy
development.
Israel
Akim Israel - National Association for the Habilitation of the Mentally
Handicapped
In reply to the questions of the Special Rapporteur, Akim Israel has made
an extensive account of the various programmes in Israel for disabled
persons, especially for the mentally handicapped.
South Africa
S.A. Federation for Mental Health
The Rules are well known at the government level and in disability
circles. The National Coordinating Committee on Disability was formed in
1993. Its main objective is to implement the Rules. At present,
disability policy and legislation are being updated. Non-governmental
organizations participate in this process. The Rules will mainly serve as
criteria regarding how change can be monitored. The Committee is in close
touch with the United Nations and Rehabilitation International but welcomes
information and advice.
-----