|
|||
Fiftieth session
Item 74 of the provisional agenda*
CONVENTION ON PROHIBITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF CERTAIN
CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS WHICH MAY BE DEEMED TO BE EXCESSIVELY
INJURIOUS OR TO HAVE INDISCRIMINATE EFFECTS
Report of the Secretary-General
1. In its resolution 49/79 of 15 December 1994, the General Assembly,
inter alia, recalled with satisfaction the adoption, on 10 October 1980, of
the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain
Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to
Have Indiscriminate Effects, 1/ together with the Protocol on Non-
Detectable Fragments (Protocol I), 1/ the Protocol on Prohibitions or
Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby Traps and Other Devices (Protocol
II) 1/ and the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of
Incendiary Weapons (Protocol III); 1/ registered its satisfaction with the
reports of the Secretary-General (A/49/421, A/49/275 and Add.1 and A/49/357
and Add.1); urgently called upon all States that had not yet done so to
take all measures to become parties, as soon as possible, to the Convention
and upon successor States to take appropriate measures so that ultimately
access to that instrument would be universal; and called upon the
Secretary-General, in his capacity as depositary of the Convention and its
three Protocols, to continue to inform it periodically of accessions to the
Convention and the Protocols.
2. Pursuant to the request of the General Assembly, the Secretary-General
submits herewith information on the actions with respect to the Convention
and its three Protocols for the period under review, that is, from 1
September 1994 to 30 June 1995, which is contained in the annex to the
present report.
________________________
* A/50/150.
95-23145 (E) 210895/...
*9523145*
3. As at 30 June 1995, the following 50 States were parties to the
Convention: Australia, Austria, Belarus, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic,
Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary,
India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lao People's Democratic Republic,
Latvia, Liechtenstein, Malta, Mexico, Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand,
Niger, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Slovenia,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay and
Yugoslavia.
Notes
1/ See The United Nations Disarmament Yearbook, vol. 5: 1980 (United
Nations publication, Sales No. E.81.IX.4), appendix VII.
ANNEX
Actions in respect of the Convention on Prohibitions or
Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons
Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to
Have Indiscriminate Effects and its three Protocols
during the period from 1 September 1994 to 30 June 1995
StatesRatification, acceptance (A)
approval (AA) or accession (a) succession (d)Acceptance pursuant to article
4, paragraphs 3 and 4
ProtocolsIIIIIIBelgium 7 February 1995XXXIreland 13 March
1995XXXIsrael a/ 22 March 1995 (a)XXItaly 20 January 1995XXXMalta
26 June 1995 (a)XXXUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
b/ 13 February 1995XXXUnited States of America c/ 24 March
1995XXUruguay 6 October 1994 (a)XXX
a/ Accepting Protocols I and II and with the following declarations and
understandings:
"1. Declarations:
(a) With reference to the scope of application defined in article 1 of
the Convention, the Government of the State of Israel will apply the
provisions of the Convention and those annexed Protocols to which Israel
has agreed to become bound to all armed conflicts involving regular armed
forces of States referred to in article 2 common to the General Conventions
of 12 August 1949, as well as to all armed conflicts referred to in article
3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.
(b) Article 7, paragraph 4, of the Convention will have no effect.
(c) The application of this Convention will have no effect on the legal
status of the parties to a conflict.
"2. Understandings:
________________________
(a) It is the understanding of the Government of the State of Israel
that the compliance of commanders and others responsible for planning,
deciding upon, or executing attacks to which the Convention and its
Protocols apply, cannot be judged on the basis of information which
subsequently comes to light, but must be assessed on the basis of the
information available to them at the time that such actions were taken.
(b) With respect to Protocol I, it is the understanding of the
Government of Israel that the use of plastics or similar materials for
detonators or other weapon parts not designed to cause injury is not
prohibited.
(c) With respect to Protocol I, it is the understanding of the
Government of Israel that:
(i)Any obligation to record the location of remotely delivered mines
pursuant to subparagraph 1 (a) of article 5 refers to the location of
minefields and not to the location of individual remotely delivered mines;
(ii)The term pre-planned, as used in subparagraph 1 (a) of article 7, means
that the position of the minefield in question should have been determined
in advance so that an accurate record of the location of the minefield,
when laid, can be made."
b/ With the following declaration:
(a) Generally
(i)The term "armed conflict" of itself and in its context denotes a
situation of a kind which is not constituted by the commission of ordinary
crimes including acts of terrorism, whether concerted or in isolation.
(ii)The United Kingdom will not, in relation to any situation in which it
is involved, consider itself bound in consequence of any declaration
purporting to be made for the purposes of article 7 (4), unless the United
Kingdom shall have expressly recognized that it has been made by a body
which is genuinely an authority representing a people engaged in an armed
conflict of the type to which that paragraph applies.
(iii)The terms "civilian" and "civilian population" have the same meaning
as in article 50 of the first Additional Protocol of 1977 to the 1949
Geneva Conventions. Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this
Convention unless and for such time as they take a direct part in
hostilities.
________________________
(iv)Military commanders and others responsible for planning, deciding on,
or executing attacks necessarily have to reach decisions on the basis of
their assessment of the information from all sources which is reasonably
available to them at the relevant time.
(b) Re: Protocol II, article 2; and Protocol III, article 1
A specific area of land may be a military objective if, because of its
location or other reasons specified in this article, its total or partial
destruction, capture or neutralization in the circumstances ruling at the
time offers a definite military advantage.
(c) Re: Protocol II, article 3
In the view of the United Kingdom, the military advantage anticipated
from an attack is intended to refer to the advantage anticipated from the
attack considered as a whole and not only from isolated or particular parts
of the attack.
(d) Re: Protocol III, article 2
The United Kingdom accepts the provisions of article 2 (2) and (3) on the
understanding that the terms of those paragraphs of that article do not
imply that the air-delivery of incendiary weapons, or of any other weapons,
projectiles or munitions, is less accurate or less capable of being carried
out discriminately than all or any other means of delivery.
c/ With the following reservations, declaration and understandings:
(1) Reservation:
Article 7 (4) (b) of the Convention shall not apply with respect to the
United States.
(2) Declaration:
The United States declares, with reference to the scope of application
defined in article 1 of the Convention, that the United States will apply
the provisions of the Convention, Protocol I and Protocol II to all armed
conflicts referred to in articles 2 and 3 common to the Geneva Conventions
for the Protection of War Victims of 12 August 1949.
(3) Understanding:
The United States understands that article 6 (1) of Protocol II does not
prohibit the adaptation for use as booby traps of portable objects created
for a purpose other than as a booby trap if the adaptation does not violate
paragraph (1) (b) of the article.
________________________
(4) Understanding:
The United States considers that the fourth paragraph of the preamble to
the Convention, which refers to the substance of provisions of article 35
(3) and article 55 (1) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions
for the Protection of War Victims of 12 August 1949, applies only to States
which have accepted those provisions.
-----
|
This document has been posted online by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). Reproduction and dissemination of the document - in electronic and/or printed format - is encouraged, provided acknowledgement is made of the role of the United Nations in making it available.
Date last posted: 18 December 1999 16:30:10
Comments and suggestions: esa@un.org