SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
The
Statement of His Excellency
Mr. Farouk al Shara
Minister for
Foreign Affairs
of
The Syrian Arab Republic
At the Conference
on
Racism, Racial Discrimination,
Xenophobia and all kinds of
Intolerance
Durban August 31-Sept. 7, 2001.
September 2,
2001
Madam President,
May I congratulate
you for chairing this important conference and convey to you, and through you,
to President Nelson Mandela, the symbol of fighting against racism, and to the
friendly people of South Africa, the warmest regards of President Bashar al
Assad, the President of Syria and his best wishes for the success of this
conference.
There is no doubt that one of the most important
contributions to the success of this conference is the fact that it has been
convened in this country, whose people were able, through a very long struggle,
immense sacrifices, the support of their African brothers and the solidarity of
the world, to crush one of the most atrocious citadels of racism, both in Africa
and the world at large.
Allow me, in this context, to indicate here that
my country, Syria, Arabs and Muslims, have stood firmly with the struggle waged
by the people of South Africa, sincerely expressed solidarity with them and
boycotted their enemies without the slightest hesitation or reservations for two
essential reasons:
First: because racism is one of the most dangerous social
evils as it combines in its layers the substance of all evils in the world: a
blind fanatic mind that may transform itself in a scientific fashion, or at
random, under the eyes of the entire world to practices that are more horrid and
appalling than anything witnessed by human beings.
Second: Because the
resistance of our people to racism has ancient historic and cultural roots which
might not be widely known. In the sixth century A.D. for example the virtuous
people in Mecca, at the heart of the Arab peninsula, agreed not to leave any
person of the residents in Mecca or the new comers to it suffer from injustice
without supporting him until the injustice is eradicated. Later on, Prophet
Muhammad blessed this ethic that is in harmony with the sanctified Islamic
teachings.
Many contemporary historians have registered with admiration,
not shorn of surprise, the human and religious diversity in Syria (Belad al
Sham) as many of the oppressed people, both in the close and distant
neighborhood found a generous and secure haven in it, so they lived, and are
still living, as Syrian citizens, who enjoy equality in both rights and
duties.
But the history of Arabs and Africans, in particular, and that of
the Third World in general, is neither objective nor accurate, because most
historians do not belong to their culture or heritage. Therefore both writer and
reader, on both sides of the globe, often forget or marginalize the grave
injustices from which those people have suffered. That is why the suffering of
two thirds of the world's population, which, in some cases, were beyond the
human capacity to bear, seemed as if they were third degree
sufferings.
The most serious danger facing the peoples of the Middle East
is the racist Israeli practices, particularly if the Israelis believe that the
killing of Palestinians and the perpetration of massacres against them,
beginning with Dier Yassin in 1948, and ending up with hunting children,
shooting them at random and killing them and assassinating Palestinian leaders
selectively, may all continue without accountability. The Israelis will also be
wrong to believe that they can continue for long in behaving as though they are
above the law and international legitimacy, ignoring what the Arabs have of
resolve and belief in justice and equality among people, added to a human
culture that never resigns itself to subjugation or
humiliation.
Circumstances, times and rules have changed. Most peoples of
the world have been liberated from colonialism. Zimbabwe, Namibia, and South
Africa have gotten rid of Racism, of which Zionist Israel was the closest ally.
Hence the world no longer accepts occupation, colonization and racism. Only
Israel, the last bastion of racism, has failed to recognize this very
fact.
One does not need research and studies in order to get to know the
racist manifestations in Israel, because racism in Israel has never been merely
a matter of intentions, rather it has always been, right from the beginning
until today, practices that are governed by racist laws and legislations such as
the law of return for the year 1950, the law of the properties of the absentees
for the year 1950, the law of national fund for the year 1953, the law of urban
planning for the year 1965 and many others.
If these racial practices
were to continue they are going to make the idea of peace with the Arabs
unattainable. The rulers of Israel want to combine the strangest anomalies in
history: They want security with the continuation of occupation, and they want a
pure Jewish state with the land but without Palestinians and, yet, they reject
the right of Palestinians to establish their independent state on their occupied
Palestinian territory.
Hence the Israeli occupation forces demolish the
houses of Palestinians under the pretext that these houses are not licensed, and
in the mean time, they facilitate the building of settlements for Jews coming
from the furthest point on earth and grant them licenses and financial
assistance in order to build on occupied Palestinian territory. Yet, despite all
this, the Israelis are very keen to appear in the world media as victims
attracting sympathy and, in the mean time, they would like to appear as heroes
who deserve admiration because when they shoot Palestinian children they boast
that they accurately hit their targets.
The strangest irony in the
history of the Arab-Israeli conflict is that Israel claims that the return of
Palestinian refugees in accordance with United Nations resolution 194 means the
end of Israel, as a state, whereas the return of Palestinian refugees will only
mean the end of racism in Israel.
Madam President,
The United
States has exerted pressure for the last few months so that the final
declaration of this conference omits the request of Africans for reparations for
the period of slavery as well as the phrase equating Zionism with Racism. But
the interesting fact is that these attempts to cross out these requests have
made them more widely known and have made their substance clearer for public
opinion to the extent that it is only a matter of time before the issue of
reparations will be resolved and that the substance of resolution 3379 that
equated Racism with Zionism has become more popular today than it had been in
1975.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Despite all what we have heard and
seen of different forms of injustice, oppression and aggression in more than one
place in the world, let's look forward to a future in which justice will triumph
over injustice and equality over oppression, a bright future for all human
beings without racial discrimination of any sort.
I thank you
all.