|
Globally, 5.7 million people live in a prolonged state of
hunger and insecurity. These are the refugees who are hopelessly
confined to makeshift shelters and urban slums, abandoned
and left to perish in the shadows of high-profile wars and
international indifference.
 |
|
UNHCR PHOTO/N. BEHRING |
The forgotten refugees in the deserts of Africa, in the rice
lands of Asia and on the mountains of Europe are caught in
a state of limbo, with diminishing hope of returning to their
native lands and a slim possibility of being granted asylum
in a third country. For them, there is no solution in sight.
Regardless of persecution, armed conflict and even genocide
that have forced them to flee, the world remains unengaged.
When 25,000 or more refugees live in exile for over five
years, their situation is considered protracted. There are
at least 33 protracted refugee situations today, not including
the 16,000 Somali refugees in Ethiopia or the 15,000 Ethiopians
in Sudan. Nearly 60 per cent of the world's 9.2 million refugees
are living under these conditions either in refugee camps
or urban slums. In Africa alone, some 3 million are victims
of this crisis situation that remains in the dark. Even more
surprising is that refugees are spending longer periods in
exile, averaging 17 years in 2003-nearly twice longer than
in 1993.
Refugees are spending more of their lives in exile. Children
are the most heavily impacted group in this tragic situation.
Camps are the only home known to them-a home and a school
offering only primary education under one roof-where they
receive a life lesson on the human consequences of inaction.
"We call them people refugees, but, of course, a very
high proportion of these people are actually children who
have been born in refugee camps and never lived elsewhere
and don't really know what a normal life is", Jeff Crisp,
author of No solutions in sight: The problem of protracted
refugee situations in Africa, a working paper for the Office
of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR),
told the UN Chronicle.
But the grim reality is that the three resolutions to the
refugee situations-repatriation, integration and resettlement-are
not viable options. For many, repatriation or returning to
their homeland would often be synonymous with walking into
a death trap, because oftentimes the persecutors from whom
refugees once fled still roam freely. Also, both host and
third countries, where refugees could potentially seek asylum,
prohibit successful resettlement and integration due to fears
that refugees will create instability and economic burden
for these countries. In reality, if afforded the opportunities
to stay in a certain community, refugees can often enrich
the economy of a host country. An article in the UNHCR Refugees
magazine mentioned that in Kenya, ironically, there were demonstrations
protesting the closing of a refugee camp due to concerns that
the economy would crumble without the refugees' economic contribution.
In addition to the many hardships that refugees endure, an
overwhelming majority is in low-profile situations, where
donor support is dwindling, because such situations do not
spark political or strategic interest for industrialized nations.
For instance, even in all its urgency, sub-Saharan Africa
remains low-profile-the region hosts 1.9 million refugees
in protracted situations in war-torn and impoverished developing
countries, such as the United Republic of Tanzania and Uganda.
The State of the World's Refugees-Human Displacement in
the New Millennium, a report published by UNHCR in 2006,
found that protracted refugee situations are burgeoning in
poor and unstable areas because regional and international
actors are not engaged in what they consider low-profile regions.
Based on strategic and economic interests, developed nations
prioritize which international conflicts are deserving of
intervention. As a result, they decide the fate of millions
of people. For instance, the armed conflicts in Kosovo and
southeastern Europe were resolved by the United States and
other nations with strategic interests in the Balkans, resulting
in over 500,000 refugees returning home just three weeks after
the war ended, which prevented a protracted situation.
Comparably, the road home has not been cleared for Somali
refugees exiled in Djibouti, Ethiopia and Kenya, as well as
in other African countries and throughout Europe, who have
not been able to return home since the early 1990s. Industrialized
nations often reconcile their selective humanitarian intervention
by asserting that meagre economic incentives do not merit
the security threats posed by brutal dictators, gorilla fighters
and militias. For example, on the Rwandan refugee crisis,
where 160,000 Tutsis fled to neighbouring countries, many
have attributed the absence of a long-term resolution to the
genocide of 1 million Tutsi and moderate Hutu Rwandans in
the 1990s. "The failure to address the problems of the
Rwandan refugees in the 1960s contributed substantially to
the cataclysmic violence of the 1990s", Mr. Crisp said
in his UNHCR working paper.
As stated in The State of the World's Refugees, ultimately
it must be recognized that the most efficient, effective and
humane approach to the refugee situations is prevention. There
is a lack of vital peacekeeping forces and conflict mediation
in low-profile regions, as well as a disparity of aid funds
allocated to them compared to high-profile areas. In 2002,
3.5 million refugees in Kosovo and southeastern Europe were
receiving 59 cents per day per person, which was incomparable
to a mere 13 cents for 12 million African refugees. "The
level of assistance to refugees in long-term situations in
Africa has fallen to below an unacceptable standard",
affirmed Mr. Crisp. "To be very honest, if you were to
give refugees in Africa a high level of assistance, you would
find that they might be living in better conditions than the
local people around them, which would in itself create all
kinds of problems between the two groups." Some of these
problems include xenophobia and raging tensions that flare
up with host community members, who have anger towards aid
recipient refugees because they feel their country is deprived
of sustainable development.
 |
| UNHCR continues
to provide protection to registered refugees from Rwanda,
the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Burundi and Ethiopia,
who are living in camps in the United Republic of Tanzania.
It also promotes education and health programmes, local
integration initiatives, women's empowerment activities,
small income generation programmes and environmental awareness
and rehabilitation projects. UNHCR PHOTO/L. TAYLOR |
African refugees receive less aid and suffer more, as their
countries have not been developed economically. In addition,
at a time when malnutrition is rampant in refugee camps, the
World Food Programme had to regrettably decrease food rations
due to insufficient funding. Despite the devastating reality
of the protracted refugee crisis, there are those who believe
that camps are comfortable havens for people content to be dependent
on foreign aid. But, much to the contrary, many camps are unsafe,
crowded and enclosed like prisons, often plagued by rape, murder
and human trafficking. "When you put 100,000 people together,
it is not possible to be crime-free", Mr. Crisp said. There
were a number of situations reported, where perpetrators of
human atrocities were alarmingly living among their victims.
Since violence erupted in Somalia in the early 1990s, as many
as 135,000 Somali refugees in the Kenyan Dadaab camp still face
adversities, such as murder, rape and armed robbery, even though
crime rate gradually falls each year, according to UNHCR. "Refugees
have limited freedom of movement, difficulty getting permission
to work, no access to land for agricultural production, and
no access to credit or saving sector. Essentially the refugees
are confined to the camp areas." Nevertheless, in spite
of these harsh circumstances, many refugees struggle to find
peace in all of the chaos. They are eager to be productive,
farm land and even provide cheap labour just to earn a living
and eventually regain normal lives, if only given the opportunity.
Their willingness to make the most of their strife "is
a testament to the indomitable courage of the refugees, who
in the face of overwhelming odds somehow find the will to survive
and rebuild their lives", stated Secretary-General Kofi
Annan in the preface to The State of the World's Refugees
report.
As one of the UN Department of Public Information's "Ten
Stories the World Should Hear More About", the protracted
refugee situation is identified as a crisis in the dark. It
is evident that the world has yet to fully recognize and take
action to end their plight. If these tragedies could gain as
much media attention as emergency relief situations, such as
the December 2004 tsunami in southern Asia, industrialized nations
would be more willing and generous with their donor support
towards refugees living in a state of limbo. In effect, there
is a chain reaction between media attention, donor support and
refugee livelihood-that is, one leads to the other. "Media
glare counts. International attention counts", UNHCR spokesman
Ron Redmond emphasized.
UNHCR is also pushing for a more organized and integrated approach
that ventures beyond humanitarian aid to these protracted refugee
situations. The instability that caused these situations is,
for the most part, still there-the violence, the poverty and
the fighting are just as prolonged as the years and decades
the refugees have not been able to return home. For instance,
the Palestinians for over fifty years have endured the longest
protracted refugee situation of the twentieth century. Since
the deep-rooted conflict and instability in the Middle East
have never actually been resolved, the years of conflict have
ceaselessly continued to take a tremendous human toll.
Both high-profile and low-profile refugee camps and urban slums,
humanitarian organizations must cooperate with peacekeeping
and development agencies in order to bring an integrated, durable
solution to protracted refugee situations. Two of the UNHCR
integrated efforts already in motion are the "Afghanistan
Plus"-a project that attempts to manage population movements
in order to resolve key policy issues for the Afghans, such
as repatriation and reintegration-and the Somalia Comprehensive
Plan of Action, which hopes to help Somalis successfully settle
in host countries. It is also important to assure the impoverished
countries that funds will not be diverted from other projects,
but that additional aid will be given to fund programmes for
development, including for peace and security. Mr. Redmond stated:
"The refugees' basic rights and essential needs remain
unfulfilled for years and even decades. They become reliant
on aid. It's wasted lives that we are seeing-they are wasted
lives, squandered resources."
|