Lebanon
Statement by the President of the
Security Council, Ambassador James B. Cunningham, Acting United States Permanent Representative to the
United Nations, on UNIFIL, at the Security Council Stake-Out,
Ambassador Cunningham: Good morning --
it’s just past morning. Let me draw on some elements that will
describe where we went in
our discussion this morning on UNIFIL and then I’ll try to answer any questions
you
have.
Members of the Council were
briefed by the Secretariat on the interim report by the Secretary General on
UNIFIL. Members are
disturbed by the reports of land, sea and air violations and serious breaches
of the
withdrawal line -- which is
known in the parlance as the "Blue Line."
Members reiterated their
call on all parties to exercise maximum restraint and to respect the Blue Line
and to fulfill
the commitments they have
given to the Security Council fully to respect the withdrawal line identified
by the
United Nations and endorsed
by the Security Council, most recently in Council Resolution 1337.
Council members recalled
their June 18, 2000 decision to endorse the Secretary General’s conclusion that
Israel
had fully withdrawn all of
its forces from Lebanon in fulfillment of Council Resolution 425.
Council members were also
deeply concerned by assertions that the Blue Line is not valid in the She’ba
farms
area. This area is governed
by UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, which are applicable to the
occupied Syrian Golan.
Members of the Council
commended UNIFIL, the Secretary General and his Personal Representative in
Lebanon for their efforts to
restore peace and security in the region. Council members understood the
concerns of
the government of Lebanon to
avoid sudden changes to UNIFIL that might upset regional security. There was
general support for the
Secretary General’s intention, taking the government of Lebanon concerns into
account, to
carry out a gradual, phased
and prudent reconfiguration of UNIFIL, in light of circumstances on the ground,
and
the need for UNIFIL to carry
out its mandate and to monitor the Blue Line more effectively.
The Council will keep this
process under review and take further steps as necessary until peace is
restored.
As Council President, that
encapsulates our discussion on UNIFIL. The next step on UNIFIL will be to renew
the mandate in July.
[Ambassador Cunningham then
answered several questions from reporters in his national capacity. Those
remarks are transcribed in
USUN Press Release #65(01).]
Reporter: Back to Lebanon,
…[inaudible question related to force numbers in the Secretary General’s report
on
UNIFIL].
Ambassador Cunningham: Well,
he has proposed an approach that stretches out over the next year and a half.
We’ll take specific
decisions on the recommendations when we come to renew the mandate. There was a
general
endorsement of the intent of
his proposal to carry out this gradual and phased approach but also recognition
that
the situation on the ground
might change over time and we need to keep the two things in mind as we go
forward.
[Ambassador Cunningham answered further
questions in his national capacity.]