Fifty-seventh session
Agenda item 122
Report of the Secretary-General on the
activities
of the Office of Internal Oversight Services
Investigation
into sexual exploitation of refugees by aid workers in West Africa
Note
by the Secretary-General*
|
* The report could
not be submitted prior to the deadline of 2 July because the investigation
had not yet been concluded. |
1. Pursuant to General Assembly resolutions
48/218 B of 29 July 1994 and 54/244 of 23 December 1999, the Secretary-General
has the honour to transmit, for the attention of the General Assembly, the
attached report, conveyed to him by the Under-Secretary-General for Internal
Oversight Services, on the investigation into allegations of sexual exploitation
of refugees by aid workers in West Africa.
2. The Secretary-General takes note of the
findings of the report and concurs fully with its recommendations. The
Secretary-General also notes that measures are being taken or initiated to
correct many of the issues raised in this report.
3. Sexual exploitation and abuse by
humanitarian staff cannot be tolerated. It violates everything the United
Nations stands for. Men, women and children displaced by conflict or other
disasters are among the most vulnerable people on earth. They look to the
United Nations and its humanitarian partners for shelter and protection. Anyone
employed by or affiliated with the United Nations who breaks that sacred trust
must be held accountable and, when the circumstances so warrant, prosecuted.
4. Since the allegations first arose of
sexual abuse and exploitation by humanitarian aid workers and peacekeepers in
West Africa, the United Nations has been determined to act firmly and quickly.
Improved systems for recourse, investigation and discipline are being instituted.
Under the auspices of the Inter‑Agency Standing Committee, which brings
together United Nations relief agencies, other international organizations and
non-governmental organizations, the humanitarian community has identified
standards of behaviour applicable to all its personnel and is implementing a
newly adopted Plan of Action (see annex I) to
strengthen mechanisms for protecting those who depend on international aid. The
Secretary-General welcomes these steps and reaffirms his commitment to working
closely with all involved to ensure full and speedy action wherever necessary.
5. Although the genesis of this report was
in West Africa, the United Nations is addressing the issue on a global basis.
Wherever the United Nations and its partners are at work, they must shoulder
their responsibilities for implementing the necessary management and
operational changes, and remain ever vigilant to ensure that such appalling
acts are not permitted to occur again.
Report of the Office of Internal Oversight Services
on the investigation into sexual exploitation of refugees by aid workers in
West Africa
|
Summary |
|
Late
in November 2001, the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) was asked
by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to
review allegations of sexual exploitation of female refugees by international
and national aid workers, specifically regarding United Nations and non‑governmental
organization (NGO) staff and peacekeepers in three West African countries:
Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. The allegation of widespread sexual
exploitation arose from a report by two consultants who had been commissioned
by UNHCR and Save the Children (UK) to study the question of sexual
exploitation and violence in the refugee communities in the three countries. Following
a series of meetings in December 2001/January 2002, UNHCR requested that the
Investigations Division of OIOS conduct an investigation to ascertain inter
alia whether the allegations against aid workers and peacekeepers could be
legally substantiated and if the problem was widespread, as alleged, what the
contributing factors were and whether evidence of criminal and/or
administrative misconduct could be obtained. It
was agreed with UNHCR that, for the purpose of the investigation, the
definition of sexual exploitation would be concerned primarily with
situations in which an international NGO, humanitarian or aid worker, in a
position of power, uses that power to request sexual favours or benefits by
trading food or services that refugees are entitled to receive free of charge
via the distribution system of international aid. It was determined that the
applicable legal framework to deal with cases of sexual exploitation would be
contained within the following texts: the Convention on the Rights of the
Child, of 1989; the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child,
of 1999; the penal laws of the three countries and the codes of conduct of
international organizations and NGOs. OIOS
assembled a carefully composed investigation team from eight countries,
comprising professional investigators, lawyers, refugee protection and human
rights specialists, translators and a paediatric trauma specialist. The
Investigation Team commenced operations in February 2002 and completed its
work in July 2002. The investigation was conducted in three phases, the first
being an assessment of the scope of the problem. The second phase consisted
of an evidence search aimed at determining whether what was reported in the
consultants’ assessment could be verified. The third phase concentrated on
seeking fresh evidence, witnesses and victims, which led to the development
of new cases of sexual exploitation for investigation. Although
the stories reported by the consultants could not be verified, the problem of
sexual exploitation of refugees is real. Extensive interviews of many
potential witnesses, victims and others thought to have relevant information
enabled the Investigation Team to identify new cases of sexual exploitation,
ranging from consensual relationships that occurred as a result of the
exploiter’s position of power to allegations of sodomy and rape of refugees. While
the consultants claimed that sexual exploitation was widespread, their report
only gave a few vague or dated examples of uncorroborated incidents of sexual
exploitation and also included a variety of reports of sexual exploitation
involving local persons and internally displaced persons, commercial sex, and
war-related incidents. The Investigation Team sought to confirm the validity
of the most serious allegations but was hampered by the lack of information
on sources and victims. Of the 12 cases from the consultants’ report which
the Team fully investigated, none was substantiated even after extensive
interviews of refugees, UNHCR staff and NGO employees. The Investigation Team
identified and fully investigated 43 cases of possible sexual exploitation.
Of these, 10 cases were substantiated by the evidence. One involved a United
Nations Volunteer working with UNHCR. His case has been referred to the
appropriate agency and action has been taken. Another involved a peacekeeper
who has been repatriated. The other cases involved NGO personnel and their
cases have been referred to the relevant organizations. It is noteworthy that
no allegation against any United Nations staff member could be substantiated.
These cases are described in greater detail in this report. This
report also contains observations as to the factors which contribute to
sexual exploitation in refugee communities, including aspects of refugee camp
life, camp structure, camp security, food and services distribution,
employment opportunities, profiles of camp workers and quality and quantities
of food and other relief items distributed. For example, it was observed that
few international staff members of UNHCR or its implementing partners are
present in the camps, allowing the actual day-to-day management of the camp
to be left to national staff and the refugees themselves. The
consultants’ report of widespread sexual exploitation of refugees has not
been confirmed, in the cases which OIOS was able to substantiate, by
sufficient evidence for either criminal or disciplinary proceedings. However,
the conditions in the camps and in refugee communities in the three countries
in question make refugees vulnerable to sexual and other forms of
exploitation and such vulnerability increases if one is a female and young.
This report contains 17 recommendations, including recommendations for
follow-up on cases with the organizations which have been provided with
evidence that one or more of their employees have been using their position
for exploitative purposes. Comments
on this report were sought from UNHCR, the Department of Peacekeeping
Operations and the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone, UNICEF and the
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (co-chairs of the
Inter-Agency Standing Committee Task Force on Protection from Sexual
Exploitation and Abuse in Humanitarian Crises) as well as the World Food
Programme. Their comments are included in italics in the text of the report
and in the two annexes. |
|
|
Contents
|
|
|
Paragraphs |
Page |
|
I. Introduction......................................................... |
1–3 |
6 |
|
|
II. Methodology........................................................ |
4–7 |
6 |
|
|
III. Definitions.......................................................... |
8–12 |
7 |
|
|
IV. The investigation..................................................... |
13–41 |
7 |
|
|
A.
Verification
of the consultants’ report |
14–16 |
7 |
|
|
B.
Case
studies.................................................... |
17–21 |
8 |
|
|
C.
Problems
in the camps............................................. |
22–23 |
11 |
|
|
D.
Camp
life....................................................... |
24 |
12 |
|
|
E.
Meeting
basic needs |
25–41 |
12 |
|
|
V. Conclusion......................................................... |
42–54 |
14 |
|
|
VI. Recommendations.................................................... |
55 |
17 |
|
|
Annexes |
|
|
|
|
I. Report of the Inter-Agency Standing
Committee Task Force on Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in
Humanitarian Crises and Plan of Action on sexual exploitation |
20 |
||
|
II. Highlights of some action taken by the
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to prevent
exploitation of refugees |
35 |
||
I. Introduction
1. Late in November 2001, the Inspector
General of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) advised the Director of the Investigations Division of the Office of
Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) of information received indicating that
sexual exploitation of refugee women and girls by humanitarian aid workers and
United Nations peacekeepers might be occurring in West Africa.
2. The information was contained in a
preliminary report written by consultants retained by UNHCR and Save the
Children UK for a separate study in the West Africa region. Following that
notification, it was agreed that a meeting should be held on the issue with a
view to obtaining full details from the consultants.
In December 2001/January 2002, several meetings were held, involving
the consultants and the relevant officers of UNHCR, the World Food Programme
(WFP) and OIOS. It was agreed that prior to an investigation there was an
urgent need for UNHCR to put in place additional safeguards to protect refugee
women and girls and to provide further means for them to report any incidents.
Once those safeguards were operational to protect victims and witnesses, OIOS
would launch an investigation to determine whether there was evidence of criminal
conduct or administrative misconduct by humanitarian aid workers or
peacekeepers, whether the problem was widespread or incidental and what the
contributing factors were. Originally, the lead consultant, from Save the
Children UK, had agreed to assist the OIOS team, but she was unable to do so
for personal reasons. The second consultant, from UNHCR, subsequently provided
some assistance in Guinea.
3. In February 2002, the investigation led
by OIOS began in West Africa, specifically in the three countries which had
been visited late in 2001 by the consultants — Guinea, Liberia and Sierra
Leone (the Mano River Union countries) — and field work was completed in July
2002. This is the report of that investigation.
II. Methodology
4. Because of the risks to refugee women
and girls who might have been subject to sexual exploitation, UNHCR reinforced
and upgraded protection mechanisms in each camp prior to the start of the
investigation to ensure that both during and after the investigation, there would
be appropriate protection and support systems for any victims identified.
Furthermore, OIOS decided to use code numbers rather than names to identify
potential victims and key witnesses as an additional measure of protection. It
is important to note that no reward or incentive was offered to any of the
refugee witnesses in exchange for providing information or assistance to the
investigation.
5. The Investigation Team assembled by OIOS
in consultation with UNHCR was carefully composed of professional investigators,
lawyers, refugee protection and human rights specialists, translators and a
paediatric trauma specialist, who are nationals of eight countries: Australia,
Burkina Faso, Ghana, India, Japan, Kenya, the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland and the United States of America. Further, owing to the
sensitive nature of the issue, female investigators and translators were
utilized to the extent possible for interviews with female refugees.
6. The Investigation Team worked on the
ground in Guinea and Sierra Leone but only to a limited extent in Liberia
because of the movement of refugees and the security situation in that country.
Meetings were held with stakeholders in the United Nations system and with the
concerned NGOs, including with the local staff of both UNHCR and the NGOs in
all three countries. Nearly 300 individual interviews were conducted of
refugees, aid workers and peacekeepers in those countries and careful
observations of camp activity were made.
7. It was appreciated from the outset that
witnesses might be reluctant to speak about sexual exploitation and other
related matters out of fear of reprisal or stigmatization, or for cultural and
social reasons. All witnesses were therefore assured of the protection of their
identity and the confidentiality of the information provided. In addition to
interviews at the refugee camps, interviews were conducted with repatriated
refugees at several transit camps from which a significant number of cases were
developed for investigation. The Investigation Team observed that some refugees
were more willing to provide information outside the refugee camp environment,
owing to fear of possible retaliation in the camps.
III. Definitions
8. Laws of the three countries were
carefully researched, as were the rules, regulations, guidelines, codes and
practices governing aid workers.
9. Article 1 of the Convention on the
Rights of the Child, of 1989, defines a child as every human being below the
age of 18 years unless, under the law applicable to the child, majority is
attained earlier. The same definition is used in article 2 of the African
Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, of 1999. In view of their
vulnerability to sexual exploitation and the seriousness of cases involving
them, the focus of the investigation was mainly on female refugees under 18
years of age as defined in various international statutes, who were allegedly
denied aid (or other benefits to which they might be entitled) for refusing to
enter into a sexual relationship with an aid worker. The Investigation Team
also looked into those cases where an aid worker allegedly used aid as a tool
to lure a refugee girl into a sexual relationship.
10. Aid workers include refugees hired by NGOs
or the United Nations as well as national and international staff of NGOs and
United Nations agencies employed in any capacity, including daily labour.
11. It was observed during the investigation
and confirmed in interviews with refugees that many relationships develop
between refugees and aid workers who themselves are refugees. Such
relationships are entered into for a variety of reasons, including the
situation where a female refugee does so in the expectation or hope that she
may be rewarded with additional goods and services beyond what she would
normally be entitled to receive. This is not to suggest that a number of these
relationships are not genuine and may result in marriages.
12. The Investigation Team discovered that
many female refugees engage in relationships because of the abject poverty
pervading the refugee camps in which they live. In the absence of skills
training and employment, many are compelled to enter into prostitution or other
forms of exploitative relationships to augment the inadequate aid provided for
their basic needs of food, clothing and shelter.
UNICEF in its comments to OIOS stated that the
scope of the investigation should have included other vulnerable groups such as
internally displaced persons because relationships entered into by females in
these situations could also be deemed exploitative.
OIOS notes that
its task was not to establish general exploitation, as that would exceed its
mandate, but to determine if those persons in need of protection, specifically
refugees, under the protection of UNHCR, were victims of sexual exploitation.
IV. The investigation
13. The Investigation Team took a two-pronged
approach: first, to try to establish whether the information obtained as a
by-product of another study by the two consultants retained by UNHCR and Save
the Children UK could be verified. This was critical as the information
provided by the consultants was based on stories related by third parties and
had not been verified by them. Second, to conduct independent interviews of
refugee women and girls to establish whether sufficient evidence could be
adduced to prove cases of sexual exploitation by aid workers and peacekeepers,
whether by criminal or administrative proceedings.
A. Verification of the consultants’ report
14. The two consultants, together with a Save
the Children staff member, had been retained to study sexual exploitation and
violence against refugee children in the three Mano River countries. During the
several weeks of their work, they met with groups which included refugees,
returnees, local populations, internally displaced persons and humanitarian aid
workers. In these groups, they heard stories concerning sexual exploitation and
prostitution in West Africa generally, and in camps for which UNHCR has
responsibility specifically, as well as in camps for internally displaced
persons who are not within the mandate of UNHCR. As a result of these stories
of exploitative behaviour by humanitarian aid workers and peacekeepers, the
consultants made a preliminary report to UNHCR late in November 2001. The
leaking to the media in February 2002 of the full draft report, which was
presented to UNHCR and Save the Children in January 2002, created a media
furore, and thereafter the unconfirmed stories were treated as facts in the
media and elsewhere.
15. Thus the first job of the Investigation
Team was to ascertain if the stories reported by the consultants could be
verified and to identify and record evidence from victims. However, this proved
problematic for a variety of reasons: the refugee population is highly mobile;
many of the stories involved non-refugee populations; stories were related to
war events; or stories were from groups of people vaguely described by the
consultants for example as “6-12 year olds”, “women leaders”, “community leaders”,
“women’s group” and “adolescents”. Some examples are given below:
(a) In
one camp in Guinea, the Investigation Team reconstructed a group of girls
described by the consultants as “girl mothers”, allegedly the victims of sexual
exploitation. None of those interviewed was in a relationship with an aid
worker; those with children informed the Investigation Team that fellow
refugees had impregnated them. Indeed, in all three countries refugees,
including leadership committees and refugee parents, told the Investigation
Team that most pregnancies were the result of relationships between refugees.
(b) The
few individual sources named by the consultants were found to be repeating
rumours and gossip rather than providing first-hand information. Those named as
perpetrators were generally identified by nicknames, initials or names very
common in the region. The Investigation Team was however able to trace some of
the sources with the assistance of the local translators and names eventually
supplied by one of the consultants.
(c) When
the Investigation Team interviewed the person who had reported sexual
exploitation to the consultants, and she was asked to provide specific examples
of such exploitation, she was unable to. She stated that her discussion with
the consultants was based on what she called her “psychological assessment”, in
view of the high incidence of teenage pregnancies observed by her in that
particular camp in Guinea.
(d) One
widely circulated story reported by the consultants was of 10 girls in Sierra
Leone allegedly on their way to meet United Nations peacekeepers who had
drowned after a canoe they were travelling in capsized. The peacekeepers were
blamed for their deaths. The Investigation Team found that the story was
reported by a group of 6 to 12 year old children who related stories of various
incidents of drowning victims in different locations. Despite substantial
efforts to confirm the report, the Investigation Team found no evidence to
support what seems to have become a kind of mythical story of desperation by
refugees. An internal investigation of the same incident previously conducted
by the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL) arrived at the same
conclusion.
(e) Another
report of groups of women and girls being photographed in suggestive poses by
peacekeepers was also found not to be credible after the Investigation Team
interviewed the group of women and girls who were said to have been involved.
(f) Where
there were specific allegations against named perpetrators, the Investigation
Team found that these were also reported by non-witness third parties. The
allegations could not be verified despite efforts to locate the possible
victims.
16. Nevertheless, the fact that the
consultants heard sexual exploitation stories from groups of unconnected
people, spread across three countries, gives some credibility to the issue even
if the specific allegations could not be verified. It is also the view of OIOS
and UNHCR that the consultants were correct to raise the issue of sexual exploitation.
The Investigation Team found that the limited assistance provided, as well as
poverty and lack of economic opportunity for women in the camps and elsewhere
in the region, are factors that lead to sexual exploitation.
B. Case studies
17. The Investigation Team conducted extensive
interviews of refugees, NGO staff and UNHCR staff in an attempt to verify the
stories reported by the consultants and to pursue new cases developed by the
Investigation Team. From these, the Team was able to identify cases for
investigation, including cases from the consultants’ report. Most of the cases
the Team investigated originated in Guinea. None of the allegations of sexual
exploitation reported by the consultants was substantiated, however. The NGO
cases have been referred to the relevant NGOs for appropriate follow-up. In a
majority of those cases, which could not be fully substantiated, either the
victim or the alleged perpetrator could not be traced.
18. OIOS acknowledges the difficulty of
obtaining corroborative evidence in the form of eyewitness testimony in cases
of sexual exploitation and related offences. Hence not all of the cases
investigated could be corroborated. In the substantiated cases, some of the
corroborative evidence obtained included medical evidence, injuries consistent
with the allegation and evidence of recent complaints by the victims. Some of
the cases related to accusations against NGO aid workers, others to the
peacekeepers of UNAMSIL and others to United Nations staff, including UNHCR.
Medical staff in the camps and UNHCR field staff reported cases of sexual
violence such as rape and sexual assault between refugees in which the
perpetrator was in a position of physical power rather than a position of power
resulting from the authority conferred on him by an NGO or an international
organization.
19. All reports of sexual exploitation or
misconduct pertaining to NGOs received and investigated by the Team were passed
on to the relevant organization through UNHCR so that the circumstances of each
case could be reviewed under the particular disciplinary or administrative
process of the NGO, as OIOS does not have jurisdiction over NGO staff. One
case, in which a United Nations Volunteer was involved, was referred to UNHCR
and his services were subsequently terminated by his agency.
20. The cases described below are derived from
the independent interviews conducted by the Investigation Team except where
there are specific references to the consultants’ report. These cases are
illustrative of all the cases the Team investigated.
Case
1
(a) A
17-year-old female refugee from Sierra Leone alleged that she was involved in a
sexual relationship with a United Nations Volunteer. She stated that she had
met him in 1999 when she was approximately 15 years old while he, a man then
aged 44 years, was a United Nations Volunteer working with UNHCR in Gueckedou,
Guinea. Following the first meeting, the victim and the Volunteer agreed to
enter into a sexual relationship.
(b) At
the time of the relationship the refugee victim was living with foster parents
in that town. The victim stated that the United Nations Volunteer knew her to
be a refugee and was aware of her age, which was confirmed by other evidence.
She further explained that the he assisted her financially by paying her school
fees, enabling her to acquire computing and typing skills. The victim told the
investigators that, as result of her sexual relationship with the United
Nations Volunteer, she became pregnant. The man then abandoned her, refused to
accept paternity or provide any form of support or maintenance for the child.
(c) When
confronted with the evidence in the case, the United Nations Volunteer at first
attempted to deny the allegation but later admitted that he had had a sexual relationship
with the victim. He refused to accept responsibility for the pregnancy,
however.
(d) The
contract of the United Nations Volunteer has since been terminated as a result
of the evidence obtained during the investigation.
Case
2
(a) A
14-year-old refugee girl from Sierra Leone was raped in a refugee camp in
Guinea early in 2002. The Investigation Team established that the offenders, a
Sierra Leonean refugee and a Guinean NGO staff member, were responsible. In the
course of her interview, the victim described in detail how the Guinean NGO
offender while on duty in the refugee camp spotted her and requested his
friend, the Sierra Leonean, to approach her on his behalf to solicit her for a
sexual relationship. She declined the solicitation. Later that day, the Sierra
Leonean refugee called to her as she was walking past his hut, saying that he
had a message for her. When she paused, he pushed her inside his hut where the
NGO offender was waiting. She was restrained and violently raped by the NGO worker.
(b) The
victim sustained serious injuries and reported the matter to friends who
immediately took her to the health post in the camp for medical attention. She
was treated for her injuries and transferred to a local hospital for further
medical attention. The physician confirmed to the Investigation Team that he
had treated the victim and that, in his professional opinion, the injuries were
consistent with rape. The physician added that he had to refer the victim to a
hospital in the neighbouring town because of the seriousness of the injuries
she sustained. The victim was subsequently able to identify the NGO staff
member and the Sierra Leonean refugee to the investigators.
(c) The
Sierra Leonean refugee who had facilitated the rape admitted having assisted
his friend, the NGO worker. The perpetrator denied the rape allegation but
acknowledged that he was present in the refugee camp when the rape allegedly
occurred. He further admitted knowing the Sierra Leonean refugee who had
abetted him and also identified him to the investigators. In view of the
criminal nature of the allegation, the matter has been brought to the attention
of UNHCR to refer the case to the local Guinean authorities for prosecution.
The matter has also been referred to the NGO that employs the perpetrator for
their action.
Case
3
(a) A
young returnee boy alleged that a UNAMSIL peacekeeper had sodomized him late in
June 2002, in an isolated bush area near the contingent’s logistic base. In
this case, the boy, who is approximately 14 years of age, was with some friends
who are all from a transit centre for returning refugees near the contingent’s
camp managed by one of the implementing partners of UNHCR. The victim says
that, while he was fishing, a non-commissioned officer, whom the victim clearly
identified and knew from prior encounters, led him away from where the other
boys and soldiers were fishing. As the victim knew and trusted the alleged
offender, he complied with the request to follow him.
(b) The
two reached a secluded point some 100 metres from their initial fishing spot on
the river’s embankment. There, the victim stated that the offender grabbed him
and forcibly sodomized him. Subsequently, the victim managed to break free from
the offender and ran to his friends to report the incident and showed them the
money that the offender had given him to keep him quiet.
(c) The
victim reported the matter to his mother later the same day and they
subsequently reported the assault to the police. As a result of the sexual assault,
he felt discomfort and, approximately two days later, was taken to a hospital
for medical examination. The physician stated that the description of
discomfort by the victim was consistent with sexual assault.
(d) The
victim, his mother and other guardians stated that they had not considered
reporting the matter to UNAMSIL as they thought it was a normal police case.
The police, on receipt of the allegation and the medical report, went to the
contingent’s camp to attempt to arrest the alleged offender. (The police told
the Investigation Team that they had been denied access to the alleged offender
when they tried to investigate the allegation.)
(e) Only
after OIOS notified UNAMSIL did the Mission’s management request that an
investigation be conducted by the Chief Provost Marshal in collaboration with
the Investigation Team. The peacekeeper was identified by the victim and
interviewed. UNAMSIL has since confirmed that the investigation is now
concluded and that, as a result of the findings, the officer in question has
been repatriated to his country of origin. The details of the allegations and
findings were forwarded by UNAMSIL to the concerned country for appropriate
action.
Case
4
Claims of sexual exploitation were
made directly against two UNHCR staff members in the consultants’ report that
were both investigated by the Team. In one case, involving a UNHCR Protection
Officer, more than 20 interviews were conducted with refugee girls of various
ages and with UNHCR staff members in an effort to obtain evidence of the
reported exploitation. As no further details other than the claims were
available, the allegations could not be substantiated. Similar allegations
against a UNHCR driver and a WFP member of staff could not be substantiated. In
the case of the UNHCR driver, the victim could not identify the perpetrator, as
she had not been in contact with him for several years. The absence of
specifics from the consultants regarding possible exploitation by United
Nations staff led the Investigation Team to spend many days trying to track
vague stories to no avail.
Case
5
The consultants’ report noted several
cases of NGO officials exploiting refugee girls or living with under-aged
refugee girls. In all the cases the Team investigated, the female refugee in
question was in fact an adult. In a particular case in Liberia, a female
refugee described in the report as a child was actually a 25-year-old woman who
had been in a long-term relationship with the NGO aid worker and had been
living with him in his apartment when she became pregnant. Although he had
agreed to support the child, he had been unable to do so when he was fired.
Case
6
An allegation that a truck driver
employed by one of the implementing partners of UNHCR was engaged in sexual exploitation
was investigated by the Team and substantiated. The under-aged victim
identified the driver from an array of photographs as the person who had
impregnated her and abandoned her. The matter has been referred to the
employing NGO for appropriate action.
Case
7
In another case investigated, the
Investigation Team confirmed that a refugee, who was also an NGO employee, had
impregnated a 17-year-old refugee girl. He has since fled to his country of
origin and cannot be located.
Case
8
Two cases involving specific NGO
staff who allegedly had exchanged sex for food with refugee girls were
investigated. The perpetrators could not be identified as the victims were not
able to describe the physical appearance of the perpetrators, nor did the girls
know their full names, giving only first names that are common in the
community. Furthermore, it is unclear if they were regular NGO staff or casual
staff from the refugee communities. The matter has been referred to the NGO in
question for follow-up.
Case
9
An allegation that a refugee
schoolteacher impregnated a 17-year-old disabled refugee girl was investigated
and substantiated. The perpetrator initially denied responsibility for the
pregnancy but he has since accepted responsibility and is providing financial
support for the child.
Case
10
It was alleged that a schoolteacher
employed by an NGO had approached a student for a relationship and regularly
subjected her to physical abuse when she rejected his advances. The Team
investigated the case but was unable to trace the victim to verify the
allegations. In any case, the teacher has been dismissed for undisclosed
reasons by the NGO.
21. These cases were not the only ones
investigated, but they represent the types of case and outcome adduced by the
Investigation Team. The evidence did not substantiate any of the other cases
involving regular United Nations staff members. This finding is consistent with
the fact that the vast majority of aid workers in the camps are from NGOs. OIOS
cautions against complacency, however, as new cases will arise.
C. Problems in the camps
22. Close examination of
the operation of the camps indicates that there are several major problems
which could easily lead to exploitation of various kinds, including sexual exploitation:
(a) The
Investigation Team found few women in key positions in the camps;
(b) Job
opportunities for refugees generally are poor to non-existent and where they do
exist, they are primarily taken by men, leaving women very little authority or
personal access to funds or power;
(c) While
girls make up substantial numbers of students in the lower grades of schools in
the camps, there are virtually none in the higher grades, leaving them with
limited education, often on their own or tending to small children;
(d) Few
international staff of either UNHCR or the implementing partners are in the
camps themselves, so that the actual management of the camps is left to local
staff and other refugees with only very limited supervision; indeed, the farther
the camp is from the UNHCR branch office, the less attention its residents are
receiving from international staff;
(e) While
many of the humanitarian aid workers the Investigation Team met are highly
dedicated staff, working under extremely difficult, exhausting and minimally
rewarding circumstances, there are others assigned to work in the camps who are
of varying skill levels, commitment and interest in refugees who may engage in
sexual exploitation;
(f) Single
young women who have lost their supporting family structures in the wars are
among those most at risk, and efforts by UNHCR to find foster families for them
have met with mixed results.
23. The Investigation Team’s observations
revealed that the camp environment is a fertile ground for breeding
exploitative behaviour.
D. Camp life
24. In general, the refugee camps are managed
by implementing partners on behalf of UNHCR, which retains responsibility for
refugee protection, coordination and monitoring of assistance in the camps. The
refugees themselves organize various committees, with a chairperson and other
designated officials. The main camp committee undertakes various roles,
including acting as a focal point for the refugees and liasing with NGOs and
UNHCR on behalf of the refugees to articulate their needs and concerns. This
committee also mediates disputes in the refugee community. Some examples found
by the Investigation Team include paternity disputes and claims for child
support. The committees are also involved in hiring refugees as casual
labourers for NGOs. In terms of recreation, there are social and sports
activities organized in the camps for and by the refugees. There is no
restriction on the movement of refugees or others at any time of the day or
night, either within the camp or exiting and entering the camp.
E. Meeting basic needs
1. Shelter
25. Refugees in the camps visited in Guinea,
Liberia and Sierra Leone live in temporary shelters made of mud bricks and
poles; normally only one room is provided for a family. Prior to the allocation
of individual plots and the provision of shelter material, refugees are housed
in communal shelters. It is the responsibility of the refugees to construct
their own homes. However, in the case of persons identified as “vulnerable”, including
single females, the responsible NGO may assist with the construction of the
shelter. The NGO staff members, however, are usually male and are often
refugees themselves. In some of the camps visited by the Investigation Team,
the camp manager is involved as well. Straw is used for bedding — anything
more requires money.
2. Sanitary facilities
26. Bathing facilities in a number of the
camps consist of one building with one side for men and another side for women.
The isolation and lack of separate and distinctly placed facilities, which
would increase the cost, has caused the facilities to occasionally be the site
of sexual violence. However, since the investigation, the camps in Liberia now
have separate facilities.
3. Health
27. Basic medical care is normally provided
through implementing partners, whose staff are stretched thin, rarely have time
for health education or prevention and lack facilities for more serious cases,
which are usually referred to neighbouring public hospitals. The case referral
system is quite cumbersome and delays are common; in the case of urban
refugees, authorization by the UNHCR physician in the branch office is
required. For example, a delay of several days in referring the case of a baby
scalded by hot water in Guinea resulted in the baby’s death.
28. Although teenage pregnancy is rife in some
of the camps visited, there is little or no pre- or post-natal care for mothers
and often the father is not identified or, if he is, does not accept
responsibility for the child. Babies are the responsibility of the mothers, who
must provide for them as best they can. Some baby milk and limited baby
supplies are normally provided.
4. Clothing
29. Appropriate clothing is available in very
limited quantities and money is required for additional clothing needs. Many
teenage girls consequently seek alternative sources of supply for clothing,
cosmetics, jewellery and other items.
5. Food
30. Food is a continuing source of frustration
and anxiety. The food distributed consists generally of bulgur wheat rather
than rice, which is the regional staple, small portions of cooking oil and
occasional protein in the form of beans. Meat, fish or other foods need to be
purchased. Protein biscuits and other foodstuffs are available in feeding
centres for cases of malnutrition. Refugees fleeing the recent fighting in
Liberia have been pouring into Guinea by the thousands, and many of them are
suffering to some extent from malnutrition.
WFP has been flying in emergency supplies, but this is expensive and
supplies are limited.
WFP stated that it distributes bulgur to refugees
because of the explicit indication of donors that rice would not be provided
for distribution because it is expensive in the region and it might be diverted
or traded by the beneficiaries.
WFP further remarked that general food rations
distributed by the Programme have had a clear positive impact on the
nutritional status of refugees and internally displaced persons in the camps,
where malnutrition rates are often lower than those found in the surrounding
host communities. The food aid basket, ration levels and overall food and
non-food requirements of the regional operation have been approved by all the
humanitarian actors in the region. WFP also informed OIOS that it has strengthened
its post-distribution monitoring of food in the region through the appointment
of seven female food monitors.
31. Distribution of food items is conducted on
a monthly or bimonthly basis, with refugees lining up for their rations with
their ration cards. Rations are often incomplete and delivery of supplies
sometimes delayed, with little or no notice given to the refugees who depend on
these supplies for basic survival. When distributions are made, refugees pay
close attention to ensure that no one gets more than the entitlement. However,
the distributors often have items left over after distribution because some
refugees have moved or are out of the camp on that day. While the ration
distribution is monitored by several people and records are kept, in each of
the camps visited by the Investigation Team it is clear that there is some
discretionary power among the men who control the ultimate distribution of any
excess rations. Although the food is supplied by WFP and stored in its
warehouse, and UNHCR has responsibility for distribution, the actual
distribution is undertaken by an NGO, while the transportation of the food is
done by another NGO working in close collaboration. Refugee or national casual
staff are regularly hired for these purposes.
WFP comments that rations are rarely insufficient
but acknowledges that this might occur when there is a break in the pipeline,
that is, inadequate pledges from donors or delays in the arrival of the
shipments. WFP stated that the regional operation is now enjoying a much higher
level of resources and that donor pledges are now covering a very high
percentage of the requirements.
In relation to surplus food during distribution,
WFP stated that the quantities distributed are closely monitored. To strengthen
the control, post-distribution monitoring of food entitlements in refugee camps
has been enhanced and an agreement in this regard has been signed by WFP, UNHCR
and its implementing partners.
32. The refugees vented their frustration and
anger about the quality and the quantity of food in a widely reported riot at
one of the camps in Guinea earlier this year, with shouting, threats and stone
throwing and the subsequent looting of all the food in the WFP warehouse.
6. Education
33. Most teachers are male, and many are
themselves refugees; few women are in the schools and those who are tend not to
be teachers, but may serve as a counsellor, librarian or cook. In Liberia, the
women’s committees in the camps near Monrovia have established morning
childcare programmes for toddlers, where they are taught singing, the alphabet
and some words. Although those women lack formal training this allows the
mothers time to go to training courses themselves or to use that time to find
ways of increasing their income. The Investigation Team heard a number of
reports that teachers had threatened to withhold passing or good grades unless
girls of 14 or 15 years agreed to have sex with them. These stories were
difficult to confirm. One girl who talked to the Team was told by her brother
to say nothing. In addition, the girls were reluctant to implicate the
teachers, who were still in positions of authority and could retaliate.
34. In one case, the Investigation Team
established the existence of a relationship between a refugee girl and her
teacher, himself a refugee. The girl’s mother told the Team that, although the
man has other wives and is much older than her daughter, she had to consent to
the relationship because of the material benefits accruing from it. The teacher
has since returned to his country of origin and the Investigation Team’s
attempts to locate his whereabouts there have not been successful.
35. The teachers in the camps visited do not
sign formal contracts of employment and only receive a stipend for their services.
This practice leads to a significant lack of morale and commitment, and a
substandard level of service. Refugees are eligible for free education up to
the end of primary school, although even this is threatened by the lack of
funds. A limited number of scholarships are available for the lucky few — who
are predominantly male.
7. Security
36. Although security in the camps is the
responsibility of the Government, the Team received many reports that the
security staff were inadequate. There were unverified allegations that they are
sometimes responsible for sexual misconduct and had facilitated the escape from
custody of men charged with sexual violence. To the extent that the camp has
security, it is often organized in a limited way by the refugees themselves. In
a number of camps, the Investigation Team did not notice any visible security.
In some camps the Team observed uniformed men manning the entrance into the
camps. Access to the camps by non-refugees is still possible, however, because
of the porous perimeters.
37. Medical staff in the camp reported that
crimes such as rape of children are committed in the camps with impunity; the
weak and the particularly vulnerable and exposed to such violence. They
reported that three to five incidents of rape occur in the camps on some days.
UNHCR field staff also reported a high incidence of rape cases. Some cases
involving rapes of children aged between 5 and 10 years by adult refugees have
been reported to the police for prosecution, but most are settled privately by
the parties and some are referred to the sexual and gender-based violence teams
run by NGOs in the camps for support and counselling.
8. Refugee employment
38. Non-governmental organizations and UNHCR
occasionally hire refugees in the camps for liaison or day jobs. For example,
for receipt of food items, day labourers are hired to unload the trucks
conveying the food and place it in a warehouse or other location for storage
until distribution. Day labour is also used in shelter programmes for the
fabrication of the materials for the shelters, including the making of mud and
straw bricks and the poles used for support. Other building projects also use
day labour but it is almost always the male refugees who are hired.
39. As a result, the ability of a woman or
girl to support herself and her children, even with the entitlements provided,
is severely limited. Training programmes aimed at women are often unsuccessful
because there are no jobs for them to use their skills, or else insufficient
funds are available in the community to support their small business attempts.
40. The camp structure is patriarchal, and
there are few opportunities for women to find means to support themselves and
their children. Young women who have lost their families in war, either through
death or separation, are especially vulnerable to sexual violence and
exploitation. As they find themselves with no means to protect or support
themselves, many resort to prostitution as the only available avenue for
survival.
41. In summary, the situation of refugees in
the camps — indeed the situation of refugees and internally displaced persons
generally — is ripe for sexual violence and exploitation by other refugees, aid
workers, and nationals they meet outside the camp environs, as sex is the only
service left to trade with.
V. Conclusion
42. The Investigation Team established that
the consultants had raised an important issue and thereby provoked a heightened
sense of awareness in the international community of the potential for sexual
exploitation of victims of forced displacement by those who are supposed to
palliate their suffering. The Investigation Team found, however, that the
impression given in the consultants’ report that sexual exploitation by aid
workers, in particular sex for services, was widespread is misleading and
untrue. None of the specific stories cited against aid workers named in the
consultants’ report could be confirmed despite a six-month-long effort by the
Investigation Team — for reasons previously cited in this report. Furthermore,
refugees and aid workers interviewed in the course of the investigation were
unanimous in stating that sexual exploitation in the context used in the
consultants’ report is not widespread. The relationships perceived as exploitative
by the consultants were in most cases relationships between refugees.
43. Further, in raising the issue of sexual
exploitation, the consultants did not distinguish between the various forms of
sexual relationships and contacts that can exist. For example, no distinction
was made between cases involving persons in power or authority taking advantage
of female refugees and those involving adult prostitution.
44. In addition, many people interviewed by
the consultants are not refugees falling within the purview of the UNHCR
mandate. Some are local street children while others are internally displaced
persons. This investigation was conducted in relation to refugees and aid
workers only as provided by the mandate of OIOS. OIOS recognizes, however, that
sexual exploitation of vulnerable population occurs — and not just in West
Africa but throughout the world.
UNHCR has acknowledged that the original
consultants’ report contains wrong and misleading information in its reference
to persons of concern to UNHCR. It incorrectly includes internally displaced
persons and host communities as persons of concern to UNHCR in the subregion by
referring to them all as refugees. UNHCR added that the status of a person in
relation to UNHCR is crucial to determining whether the person is entitled to
UNHCR assistance.
UNICEF has expressed its concern that the focus of
the investigation was female refugees under the age of 18 excluding other
vulnerable persons like internally displaced persons, women over the age of 18
and those not directly benefiting from international aid programmes like street
children.
The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs also commented that many of the risks and vulnerabilities highlighted
in the report apply equally to internally displaced persons, host community
situations, camps and settlements as well as refugees. The Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs expressed the view that these broader
problems need to be further addressed on behalf of the humanitarian community.
45. Another point of note was that the
consultants did not seem to distinguish between cases of sexual exploitation
arising from positions of power in the aid community and war-related sex crimes
such as rape. Refugee women and girls told the Investigation Team that many of
them, or members of their families, had been victims of rape during the war or
victimized by other refugees.
46. By reporting, with little or no evidence,
that sexual exploitation is widespread, the consultants unfairly tarnished the
reputation and credibility of the large majority of aid workers, national and
international staff of United Nations agencies and NGOs and United Nations
peacekeepers in West Africa. This is very unfortunate as most of them work in
extremely difficult conditions and demanding circumstances, and their
continuing commitment and efforts are vital to the humanitarian operations in
West Africa.
47. The Investigation Team found, however,
that early detection of problems in this area could be improved. It was observed
that, when a case is brought to the attention of management in UNHCR, the
Department of Peacekeeping Operations, or other international agencies or NGOs,
management tends to act relatively quickly in an attempt to discover what
actually happened. In some cases the first report did not come to the
organization concerned but went to the local police or other body set up to
deal with gender-based and/or family violence. The organization which first
receives the report may attend to other priorities before disseminating the
report to other functional and/or organizational entities, which need to be
involved as early as possible. In this regard, clear lines of reporting for all
organizations which need early notification, whether they are responsible for
the victim or the perpetrator, have not been well established.
48. Many persons spoken to by the
Investigation Team held the view that prostitution is a matter of survival and
that there is little that can be done about members of the international
community, including private contractors, being involved in it. They also
consider that it is a private matter in which management should not interfere.
This view is inappropriate and ignores the inherently unequal status of the
persons involved, especially when United Nations or NGO staff members are
implicated.
49. The Team found that there was no
encouragement for staff or other persons to report ethical issues to
management, nor for that matter is there a particular office or person with
whom this type of problem can be discussed. However, there is some evidence
that this is changing with the corrective measures being implemented by the
UNHCR country offices and their partners. In the case of the peacekeeping
mission in Sierra Leone, the Office of the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General has instituted a Personal Conduct Committee to look into
cases of misconduct, including sexual exploitation, involving the civilian and
military personnel of UNAMSIL.
UNAMSIL confirms that the Committee was formally
constituted in August 2002 to replace the previous misconduct committee. Its
terms of reference include receiving allegations of misconduct by Mission
personnel and recommending investigation by the appropriate Mission authorities
of all allegations of misconduct, sexual exploitation or abuse against women
and children by UNAMSIL personnel.
OIOS notes that
the reporting relationship between UNAMSIL headquarters and field operations
produced only one allegation of sexual exploitation. With 17,500 soldiers,
14,000 in the field, this seems more indicative of a poor reporting system than
of a lack of cases.
50. The Investigation Team observed that in
some cases NGOs did not have codes of conduct. Even where they do exist, they
are not well known to their staff, do not seem to be routinely adhered to and
may not include conduct involving sexual exploitation.
51. OIOS wishes to acknowledge the support and
assistance received by the Investigation Team from UNAMSIL management, the
various NGOs and UNHCR staff at headquarters, regional offices, branch offices
and the field offices in the countries visited. The efforts now being taken to
improve reporting and detecting of cases are noted, but more needs to be done.
52. OIOS commends the ongoing action by the
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs to put consistent
preventive measures in place, as well as action taken by the NGOs, UNHCR and
UNAMSIL to address the problem of sexual exploitation. Codes of conduct
prohibiting exploitation are being put in place and action is being taken
against staff members suspected of involvement in sexual exploitation.
Sensitization training for staff and for refugees to resist and report
exploitation when it occurs has commenced in all three countries.
53. OIOS has further noted efforts undertaken
by the three representatives of UNHCR and the West African Regional Coordinator
to build ongoing programmes to protect refugee women and girls from
exploitation and to provide mechanisms for better reporting and resolution of
cases that do occur. Indeed, new cases reported are receiving direct attention
at the most senior levels. Plans are in hand to strengthen the protection work
of UNHCR in the regions and to have a more visible presence in the camps. In
Guinea, for example, action being taken by the country office includes the
establishment of inter-agency task forces to address sexual exploitation.
Measures are also being taken to review the camp environment with a view to
curbing sexual exploitation and sexual and gender-based violence, especially as
they relate to the equitable provision of food, shelter, sanitary facilities,
education, security and protection. The complaints handling procedures are also
being reviewed.
54. Similarly, in Liberia, the UNHCR office
and its implementing partners have adopted a plan of action based on the UNHCR
headquarters Framework of Action to tackle the issue of sexual exploitation,
including the discouragement of relationships between aid workers and refugees
through a staff rotation system, and training aid workers and refugees on
sexual and gender-based violence and sexual exploitation. Refugees are also
being encouraged to engage in agriculture to supplement their food rations.
Action is being taken to improve other sectors of the camp environment that may
result in sexual exploitation like shelter, education and food distribution.
UNHCR has further advised OIOS that in Sierra Leone
the inter-agency Coordination Committee for the Prevention of Sexual
Exploitation has formulated a humanitarian community action plan and standards
of accountability to govern the conduct of all staff; community/agency
reporting systems and training and empowerment initiatives have also been put
in place. Within the overall humanitarian community’s action plan, UNHCR Sierra
Leone in collaboration with its implementing partners has formulated a plan of
action to minimize the risks of exploitation in every sector of Liberian
refugee and Sierra Leonean returnee operations. Building on existing sexual and
gender-based violence programmes, initiatives have been undertaken in training,
mass information, codes of conduct, protection reception days and increasing
beneficiaries’ access to UNHCR staff in camps and communities. UNHCR is trying
to improve refugee shelter standards through various measures, such as
increasing the size and providing separate adult and child quarters.
Post-distribution monitoring has been put in place by food pipeline agencies
and UNHCR. A proposed legal framework will include employment and other refugee
rights.
OIOS urges UNHCR
and its implementing partners to take the suggested measures to protect female
refugees from sexual exploitation and to provide programmes wherein refugees
can file complaints without fear of exposure or retaliation.
VI. Recommendations
55. OIOS makes the following recommendations:
|
* The numbers in
parentheses in this section refer to an internal code used by OIOS for
recording recommendations. |
Recommendation 1: The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC),
co-chaired by the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and
UNICEF, must continue to play a prominent and essential role in working with
all of the humanitarian organizations and agencies to ensure that appropriate
and standard norms are included in their respective codes of conduct
specifically prohibiting sexual exploitation and imposing sanctions for
violations of the code. In this regard it is recommended that the Office for
the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs take the lead in coordinating and
harmonizing the codes of conduct, not just for West Africa but also in all
other regions. (Rec. No. IV01/454/01)*
UNICEF agrees with this recommendation and confirms
that a Task Force on Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in
Humanitarian Crises established by IASC is already implementing this and most
of the other recommendations in this report. The need for clear ethical
standards and improved mechanisms of accountability is one of the major
priorities for the Task Force.
UNHCR also agrees with this recommendation and
stated that its recently published code of conduct is in conformity with the
recommendations agreed in the framework of the IASC Task Force. UNHCR will
continue to support the follow-up to the Task Force’s Plan of Action.
The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs acknowledged the value of the recommendation and confirmed that a plan
of action has already been prepared by the IASC Task Force to address these
concerns, including the harmonization of codes of conduct for United Nations
and non-United Nations personnel (annex I).
Recommendation 2: It is further recommended to the Inter-Agency
Standing Committee that a report be provided to the General Assembly before the
end of the fifty-seventh session on the measures put in place. (Rec. No.
IV01/454/02)
Recommendation 3: Aid agencies, international organizations and
NGOs should do more to address the issue of intimate relationships between
their staff and the refugees they care for. In this regard it is recommended
that the Inter-Agency Standing Committee coordinate with the relevant entities
the appointment within each organization of focal points in the field so that
staff members who propose to enter into relationships with refugees must
disclose such relationships. (Rec. No. IV01/454/03)
UNHCR confirmed that its revised code of conduct
specifically provides for the disclosure of relationships for appropriate
guidance even if they are deemed consensual and not exploitative.
Recommendation 4: UNHCR should coordinate with other aid agencies
and NGOs ways by which refugees can quickly report exploitation in confidence
and with anonymity if desired. Although there have been improvements, OIOS has
observed the ad hoc nature of the reporting systems and the need for early
detection. In this regard, it is recommended that UNHCR appoint a person to set
up an independent reporting system to reach into the refugee camps and
communities. All reported cases should be brought to the attention of a
designated focal point in UNHCR for effective monitoring. (Rec. No.
IV01/454/04)
UNHCR commented that branch offices in Sierra Leone
and Guinea have established centres in refugee camps to receive complaints.
UNHCR protection staff have also established counselling centres in the camps.
Furthermore, the UNHCR office of the Inspector General has established
mechanisms for the confidential reporting of sexual exploitation by staff and
non-staff.
Recommendation 5: UNHCR and its implementing partners should put in
place clear procedures and guidelines for the investigation of sexual
exploitation of refugees and other related conduct which include reporting all
such instances to the UNHCR Inspector General for appropriate monitoring. The
office of the Inspector General should conduct periodic spot-checking and
undertake appropriate follow-up to ensure compliance. (Rec. No. IV01/454/05)
Recommendation 6: UNHCR and its implementing partners should
sensitize the refugee population on sexual exploitation. In addition much more
information should be provided on the nature and extent of refugee entitlements
to the various forms of aid available. The programme implemented in Liberia
could serve as a regional model. (Rec. No. IV01/454/06)
UNHCR informed OIOS that UNHCR staff and
implementing partners have been sensitized on sexual exploitation.
Additionally, awareness campaigns were conducted for female refugees and their
leaders. Refugees have been made aware of their free entitlement to
humanitarian assistance.
Recommendation 7: UNHCR in collaboration with its implementing
partners should conduct a comprehensive review of the services provided to
refugees, especially in the areas of food distribution, employment
opportunities, security, health services and shelter. UNHCR needs to take
measures to ensure that the distribution of food and non-food items by aid
agencies is closely monitored to prevent future abuse and exploitation. The
involvement of women in the distribution process needs to be significantly
enhanced. (Rec. No. IV01/454/07)
UNHCR confirmed that it has undertaken a
comprehensive review of all services in collaboration with its implementing
partners. UNHCR staff are now required to be present at all distribution times
and the involvement of women in the distribution of food and non- food items
has been enhanced.
Recommendation 8: UNHCR should take steps to ensure that
recruitment of refugees for jobs in the camps by aid agencies is equitably and
transparently undertaken without any discrimination, particularly on the
grounds of gender. (Rec. No. IV01/454/08)
UNHCR stated that it has recruited additional field
staff including females. UNHCR further stated that its plan of action, which is
being implemented and in some measure has already been implemented, addresses
these areas (annex II).
Recommendation 9: WFP should urgently take steps to improve on the
nature and quantity of food supplied to refugees in the region, paying
attention to the dietary requirements of the refugees. It should also tighten
its current procedures for excess food to prevent those with access to it from
using this in exchange for sex. (Rec. No. IV01/454/09)
WFP noted that its food distribution policy is
based on a consensus and extensive consultations with all humanitarian actors
in the region — United Nations agencies, NGOs and donors. The quality and
energy/protein/fat/micronutrient levels of the rations are in line with WHO,
WFP and UNHCR guidelines resulting from the UNHCR/WFP/donors joint needs
assessment missions.
Recommendation 10: UNHCR and the NGOs should have a more visible
presence in the camps, increasing the number of field staff working inside the
refugee camps so as to better monitor camp activities and to ensure that the
refugees are indeed receiving the services to which they are entitled. (Rec.
No. IV01/454/10)
UNHCR responded that it has increased its presence
in the camps, including senior staff.
Recommendation 11: UNHCR, with its implementing partners for the
provision of medical services in the camps, should take measures to staff the
clinics with sufficient and qualified personnel and to have a comprehensive
preventive and curative programme. Furthermore, the clinics need to be properly
equipped. (Rec. No. IV01/454/11)
Recommendation 12: UNHCR, with its implementing partners responsible
for shelter, should give adequate attention to the gender distribution, age and
number of persons in households in allocating shelter to families. The practice
of accommodating male and female adults with children in the same room may lead
to abuse. (Rec. No. IV01/454/12)
Recommendation 13: UNHCR should review the current vehicle
identification system with a view to clearly distinguishing UNHCR vehicles from
the vehicles of its implementing partners. This would make it easier for
victims of sexual exploitation to identify the agency for which a perpetrator
works. (Rec. No. IV01/454/13)
Recommendation 14: UNHCR should ensure that NGOs in the camps keep
proper records including photographs of staff they recruit on a casual or
permanent basis to make it easier to identify any NGO staff involved in sexual
exploitation or other wrongdoing. (Rec. No. IV01/454/14)
Recommendation 15: UNHCR, in collaboration with the host
Governments, should take steps to improve the security in the camps by
increasing the security personnel and providing modern security and
communication equipment and transportation for patrols. (Rec. No. IV01/454/15)
UNHCR has taken measures on all of these issues (see annex II). UNHCR, in collaboration with host Governments, is specifically
undertaking a review of camp security, and police posts with 24-hour police
presence are being established in the camps.
Recommendation 16: The Department of Peacekeeping Operations should
examine the gaps that exist in the procedures for reporting sex-related
offences when peacekeepers are accused. The parties and agencies necessary to
the proper resolution of cases involving sex offences need to be clearly
identified. Key personnel should be in regular contact so that any new matter
is raised and attended to forthwith. The office of the Provost Marshal should
be notified of all such incidents to ensure that thorough investigations can be
conducted and to track the cases for evidence of patterns of behaviour (Rec.
No. IV01/454/16)
UNICEF suggested that the Department of
Peacekeeping Operations should take affirmative steps to curb abuse by
peacekeepers and to ensure that appropriate action is taken in proven cases of
abuse or exploitation.
The Department of Peacekeeping Operations informed
OIOS that the UNAMSIL Personnel Conduct Committee is to have a dedicated
communications channel widely known to the local population to receive
allegations against UNAMSIL civilian and military personnel (OIOS suggests that this mechanism
should be extended to all peacekeeping missions).
Recommendation 17: The Department of Peacekeeping Operations should
ensure that protocols for criminal investigations and liaison with local
authorities are established for UNAMSIL civilian and military personnel who may
be accused of a crime. (Rec. No. IV01/454/17)
The Department of Peacekeeping Operations advised
OIOS that relations between a mission and the host authorities and respective
rights and responsibilities are defined in the status-of-forces and
status-of-mission agreements or under a memorandum of understanding with regard
to relations between the United Nations and troop-contributing countries.
OIOS reinforces
the view that such protocols should be carefully reviewed to ensure that
adequate mechanisms are in place for the investigation of criminal conduct by
UNAMSIL military personnel with a provision for referral to the jurisdiction of
the troop-contributing country to deal with such cases. For civilian staff,
they should be subject to the same legal requirements as all United Nations
staff, including possible criminal prosecution as appropriate.
The Department of Peacekeeping Operations confirms
that current procedures in peacekeeping missions require that all cases of
misconduct by military personnel be brought to the attention of a Provost
Marshal for investigation. Allegations of misconduct against civilian staff
members are investigated and dealt with in accordance with United Nations rules
and regulations.
To strengthen the awareness and accountability of
all mission personnel in relation to exploitation and abuse, the Department of
Peacekeeping Operations informed OIOS that it is currently reviewing its
existing policies, procedures and guidelines on disciplinary issues. Updated
guidelines have also been prepared on various aspects of standards of behaviour
of mission personnel, including investigation procedures and follow-up with
troop- and police-contributing countries.
(Signed)
Dileep Nair
Under-Secretary-General for
Internal Oversight Services
Annex I
Report
of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee Task Force on Protection from Sexual
Exploitation and Abuse in Humanitarian Crises
13 June 2002
A. Background
1. The grave allegations of widespread
sexual exploitation and abuse of refugee and internally displaced women and
children by humanitarian workers and peacekeepers in West Africa have
highlighted the vulnerability of refugees, internally displaced persons and
others, especially women and girls. Acknowledging the important challenge that
this presents to the entire humanitarian community, in March 2002, the
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) established a Task Force on Protection
from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in Humanitarian Crises. The Task Force was
mandated, within the overall objective of strengthening and enhancing the
protection and care of women and children in situations of humanitarian crisis
and conflict, to make recommendations that specifically aim to eliminate sexual
exploitation and abuse by humanitarian personnel and the misuse of humanitarian
assistance for sexual purposes.
2. In setting up the Task Force, IASC
recognized that the problem of sexual exploitation and abuse in humanitarian
crises is not confined to West Africa but is a global problem. No country,
society or community is spared. The foundations of sexual exploitation and
abuse are embedded in unequal power relationships. It represents a complex
problem requiring responses from a broad range of actors and a shift in the
organizational culture and approach of humanitarian agencies.
3. This report reflects the deliberations
and analysis of the members of the Task Force, as well as the opinions and
experience of other actors in the United Nations system, NGOs, donors and
Member States, gathered through a series of consultations. It is informed by
the extensive work undertaken by humanitarian agencies in Guinea, Liberia and
Sierra Leone, and draws on existing literature and guidelines, particularly in
relation to gender-based violence.[a] The attached Plan of Action outlines a
number of steps that the Task Force believes must be taken by the humanitarian
community towards preventing sexual exploitation and abuse and responding to
survivor needs. This plan is not a blueprint. It is part of an ongoing effort
of the humanitarian community and will be refined on the basis of experience,
pilot activities in selected countries and field visits to affected locations.
4. Once approved by IASC, the Plan of
Action will apply to all IASC members and standing invitees.[b] However, it is hoped that the Plan of
Action will also have broader application. It will be an important guide for
monitoring and evaluating progress made in efforts to eliminate sexual
exploitation and abuse. It is hoped that it will form the basis for further
discussions within the humanitarian community, with host Governments, donors,
peacekeepers and others engaged in working with and for populations affected by
humanitarian crises, on the long-term measures and changes that need to be
introduced to address the problem of sexual exploitation and abuse. It could
also be used by donors for establishing requirements for eligibility for
humanitarian funding or elements to be included in reporting on humanitarian
activities.
B. The context
5. Conflict and displacement inevitably
erode and weaken many of the social and political structures that are designed
to protect members of the community. Displaced populations, particularly in the
context of armed conflict, have usually fled from an environment of violence
and will often encounter further violence during the course of their
displacement. The resources available to affected populations, and to the
humanitarian community that is there to assist them, are frequently
insufficient to meet basic needs. All too often, mechanisms for protection are
not given sufficient priority.
6. Sexual exploitation and abuse occur in
many different environments. However, in humanitarian crises, the dependency of
affected populations on humanitarian agencies for their basic needs creates a
particular duty of care on the part of humanitarian workers and peacekeepers,
when present. Managers have an additional responsibility to ensure that there
are proper mechanisms for preventing and responding to sexual exploitation and
abuse. Humanitarian agencies must make every effort to create an environment
where sexual exploitation and abuse are not tolerated. This is especially
necessary given the following features of humanitarian crises:
(a) The
lack of economic opportunities for displaced populations may result in
commercial and exploitative sex being one of the few options for income
generation to meet basic needs;
(b) Beneficiary
communities have often come from an environment of gender-based violence with
which community structures collude. Unless proper safeguards are put in place,
the same patterns can continue or even be exacerbated in a camp or settlement
environment;
(c) The
usual social protections are not in place or are no longer functioning. Levels
of protection and security are generally poor; justice and policing frequently
do not exist in the displaced environment.
7. The question who constitutes a
humanitarian worker highlights another layer of complexity. The group is much
more broadly defined than the internationally engaged staff of humanitarian aid
organizations. Thousands of staff are engaged in a variety of work: they range
from volunteers, casual labourers, drivers and warehouse guards to decision
makers at the country, regional and international levels. Many of these staff
are drawn from beneficiary communities themselves. This can blur distinctions
between what constitutes professional and private relationships with other
members of the beneficiary community. However, by accepting work with
humanitarian agencies, humanitarian workers also have to accept the special
responsibility of humanitarian care that goes with the job.
C. Key definitions
8. There is general recognition of the
existing problem of sexual exploitation and abuse in humanitarian crises. The
problem is broader and harder to define than initially assumed and, by its
nature, is difficult to investigate Therefore, for the purposes of the plan of
action, the Task Force has used the following definitions:
• “sexual abuse” is actual or threatened physical
intrusion of a sexual nature, including inappropriate touching, by force or
under unequal or coercive conditions;
• “sexual exploitation” is any abuse of a
position of vulnerability, differential power, or trust for sexual purposes;
this includes profiting monetarily, socially or politically from the sexual exploitation
of another;
• “humanitarian workers” include all workers
engaged by humanitarian agencies, whether internationally or nationally
recruited, or formally or informally retained from the beneficiary community,
to conduct the activities of that agency.
D. Broader issues
9. The Task Force identified the following
constraints which will affect implementation of its recommendations and which
will require further analysis by the humanitarian community:
(a) Humanitarian
standards of behaviour. There is, as yet, no common code of conduct governing
the individual behaviour of humanitarian workers. The problem of sexual
exploitation and abuse has highlighted the need for clear standards of
behaviour for humanitarian workers. The Task Force has focused on the narrower
question of behaviour in relation to sexual exploitation and abuse. However,
its recommendations should ideally be situated within a broader framework of
generic standards of humanitarian behaviour. These have not yet been explicitly
identified and should be given proper consideration by the humanitarian
community. This will raise additional questions as to who should be responsible
for enforcing standards of behaviour, and whether that responsibility should be
individual or collective and lie at the country, regional or international
level. At present, such issues are dealt with on an ad hoc basis, from agency
to agency, which limits the effectiveness of a common plan of action.
(b) Protection.
There is no commonly agreed operational definition of protection or any
consensus on what constitutes core competencies. There is a need for a more
thorough analysis of what constitutes protection and what the acceptable
minimum standards for protection are. The Task Force agreed that protection requires
a holistic definition that encompasses legal, social and physical protection,
but more consideration must be given to what this implies for humanitarian
action.
(c) Gender
and power. Unequal power relationships provide the basis for sexual exploitation
and abuse. Owing to their unequal status, women and girls are particularly at
risk of sexual exploitation and abuse. However, it is important to recognize
that boys are also vulnerable to sexual exploitation and abuse.
(d) Economic
environment. The resource environment, particularly the lack of adequate food
and services, contributes to the risk of sexual exploitation and abuse.
Particular issues such as breaks in food pipelines are exacerbating factors
that need to be addressed by the entire humanitarian community in a manner that
reduces risk. Greater efforts must be made to provide displaced populations
with alternative income generation opportunities, particularly for women.
(e) Responsibility
and accountability. There are no common systems of accountability for the
humanitarian community. At present, accountability for the behaviour of staff
exists only within individual agencies and varies, in level, between agencies.
Further consideration must be given to the adequacy of internal systems to maintain
standards of behaviour. This should be complemented by more detailed discussion
of the issue of collective responsibility, and at what level it should be
considered. The Task Force’s work revealed that avenues of recourse for
beneficiaries are practically non-existent. Accountability to the beneficiary
community should be strengthened and institutionalized. In a related vein, more
attention must also be paid to how the responsibilities of the humanitarian
community relate to those of host Governments.
E. Plan of Action: core central recommendations
10. The Plan of Action is divided into three
sections: prevention, response and management and implementation issues. It
addresses protection from sexual exploitation and abuse during humanitarian
crises by seeking to prevent exploitative and abusive behaviour from being
perpetrated and addressing the conditions that make women and children
vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. The following recommendations are set out
in the attached Plan of Action and constitute the essential actions that the
Task Force would expect IASC to require of its members and standing invitees:
(a) Behaviour
of staff. All humanitarian agencies must clearly define the principles and
standards of behaviour that they expect of their staff. In relation to sexual
exploitation and abuse, these core principles have been identified as:[c]
• Sexual exploitation and abuse by humanitarian
workers constitute acts of gross misconduct and are therefore grounds for
termination of employment.
• Sexual activity with children (persons under
the age of 18) is prohibited regardless of the age of majority or age of
consent locally. Mistaken belief regarding the age of a child is not a defence.
• Exchange of money, employment, goods, or
services for sex, including sexual favours or other forms of humiliating,
degrading or exploitative behaviour, is prohibited. This includes exchange of
assistance that is due to beneficiaries.
• Sexual relationships between humanitarian
workers and beneficiaries are strongly discouraged since they are based on
inherently unequal power dynamics. Such relationships undermine the credibility
and integrity of humanitarian aid work.
• Where a humanitarian worker develops concerns
or suspicions regarding sexual abuse or exploitation by a fellow worker,
whether in the same agency or not, he or she must report such concerns via
established agency reporting mechanisms.
• Humanitarian agencies are obliged to create and
maintain an environment which prevents sexual exploitation and abuse and
promotes the implementation of their code of conduct. Managers at all levels
have particular responsibilities to support and develop systems which maintain
this environment.
Further, these
principles and standards should be incorporated into agency codes of conduct
and staff rules and regulations. Mechanisms to ensure that these standards and
principles are promoted, disseminated and integrated into personnel
requirements, administrative standards and agreements with partners and
contractors must also be established. In addition, mechanisms for reporting
complaints, investigative procedures and disciplinary processes should be
established. Clear definitions of management responsibility and accountability
are vital.
(b) Protection
from sexual exploitation and abuse will only be effective within a broader
framework of effective protection from gender-based violence. Protection is a
central and indispensable component of humanitarian action. It should not be
compromised. Particularly in times of financial stringency, agencies must
commit themselves to sustaining protection activities.
(c) The
creation of an environment that is conducive to the prevention and elimination
of sexual exploitation and abuse is essential. Such an environment will include,
at a minimum, enhanced beneficiary participation in all aspects of humanitarian
programming and camp governance, improved delivery mechanisms to reduce their
potential for exploitation, and dissemination of information on beneficiary
rights, entitlements, responsibilities and complaints procedures.
Accountability to beneficiaries is a necessary step towards creating an
environment that discourages sexual exploitation and abuse.
(d) The
focus of the response by humanitarian agencies is to provide basic health and
psychosocial care for survivors and ensure their access to mechanisms for
recourse and redress. A key element in promoting accountability is to ensure
that, wherever feasible, survivors have access to legal and judicial systems.
(e) Accountability
needs to be addressed at the individual agency level and collectively. The
sustainability and effectiveness of mechanisms to protect against sexual
exploitation and abuse require an express commitment by management. Managers
must be tasked with promoting a culture of protection in which exploitation and
abuse is not tolerated and reports of possible violations are treated seriously
and confidentially. Coordination between agencies is also essential to ensure a
common approach to protecting against sexual exploitation and abuse and to
foster a concept of collective responsibility. In each country in humanitarian
crisis, a properly representative team, including United Nations agencies and
relevant national and international NGOs should be established to address this
issue on behalf of the humanitarian community.
11. The Plan of Action seeks to ensure respect
for, and fulfilment of, international human rights standards including those
enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. The Plan of
Action recognizes that humanitarian crises have different impacts and create
different needs for men, women, boys and girls. The Task Force believes that it
is critical that a gender perspective is adopted in all elements of design,
planning and implementation of humanitarian activities. In the context of
preventing sexual exploitation and abuse, this ranges from ensuring the
presence of more women staff to addressing gender inequalities in access to
economic opportunities by beneficiaries and participation in decision-making
processes.
F. Implementation
12. There are some issues where there is not
yet clear agreement on how to move forward. In these circumstances, the Task
Force recommends running pilot schemes and trials of some options in order to
assess their practicability and feasibility. The Task Force emphasizes the need
to be realistic about what can be managed, and has made every effort to ensure
that its recommendations are practical and enforceable, especially in the area
of codes of conduct.
13. The Task Force recognizes that there needs
to be collaboration between agencies on dissemination of information, in order
to avoid fragmentation. The Task Force proposes that a common information and
dissemination strategy be developed at the country level, with agreed target
audiences. In addition, all agencies should agree to conduct internal
information campaigns. A communications strategy has already been developed for
external audiences. More needs to done internally and with respect to mass
information for beneficiary communities.
14. Training at all levels of humanitarian
agencies was identified as an important element. However, there is again a risk
of fragmentation unless efforts are coordinated. The consultations identified
areas where no training or guidance exists, such as camp management; others
where there is a need to promote consistency; and others where there is an
abundance of training and guidelines but problems remain with regard to
ensuring their implementation. Effective implementation of the Plan of Action
requires that these problems be addressed.
15. The Task Force has a further mandate for
monitoring and evaluating the implementation of its recommendations and
perhaps, where necessary, further refining them. It therefore recommends the
extension of its mandate to the next plenary meeting of IASC in 2003, so that
it can fully report on its activities in this regard.
16. The Task Force recognizes the extensive
work that has already been undertaken in West Africa. In particular, this has
demonstrated the commitment in the field to addressing the problem of sexual
exploitation and abuse effectively and responsibly. The Task Force is confident
that the requisite good will to implement its recommendations exists in other
parts of the world, as it does in West Africa. Enforcement will also rely on
the responsibility of managers and humanitarian workers in the field. In
acknowledging the commitment of humanitarian workers to addressing the problem,
the Task Force also recognizes the constraints under which they operate.
Agencies need to consider the proportion of their budgets that goes to
protection and activities to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse and allocate
more resources to these issues.
17. The Task Force also recognizes that
responsibility for full implementation of the Plan of Action may rely on
parties that are outside the IASC structure, such as peacekeepers and host
Governments. It also calls on donors to promote some of the core
recommendations with the humanitarian organizations that they choose to fund.
G. Conclusion
18. The humanitarian community has now
acknowledged that the issue of sexual exploitation and abuse is a global
challenge. This represents an important step forward. From consultations, it is
clear that there is a genuine recognition on the part of agencies that sexual
exploitation and abuse represent a betrayal of trust as well as a catastrophic
failure of protection. There is a real commitment on the part of agencies to
address this problem and take responsibility for implementing necessary
management changes.
19. In preparing this report and Plan of
Action, the members of the Task Force have often expressed different views and
perspectives on some issues but their commitment to working together within the
framework of the Task Force has been impressive. All members have learned from
each other. Perhaps the most important lesson has been that humanitarian
agencies must be more accessible and better able to listen and make themselves
accountable to those they wish to assist. Without the development of real and
effective frameworks for accountability, little progress can be made in this
area.
20. The Task Force acknowledges the way in
which IASC has responded to this issue. Its support has been exemplary. It has
accepted a policy statement with serious implications in terms of staffing and
management responsibilities and their relationship with beneficiaries. It hopes
that IASC will demonstrate the same spirit on receiving this report and Plan of
Action and that it will provide the leadership required to ensure its effective
implementation.
Plan of Action
I. Prevention
Goal: to create an environment free of sexual exploitation and abuse in
humanitarian crises, by integrating the prevention of and response to sexual
exploitation and abuse into the protection and assistance functions of all
humanitarian workers.
A. Core principles of a code of conduct
Humanitarian agencies have a duty of
care to beneficiaries and a responsibility to ensure that beneficiaries are
treated with dignity and respect and that certain minimum standards of
behaviour are observed. In order to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse, the
following core principles must be incorporated into agency codes of conduct:[d]
• Sexual exploitation and abuse by humanitarian
workers constitute acts of gross misconduct and are therefore grounds for
termination of employment.
• Sexual activity with children (persons under
the age of 18) is prohibited regardless of the age of majority or age of
consent locally. Mistaken belief regarding the age of a child is not a defence.
• Exchange of money, employment, goods, or
services for sex, including sexual favours or other forms of humiliating,
degrading or exploitative behaviour is prohibited. This includes exchange of
assistance that is due to beneficiaries.
• Sexual relationships between humanitarian
workers and beneficiaries are strongly discouraged since they are based on
inherently unequal power dynamics. Such relationships undermine the credibility
and integrity of humanitarian aid work.
• Where a humanitarian worker develops concerns
or suspicions regarding sexual abuse or exploitation by a fellow worker,
whether in the same agency or not, he or she must report such concerns via
established agency reporting mechanisms.
• Humanitarian workers are obliged to create and
maintain an environment which prevents sexual exploitation and abuse and
promotes the implementation of their code of conduct. Managers at all levels
have particular responsibilities to support and develop systems which maintain
this environment.
Objective: to adopt and incorporate into codes of
conduct specific responsibilities of humanitarian aid workers to prevent and
respond appropriately to sexual exploitation and abuse and to adopt appropriate
disciplinary procedures for dealing with violations when they occur.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Adopt codes of conduct that include, as a
minimum, the core principles identified by the IASC Task Force, or
incorporate them into existing codes of conduct. |
All agencies |
By end 2002 |
|
2. Incorporate adherence to a code of conduct
into new and existing employment contracts, job descriptions, terms of reference
and performance appraisal systems.[e] |
All agencies |
By July 2003 |
|
3. Develop and implement a strategy for the
dissemination of and training activities on the code of conduct for all
current and future staff, including local and international staff, at all
levels. |
All agencies |
By end 2002 |
|
4. Incorporate the core
principles into all agreements with implementing partners. |
All agencies |
2003 |
|
5. Encourage donor Governments
to include the core principles in their agreements with implementing
partners. |
IASC
Task Force |
By end 2002 |
|
6. Develop and incorporate into staff rules
and regulations appropriate disciplinary procedures for dealing with
violations of the core principles when they occur. |
All agencies, with support of IASC Task Force |
By end 2002 |
|
7. Investigate the feasibility
of developing a database, to be shared among humanitarian agencies, of
persons whose contracts have been terminated because of violations of the
core principles.e |
IASC Task Force |
By October 2002 |
B. Situation analysis/assessment of needs
Objective:
to ensure that agency situation analyses and needs assessments identify
vulnerabilities to sexual exploitation and abuse and provide a basis for
improved programme planning that minimizes risks and opportunities for sexual
exploitation and abuse.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Conduct
an inter-agency review of assessment processes and guidelines, with a view to
incorporating processes for assessing vulnerability to sexual exploitation
and abuse. All agencies should agree to common standards of assessment of
vulnerabilities and capacities. |
IASC Working Group |
By end 2002 |
|
2. Through
an inter-agency process, complete the revision of, and distribute, sexual and
gender-based guidelines that will provide guidance on specific issues dealing
with sexual exploitation and abuse. |
UNHCR |
By end 2002 |
|
3. Report
on the extent to which underfunding of humanitarian programmes leads to
increased vulnerability of beneficiaries to sexual exploitation and abuse. |
All agencies |
By end 2002 and regularly thereafter |
C. Camp governance and delivery processes
Objective:
to ensure that camp governance is conducted in an equitable manner that
empowers women and children, and reduces the risk of sexual exploitation and
abuse, and
to ensure that distribution processes, including the quantity of assistance and
distribution methods, are designed and implemented in a manner that reduces
opportunity for sexual exploitation and abuse.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Define
benchmarks to determine the adequacy of staff directly responsible for
protection, in terms of number, profile and sex. |
All agencies |
By end 2002 |
|
2. In
three pilot countries, assess the extent to which the deployment of
specialized staff (protection, gender and children advisers etc.) and the
existence of specialized programmes for gender-based violence contribute to
ensuring/strengthening activities to prevent and respond to sexual
exploitation and abuse. |
IASC Task Force |
July 2003 |
|
3. Promote
the economic and social empowerment of women, thus reducing their
vulnerability to abuse, through working towards equal representation of women
and men among beneficiary staff, and institute measures to ensure that women
participate in decision-making structures equally with men. |
All agencies |
Ongoing |
|
4. Promote
the empowerment of girls, through incentives to encourage greater attendance
of girls at schools. |
Site coordinating agency |
Ongoing |
|
5. Issue
ration cards in the name of a woman in each household. |
Site coordinating agency |
Ongoing |
|
6. Review
the chain of distribution and prioritize direct distribution of food and
non-food items to beneficiaries, especially to women, to minimize risks of
exploitation. |
Site coordinating agency |
By end 2002 |
|
7. Increase
the proportion of female staff involved in the distribution of food and
non-food items. |
Site coordinating agency |
Ongoing |
|
8. Coordinate
timing of distribution among agencies to eliminate the need for proxies that
can make women and children more vulnerable to sexual exploitation. |
Site coordinating agency |
Ongoing |
|
9. Improve
mechanisms for ensuring stable continuity of supply, particularly in
high-risk areas, and discuss flexible arrangements with donors. |
All agencies |
Ongoing |
|
10. In four
pilot countries, conduct reviews of distribution, post-distribution, end-use
and commodity baskets to establish the relationship between the level and
nature of humanitarian assistance and vulnerability to sexual exploitation
and abuse. The reviews will assess: appropriateness of the package;
timeliness of provision; volume; distribution procedures; gender balance and
beneficiary involvement in distribution committees; and gender balance among
staff. |
IASC Task Force |
By end 2002 |
D. Mechanisms for accountability to beneficiaries
Objective:
to develop mechanisms to ensure that agencies providing humanitarian relief
are accountable to the communities they serve, with respect to both prevention
efforts and response mechanisms.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Take
appropriate measures to ensure that beneficiaries are informed of the
rationale for assistance eligibility criteria, individual entitlements, and
distribution venues and schedules. When any of the above change,
beneficiaries should be notified as soon as possible. |
All agencies |
By end 2002 |
|
2. Ensure
adequate opportunities to educate populations at risk about sexual
exploitation and abuse by providing information about rights, entitlements,
responsibilities and procedures for complaints and survivor assistance, for
example, through participatory workshops with the beneficiary community to
raise awareness about gender-based violence and sexual exploitation and
abuse, as well as relevant human rights instruments. |
Site coordinating agency |
Ongoing |
|
3. Compile
and disseminate a list of relevant guidelines and resource materials relating
to protection issues (including gender-based violence, gender and children’s
issues) as a basis for understanding areas of responsibility and
accountability. |
UNHCR to compile list/ produce CD-ROM. All
agencies to disseminate |
By end 2002 |
II. Response
Goal: to provide
basic health and psychosocial care to survivors of sexual exploitation and
abuse and ensure they have access to appropriate avenues for recourse and
redress.
A. Avenues for recourse
Objective:
to develop mechanisms that allow survivors of sexual exploitation and abuse to
report incidents of sexual exploitation and abuse; access legal, judicial or
community-based recourse systems; and seek redress, including disciplinary
action against perpetrators.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Distribute
revised guidelines (see I.B.2) for gender and age-sensitive investigative
protocols and complaints mechanism. |
IASC Task Force |
September 2002 |
2. Establish
confidential systems for both directly and indirectly receiving reports about
possible sexual exploitation and abuse and ensuring their follow-up, with the
agreement of the survivor. |
Inter-agency country team[f]/ |
By end 2002 |
|
3. Develop
a process for determining appropriate redress for individual survivors, based
on consultations with the community and local authorities, and support
survivors in seeking such redress, in a manner that respects the due process
rights of the accused as well as the rights of the survivor. |
Inter-agency country team/ Humanitarian
Coordinator |
By end 2002 |
|
4. Develop
a mechanism for monitoring survivors to ensure that they do not face any
repercussions as a result of having lodged a complaint. |
Inter-agency country team/ Humanitarian
Coordinator |
By end 2002 |
B. Provision of basic services to meet
immediate survivor needs
An appropriate integrated response
for survivors of sexual exploitation and abuse includes: psychosocial support
for survivors; comprehensive health care including reproductive health care;
access to timely legal redress; and community-driven safety and security
measures.
Objective:
to provide survivors of sexual exploitation with appropriate support.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Ensure
that in every camp/settlement at least one health-care practitioner is
trained on the physical and mental health ramifications of gender-based
violence, including reproductive health care, and appropriate protocols for
treatment and data collection. |
Coordinating agency for health |
Ongoing |
|
2. Ensure
that survivors of sexual exploitation and abuse have access to appropriate
reproductive health services. |
Site coordinating agency |
Ongoing |
|
3. Review
the availability of counselling and case management services and, on the
basis of that review, establish targets to increase available counselling and
case management services, especially in areas identified as high risk for
sexual exploitation and abuse. |
Coordinating agency for health |
Ongoing |
|
4. Integrate
concepts of protection from sexual exploitation and abuse into community
service delivery programmes. |
Coordinating agency for community services |
Ongoing |
III. Management and implementation issues
A. Management and coordination responsibility
Objective:
to develop mechanisms to ensure accountability of humanitarian agencies to
Governments and donors in the implementation of actions to prevent sexual
exploitation and abuse.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Revise
job descriptions, employment contracts and performance appraisal systems etc.
for managers to ensure adequate attention to the responsibility to prevent
and respond to sexual exploitation and abuse. |
All agencies |
By July 2003 |
|
2. Increase
the accountability and capacity of senior management to ensure protection
against sexual exploitation and abuse, through training and monitoring.
Priority should be given to heads of office and staff directly involved in
protection activities. |
All agencies |
By end 2002 |
|
3. Integrate
protection against gender-based violence into the work and terms of reference
of existing coordination and management mechanisms, such as the consolidated
appeals process, humanitarian coordinator system, IASC mechanisms etc. |
IASC Task Force |
Early 2003 |
|
4. Engage
more substantially with host Governments and appropriate ministries in order
to improve protection in camp management and strengthen mechanisms for legal
redress. |
All agencies |
Ongoing |
|
5. Engage
more substantially with the Department of Peacekeeping Operations to ensure
coherence and complementarity of approach to addressing sexual exploitation
and abuse in humanitarian crises. |
IASC Task Force |
Ongoing |
|
6. Coordinate
the regular and confidential sharing, by all agencies mandated with
protection or the provision of relief items and services, of a summary and
analysis of their monitoring findings regarding sexual exploitation and
abuse. |
Inter-agency country team |
On a bimonthly basis beginning November 2002 |
|
7. Develop
a plan for implementing the recommendations and action points agreed to
through the IASC process for preventing sexual exploitation and abuse. |
Each head of agency |
By September 2002 |
B. Monitoring and supervision
Goal: to ensure regular monitoring and
supervision of the provision of protection and assistance in humanitarian
operations, with awareness of risks and opportunities for sexual exploitation
and abuse.
Objective:
to ensure monitoring and supervision of programming for protection from sexual
exploitation and abuse and to support staff at a field level to implement the
Plan of Action.
|
Action |
Agency responsible |
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Compile
and share all available checklists and tools in relation to prevention and
response to sexual exploitation and abuse. |
UNHCR |
By end 2002 |
|
2. Ensure
supervisory staff visit sites of affected populations and report on progress
made to reduce sexual exploitation and abuse. |
All agencies: heads of country offices |
Ongoing |
|
3. Within
the existing humanitarian coordination structure, nominate a team at country
level, to monitor and supervise activities to prevent and respond to sexual
exploitation and abuse. |
Humanitarian/ |
Following pilot |
|
4. Engage
in two to four field visits to targeted countries to provide technical
assistance and support for implementation of the Plan of Action. |
IASC Task Force |
July 2003 |
Annex II
Highlights
of some actions taken by UNHCR to prevent the exploitation of refugees
Below
is a non-exhaustive summary of actions taken by UNHCR headquarters, regional
bureaux, field offices and managers to prevent the occurrence of sexual
exploitation by humanitarian workers.
After an intense consultative
process, UNHCR has finalized and disseminated the UNHCR Code of Conduct. The
Code is to guide UNHCR staff in their work and to inspire staff to live up to
the high ideals of the United Nations. It explains the standards of conduct
that all are expected to adhere to under the Charter and the Staff Regulations
and Rules.
Newly drafted clauses addressing the
conduct required of partners will be included in the governing clauses of all
UNHCR implementing agreements. These incorporate by reference the UNHCR Code of
Conduct. They are being “tested” with selected partners before formal
introduction later this year.
A senior staff member at headquarters,
reporting directly to the Assistant High Commissioner, will coordinate
consistent and resource-effective follow-up to all pending evaluation
recommendations.
UNHCR has very actively participated
in and contributed to the development of the IASC Plan of Action, which all
humanitarian agencies have endorsed. This plan is an important tool for future,
concrete actions to prevent sexual abuse in humanitarian situations and will be
followed by all offices. Additionally, together with its partners, UNHCR has
developed, operationalized and received funding for a comprehensive plan to
address some of the root causes leading to exploitative situations in West
Africa.
All regional bureau directors have
sent written and specific instructions to all field offices under their
supervision, to establish or reinforce measures to prevent the sexual
exploitation of refugees.
All regional bureaux have designated
focal points that are actively following the actions taken and reported by the
field offices.
Bureaux have distributed a checklist
of vulnerable processes that should be reviewed to avoid abusive situations.
Offices have strengthened vulnerable areas and procedures, such as those
followed in refugee status determination, the provision of information about
available assistance and entitlements and the handling of individual case
files. They have been requested to report on the procedures put in place in
their regular situation reports.
Two bureaux have undertaken internal
investigations into “high risk” environments where there would have been
potential for exploitation. No incidents were substantiated.
Offices have included provisions for
activities contributing to the prevention of sexual exploitation in their 2003
Country Operation Plans, including the creation of several new posts of
regional gender advisers, and have prioritized the retention of protection
staff even while undergoing downsizing exercises.
To the extent possible, female staff
have been designated as focal points for receiving asylum-seekers.
Counselling services to refugees and
asylum-seekers have been increased, including, in some offices, opportunities
for refugees to have access to telephone counselling.
Many offices have set up complaint
mechanisms and have improved the access by refugees to international staff
members. Procedures have been established to channel complaints and to permit a
response by UNHCR and partner staff and redress claims. Offices are to maintain
a written record of complaints received and actions taken.
Field offices have been instructed to
meet regularly with their respective implementing partners and brief them on
the current concerns and the commitment of UNHCR to maintaining the highest
level of standards to meet the protection and basic needs of refugees and asylum-seekers.
Field offices have held meetings with
their partners in a number of forums, for the purpose, inter alia, of
formulating and promoting standards for the advancement of UNHCR policy
priorities, and to monitor performance by UNHCR and its partners.
Some field offices have established
committees — consisting of gender, children, protection and NGO staff — to
handle emergencies among asylum-seekers and refugees, which have formulated
guidelines on the handling of specific situations such as domestic violence,
sexual violence etc.
The UNHCR monitoring mechanisms were
reviewed and, in general, more frequent camp visits have been ensured. In
addition to more frequent protection monitoring in the refugee camps, offices
have been encouraged to ensure that the refugee community continues to play a
key role in the camp management. This appears to be facilitating “law and
order” in some camps.
Notices have been posted in refugee
areas to provide clear information to refugees about their rights and responsibilities
and what they can reasonably expect in terms of protection and assistance.
Offices are continuing to prioritize
the identification, registration and reunification with their families of
separated children or to provide fostering arrangements.
UNHCR is continuing to fund national
women’s NGOs which are providing social, economic and community support to
refugee returnee women, particularly those identified as being most in need.
Newly revised Guidelines on
Prevention and Response to Sexual Violence against Refugees have been field
tested in more than 20 countries and are being finalized for global
implementation.
Many field offices have already
organized appropriate and often customized training sessions for their staff or
their partners’ staff. Training sessions have been held with guards,
receptionists, and local police working at UNHCR offices who come into contact
with asylum-seekers on appropriate behaviour, UNHCR policy etc.
The effect of having designated staff
at all levels to handle the issue has been fruitful in a number of important
respects, including:
• The systematic involvement of refugees and
returnees in initiatives relating to sexual and gender-based violence.
• The development of mass information campaigns
to sensitize the refugees on their rights and responsibilities, and the zero
tolerance policy of the High Commissioner.
• Enhanced partnership building efforts.
• Systematic elaboration of actions to address
sexual and gender-based violence.
• The identification of serious gaps in the
assistance UNHCR is able to provide and examination of how root causes may be
addressed.
• Increased awareness about the problems of and
related to sexual and gender-based violence on the part of staff, refugees and
national partners.
• The need to improve national legal protection
for refugee and returnee women has been highlighted and brought to the
attention of national authorities.
![]()
[a]
In particular, the extensive guidelines developed by UNHCR and the
Reproductive Health for Refugees Consortium. Gender-based violence is violence
that is directed against a person on the basis of gender or sex. Gender-based
violence includes acts that inflict physical, mental, or sexual harm or
suffering, threats of such acts, coercion, or other deprivations of liberty.
While women, men boys and girls can be victims of gender-based violence,
because of their subordinate status, women and girls are the primary victims.
[b]
For the purpose of this report and plan of action, the term “agency”
will be used to cover all IASC members and standing invitees that endorse
this report.
[c] Different
considerations will arise regarding the enforcement of some of these principles
for humanitarian workers hired from the beneficiary community. While sexual
exploitation and abuse and the misuse of humanitarian assistance will always be
prohibited, discretion may need to be used in the application of the principles
regarding sexual relationships for this category of humanitarian worker.
[d] Different
considerations will arise regarding the enforcement of some of these principles
for humanitarian workers hired from the beneficiary community. While sexual
exploitation and abuse and the misuse of humanitarian assistance will always be
prohibited, discretion may be used in the application of the principles
regarding sexual relationships for this category of humanitarian worker.
[f] The
team would include United Nations agencies and relevant national and
international NGOs and should be linked to existing aid coordination
structures. The team will be responsible for setting a culturally sensitive
policy for the country on the issue of protection against sexual abuse and
exploitation. It will also allocate
responsibility between its members for the necessary activities, based on the
particular coverage, mandates, skills and resources available in that country
(e.g. some functions will require universal coverage based on specific
skills available at agency level, such as for interviewing children).